Thanks for your concern Rob, but I'm pretty comfortable evaluating things
myself and have already read that discussion. The backward compatibility
history of Tapestry will certainly be taken into consideration. (that was
the distraction I mentioned) Sometimes it's better to break backwards
compati
Hi Rob or however you are!
Nice to see you spicing up this list ;)
Your comments are always very thoughtful so everybody on this list can
feel how you from your deepest heart care about people on this list as
well as the evolution of Tapestry. Thank you for your invaluable
contribution!
Rea
Hi Andy,
Be wise and dig around the Internet to find answers to your questions and
don't turn to this list since they won't offer you a non-biased answers. For
a starter go to theserverside.com where recently a discussion was held on
Tapestry. The link is:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread
e of an issue in
the future. I also see it being an issue for adoption in larger shops where
there is a separation of roles.
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: Angelo Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 6:37 PM
> To: users@tapestry.apache.
Andy Blower wrote:
>
> 2) How easy is it to add custom AJAX interactions? I'm thinking of
> interactions like checking a checkbox to mark a search result, return
> success and visually change the appearance.
>
For this I would advise you to use t5components - an ajax-enabled component
package.
Hi Fernando,
I think so, if you want to be wisiwig, use regular tags, but programmers
turn to use the component tags for that as it is easier to read, so that's
really a 'policy' issue, if it's a team work i think regular tags are
better.
Angelo
Fernando Padilla wrote:
>
> I am actually using
I am actually using this syntax, so that I should get the best of both
worlds.
Angelo Chen wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Initially I use dreamweaver to design the page, and make it a point to use
regular tags like:
my Link , this will make it easier for me to go back to dreamweaver for page
update, b
Hi Jonathan,
Initially I use dreamweaver to design the page, and make it a point to use
regular tags like:
my Link , this will make it easier for me to go back to dreamweaver for page
update, but later I found out that I started to write my
link and not coming back any more to dreamweaver, I fire
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Blower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:45 AM
> To: users@tapestry.apache.org
> Subject: [T5] Tapestry evaluation + questions
>
>
> Hi there, I'm evaluating Tapestry (among others) f
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Andy Blower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there, I'm evaluating Tapestry (among others) for the web framework we'll
> use at my company for the next 5 years or so. We've used Struts 1 for the
> last 5-6 years and it's served us well, even if it was higher mai
Andy, you should take a look at tapestry jumpstart by geoff callender:
http://files.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart/
I only wish there were a demo server of this somewhere because the
webapp itself will show its template + class in the browser.
-mike
On Mar 29, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Andy Blow
Hi Andy,
Definately you should go Teaptesry 5, not 4.x. with 6 years experience you
should have no problem trying out the tutorials for a few days and see if
Tapestry 5 works for you, tutorials are trivial but you can always find a
use case to test Tapestry 5's features to see if it suits your ne
Hi there, I'm evaluating Tapestry (among others) for the web framework we'll
use at my company for the next 5 years or so. We've used Struts 1 for the
last 5-6 years and it's served us well, even if it was higher maintenance
than was first apparent. I have spent over two days reading about Tapestr
13 matches
Mail list logo
