On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bret Miller wrote:
I said:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
try:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.sbc.com
If that does work, it goes against what is documented. I haven't had any
problem
Greets,
Can lines be combined in a situation like this
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisdomain.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisotherdomain.com
does this work or should this be done?
can they be combined into one statement or should they be separate?
Any other tips etc
Greeting,
Can lines be combined in a situation like this...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisdomain.com whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hisotherdomain.com
does this work or should this be done?
can they be combined into one statement or should they be separate?
Any other tips
R Lists06 wrote:
Greeting,
Can lines be combined in a situation like this...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisdomain.com whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hisotherdomain.com
does this work or should this be done?
No. If you run spamassassin --lint, it should generate
parameter
Still separate???
How do we deal with multiple possible sending domains?
I take it that it still cannot be dealt with on one line? :-)
The original email should have looked like this as when I got it back it was
all one line. Oops.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisdomain.com
I have this in my local.cf file...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com
Shouldn't this not get tagged?
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: spam-quarantine
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Quarantine-ID: AoDSTJF3q8ee
X-Spam-Flag
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:03:49PM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I have this in my local.cf file...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com
Shouldn't this not get tagged?
Change that to
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] blackberry.com
You don't need or want
I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
doesn't work on this message.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
Mutual Statements
Message Headers:
X-Spam-Tests: tests=AWL=0.427,BAYES_00=-2.599,DBL_12_LETTER_PGIMG=0.2,
HEADER_SPAM=3.789
I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
doesn't work on this message.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
Mutual Statements
In my debug output, I get:
[3260] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=167.88.194.145
rdns=mtaw014
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Gary V wrote:
I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
doesn't work on this message.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
Mutual Statements
In my debug output, I get:
[3260] dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip
would not be
coming from the amavisd localhost, can someone tell me what is going on?
Perhaps my whitelist_from_rcvd line is wrong? I want anything coming
from a user at culin.com using their blackberry to bypass filtering.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] blackberry.com
Passed message
blocked. Not sure why all would not be
coming from the amavisd localhost, can someone tell me what is going on?
Perhaps my whitelist_from_rcvd line is wrong? I want anything coming
from a user at culin.com using their blackberry to bypass filtering.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] blackberry.com
I was wondering if SA could be modified to take an IP address
for the second argument to whitelist_from_rcvd as well as a
domain/host name string.
Lately I seem to be dealing with a lot of small businesses with
poorly set-up mail servers, and no rDNS. Sigh.
It would be useful to not bounce
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I was wondering if SA could be modified to take an IP address
for the second argument to whitelist_from_rcvd as well as a
domain/host name string.
Unfortunately, no. It would be a nice feature to add.
whitelist_from_rcvd_ip or some such.
Lately I seem
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist_from and whitelist_from_rcvd not working
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:55:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
Currently
brother.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist_from and whitelist_from_rcvd not working
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:55:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
Mark
;
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain.com
and
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain.com
But nothing seems to work? has anyone got any advice on this?
do you have
always_trust_envelope_sender 1
?
Hi All,
Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
Currently have entries like the following in the local.cf file
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But mail is still picked up as spam for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have also tried the following;
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
So should I write? :
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mydomain.ac.il
OR
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail.mydomain.ac.il
Regards
Leon
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:57 PM
To: users
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: adjust rules and whitelist_from_rcvd
On Tue, November 14, 2006 14:08, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 tag1=-999.0 tag2=5.0 kill=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL
,
Leon
-Original Message-
From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:01 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: adjust rules and whitelist_from_rcvd
On Tue, November 14, 2006 14:08, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2
score give to
those rules in local.cf) so these kinds of mails score below 5.
2) I've tried to add whitelist_from_rcvd to local.cf, but it didn't help:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtualdomain1.ac.il
Should this line look like this?
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED
below 5.
2) I've tried to add whitelist_from_rcvd to local.cf, but it didn't help:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtualdomain1.ac.il
Should this line look like this?
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mydomain.ac.il
Or this?
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED
What version of SA are you using?
Daryl
(and what score give to
those rules in local.cf) so these kinds of mails score below 5.
2) I've tried to add whitelist_from_rcvd to local.cf, but it didn't help:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtualdomain1.ac.il
Should this line look like this?
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, November 14, 2006 14:08, Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 tag1=-999.0 tag2=5.0 kill=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,
RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RCVD_IN_XBL
X-Spam-Level: **
you are running a
Miles Fidelman wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmmm...not sure how that last bit made it into my email, I thought I'd
just typed
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
must have to do with typing it at 2:46 in the am, sigh...
Nah, it's probably just
with
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but what would I use as the domain part?
Actually, no.. it would not start like that... As written the
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be interpreted as the Received:
header check.
Try:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED
start with
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmmm...not sure how that last bit made it into my email, I thought I'd
just typed
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
must have to do with typing it at 2:46 in the am, sigh...
but what would I use as the domain
start with
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but what would I use as the domain part?
Actually, no.. it would not start like that... As written the
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be interpreted as the Received:
header check.
Try:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Do you *really* need to pass locally generated mail through
Spamassassin? Most likely not.
*Received: * from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDE2B6C2F0 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Not as easily done as said.
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Do you *really* need to pass locally generated mail through
Spamassassin? Most likely not.
I prefer to, since I have a number of users who use my machine as their
SMTP route to the world - and you never know when a
, NO_RELAYS
*X-Spam-Level: * *
*X-Spam-Flag: * YES
*Status:** *
It's pretty clear that the entry in user_prefs would start with
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but what would I use as the domain part?
Thanks very much,
Miles
-0500
Received: from harbor.x-cart.com (harbor.x-cart.com [69.20.14.15])
by gandalf.ctdx.net (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA14M3vT018502
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:22:03 -0500
snip
So there entry would be...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] x-cart.com
find the needed information inthe headers of an email to create a
whitelist_from_rcvd entry in local.cf? If so, what information do I
need? If not, where would I go about finding it.
Thanks!
---Chris Edwards
we own into a white
list. Can I find the needed information in the headers of an email to
create a whitelist_from_rcvd entry in local.cf? If so, what
information do I need? If not, where would I go about finding it.
whitelist_from_rcvd needs to match two parts:
1) A From address. This could
From my understanding the whitelist entry should contain and address then the
domain
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] cecinfo.org
-Original Message-
From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:13 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong hereI have this in my
local.cf file:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail*.magnetmail.net
But messages are getting blocked that I believe should match this?
May 5 14:54:19 esmtp postfix/smtpd[994]: 9315B7FA20:
client=mail10.magnetmail.net
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong hereI have this in my
local.cf file:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail*.magnetmail.net
But messages are getting blocked that I believe should match this?
What about the below suggests this mail is [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are lists that use various servers for their distributions.
These servers can be described using wild cards as for instance
*.somelist.org
I tried to use such wild cards in local.cf as in
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED
The wildcard isn't needed, and I doubt it's allowed either. See the info and
examples at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#whitelist_and_blacklist_options
Specifically, the string at the end of whitelist_from_rcvd which refers to
the reverse DNS
from somewhere in ebay.com, so an update to:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ebay.com
Corrected this problem.
In looking at other domains, that I had similarly whitelisted, I found one or
two, for which, legitimate emails originate through different domains,
without a common domain
James Long wrote:
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:29:49PM -0800, jdow wrote:
Received: from smtp.earthlink.net [209.86.93.205]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:36:39
-0800 (PST)
Received: from amazon.com ([80.33.31.58])
by
the typical behavior of postgress when the RDNS matches the HELO.. I'm
not sure if Earthlink's server does the same.
This does also outline reason why whitelist_from_spf is better than
whitelist_from_rcvd.. Forging RDNS is difficult, but if your ISP gives you
sub-delegation of your RDNS then you can
===8---
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp.earthlink.net [209.86.93.205]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amazon.com ([80.33.31.58])
by mx-pigeons.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink
])
Matches the typical behavior of postgress when the RDNS matches the HELO.. I'm
not sure if Earthlink's server does the same.
This does also outline reason why whitelist_from_spf is better than
whitelist_from_rcvd.. Forging RDNS is difficult, but if your ISP gives you
sub-delegation of your RDNS
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had hoped would match that whitelist entry
are not. How can I fix
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as 65.75.198.49, are you
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as
On 3/12/2006 2:21 PM, James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had hoped would match
On 3/12/2006 2:21 PM, James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had
On 3/12/2006 8:13 PM, James Long wrote:
Mail sent via SMTP should have all of it's headers parsed correctly and
your whitelist_from_rcvd should work.
Yet, it doesn't. One of the nightly server log messages has been
getting rejected because SA thinks it is spam, and doesn't see
In my local.cf, I have the following:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail.someplace.com
However, when messages arrive at my server from mydomain.com through
mail.someplace.com, they are still being tagged as SPAM:
sm-mta: k23G6r86071146: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=38180, class=0
Gustafson, Tim a écrit :
In my local.cf, I have the following:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail.someplace.com
However, when messages arrive at my server from mydomain.com through
mail.someplace.com, they are still being tagged as SPAM:
you didn't show the Received headers, so we
Hello Dr. Young,
Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 3:37:18 PM, you wrote:
DRY If this is set in local.cf
DRY whitelist_from_rcvd@gold.com gold.com
DRY trusted_networks gold.com ( via the IP address }
DRY and the incoming email header looks like (xxx added by me)
DRY Received: ...
DRY From
If this is set in local.cf
whitelist_from_rcvd@gold.com gold.com
trusted_networks gold.com ( via the IP address }
and the incoming email header looks like (xxx added by me)
Received: from email1.gold.com (relay1.gold.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by
kashmir.gold.com with SMTP (Microsoft
wouldn't this trigger this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] zenit.org
I need to create a custom rule to imitate the action of whitelist_from_rcvd.
The reason I need to do this is because I have several networks where mail
originates for the same domain before it is received at our internal mail
server.
Originally, I tried to use multiple whitelist_from_rcvd
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain
names that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it
should. When the domain name is one that has multiple possibilities
that it can
Joe Smith wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain
names that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it
should. When the domain name is one that has multiple possibilities
that it can reverse dns to then it doesn't work unless it happens
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Joe Smith wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain names
that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it should. When the
domain name is one that has
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Dan Mahoney, System Admin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The person running 1.2.3.4 has NO CLUE what they are doing. 1.2.3.4
should RDNS to whatever the hostname value of that machine is. This
should be the same as the HELO the machine uses when
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Dan Mahoney, System Admin
The person running 1.2.3.4 has NO CLUE what they are doing.
1.2.3.4 should RDNS to whatever the hostname value of that
machine is. This should be the same as the HELO the machine uses
when talking out to the outside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I need to create a custom rule to imitate the action of whitelist_from_rcvd.
The reason I need to do this is because I have several networks where mail
originates for the same domain before it is received at our internal mail
server.
Originally, I
201 - 265 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
