Re: Who went to the GWT vs Wicket presentation in Normandy and wants to share their findings?

or projects like gwtrpc-spring or Gilead in the other). - Available widgets natively or by sub projects (Google vizualization, gears, Ext GWT... vs Wicket stuff, Wiquery ...) - CSS or How the design layer is handled comparison. - Browsers compatibility (generated code plus handmade

Who went to the GWT vs Wicket presentation in Normandy and wants to share their findings?

There's been quite some announcements going across twitter, but no conclusion... Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Who went to the GWT vs Wicket presentation in Normandy and wants to share their findings?

war treeview in eclipse) - Server integration with other technologies like (Spring, EJB, Hibernate etc. using wicket-stuff in one hand or projects like gwtrpc-spring or Gilead in the other). - Available widgets natively or by sub projects (Google vizualization, gears, Ext GWT... vs

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GWT-vs.-Wicket--tp22950178p23020555.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

I really like the idea behind GWT. And striving for a statically typed 'true' OO programming model is what GWT and Wicket have in common. I haven't build anything with GWT, so my opinions in this respect are what I infer from how I think GWT works. I expect GWT to scale more easily if you plan

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Casper, for the case when you can not enforce your users to have javascript, it's more worthwhile to compare Wicket to Tapestry5. I'm evaluating the latter right now. On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Casper Bang cas...@jbr.dk wrote: I was just wondering about the Wicket community's opinion of

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

I haven't found a easy way out. Appreciate any suggestions. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GWT-vs.-Wicket--tp22950178p22962926.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Peter Thomas did a great side by side you should checkout: http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/wicket-and-gwt-compared-with-code/ Craig. On 8-Apr-09, at 8:11 AM, Casper Bang wrote: I was just wondering about the Wicket community's opinion of GWT. It seems to share many of the positive

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Working with GWT is kind of a nightmare. You have to write custom build scripts for any library / module you use so that the sources are included in the jar and available to the GWT compiler. Until GWT has a build system that is better I'll stay away from it. Really a shame because the programming

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Hi, You may also take a look at ZK framework. It's also a kind of framework which can be used to build beautiful RIA's. You can chose to use it by writing your app in just Java or in Java/Zul. http://www.zkoss.org But in my opinion, Wicket stills beter then these kind of frameworks :) Regards,

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

I thought Matt Raible had some success with getting GWT to play nice with Maven: http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/modularizing_gwt_applications_with_gwt Personally I would choose GWT only when I want to keep server calls to a bare minimum. Ready made components and all may look enticing, but

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

P.S. people say my article is one sided but no-one can explain *why ;) - ok, ok this has been discussed to death in the comments there ... I should mention I love wicket (coming from JSF) but has only limited exposure to it while having no experience at all with GWT. However while reading, I

Re: Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Thank you for your mail. I am presently on vacation and will return April 14th. If you need urgent assistance, please email supp...@bookingbooster.com. You can also reach our Support via Skype callto://premiersupport Thank you Best regards, Nick Wheeler Booking Booster.com t: +44 (0)1273

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Getting to to do something specific is not usually my problem with GWT (its component model feels just like Wickets does)... the biggest problem I have is having less control over the html, which makes things a bit harder to deal with (Googles ui style now is partly the result of how you

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Zk ia good for buildng qpplication bt the zul wndow layout is just like that. And the license os stopping us from buildng commercial apps wthout buying their licnse.it worth th money but if u live in an economically poor country,you can't afford it. I wish wicket can play nicely with

Re: Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

Thank you for your mail. I am presently on vacation and will return April 14th. If you need urgent assistance, please email supp...@bookingbooster.com. You can also reach our Support via Skype callto://premiersupport Thank you Best regards, Nick Wheeler Booking Booster.com t: +44 (0)1273

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

There was a grails-wicket plugin but I don't think it works with any recent version. They are also working on making grails more modular with standalone GORM etc... Also heard somewhere that Groovy 1.7 or 1.8 will allow anonymous inner classes. On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Andre Prasetya

Re: GWT vs. Wicket?

of pain to do a little bit more advanced things in wicket for beginners and there are many user requests in user email list. I never had so much trouble in my gwt project. Maybe I haven't found a easy way out. Appreciate any suggestions. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GWT-vs