On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jörn Zaefferer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, then I add: Annotations for form validation. Maybe integrated
> with the bean validation JSR, Hibernate Validation or standalone.
> Enabled by adding AnnotationValidator instance to a form or indivdual
> fields...
>
> It's kind of an established standard that by default,
> outputMarkupId is false, so in 1.3 or 1.4 I don't see it
> could be changed. Later on, if the change is made, maybe it
> would be better to change the default for all Components and
> not just FeedbackPanel.
>
+1 from me. I don't see any
Doh!
Forgot to post the url for info on the project. :)
http://jroller.com/wireframe/entry/hibernateannotationcomponentconfigurator
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations, this looks like a nice addition so far.
>
> I
Congratulations, this looks like a nice addition so far.
I would recommend checking out a wicket annotation project that has been
around for a little while. It dynamically picks up Hibernate annotations
*directly* from your model objects instead of annotating your pages. these
annotations are mu
>
>
> Etc. There's a ton more questions to ask, but I'm sure you'll figure
> that out in the context of your project :-) One of the most important
> decisions you'll make is what parts of your application (maybe even
> everything) you'll set up to be stateless and bookmarkable. Keep in
> mind that
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> We are having the potential fun of running a site with around 1 million
> users, and a lot more over time. What could be great optimizing points?
>
> We have looked at these things
>
>
Okay, I've attached a patch that adds the maxlength html attribute.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do any of the core validators actually implement t
Do any of the core validators actually implement this interface?
I have an issue filed in JIRA for the StringValidator.maximumLength()
validator to append the maxlength HTML attribute to form components.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1310
This seems like a perfect place to implement
That's odd. I run all of my examples in FF2 and have never seen that issue.
On 6/26/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I can't figure out why, but I am getting these in my scriptaculous pages
> (using ff2, safari3 does not complain):
>
> unterminated string li
On 6/26/08, Martin Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sven Meier wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm investigation the issue:
>> It seems that Google's css is being screwed up in FF3. When I let Wicket
>> strip all wicket tags *or* assign pixel width (instead of 100%) to the
>> element holding the map, ever
ting up in too
> many projects... But it's fine with me, so we should just move all the stuff
> from the fx package away from your project right? Since the other stuff(only
> the queue part though) I do need to be present or i'll have to build a new
> project to depend on.
>
>
>
>
>> It's a combination of effects(the example effects from scriptaculous),
> something that fades in shakes and for example squishes.. Did you see the
> example?
I still think this would best be served in a separate project.
need to
> add an option to set queue on effects... However I also added the parallel
> effect, but we could remove it since i do not use it.
>
> You can see in the scriptacoulus how the toaster works...
>
>
> Ryan Sonnek wrote:
>
>> Okay Nino, I've created a new
}
new Effect.multiple(effects).toJavascript();
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take a swing at it and try to check something workable in asap.
>
>
> On 6/6/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> w
the component. It would be much more
> flexible if it could be changed. And would allow the user to control which
> effects were used..
>
> So what do you say? I could make the change:) API should be okay, and we
> could deprecate the old constructor..
>
> Ryan Sonnek wrote:
>
Not sure what this 'toaster' is, but i really like the multiple effect! is
it available in 1.8 or is this in scriptaculous 2.0?
We have a scriptaculous header contributor using the
ScriptaculousAjaxBehavior.newJavascriptBindingBehavior(). do you need
something different?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at
>
> 1) Generifying* Wicket
> [x] Should be avoided, I prefer the way 1.3 works. Because... (fill
> in your opinion here).
>
After seeing the impact that generics had on the codebase, I'm begining to
feel that it's not worth the effort. Trying to *JUST* generify models seems
like a half baked sol
As I posted on my blog, you have complete access to the ROME SyndEntry which
should contain all the information from the RSS feed you're consuming. you
should have no issues inspecting the feed for the data you want. If you're
unable to extract the information, you'll need to talk with the ROME
d
the only reason to break annotations out into separate distributions is if
new dependencies are introduced with a subset of annotations.
if a new annotation comes along that requires hibernate jars to be on the
classpath, that definitely should be it's own project. otherwise, it makes
sense to lu
nice work!
i really like how you don't have to touch the web application class every
time add a new page!
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Luca Marrocco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/5/6 Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I am pleased to announce the 1.0 release of wicketstuff-annotat
upContainer and move the mouse. I think I wait until you did the thin.
>
> Stefan.
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 28. April 2008 14:55
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Wicket 1.4 and Wicketstuff/
I'd suggest that you prove out that your concept is "better" than the
current solution by building out a competing solution and contributing it as
an opensource project to let the community decide which solution is the best
fit for them.
i'm all for a little competing innovation! =)
On Tue, Apr
rceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-scriptaculous
>
> As for when it will be available for wicket 1.4?, i have no idea since
> i have nothing to do with that project.
> Perhaps Ryan Sonnek can answer that.
>
> Maurice
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Stefan L
edds it, please let me
> know!
>
> Stefan Lindner
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 25. April 2008 15:50
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Wicket 1.4 and Wicketstuff/Dojo/DragAndDrop
> Wi
the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project has drag/drop support. I haven't
updated it to reflect 1.4 changes yet.
are 1.4 snapshots available for wicket yet on the bamboo snapshot
repository?
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, before I lay ma hands on i
y time I
> have to use the Resource API I want to put my head through a brick wall.
> That is definitely an area that could use some simplification & refinement
> in a future release.
>
> Thanks,
> Zach
>
>
>
>
>
> Ryan Sonnek-2 wrote:
> >
> > see r
see responses inline:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Zach Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to have URLs for this feed something like this:
>
> http://site.com/feed/1234
>
>
This should be possible by mounting the feed resource with a "nice" url from
within your WebApplication class
the scriptaculous autocomplete component does work on all known versions of
IE and firefox (and safari too).
it's a very simple API to use. here's an example of how to use it in your
app.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+AutoCompleteBehavior
On Mon, Apr 21, 200
Glad you liked it...That's actually my blog. =)
you may want to check out the updated version of the autocomplete wicket
components...
http://jroller.com/wireframe/entry/from_components_to_behaviors
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, ak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Ryan and Gerolf.
the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project adds an attribute "autocomplete='off'"
to prevent browsers from adding their specific autocomplete suggestions.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:10 PM, ak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have implemented wicket AutoCompleteBehavior on TextField. All seem
have you looked at the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project? there's an
autocomplete text field that should be what you need.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Ryan Gravener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Set the model object in getTextValue(java.lang.Object object)
>
> but in your renderChoice(*) do
hmmmthey worked the last time I checked.
I'll try to take a look, but if you see anything that's obviously
incorrect, let me know.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I try to run mvn jetty:run I get this error:
>
> 2008-04-
very nice article. well balanced and thoughtful.
The more I see the two compared I can't help but think, "People are
*insane* if they choose tapestry over wicket."
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM, cwilkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/os-tapes
I haven't checked out the code yet, but the demo available at
indyphone is *really* impressive. Nice work! This could be a *very*
useful component.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everbody,
>
> I finally had the time to finish a first beta relea
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> works fine for me, only problem are that something cant handle if you
> have æ ø å in your domain... You then have to use the alternate domain
> qualifiyer
That sounds like a ROME specific issue?
-
I just published a new wicketstuff-rome component that will allow
users to consume rss feeds in wicket. This is something that I've
been meaning to do for a *long* time, and finally got around to it.
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/consume_rss_feeds_within_wicket
I've seen a few posts on t
url?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've created a linkedin group for wicket, please feel free to join.. And
> I hope it's okay that I created it..
>
> regards Nino
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
>
There's also a drag/drop reordering of lists available using the
scriptaculous library:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+SortableListView
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shelli D. Orton schrieb:
>
> hi shelli
> > I'm wo
> We're currently working on it. We use wicketstuff-scriptaculous, and
> so far it seems to work, but some things are still missing.
Please let me know if you run into anything that's "missing".
Anything that's supported by the core scriptaculous library should be
possible in the wicket library
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-jamon/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/jamon/
I was browsing the sources for wicketstuff-jamon and I was wondering
how to actually "hook it up" into my app? How do you use the custom
web request cycle instead of the d
done!
patch has been applied. bamboo should publish a new snapshot jar any
minute now.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, thanks for the patch.
>
> The only reason it wasn't added is that no-one had requested it. =)
> i&#
Hey, thanks for the patch.
The only reason it wasn't added is that no-one had requested it. =)
i'll be happy to apply the patch and push out a new release ASAP.
Thanks again!
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Kappler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, sorry if this is th
Yep. Just what Igor said. I've successfully been using open id with
my wicket app for quite a while.
Once the RequestUtils method was added, it became really simple.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mount a bookmarkable page. get a url for it via urlf
I agree. There's already a JIRA filed for this enhancement. Please
vote for this issue if you want to see it fixed! hopefully it'll make
it into 1.4?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1310
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and thats why it
FYI:
you might want to check out the wicketstuff-scriptaculous auto
complete component instead.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+AutoCompleteBehavior
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:38 AM, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that does suck! why would wicket use a dif
t the previous post
>
>
> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> > Yes it was a reader/consumer I was looking for..
> >
> > I'll just roll my own then..
> >
> >
> > regards Nino
> >
> > Ryan Sonnek wrote:
> >> Ar
Are you looking for how to *publish* RSS feeds, or consume them?
the wicketstuff-rome project helps with publishing RSS feeds from
within your application.
If you're looking to consume rss feeds, ROME makes it pretty trivial
to do. Not sure how much value there is for a generic "display RSS"
fee
I think this looks really great. I'm pretty sure the current wicket
builder project has been abandoned, so this would be a welcome
replacement.
I've been dying to dive into grails now that it supports a *real* view
layer! =)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:59 AM, graemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
there's a wicket project that integrates the scriptaculous sortable
object which might be what you're looking for:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Script.aculo.us+SortableListView
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jeredm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking for an easy w
There's also an autocomplete textfield that uses the scriptaculous
javascript library. a fancy demo of it can be found here:
http://demo.script.aculo.us/ajax/autocompleter_customized
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The feature is called autocomplete te
Is this for real? =)
Wow! This really makes my day. I'll have to check this out.
Having Groovy take care of "hot reloading" Pages seems like a *MUCH*
better solution than what we have today (spotty reloading of java
classes through the JVM).
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:49 AM, graemer <[EMAIL PRO
+1 for complete removal... sf.net will always serve up the binaries,
but no need leaving the rest of the entrails lying around.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can we remove the old website?
> or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases?
>
> Gerolf
>
related to the
> wicketstuff project? Or should I just appy for commit access as
> described on: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWEB/Home.
>
> Cheers, Lars
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'v
I've been looking at doing something similar to this in my
application. any thoughts on contributing this to a new wicketstuff
project?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure if I follow you here. What do you mean by testing two
> > pag
Yep. If your using the effects directly without any of the Ajax
components, you need to manually add the scriptaculous javascript
files to your page.
add this code to your page and you should be good to go:
add(ScriptaculousAjaxBehavior.newJavascriptBinding());
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:56 AM,
erarchy to some degree:
> loadableinjectablemodel, abstractreadonlyinjectablemodel, blah blah
> blah injectablemodel
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2008 7:45 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just because it's trivial doesn't mean it's not useful. O
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> its a 3 liner, cant people roll their own?
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2008 6:57 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sounds like a good addition to me. could this be used for the guice
> > integration project as well?
&
sounds like a good addition to me. could this be used for the guice
integration project as well?
On Feb 19, 2008 3:49 AM, Bart Molenkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created an AbstractInjectableModel for this. It does dependency
> injection for models, the same way as in components.
>
> Would
you can mount the wicket rss feed as a "bookmarkable url" and use a
filter to ensure security.
Not sure if wicket has the concept of "securing application resources"
currently built in?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Murat Yücel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have started using the
ave an example running, i'll be happy to test on safari and
> ie6/7/ff ..
>
>
> Ryan Sonnek wrote:
> > No, i haven't yet. the problem for me is that I don't have an install
> > of IE6/7 to test this out on. I'd be happy to apply any patch that
>
No, i haven't yet. the problem for me is that I don't have an install
of IE6/7 to test this out on. I'd be happy to apply any patch that
someone has that has been tested against IE6 and IE7 though.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:54 AM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanx for the hints :)
Glancing through the javadocs, that JavascriptBuilder class looks
awefully familiar. i'm assuming you've seen the
wicketstuff-scriptaculous project? =)
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:02 -0700, Jeremy Fergason wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been trying to use the ExtJS forms from within wicket. It seemed tha
Alright Folks!
Anyone in the minneapolis/st.paul area that is a wicket user should
head over to a newly created google group to start lining up
dates/times to get together. Food, presentations, and good times will
be had by all.
http://groups.google.com/group/wicket-user-group-twincities
feel fr
On Feb 1, 2008 3:26 AM, Lan Boon Ping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My colleague (Edward Yakop) found out the cause root and have a
> solution for it. The reason why this is only occured in IE is because
> wicket-ajax.js uses Element.removeChild and Element.addChild to
> replace component during aja
I know where you're coming from Zach. I went through something
similar when creating RSS/Atom feeds with Wicket.
You may want to look into the wicketstuff-rome project to see details
on how I integrated these features into Wicket. It ended up being
pretty clean using the Wicket Resource API's, a
That's quite a shocker to me. if it works in the scriptaculous demo,
i don't see why it wouldn't work in wicket.
On Jan 29, 2008 9:29 PM, Lan Boon Ping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Say if you have trouble with it. I'll look into it then, two pair of
> > eyes are better than one:)
> >
> > Hey th
If your service (http, webservice, whatever) returns some kind of
business object, it'll be very easy to bind it to form values.
MyObject object = service.find();
add(new TextField("name", new PropertyModel(object, "name"));
make sense?
On Jan 28, 2008 5:32 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
f overhead both to my database and to the
> response time of the ajax - because optimally if the field is
> standalone only that one field would be validated...
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Jan 27, 2008 8:04 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > out of curiosity, would
On Jan 27, 2008 12:20 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but then my app wont work. i add my own ajax behavior that knows how
> to do all this... so i would have to override some method on the form
> and tell it not to do its default thing? let me quote someone
> "Yuk...I'd hate to go t
On Jan 27, 2008 12:15 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, create an IComponentInstantiationListener that looks for Forms and
> adds the behavior to them.
Yep. That's what I posted on my blog.
I'm just asking if there's any interest in making this the *default*
behavior. When peopl
On Jan 27, 2008 12:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also -1. it is trivial to do it yourself automatically like you said
> in your blog. there are plenty of usecases that wont work out of the
> box. take a common usecase where the label turns red if the field is
> in error, how do
On Jan 27, 2008 12:07 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, I guess you could create your own form superclass that does the
> default behavior you want.
Yuk...I'd hate to go through my *entire* application and replace
org.apache.wicket.Form with com.mysite.MySpecialForm. very messy.
On Jan 27, 2008 11:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost any government site/application must comply with accessibility rules
> which often prohibit the use of JavaScript.
section 508 compliance does *not* prohibit javascript or Ajax. You
just have to be careful how you use
nough companies and projects that can't use or aren't allowed
> to use JavaScript, which also precludes the default enabling of such
> functionality.
> Martijn
>
>
> On 1/27/08, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > out of curiosity, would
out of curiosity, would there be any interest in shipping Wicket with
Ajax form validation turned on *by default* instead of developers
manually adding the AjaxFormValidatingBehavior? Are there any
drawbacks to having this be the default behavior?
On Jan 27, 2008 9:00 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EM
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/wicket_client_side_validation
I've spent the past couple weeks investigating Wicket's support for
client side validation. IMO, using Ajax for validation in Wicket is
really amazing. Lots of folks are touting "javascript validation"
right now, but I think Wi
If you're using scriptaculous in your example, you might be interested
in using the wicketstuff-scriptaculous project. it would simplify
your custom component by:
* automatically adding the javascript for you
* using Java API to do effects instead of writing "String" javascript functions.
On Jan
Congrats, and wonderful work!
I really hope this project takes off and is adopted by the wicket community!
On Jan 14, 2008 6:57 AM, Dan Syrstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wicket Web Beans 1.0 (final) has been released. Wicket Web Beans (WWB) is an
> Apache Wicket component toolkit for displayi
On Jan 11, 2008 9:37 AM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not the code for finding the component that bothers me. as you
> > said, it's very easy. My problem is that now you have to muck with
> > the scriptaculous javascript callback to extract the component path
> > instead of ju
> > don't see this as a very strong usecase. Most usecases will have some
> > kind of placeholder text instructing the user to drop objects on it.
> > Does this work for you?
> I tried , and your example.
> Neither work for firefox 2.0 and 1.5 (I haven't test it on another browser).
> The only wa
On Jan 11, 2008 9:08 AM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 11:04 PM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't care if it can be optomized if it introduces more complexity.
> > How often are people drag/dropping objects on webpages
I don't care if it can be optomized if it introduces more complexity.
How often are people drag/dropping objects on webpages anyways? There
isn't a need to support 100,000 operations per second for this kind of
operation. Looping over components in a page is blazing fast unless
you have *thousand
On Jan 10, 2008 10:10 PM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 11:51 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if there are other improvements to be made, let me know!
>
> How about committing the [DraggableTargetBehavior] and its support for
On Jan 10, 2008 9:22 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edward,
> Thanks for the email. I'm currently working on revamping the drag
> drop API. if you have any code you'd like to contribute feel free to
> drop me an email. maybe we could hash out a great ne
i've reopened the issue.
It must only allow whoever filed the issue to reopen it...
On Jan 10, 2008 10:00 AM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > regarding the javascript issues, could you re-open this bug i filed in
> > > wicket?
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-987
Edward,
Thanks for the email. I'm currently working on revamping the drag
drop API. if you have any code you'd like to contribute feel free to
drop me an email. maybe we could hash out a great new api to simplify
it's use.
regarding the javascript issues, could you re-open this bug i filed in w
is there any way to locate a component in a page with only the markup id?
For scriptaculous integration, i have an ajax request with only the
markup id, and i'd like to find the matching wicket component.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
hmmm
this change doesn't really work when dealing with a SortableListView.
With the SortableListView, there's no "Component" for the
DraggableTarget to work with. It really only has the markupId. Maybe
another wicket dev has an idea for how to do this?
On Jan 7, 2008
gt;
> public class ApplePanel extends FruitPanel
> {
> public ApplePanel(AppleModel model)
> {
>super(model);
> }
> }
>
> Instead of using markupId, it is possible for the parameter to be a
> Component for DraggableTarget.onDrop?
>
> Thanks
It sure is still active. I recently upgraded to version 1.8.0 and
haven't heard of any issues.
http://www.jroller.com/wireframe/entry/scriptaculous_1_8_release
1.8.1 was just released, but i haven't had time to upgrade to it yet.
On Jan 7, 2008 5:17 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMA
excellent work! I've been anxiously waiting for this release. It's
been tough to live without this plugin since I've been working with
1.3 for so long.
On Jan 6, 2008 10:20 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for keep working on this!
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 PM, J
Wonderful work! I've been very interested to try this out in my wicket app!
On Dec 20, 2007 1:00 PM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow that looks pretty cool. I'm thinking about making a website that may be
> able to use that. I bookmarked the article
>
>
> -Original Message-
Whoo hoo!
Nice work. I hope that this is well accepted by the wicket community.
Yet another example of how easy it is to integrate some *excellent*
javascript libraries into wicket.
On Dec 18, 2007 6:47 PM, JulianS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've checked in wicketstuff-suckerfish and wicket
this would make a great contribution to the wicketstuff project!
On Dec 16, 2007 5:41 AM, tsuresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Tames,
> It worked when I upgraded from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 and showed no error.
> Would you please suggest me what change should I make in your code, so that
> I w
I use the sortable list view in my app. what issues are you having?
just an FYI, that the sortable list view uses scriptaculous, so if you
can get it to work with "basic" scriptaculous, it'll work with the
sortable list view. for some reason, the scriptaculous sortable
library works great with l
ing that
> headerresponse param.
>
> But maybe i dont see the complete picture here what you are
> describing. So how does XxxxResource.headerContribution() method look
> like? What params does it get? How does it get the right response
> object? (it has to be an implementation of (Aja
ethod?
>
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 29, 2007 12:15 PM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Understood. Just want to make it aware that the current pattern makes
> >> it impossible for other projects (wicketstuff) to add header
>
r the sake of future extension points.
On Nov 29, 2007 2:54 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 11:37 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't quite understand this...
> > "Instead of having to know a ton of classes,
I don't quite understand this...
"Instead of having to know a ton of classes, you just have to know this one."
I really struggled with wicket originally when trying to do these
header contributions. I was using the IDE and searching for
"Javascript*" or "CSS*" and nothing relevant came up. Inste
-1 for this.
I'm very much against the current "static util" pattern that the
HeaderContributor object is headed. I would much rather have this
behavior moved into the appropriate class (ex:
JavascriptResource.headerContribution()) instead of bloating
HeaderContributor. this is how i designed th
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
