Sorry, I mean @Translate("lowercase")
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Onno Scheffers wrote:
>>
>> How about defining a "lowercase" translator, and using
>> @Validate("lowercase") on those fields?
>
>
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> I didn't know it was possible to use translator
This will be a good step, like it or not jQuery is one of the most popular js
library out there, in fact I have seen jobs asking for jQuery experience, I
have used jQuery with T5 extensively, and the switch from Prototype to
jQuery will be a dream come true:):clap:, any time table the jQuery enabl
Just a thought :
Wouldn't be the best solution to add some sort of wrapper for Prototype
written in jQuery.
That way Tapestry will be backward compatible, and have jQuery
enabled.(Prototype functions
would be executed with jQuery).
I'm not an expert for JavaScript so I'm not sure if this would b
That last concept, JavaScript consolidation, is on the drawing board.
It will work especially well in the concert with the existing GZIP
compression. There's just a few things to work out, such as how to
properly handle components dynamically adding JavaScript libraries.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:
Thanks. Having your dirty laundry out for all to see is very motivating.
To be honest, one area of T5 that isn't so stirling is package layout,
but that horse has left the barn.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Onno Scheffers wrote:
> Wow, this looks very good.
>
> My compliments to the Howard
Wow, this looks very good.
My compliments to the Howard and the rest of the team. Every time I look an
the Tapestry source code for something, I am impressed by how clean the code
looks.
Many commercial projects could learn a thing or two from Tapestry :o)
regards,
Onno
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 a
>
> How about defining a "lowercase" translator, and using
> @Validate("lowercase") on those fields?
Hi Howard,
thanks for your response.
I didn't know it was possible to use translator-names as arguments to the
Validate annotation.
Do I still have to contribute the translator in some way or i
I really like jQuery and I use it all the time in various Tapestry apps.
But it's trivial to use it with Tapestry due as you can just do $j =
jQuery.noConflict() and use it as $j instead. Most jQuery libraries use
"jQuery" instead of "$" so there are no conflicts.
Although I prefer jQuery, I c
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
> that it is less than ideal for building front end widgets
That's not true. As a matter of fact, jQuery is currently one of the most
popular Javascript libraries for developing frontend widgets and I see very
cool widgets popping up all over
Thanks a lot Sven :)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Sven Homburg wrote:
> bug fixed in svn branches/1.0
>
> 2009/1/30 Juan E. Maya
>
> > This was happening because the js file "Chenillekit.js" is not been
> > included
> > by the GPlotter compoment.
> > To fix it i had to add the follwowinig to
bug fixed in svn branches/1.0
2009/1/30 Juan E. Maya
> This was happening because the js file "Chenillekit.js" is not been
> included
> by the GPlotter compoment.
> To fix it i had to add the follwowinig to my class
> @IncludeJavaScriptLibrary(value =
> {"classpath:org/chenillekit/tapestry/core/
This was happening because the js file "Chenillekit.js" is not been included
by the GPlotter compoment.
To fix it i had to add the follwowinig to my class
@IncludeJavaScriptLibrary(value =
{"classpath:org/chenillekit/tapestry/core/Chenillekit.js"})
I am still not sure if i am missing something or
How about defining a "lowercase" translator, and using
@Validate("lowercase") on those fields?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Onno Scheffers wrote:
> Is there a way I can setup a custom String validator that is only added to
> fields I explicitly set the translator for?
>
> I want to make sure
Occasionally, I'll have a data object that stores a reference to
service. Here's an example:
public class ActiveUser extends BaseOptimizedSessionPersistedObject
{
private long userId;
private final Session session;
public ActiveUser(Session session)
{
this.session = sess
Fernando Padilla wrote:
We use YUI ourselves. What ever happened to the concept of pluggable
javascript implementations?
So people can choose what underlying javascript system to use?
I believe that this is the core problem : whatever the JS framework
chosen, there will be happy/unhappy peo
Hello, i am trying to use the gplotter component from Chenille Kit
Framework, but i am getting the following error:
Ck is not defined
http://localhost:8080/profilr/assets/org/chenillekit/tapestry/core/components/GPlotter.js
Line 15
am i missing something?
Also another question, would it be possib
We use YUI ourselves. What ever happened to the concept of pluggable
javascript implementations?
So people can choose what underlying javascript system to use?
Chris Lewis wrote:
I have a great deal of experience with prototype, and not so much with
jQuery. From my brush with it, it seems to
Yep, I'm trying to have a dynamic URL for my CSS (not dynamic content). I'll
checkout chenillekit, thanks for the suggestion.
- Original Message
From: Sven Homburg
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 7:00:22 AM
Subject: Re: Dynamic Variables in Asset declarations
The U
This confirms my gut feelings that tapestry framework itself is not only
good but also its codebase :)
http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.apache.tapestry:tapestry-project
--
manuel aldana
ald...@gmx.de
software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de
--
Thanks Howard.
We have few Tapestry applications running in the same server. (and planning
to have more)
I am assuming it is going to cause issues based on your reply. What is the
best way to avoid this issue?
Just curious, at what point does a service(/proxy) gets
serialized/de-serialized? I am
I have a great deal of experience with prototype, and not so much with
jQuery. From my brush with it, it seems to me that it is less than ideal
for building front end widgets, as it's primary focus is more on easily
navigating the DOM and affecting elements in various, insulated ways. It
doesn'
If you have only one Tapestry application, you can safely ignore this warning.
It's related to the code that allows services to be serialized (that
is, the service proxies are serializable even though the services
themselves are not). When a service is de-serialized, there's a static
variable used
There's been a lot of discussion on blogs lately about the merits of
Prototype vs. jQuery.
http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2009/01/comparing-prototype-and-jquery.html
I've added an issue to JIRA to discuss this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-486
Basically, a rewrite of tapestry.js
Getting the following error when refreshing/redeploying the web application
in JBoss. "[org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.SerializationSupport] Setting
a new service proxy provider when there's already an existing provider. This
may indicate that you have multiple IoC Registries."
For maintenance
I was using a pre-made template and the css include was hardcoded there.
When the browser tried to get the css, Tapestry misunderstood that as a
page activation context and tried to coerce it which failed.
Uli
Ulrich Stärk schrieb:
Hi,
with 5.1.0.0-SNAPSHOT I'm getting this really weird coer
The URIAssetFactory is located in the chenillekit-core module
2009/1/30 Massimo Lusetti
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> wrote:
>
> > I think Dave is trying to have an asset URL defined dinamically, not
> > its content . . . For dynamic content, I would use St
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> I think Dave is trying to have an asset URL defined dinamically, not
> its content . . . For dynamic content, I would use StreamResponse too.
> ;)
Look in the chenillkit project, there's an implementation of
AssetFactory ba
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> wrote:
>
>> Couldn't this be easily implemented just using AssetFactory?
>
> I'm not so sure about the easily part of the implementation, I've
> found more easier to impleme
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> Couldn't this be easily implemented just using AssetFactory?
I'm not so sure about the easily part of the implementation, I've
found more easier to implement using the StreamResponse approach as
I've envisioned the whole As
Couldn't this be easily implemented just using AssetFactory?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Dave Greggory wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to declare an asset but with a dynamic variable used for
>> declaration. I need a dynamic var
Hi,
with 5.1.0.0-SNAPSHOT I'm getting this really weird coercion exception:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Exception in method
de.spielviel.mailadmin.pages.account.ListAccount.onActivate(de.spielviel.mailadmin.entities.MxDomain)
(at ListAccount.java:50), parameter #1: Coercion
I certainly could do it that way, but I expect there to be some markup go in
around these elements so it's much easier for our UI design people to add it
into the tml than have to ask us to change the Java.
As I said it's not a problem I can't get around, but it doesn't seem right to
me so eith
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Dave Greggory wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to declare an asset but with a dynamic variable used for
> declaration. I need a dynamic variable (similar to an expansion in a tml)
> because the css is selected based on some user selected parameters from the
> req
Many thanks Ville.
Quite obvious when one sees how to do it!
p.
Quoting Ville Virtanen :
This is what we use, and it works well:
@Retain
private BeanModel model;
{
model = beanModelSource.createEditModel(Organization.class,
messages);
model.add("organizationType"
34 matches
Mail list logo
