FYI, effective immediately this (nicholas.willi...@ul.com) is my new email
address. I can no longer be reached at nicholas.willi...@puresafety.com.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nicholas.willi...@puresafety.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 4:57 PM
To: Tomcat User
Just my smarmy reply to Tony's "when Sun owned Java" comment...
Used to be when Sun owned Java you got security updates months, not days, after
a vulnerability like this was discovered. :-)
Not saying I like Oracle (I loathe it most days); just making the point that
they were REALLY good about
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Suggestions for obtaining mod_jk for Amazon EC2
>
>> I'm trying to set up an Amazon EC2 instance as a proxying web server
>> for Tomcat using mod_jk. I'm using Amazon's basic "Linux"
>> 32-bit AMI which doesn't include m
> -Original Message-
> From: Williams, Nick [mailto:nicholas.willi...@ul.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Suggestions for obtaining mod_jk for Amazon EC2
>
>>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christop
> -Original Message-
> From: Shanti Suresh [mailto:sha...@umich.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:04 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: JDK 1.6 or JDK 1.7
>
> All,
>
> I am trying to decide whether to run Tomcat 7.0.33 on JDK 1.6 or JDK 1.7.
> Tomcat-7 release notes say:
>
> Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:08 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Is it possible to expire jvmRoute cookie
>
> > 2. How one additional user can be a problem in such a system? If he
> > ac
So I read some code in org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.java. When
parseParameters() is called, it checks whether the Content-Type is
"multipart/form-data" or "application/x-www-form-urlencoded". If it's
"application/x-www-form-urlencoded", it checks to make sure that the
Content-Length is
, Mark.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 3:17 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Does maxPostSize has an effect on file upload?
On 14/12/2012 19:58, Williams, Nick wrote:
> (Note: It's entirely possible that I'
> If it was using the global Content-length header, it would count not only the
> encoded data bytes, but also the parts separators, headers etc..
> So that's nice. It counts only the net data bytes, which is easier to compare
> to the size on disk of a file that you would upload.
Indeed. A gre
> The way Tomcat is apparently doing it now is much more sensible, in my humble
> opinion, because it does allow a direct and easy comparison with the files
> being uploaded.
> And since as per above it needs to be kept in some cases anyway, my vote - if
> I had one - would be to not change it.
Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand that
it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
specifications that Tomcat does not implement. However, I'm wondering if any
Tomcat users out there have any experience with any JMS solutions t
t: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand
> that it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
> specifications that Tomcat does not i
t: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> I do not have a preferred implementation, no. I understand the basics of JMS
> and how it works, but I have never actually used it before.
I would second Chris' suggestion that you do a POC an
: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 2:06 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
> Thanks for the input, both of you. I will take a look at the activity
> in the repository and also i
Our enterprise apps are deployed in a 64-bit environment and we have not seen
any issues on Tomcat 64-bit with Spring Framework, Spring Security and
Hibernate. I would wager that, these days, 64-bit is more common than not.
However, I don't have any research to back up my opinion.
Nick
-Or
> -Original Message-
> From: Jess Holle [mailto:je...@ptc.com]
>
> ...
> It's that you can't make Java source code which /implements /JDBC interfaces
> and make it compilable with both Java 6 and Java 7. The JDBC interfaces have
> new methods in Java 7 *and* some of these new methods use
> No wonder those guys were so reticent to change the JDBC API to
> (directly) support the upcoming Java Date & Time APIs: they've made everyone
> so angry in the past they don't want to do it again ;)
> - -chris
Chris,
DID/WILL they update the JDBC API to support the new date/time API? Or did
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Kirk Hoganson wrote:
>> I am currently in the middle of an upgrade from Apache (2.2)/Tomcat
>> (5.5.16) to Apache (2.2)/Tomcat (6.0.24). The JVM is being upgraded
>> from
>> 1.5.0_09-b01 to 1.6.0_22-b22. The new host servers will be RedHat 6.2.
>
>Why are you upgradi
18 matches
Mail list logo
