Excellent, thanks Jesse.
-J.
BTW
(We'll stick to good 'ol ANT + Ivy ;-) )
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
If your company doesn't allow using maven then you can download
Tapestry like anyone else:
http://tapestry.apache.org/download.html
Other than that you'll be missing out on all of the archetypes /
If your company doesn't allow using maven then you can download
Tapestry like anyone else:
http://tapestry.apache.org/download.html
Other than that you'll be missing out on all of the archetypes /
snapshot updates / etc. ...You can go find out more about that at :
http://maven.apache.org
Yes
Well, that's just because I've had no real answer from any of you.
The T5 manual goes into great detail as to how Maven should be used
in creating a Tapestry application, Howard Screencast #3 is describing
how Maven is used in Tapestry development. His blogs mentions a bunch
of stuff related to Ma
It only feels redundant because you already have your answer. It's
self describing. You can do whatever you can do today. Is make a
requirement for c++ development? I just don't understand your
question.
if you want to develop the actual framework code it's probably a
requirement. If not, I don't
C'mon - Since T5 is a single man effort (or at least that's what it says
at the Maven project info ;-) - we
as users of Tapestry have right to know whether Maven will be a
requirement in our every day work or
not.
To me the thing that is annoying is seeing more and more Maven related
threads i
: Mittwoch, 28. März 2007 08:40
An: Tapestry users
Cc: Tapestry users
Betreff: Re: I thought this was a newsgroup about Tapestry ;-)
> but I think there's tremendous value in imposing some sort of
> standard build lifecycle and directory structure, not to mention
> transitive
> depe
What do you really expect Howard to say that you didn't read in TSS
link posted earlier in this thread?
At this point this conversation is redundant and annoying. Everyone is
free to develop their software however they like, please allow us the
same courtesy.
On 3/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROT
> but I think there's tremendous value in imposing some sort of
> standard build lifecycle and directory structure, not to mention
> transitive
> dependency management.
Sure - but in my opinion this shouldn't be imposed by a web application
framework. I should be able to decide whether to use Mav
--- Borut BolÄina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Konstantin Ignatyev wrote:
> > http://www.bileblog.org/?p=59
> This pretty insulting blog was posted on July 17th,
> 2005.
>
Insulting, but pretty damn valid IMO to this day
(Mar-27-2007).
> I share my oppinion with
>
http://www.these
I find maven extremely useful, not only for my own projects. But also for
building fresh checkouts from other os projects.
Its really time saving and handy.
We are currently working in a multimodule project using maven and it's
working charmingly.
On 3/27/07, D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I wasn't a very big fan of Maven 1, but I really like Maven 2. I've spent a
couple of days in the aggregate tearing my hair out over various Maven 2
quirks, but I think there's tremendous value in imposing some sort of
standard build lifecycle and directory structure, not to mention transitive
dep
Hello,
Konstantin Ignatyev wrote:
http://www.bileblog.org/?p=59
This pretty insulting blog was posted on July 17th, 2005.
I share my oppinion with
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=44285#227686
Best,
Borut
P.S. This thread is a paradox, quite funny.
Maven is very much like Windows and Project Wizards -
does work fine till we need something slightly
different than "they" think we would need.
For example I think that:
Much praised transitive dependencies in Maven 2 is
simply abomination because it makes build dependent
on repository content.
What's more - suppose I want to create a web application, consisting of
several (Eclipse) projects
reflecting my application layering. Using Maven I first have to figure
out how to setup multimodule
applications and then wait whether this is indeed working properly in
the specific Maven version
Just created a new Tapestry 5 app and am not sure whether things
completed ok.
Maven is given me the following feedback:
[INFO] Created: 20 parsers.
[INFO] Velocimacro : initialization starting.
[INFO] Velocimacro : adding VMs from VM library template :
VM_global_library.vm
[ERROR] ResourceMana
Hi
I would disagree. Maven (especially version 2) is a very nice
framework that really simplify project structure and development
practices. It has some issues in the dynamic projects like tapestry5
but in general it works very well (which is reflected by the number of
projects build by maven).
On 3/27/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it me, or is the amount of maven related posts steadily growing
I hope T5 will not be dependent on Maven, or will it?
Development of, currently yes.
Development with, currently no.
--
regards,
Robin
-
Good catch.
Maven has good idea behind but not too good
implementation :) I think that inventor of Jelly
simply can not produce anything useable :(
I wish Howard used good-old Ant + Ivy for dependency
management and publishing: just a bit more work
initially but them it all just works...
--- J
Is it me, or is the amount of maven related posts steadily growing
I hope T5 will not be dependent on Maven, or will it?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo
