Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-04 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 3/3/13 1:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: The decision was taken, therefore, to link the base file name and context name as previously described. This removed nearly all of the nasty edge cases, made for much simpler code and made the overall

Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for tomcat deployment. If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the war filename. Has there been a regression in recent 7.x releases in this regard? Interestingly, a colleague confirms that this is

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/3/3 James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com: We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for tomcat deployment. If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the war filename. As expected, in any of 7.0., 6.0 and even 5.5 . Have you read the

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/3/3 James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com: We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for tomcat deployment. If we drop this war into webapps, the context root remains that of the war

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/3/3 James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com: We have a war archive that includes a netbeans-generated context.xml for tomcat deployment. If we drop this war into webapps, the

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/3/3 James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com: So now I have a war deployed. Easy enough. Now to set the URL path.

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/3/3 James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com: So now I have a war deployed.

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/3/3

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Eggers
On 3/3/2013 8:22 AM, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 15:29, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 14:32, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 14:24, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: snip/ The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the context path, the simplest solution is to change the base file name. Fine. But this is not as described on this

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 17:58, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: snip/ The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the context path, the simplest solution is to change

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/03/2013 19:25, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 17:58, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 16:22, James Green wrote: On 3 March 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: snip/ The base file name controls the context path. If you want to change the context

Re: Context.xml ignored.

2013-03-03 Thread James Green
On 3 March 2013 19:44, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 03/03/2013 19:25, James Green wrote: I am clearly inferring too much. An explicit statement would certainly help reduce confusion, and perhaps cause the Netbeans people to avoid putting the path attribute into the context

Configured root path in META-INF/context.xml ignored

2011-08-26 Thread Oliver Wulff
img src=http://zdownload.zurich.com/mailimages/ZHP_MailHeader.gif; / Hi there I'm trying to run my web application (myweb.war) in Tomcat 6.0.32 under the root context. I've tried to add a context.xml in META-INF/context.xml which is part of myweb.war: Context docBase=myweb path=/

Re: Configured root path in META-INF/context.xml ignored

2011-08-26 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/8/26 Oliver Wulff oliver.wu...@zurich.ch: I've tried to add a context.xml in META-INF/context.xml which is part of myweb.war: Context docBase=myweb path=/ reloadable=false/ docBase and path attributes are invalid here Have I missed anything? 1) FAQ 2) search mailing list archives 3)

Antwort: Re: Configured root path in META-INF/context.xml ignored

2011-08-26 Thread Oliver Wulff
PM Thema Re: Configured root path in Bitte antworten META-INF/context.xml ignored

Re: Re: Configured root path in META-INF/context.xml ignored

2011-08-26 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/8/26 Oliver Wulff oliver.wu...@zurich.ch: I'd very much like to be able to deploy my war in webapps and configure either the path in META-INF/context.xml to / You cannot configure those attributes in META-INF/context.xml at all. or define docBase in conf/Catalina/localhost/ROOT.xml. It

Antwort: Re: Re: Configured root path in META-INF/context.xml ignored

2011-08-26 Thread Oliver Wulff
Re: Re: Configured root path in Bitte antworten META-INF/context.xml ignored an Tomcat Users

Re: Re: Re: Configured root path in META-INF/context.xml ignored

2011-08-26 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/8/26 Oliver Wulff oliver.wu...@zurich.ch: I'm asking whether this would be an intrusive way thus I would raise a request. Try to write a patch and you'll find that it is easier to rename your war. The feature you are asking will seriously confuse auto-deployment. Best regards,

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-06 Thread Mark Thomas
Eric Berry wrote: Mark, Chuck, Thank you both very much for the detailed explanations. I can certainly see how this would definitely speed development along, and how - in most cases - the context.xml is unnecessary. I myself, have rarely used them unless as Mark mentioned, I needed

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-05 Thread Mark Thomas
Eric Berry wrote: Ok cool. Thank you very much for clearing that up for me. The first time I deployed the war, there wouldn't have been a context in any of the 3 locations mentioned above. As you said, it would have copied the context.xml file from the war into the 3rd location as

RE: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Eric Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war. (Just expanding a little on what Mark gave you.) Why recommend the use of the context.xml if it really isn't used? It is used - Tomcat copied the context.xml file from

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-05 Thread Eric Berry
Mark, Chuck, Thank you both very much for the detailed explanations. I can certainly see how this would definitely speed development along, and how - in most cases - the context.xml is unnecessary. I myself, have rarely used them unless as Mark mentioned, I needed specific context parameters.

Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-04 Thread Eric Berry
Hello, I'm trying to use the manager to deploy a war file creating using Maven 2. The war is a snapshot file which contains a META-INF/context.xml file. It seems that this file is being ignored when deploying this way and the war file-name is being used instead. I thought the purpose of the

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-04 Thread Mark Thomas
Eric Berry wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use the manager to deploy a war file creating using Maven 2. The war is a snapshot file which contains a META-INF/context.xml file. It seems that this file is being ignored when deploying this way and the war file-name is being used instead. I

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-04 Thread Eric Berry
Mark, thanks for the reply. You appear to have misunderstood. Which part of the doc did you get this from and I'll see if it can be made clearer. From my understanding of the the order of precedence. [quote] *Context* elements may be explicitly defined: - in the

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-04 Thread Mark Thomas
Eric Berry wrote: Mark, thanks for the reply. You appear to have misunderstood. Which part of the doc did you get this from and I'll see if it can be made clearer. From my understanding of the the order of precedence. [quote] *Context* elements may be explicitly defined: - in

Re: Tomcat 5.5. META-INF/context.xml ignored when deploying as war.

2008-09-04 Thread Eric Berry
That isn't quite how it works. $CATALINA_HOME/conf/context.xml provides global defaults which can be overridden at the host level by: $CATALINA_HOME/conf/[enginename]/[hostname]/context.xml.defaultfile which in turn can be overridden at the context level by:

WEB-INF/context.xml ignored

2007-02-23 Thread Matt Bockol
Hi Folks, I'm having trouble getting a context.xml file to be obeyed. I'm using: Tomcat 5.5.20, the stock install from tomcat.apache.org. JDK 1.6, direct from Sun. RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3 The application I'm installing is the Shibboleth Identity Provider (IdP). The installation process

Re: META-INF/context.xml ignored

2007-02-23 Thread Matt Bockol
Obviously the subject should have been META-INF/context.xml Sorry 'bout that. Matt Bockol wrote: Hi Folks, I'm having trouble getting a context.xml file to be obeyed. I'm using: Tomcat 5.5.20, the stock install from tomcat.apache.org. JDK 1.6, direct from Sun. RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3