RE: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
riday, October 13, 2006 2:33 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Thanks guys, I omitted the Login.page file and tore out the annotations. All that was left was the Login.html and thats even better for me. So it runs alright. James I ha

RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Thanks guys, I omitted the Login.page file and tore out the annotations. All that was left was the Login.html and thats even better for me. So it runs alright. James I has a few ques if you don;t mind. 1. What is Auto-wire? 2. Does trails use your tapernate as part of it's processing? 3. Why

Re: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
You don't have to be a 4.x expert to recognize this one; I told you before. :) You're trying to implicitly and explicitly define the same component, and tapestry is complaining. There are two types of component definitions in tapestry: explicit, and implicit. Implicit definitions define the enti

RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Well, as it turns out... That last stack dump disappeared by NOT specifying my own ID Should this be bugged? For sake of relying upon my self, I prefer to name my own ID's. Thanks in advance - To unsubscribe, e-

RE: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
You're defining your component in both places. Take it out of the page spec file and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Ken nashua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:17 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1

RE: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
org Subject: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Thanks Guys for the attention and apologies for the extra posts... web latency I guess. Wasn't sure I even had a mailing list for a bit. Anyway... I have checked out and built all the tapestry-4.1.1 etc... I am trying to create

RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Ok, so currently I have omitted the inline component annotation from the java file and moved it back to the Login.page file Specification 4.0//EN" "http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";> Tapestry Proto 1.0

RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Thanks Guys for the attention and apologies for the extra posts... web latency I guess. Wasn't sure I even had a mailing list for a bit. Anyway... I have checked out and built all the tapestry-4.1.1 etc... I am trying to create a tapestry app that has no "Login.page" file James, I took your a

RE: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
: Tapestry users Subject: Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Right... I just looked at his original e-mail and the exception is different than the one he reported later (which I didn't realize before; that's what I get for 1/2 reading e-mails. :). Apologies if I came a

Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
believe that Tapestry isn't finding his page class. He may have changed something in the meantime, though. -Original Message- From: Robert Zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:41 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 h

RE: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
n_x." So, that leads me to believe that Tapestry isn't finding his page class. He may have changed something in the meantime, though. -Original Message- From: Robert Zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:41 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: @Com

Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
ed the emailAddress component in your .page spec (or, in this case, via an annotation in the class file), and you're attempting to redefine it in the template. Robert -Original Message- From: Ken nashua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:22 AM To: users@tapes

Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
I'm really not a tap 4.x guru, but... Doesn't it seem funny that id="emailAddress", but the field is emailAddressComponent? Now, it may very well be that tapestry 4 will merilly let you have inconsistent component ids and method names (like I said, not a tap4 wiz), but, why do you then also go

RE: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
rom: Ken nashua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:22 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Guys, All I am trying to do is operate a model object Person.getEmailAddress() from html to java. Whats the deal wit

@Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Guys, All I am trying to do is operate a model object Person.getEmailAddress() from html to java. Whats the deal with this notation... @Component(type = "TextField", id = "emailAddress", bindings = { "value = ognl:person.emailAddress", "displayName = message:label.emailAddres