Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

ry to make it work at all - not mentioned). I still have the old one if need be and yes I tried it too. I installed the mod_jk.so in /usr/lib64/httpd/modules with the rest of them (the Apache mod_jk online docs seems a little old here but were helpful). I modified the workers.properties (rem

Re: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

2012/3/23 Ray Holme : > I downloaded and built the newest mod_jk.so (tomcat-connectors-1.2.33) from > src (had to strip final binary to make it work at all - not mentioned). I > still have the old one if need be and yes I tried it too. 1.2.33 is known to be broken and causes core in httpd in cer

RE: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

> From: Ray Holme [mailto:rayho...@yahoo.com] > Subject: upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work > I downloaded and built the newest mod_jk.so (tomcat-connectors-1.2.33) Oops - please read the headline in the docs: "The Apache Tomcat team wishes to draw your attention to stabili

upgraded fedora and mod_jk will not work

ork at all - not mentioned). I still have the old one if need be and yes I tried it too. I installed the mod_jk.so in /usr/lib64/httpd/modules with the rest of them (the Apache mod_jk online docs seems a little old here but were helpful). I modified the workers.properties (removed cache stuff wh

Re: crash with mod_jk 1.2.33

t?) If > > not, please tell me what I should have done. > > Looks great. I'm not the best resource for debugging mod_jk crashes, > but it definitely looks like either a problem directly in mod_jk or a > problem that mod_jk does not detect and crashes anyway: > >

Re: crash with mod_jk 1.2.33

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thad, On 3/15/12 9:39 AM, Thad Humphries wrote: > Thanks. I hope I did this right. (Google is my friend, correct?) If > not, please tell me what I should have done. Looks great. I'm not the best resource for debugging mod_jk cras

Re: crash with mod_jk 1.2.33

> uname -m = i686 uname -r = 2.6.37.6-0.11-desktop uname -s = Linux > uname -v = #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-12-19 23:39:38 +0100 > > Initially I tried building the connector using --with-apxs set to > the apxs in my copy of Apache 2.2.15. When that failed, I > downloaded, built, and install

crash with mod_jk 1.2.33

Since October of last year, I have run the mod_jk connector v. 1.2.32. I built the connector myself using Apache 2.2.15's apxs (I also built Apache myself). Today I downloaded, built, and installed the latest mod_jk connector, v. 1.2.33 ( http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

gt;> On 2/23/12 1:57 PM, Ofer Israeli wrote: >>>> Felix Schumacher wrote: >>>>> Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >>>>>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>>>>>>> From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Tomcat with m

Re: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

te: >>>> Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >>>>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>>>>>> From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Tomcat with >>>>>>> mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile >>>>>&g

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

gt;>> From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk >>>>>> becomes irresponsive after working for awhile >>>>> >>>>>> You might want to take a thread dump of Tomcat and see just what >>>>>> is going on.

Re: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ofer, On 2/23/12 1:57 PM, Ofer Israeli wrote: > Felix Schumacher wrote: >> Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>>>> From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk

Re: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Ofer, Look at the articles in the link already given - http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/HowTo#How_do_I_obtain_a_thread_dump_of_my_running_webapp_.3F- find the bit about sendsignal. Download this program, and run it. This provides the windows equivalent of sending -3 to a *nix java process, e.g. encou

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Felix Schumacher wrote: > Am 23.02.2012 19:50, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >> Felix Schumacher wrote: >>> Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >>>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>>>>> From: Ofer Israeli [mailto:of...@checkpoint.com] >>>>&

Re: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

> > http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/**HowTo#How_do_I_obtain_a_** >>> thread_dump_of_my_running_**webapp_.3F >>> for more info, to get a thread dump of tomcat. >>> >> I have seen that page but actually can't u

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Am 23.02.2012 19:50, schrieb Ofer Israeli: Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Ofer Israeli [mailto:of...@checkpoint.com] Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile I am in the situation

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Felix Schumacher wrote: > Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>>> From: Caldarale, Charles R >>>> Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working >>>> for awhile >>> >>>> Y

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Felix Schumacher wrote: > Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: >> Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >>>> From: Ofer Israeli [mailto:of...@checkpoint.com] >>>> Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working >>>> for awhile >&g

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile You might want to take a thread dump of Tomcat and see just what is going on. Also look in the Tomcat logs (there

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Am 23.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Ofer Israeli: Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Ofer Israeli [mailto:of...@checkpoint.com] Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile I am in the situation where the server is giving 503s for all incoming requests, so I did a

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Caldarale, Charles R >> Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working >> for awhile > >> You might want to take a thread dump of Tomcat and see just what is >> going on. > > Also look in the To

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Ofer Israeli [mailto:of...@checkpoint.com] >> Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working >> for awhile > >> I am in the situation where the server is giving 503s for all >> incoming requests, so I

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

> From: Caldarale, Charles R > Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile > You might want to take a thread dump of Tomcat and see just > what is going on. Also look in the Tomcat logs (there are several) to see if errors are being reported ther

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

> From: Ofer Israeli [mailto:of...@checkpoint.com] > Subject: RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile > I am in the situation where the server is giving 503s for > all incoming requests, so I did a capture now to see what > the situation is and as me

RE: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

André Warnier wrote: > Ofer Israeli wrote: >> All, >> >> I have a deployment on Windows 2003 Server using Apache 2.2.16, >> Tomcat 5.5.30 and mod_jk 1.2.31. Apache and Tomcat reside on the >> same machine. The communication is fine for days / weeks, but at >>

Re: Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

Ofer Israeli wrote: All, I have a deployment on Windows 2003 Server using Apache 2.2.16, Tomcat 5.5.30 and mod_jk 1.2.31. Apache and Tomcat reside on the same machine. The communication is fine for days / weeks, but at some point all requests to the server (to Apache) that use mod_jk return

Tomcat with mod_jk becomes irresponsive after working for awhile

All, I have a deployment on Windows 2003 Server using Apache 2.2.16, Tomcat 5.5.30 and mod_jk 1.2.31. Apache and Tomcat reside on the same machine. The communication is fine for days / weeks, but at some point all requests to the server (to Apache) that use mod_jk return HTTP 503. The error

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:03 PM, "Rainer Jung" mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de>> wrote: No no no: as I said multiple times now, the string "...host3.mydomain.com:/mywebapp/flex_wizard_project..." in the "missing uri map" mod_jk log message means: the VirtualHo

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Rainer Jung wrote: ... No no no: as I said multiple times now, the string "...host3.mydomain.com:/mywebapp/flex_wizard_project..." in the "missing uri map" mod_jk log message means: the VirtualHost that handles "host3.mydomain.com" has not JkMount de

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

not understand why an Adobe request results in this URI being logged by mod_jk : [Thu Feb 16 06:47:35 2012] [13723:140020322740160] [debug] jk_map_to_storage::mod_jk.c (3647): missing uri map for host3.mydomain.com:/mywebapp/flex_wizard_project_test_script_server_550713325917236076.htm while w

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

e request results in this URI being logged by mod_jk : [Thu Feb 16 06:47:35 2012] [13723:140020322740160] [debug] jk_map_to_storage::mod_jk.c (3647): missing uri map for host3.mydomain.com:/mywebapp/flex_wizard_project_test_script_server_550713325917236076.htm while when doing it by hand

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

ng? If there's no activity it seems to me the traffic isn't even getting to your site. --David > ----- Original Message - > From: "David N. Smith" > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:43:57 AM > Subject: Re: mod_jk doe

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

. - Original Message - From: "David N. Smith" To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:43:57 AM Subject: Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

cess host3.mydomain.com I'm still curious as to why Adobe sees a different experience than you do with your web browser. Me too in fact. I didn't quite get Rainer's explanation, and still do not understand why an Adobe request results in this URI being logged by mod_jk : [Thu Feb

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On 17.02.2012 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 2/16/12 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote: A correct request should have at least 2 lines such as line 1 : GET /mywebapp/... HTTP/1.1(could also be POST instead of GET) then: .. (any number

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On 17.02.2012 16:15, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 2/17/12 3:41 AM, Purvis Robert (NHS CONNECTING FOR HEALTH) wrote: 1.2.14.1 is not a valid version number for Apache mod_jk. All historic versions of mod_jk can be downloaded directly from the Apache web site

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

x27;m still curious as to why Adobe sees a different experience than you >> do with your web browser. > > Me too in fact. I didn't quite get Rainer's explanation, and still do not > understand why an Adobe request results in this URI being logged by mod_jk : > >

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

cations in the limited places where they are allowed. I'm new to this, but it's probably nothing new to you. My point is, the one thing I do have control over is placing mod_jk attributes globally in httpd.conf as well as in its VirtualHost tags for mydomain.com and myotherdomain.co

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 2/17/12 10:26 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Is it just a variation due to how the mod_jk logging works, or is > it really that the request URI is arriving differently to Apache in > one case or the other ? I think it's confus

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 2/16/12 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote: A correct request should have at least 2 lines such as line 1 : GET /mywebapp/... HTTP/1.1(could also be POST instead of GET) then: .. (any number of header lines, 0-n)

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

rious as to why Adobe sees a different experience than you do with your web browser. Me too in fact. I didn't quite get Rainer's explanation, and still do not understand why an Adobe request results in this URI being logged by mod_jk : [Thu Feb 16 06:47:35 2012] [1372

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 2/16/12 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote: > A correct request should have at least 2 lines such as > > line 1 : GET /mywebapp/... HTTP/1.1(could also be POST instead > of GET) then: .. (any number of header lines, 0-n) then: Host: > the.cor

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert, On 2/17/12 3:41 AM, Purvis Robert (NHS CONNECTING FOR HEALTH) wrote: > I have found that some versions of mod_jk 1.2 don’t work. Then you should report a bug and get them fixed. Or, fir your configuration to make them work. > I use 1.

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To whom it may concern, On 2/16/12 1:29 PM, modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: > I took all JkMounts inside the VirtualHost tags and placed them > outside these tags, and above them added JkMountCopy All, > restarted Apache, and now Adobe successfully can

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On 17.02.2012 09:41, Purvis Robert (NHS CONNECTING FOR HEALTH) wrote: I have found that some versions of mod_jk 1.2 don’t work. I use 1.2.14.1 with Apache 2.0.52, and Tomcat 5.5.23. When I tried going up to a higher version of mod_jk then the connection to Tomcat was ignore, as if there was

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On 17/02/2012 08:41, Purvis Robert (NHS CONNECTING FOR HEALTH) wrote: > I have found that some versions of mod_jk 1.2 don’t work. I use 1.2.14.1 with > Apache 2.0.52, and Tomcat 5.5.23. When I tried going up to a higher version > of mod_jk then the connection to Tomcat was ignore, as

RE: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

I have found that some versions of mod_jk 1.2 don’t work. I use 1.2.14.1 with Apache 2.0.52, and Tomcat 5.5.23. When I tried going up to a higher version of mod_jk then the connection to Tomcat was ignore, as if there was nothing there at all. If you can, get hold of 1.2.14.1 and see if that

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

me's in the sections (because the IP matches), or in the sections (because the "*" also matches the IP 1.2.3.4) ? So don't do that unless you have a specific reason to do it. This is fast becoming an Apache httpd forum... On the other hand, it is rather important to unde

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

local/apache/conf/userdata/*.conf" Include "/usr/local/apache/conf/userdata/*.owner-root" Include "/usr/local/apache/conf/userdata/std/*.conf" Include "/usr/local/apache/conf/userdata/std/*.owner-root" Include "/usr/local/apache/conf/userd

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Just one more thing, then I'm going to bed.. modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Thanks Andre, I'd still be interested is there's a way to have mod_jk only check for traffic coming into mydomain.com for folder /mywebapp. I think the current solution checks all domains, such as my

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On 16.02.2012 21:24, André Warnier wrote: modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Thanks Andre, I'd still be interested is there's a way to have mod_jk only check for traffic coming into mydomain.com for folder /mywebapp. I think the current solution checks all domains, such as mydomain2.com and

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Thanks Andre, I'd still be interested is there's a way to have mod_jk only check for traffic coming into mydomain.com for folder /mywebapp. I think the current solution checks all domains, such as mydomain2.com and mydomain3.com, etc., for a map to my

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Thanks Andre, I'd still be interested is there's a way to have mod_jk only check for traffic coming into mydomain.com for folder /mywebapp. I think the current solution checks all domains, such as mydomain2.com and mydomain3.com, etc., for a map to mydomain.com/mywebapp. Could

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Hi Andre, yes I see your point (Rainer's solution would solve that too I suppose). Also, believe me, I was trying all sorts of addresses in Adobe's input field: http://www.mydomain.com/mywebapp http://mydomain.com/mywebapp http://mydomain.com:80/mywebapp http://hos

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Thank you Chuck, I feel a lot better now :-) - Original Message - From: "Charles R Caldarale" To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:17:05 AM Subject: RE: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this add

RE: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

> From: modjkl...@comcast.net [mailto:modjkl...@comcast.net] > Subject: Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web > address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser > Also interesting is the tcpdump I send out earlier reports two cksum > INCORRECTs when

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

ea what's going on there. - Original Message - From: "André Warnier" To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 10:46:45 AM Subject: Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it in

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

And still more.. André Warnier wrote: Another addendum at end. André Warnier wrote: In this case, and although Rainer is of course The mod_jk specialist, I beg to differ with his analysis. modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: mod_jk.log file snippet-- [Thu Feb 16 06:46:37

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Another addendum at end. André Warnier wrote: In this case, and although Rainer is of course The mod_jk specialist, I beg to differ with his analysis. modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: mod_jk.log file snippet-- [Thu Feb 16 06:46:37 2012] [13722:140020322740160] [debug

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

ary 16, 2012 9:47:13 AM Subject: Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser On 16.02.2012 17:55, modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: > original message is below--- > > Hello. I'm

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

In this case, and although Rainer is of course The mod_jk specialist, I beg to differ with his analysis. modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: mod_jk.log file snippet-- [Thu Feb 16 06:46:37 2012] [13722:140020322740160] [debug] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2662): Service finished with

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

On 16.02.2012 17:55, modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: original message is below--- Hello. I'm trying to setup Adobe's Flexbuilder 4.6 software to access mydomain.com/mywebapp using port 80 on Apache Webserver 2.2.21 and connect using mod_jk 1.2.32 on a re

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

ypos you found. Also, the initial part of the mod_jk.log below was critical to understanding the problem (I'll edit it to make it more obvious -- see THE CAPITAL LETTING inside the mod_jk snippet below). [root@host3 /etc]# tcpdump -v -n port http tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Ok, that's a lot more readable. See in-line. modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: (removing the irrelevant bits) ... http://mydomain.com:8080/mywebapp the Adobe Flashbuilder software states that a connection was successfully made to the server. However, if I enter the following instead: As Chri

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

as well, but since it is consistently everywhere, I assumed it was a formatting issue related to mod_jk. I'm not switching ports or changing protocols. I'm trying to keep everything simple. The address you pointed out is the IP address for host3.mydomain.com. As an experiment, I replaced

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Christopher Schultz wrote: ... The image was stripped by the list, so we can't see it. You'll have to post elsewhere if it's important. Also, though I could see your customized font colors, many readers will not be able to, and the archives may not show them either. Then there are red-green co

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Sorry, a bit more readable, still in-line. (my email program seems to do funny things with your text). modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Hello. I'm trying to setup Adobe's Flexbuilder 4.6 software to access mydomain.com/mywebapp using port 80 on Apache Webserver 2.2.21 and connect us

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To whom it may concern, On 2/16/12 10:59 AM, modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: > Hello. I'm trying to setup Adobe's Flexbuilder 4.6 software to > access mydomain.com/mywebapp using port 80 on Apache Webserver > 2.2.21 and connect using

Re: mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

See notes in-line. modjkl...@comcast.net wrote: Hello. I'm trying to setup Adobe's Flexbuilder 4.6 software to access mydomain.com/mywebapp using port 80 on Apache Webserver 2.2.21 and connect using mod_jk 1.2.32 on a remote Linux CentOS 6.2 server. I'm puzzled by the mod_jk.log f

mod_jk doesn't map to software-generated web address, but maps to this address when I enter it into browser

Hello. I'm trying to setup Adobe's Flexbuilder 4.6 software to access mydomain.com/mywebapp using port 80 on Apache Webserver 2.2.21 and connect using mod_jk 1.2.32 on a remote Linux CentOS 6.2 server. I'm puzzled by the mod_jk.log file, which I've included a snippet bel

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

Hi. Basically, many people here wouldn't know Glassfish, and would not know how in Glassfish one sets up a (if they are called that way in Glassfish) listening on port 8009 AND expecting AJP as a protocol. I know even less of Glassfish, but the kind of messages shown in the mod_jk log

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

t of thing. What does the log file tell us about the communication between Apache and GlassFish, and what does it not tell that we would need to know to pinpoint the problem, etc.? Yes, without Glassfish at least listening to 8009 you would have seen something different in the mod_jk logs, name

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

tions/359218/mod-jk-log-error-message-what-does-it-hint-might-be-the-issue to stackoverflow here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9220969/access-web-container-through-apache-webserver-port-80-using-mod-jk but didn't get much feedback. I submitted here because I was hoping someone w

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

> > asadmin> create-http-listener --listenerport 8009 --listeneraddress 0.0.0.0 > --defaultvs server jk-connector --port 4850 > So you're creating a listener called jk-connector (why do you add the -port 4850 btw? > > > asadmin> create-network-listener --protocol http-listener-1 --listenerp

RE: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

> From: modjkl...@comcast.net [mailto:modjkl...@comcast.net] > Subject: Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward > mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container > When I say GlassFish embeds Tomcat I just mean it's derived > from Tomcat (could be f

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

On 12 Feb 2012, at 00:03, "modjkl...@comcast.net" wrote: > Hi Pid, > > > 1. When I say GlassFish embeds Tomcat I just mean it's derived from Tomcat > (could be fork, etc.) > > > 2. I should have mentioned the configuration for GlassFish to talk to mod_j

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

Hi Pid, 1. When I say GlassFish embeds Tomcat I just mean it's derived from Tomcat (could be fork, etc.) 2. I should have mentioned the configuration for GlassFish to talk to mod_jk. I used the example in the admin's document (go here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18930_01/htm

Re: desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

On 11 Feb 2012, at 23:36, "modjkl...@comcast.net" wrote: I'm trying to get Apache2 Webserver talking to Glassfish3 using mod_jk on CentOS, where everything is a fresh install (new server), no load balancing, no clustering, and everything is all on one server (so no firewall bet

desperate for help to set up straightforward mod_jk connection between Apache2 webserver and web container

I'm trying to get Apache2 Webserver talking to Glassfish3 using mod_jk on CentOS, where everything is a fresh install (new server), no load balancing, no clustering, and everything is all on one server (so no firewall between Apache and Glassfish). I'm quite desperate to get this wo

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

12 19:36, Caldarale, Charles R skrev: >>>>> From: Casper Wandahl Schmidt [mailto:kalle.pri...@gmail.com] >>>>> Subject: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? I don't want the >>>>> app to become ROOT since I have another app that should be >>>>&

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Casper, On 2/10/12 2:20 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: > Well at least I don't have to restart tomcat for the changes to > take effect :) Maybe I would take some time to look at how tomcat > reads from server.xml and how the host-manager works and

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

Den 09-02-2012 22:02, Christopher Schultz skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Casper, On 2/9/12 1:43 PM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: Den 09-02-2012 19:36, Caldarale, Charles R skrev: From: Casper Wandahl Schmidt [mailto:kalle.pri...@gmail.com] Subject: mod_jk and URL

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Casper, On 2/9/12 1:43 PM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: > Den 09-02-2012 19:36, Caldarale, Charles R skrev: >>> From: Casper Wandahl Schmidt [mailto:kalle.pri...@gmail.com] >>> Subject: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? I don&

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

On 09/02/2012 20:18, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com] Subject: >> RE: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? > >> does one still have to modify the server.xml if we want new hosts >> to be there the next time we r

RE: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com] > Subject: RE: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? > does one still have to modify the server.xml if we want new hosts > to be there the next time we restart tomcat? A brief scan of the code indicates that you will have

RE: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

> -Original Message- > From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:36 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? > > > From: Casper Wandahl Schmidt [mailto:kalle.pri..

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

On 09.02.2012 19:07, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: Hi List I have a quick question (I hope). I'm using mod_jk to forward from Apache httpd 2.2.8 to tomcat 7.0.20 (Ubuntu 8.04). I think I saw something on this list some time ago but can't remember what it was really about (the real

Re: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

Den 09-02-2012 19:36, Caldarale, Charles R skrev: From: Casper Wandahl Schmidt [mailto:kalle.pri...@gmail.com] Subject: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? I don't want the app to become ROOT since I have another app that should be running as ROOT. And how is that one accessed? From wha

RE: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

> From: Casper Wandahl Schmidt [mailto:kalle.pri...@gmail.com] > Subject: mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying? > I don't want the app to become ROOT since I have another app > that should be running as ROOT. And how is that one accessed? From what you described it sounds like y

mod_jk and URL rewriting/proxying?

Hi List I have a quick question (I hope). I'm using mod_jk to forward from Apache httpd 2.2.8 to tomcat 7.0.20 (Ubuntu 8.04). I think I saw something on this list some time ago but can't remember what it was really about (the real issue was not want I want to do). So I want users

Re: Apache mod_jk proxy for Tomcat v6.0.29

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ruiyuan, On 1/20/12 1:25 PM, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote: > We have an Apache (v2.0.59) mod_jk on HPUX 11.23 and Tomcat > v6.0.29 (Java 6). When we tried to access the home page, it shows > the source code of the home page. Sounds like your Doc

Apache mod_jk proxy for Tomcat v6.0.29

Hi, all We have an Apache (v2.0.59) mod_jk on HPUX 11.23 and Tomcat v6.0.29 (Java 6). When we tried to access the home page, it shows the source code of the home page. On the same HPUX host, the same Apache server serves many virtual hosts that use mod_jk and the Tomcat 5.5.27 (Java 1.5) no

Re: static content not served for non-root apps via mod_jk

for this so that I don't have to create > static content aliases for each new Tomcat app I deploy? I would be > stuck using a unique alias for every app which seems crazy. > > Thanks, > Eric > > 2012/1/13 Eric P : >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having trouble ge

Re: static content not served for non-root apps via mod_jk

On 14.01.2012 04:17, Eric P wrote: Hi all, I'm having trouble getting Apache to serve static content (jpg, css, js, etc.) for Tomcat apps via mod_jk for any application except the ROOT Tomcat app. The ROOT app shows static content just fine. I have the following Apache settings attem

Re: static content not served for non-root apps via mod_jk

Eric P : Hi all, I'm having trouble getting Apache to serve static content (jpg, css, js, etc.) for Tomcat apps via mod_jk for any application except the ROOT Tomcat app. The ROOT app shows static content just fine. I have the following Apache settings attempting to point *all* requests

Odp.: static content not served for non-root apps via mod_jk

Have you measured that Tomcat is too slow for you to serve static content? If not - serve everything from Tomcat itself and enjoy simple configuration;-) -- Sent from my wireless G705 device - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsu

Re: static content not served for non-root apps via mod_jk

; Hi all, > > I'm having trouble getting Apache to serve static content (jpg, css, js, > etc.) for Tomcat apps via mod_jk for any > application except the ROOT Tomcat app.  The ROOT app shows static content > just fine. > > I have the following Apache settings attempting to

static content not served for non-root apps via mod_jk

Hi all, I'm having trouble getting Apache to serve static content (jpg, css, js, etc.) for Tomcat apps via mod_jk for any application except the ROOT Tomcat app. The ROOT app shows static content just fine. I have the following Apache settings attempting to point *all* requests to Tomca

Re: RE : mod_jk linux binaries

Apologies if you already know this, or if it is not relevant to your particular case. Many Linux distributions (*) already provide pre-packaged binaries for Apache httpd, Tomcat and mod_jk. There is a lot of debate always about whether one should use these pre-packaged versions, or download

RE : mod_jk linux binaries

ok Thank you very much for your answer De : Christopher Schultz [ch...@christopherschultz.net] Date d'envoi : vendredi 6 janvier 2012 22:09 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: mod_jk linux binaries -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Olivier

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >