RE: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
As I said, Tapestry can't find your page class. It doesn't know that Login.html is supposed to use the Login class you've defined. Have you told it the default package to look for page classes? Are your templates/page classes in the right places? -Original Message- From: Ken nashua

Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
I'm really not a tap 4.x guru, but... Doesn't it seem funny that id=emailAddress, but the field is emailAddressComponent? Now, it may very well be that tapestry 4 will merilly let you have inconsistent component ids and method names (like I said, not a tap4 wiz), but, why do you then also go

Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
James Carman wrote: As I said, Tapestry can't find your page class. It doesn't know that Login.html is supposed to use the Login class you've defined. Have you told it the default package to look for page classes? Are your templates/page classes in the right places? I'm not so sure

RE: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
that Tapestry isn't finding his page class. He may have changed something in the meantime, though. -Original Message- From: Robert Zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:41 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) James

Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
have changed something in the meantime, though. -Original Message- From: Robert Zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:41 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) James Carman wrote: As I said, Tapestry

RE: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
users Subject: Re: @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Right... I just looked at his original e-mail and the exception is different than the one he reported later (which I didn't realize before; that's what I get for 1/2 reading e-mails. :). Apologies if I came across short. Robert

RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Thanks Guys for the attention and apologies for the extra posts... web latency I guess. Wasn't sure I even had a mailing list for a bit. Anyway... I have checked out and built all the tapestry-4.1.1 etc... I am trying to create a tapestry app that has no Login.page file James, I took your

RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Ken nashua
Ok, so currently I have omitted the inline component annotation from the java file and moved it back to the Login.page file !DOCTYPE page-specification PUBLIC -//Apache Software Foundation//Tapestry Specification 4.0//EN http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd;

RE: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
@Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Thanks Guys for the attention and apologies for the extra posts... web latency I guess. Wasn't sure I even had a mailing list for a bit. Anyway... I have checked out and built all the tapestry-4.1.1 etc... I am trying to create a tapestry app that has

RE: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
You're defining your component in both places. Take it out of the page spec file and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Ken nashua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:17 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help

Re: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Zeigler
You don't have to be a 4.x expert to recognize this one; I told you before. :) You're trying to implicitly and explicitly define the same component, and tapestry is complaining. There are two types of component definitions in tapestry: explicit, and implicit. Implicit definitions define the

RE: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks)

2006-10-13 Thread James Carman
PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: RE @Component whoas... Tap-4.1.1 help please (thanks) Thanks guys, I omitted the Login.page file and tore out the annotations. All that was left was the Login.html and thats even better for me. So it runs alright. James I has a few ques if you don;t mind