:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341004.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
Also noticed in prior messages with similar topic that someone suggested
using Void (FormVoid). Never knew there was a Void keyword (capital V).
Is this a recommended technique for Form (ie. FormVoid)?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Mike Dee mdichiapp...@cardeatech.com wrote:
I'd like to try and understand this. What could T possibly be?
It would be whatever your form is editing.
But isn't TextField implying text (or a string). Would TextFieldInteger
make sense (haven't tried it yet)?
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mike Dee mdichiapp...@cardeatech.com wrote:
Also noticed in prior messages with similar topic that someone suggested
using Void (FormVoid). Never knew there was a Void keyword (capital V).
Is this a recommended technique for Form (ie. FormVoid)?
It's
Makes sense. What is the recommended practice when a form is not tied to a
class that encapsulates the model? For example, picture a login screen that
simply capture username and password strings.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about
? For example, picture a login screen that
simply capture username and password strings.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341026.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Great, didn't know there was a built in LoginForm.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341060.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Mike Dee mdichiapp...@cardeatech.com wrote:
In my experience, there are lots of other situations too. For example, we
have lots of forms for doing searches. The form gathers the search
criteria. Maybe it would make sense to have a SearchFormCriteria class,
i have written plenty forms and about 99% of them have FormVoid.
models on the form are just not that useful, its the fields that
care.
-igor
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:45 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mike Dee mdichiapp...@cardeatech.com
just offering the other side of the coin...i didnt say we were going
to yank the generics from the Form, chill :)
-igor
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
i have
be the model? How are others doing this?
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341288.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Question about Wicket and generics
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i have written plenty forms and about 99% of them have FormVoid.
models on the form are just not that useful, its the fields that
care.
That doesn't mean that's
this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Wicket-and-generics-tp2341004p2341500.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
to embed Labels like I do?
b) How can I make sure the embedded span will not be replaced by xxx?
Thanks !!!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-embedded-labels-tp2307332p2307332.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Labels like I do?
b) How can I make sure the embedded span will not be replaced by xxx?
Thanks !!!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-embedded-labels-tp2307332p2307332.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
be an IModel. This interface is
implemented by many classes.
Which one should I use?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-embedded-labels-tp2307332p2307380.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-embedded-labels-tp2307332p2307380.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
that it should be an IModel. This interface is
implemented by many classes.
Which one should I use?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-embedded-labels-tp2307332p2307380.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
compile because the the-class-name parameter cannot be a
string.
I checked the doc and saw that it should be an IModel. This interface is
implemented by many classes.
Which one should I use?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-embedded
Ok, it compiles. Thanks.
Just one last question about the usage of WebMarkupContainer, because this
is new to me.
If I create a WebMarkupContainer, will it automatically 'attach' itself to
the provided html tag using the provided wicket id no matter the type of the
HTML tag? Can I use
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:13 PM, jverstry jvers...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, it compiles. Thanks.
Just one last question about the usage of WebMarkupContainer, because this
is new to me.
If I create a WebMarkupContainer, will it automatically 'attach' itself to
the provided html tag using
Hot spot is gone.
-Danny
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/question-about-adding-synchronized-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp1878901p2274801.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Optimization helped!
Thank you for fixing it.
Kind regards,
Danny
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/question-about-adding-synchronized-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp1878901p2272701.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
did it reduce it or is the hotspot completely gone?
-igor
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:38 AM, dannyboy danny.bolla...@gmail.com wrote:
Optimization helped!
Thank you for fixing it.
Kind regards,
Danny
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/question
-_YourKit_Java_Profiler_9.0.5.png
Kind Regards,
Danny
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/question-about-adding-synchronized-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp1878901p2272250.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n2272250/Screenshot-Bootstrap-2010-06-29-1.snapshot_%5B-home-dbollaer-Snapshots%5D_-_YourKit_Java_Profiler_9.0.5.png
Kind Regards,
Danny
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/question-about-adding-synchronized-on-mountsOnPath
I was a little confused about page layouts and markup inheritance. I
was thinking that a I could take a piece of HTML markup and reuse that
component when I need to, and use it multiple times within page without
ever having to create the content.
I was not able to do this. What I have now,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:
I was a little confused about page layouts and markup inheritance. I
was thinking that a I could take a piece of HTML markup and reuse that
component when I need to, and use it multiple times within
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:26 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc: Berlin Brown
Subject: Re: Question about markup inheritance and page layouts
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS
Where did you place the wicket:panel tags in your markup?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
They are in the SomePage:
SomePage.html:
wicket:extend
div
div wicket:id=myPanel/div
div wicket:id=myPanel1/div
/div
/wicket:extend
No, the wicket:panel tags
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:34 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc: Berlin Brown
Subject: Re: Question about markup inheritance and page layouts
Where did you place the wicket:panel tags in your markup
I believe that passing the page where user click Add as parameter to the
wizard is an simple solution to has an reference to set on the cancel
response.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Swanthe Lindgren
swanthe.lindg...@megasol.se wrote:
Hello all.
I our application we have a lot of search and
see ContextImage, create your own version that is style-aware.
alternatively you can create tag handlers just like wicket:link that
will add your own version of ContextImage for you.
-igor
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
I am
Hi!
I am trying to brand my app with session.setStyle. My question is
about static images in src/webapp/*
I have been using them like img src=/images/logo.png/
Do I have to switch them into img src=/images/logo.png
wicket:id=image-tag/ and attach a corresponding Image component?
Seems like a
I'm a new Wicket using trying to figure out how to populate a form's
initial value with data from a bean (that is in the session already).
I've actually got it working, but I don't think I'm doing the best way.
public final class EmployeeMain extends BasePage {
public EmployeeMain() {
If you're using a CPM there's no need to explicitly set models for child
components. Also think about what you want to happen on page reload.
Generally I'd imagine you want current data, so set CPM's object on
Page.onBeforeRender():
public class EmployeeMain extends BasePage{
final private
Why not use a LoadableDetachableModel instead of setting on onBeforeRender()?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Nikita Tovstoles
nikita.tovsto...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're using a CPM there's no need to explicitly set models for child
components. Also think about what you want to happen on
Yeah, guess you could do that too, but then you'd have to wrap one model
into another (since LDM does not do property matching like CPM) + you've to
extend LDM.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:24 AM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
Why not use a LoadableDetachableModel instead of
That's one of the key concepts of Wicket models.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Nikita Tovstoles
nikita.tovsto...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, guess you could do that too, but then you'd have to wrap one model
into another (since LDM does not do property matching like CPM) + you've to
extend LDM.
Subject: Re: A question about using Spring in Wicket 1.4
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 9:09 AM
yes
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:56 AM, David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Yesterday I was looking at the page Migrating to
Wicket 1.4
http
Yesterday I was looking at the page Migrating to Wicket 1.4
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrating-to-wicket-14.html
Regarding SpringWebApplication, it says:
SpringWebApplication has been deprecated in favor of SpringBean annotation. See
SpringWebApplication javadoc for how to setup
yes
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:56 AM, David Chang david_q_zh...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yesterday I was looking at the page Migrating to Wicket 1.4
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrating-to-wicket-14.html
Regarding SpringWebApplication, it says:
SpringWebApplication has been deprecated in favor
generates
compiler error.
Regards.
--- On Thu, 3/11/10, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: A question about using Spring in Wicket 1.4
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 9:09 AM
yes
On Thu, Mar
: James Carmanjcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject: Re: A question about using Spring in Wicket 1.4
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 9:09 AM
yes
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:56 AM, David Changdavid_q_zh...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Yesterday I was looking at the page Migrating
Hi,
I am still new to Wicket and I think I might be missing something. I
am trying to create a list of items and then have a panel generate a
ListView which contains the previously created list (and all their children
and children's children..etc). In order to do this I created a class for
Don't generate lists in your constructor / init methods and set them on the
list. This is one of the most common pitfalls that newcomers to Wicket fall
in to. Instead, create a LoadableDetachableModel, ala:
new ListView(list, new LoadableDetachableModelListPerson() {
public ListPerson load()
Hello,
I am pretty well new to wicket and I am running into a problem I was
wondering if anyone knew how to solve. I have a class which extends the
WebApplication class. I have a static get method which is outlined below
public static MyApp get(){
return
On 02/25/10 17:47, Eric Reagan wrote:
Hello,
I am pretty well new to wicket and I am running into a problem I was
wondering if anyone knew how to solve. I have a class which extends the
WebApplication class. I have a static get method which is outlined below
public static
button was pressed, the page was
deserialized
and the transient object (testString) be null. But that don't happend.
Can anyone tell me why?.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-transient-and-serialization-tp18641031p18641031.html
Sent from
.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree
: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite
fragile - I had a look at the code that does the checks. I could
'assume
looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I
been working with
swam for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite fragile
- I had a look at the code that does the checks. I could 'assume' that an
anonymous class needs the same rights as the 'normal' class. so
-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite
fragile - I had a look at the code that does the checks. I could
Hi Sam,
I have added a sample to the secureform sample where the home page creates an
anonymous class of the MySecurePage
An anonymous page has a kind of a class name. Look for a
ERROR - RequestCycle - Not authorized to instantiate class
I know I can do that, but there's no way do do it by inheritance? I have
hundreds of anonymous subclasses throughout my application. Seems
sensible that subclasses should inherit their parent's permissions.
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 10:41 +0100, Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Sam,
I have added a sample
That's extremely fragile.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Sam,
I have added a sample to the secureform sample where the home page creates
an anonymous class of the MySecurePage
An anonymous page
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite fragile - I
had a look at the code that does the checks.
I could 'assume' that an anonymous class needs the same rights as the 'normal'
class. so when your CreateItemPage has the proper rights, an anonymous
at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite
looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree
Wow that was quick. Thanks a lot I really appreciate it
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:31:34
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam,
Found the way to solve
I hope this is the right list for wasp/swarm.
How do i manage permissions for an anonymous subclass?
I have a page called ItemPage. I can view ItemPage, but if I try to
redirect to an anonymous subclass of ItemPage, i get an access denied
error.
this works:
setResponsePage(new
I am reading the book: Wicket in Action.
The first sentence of second paragraph of page 273 reads:
-
In the UserPanel, we created a model that extends LoadableDetachableModel for
representing the current user (if any).
-
In this chapter (Chapter 11 Securiing your application), I am
Hi all,
I'm relatively new to Wicket, and I have a small question. I have a
dynamic form in Javascript, which can have an unlimited set of input
fields. For example, I can have a form to manage persons, and the user
can enter multiple addresses, which are currently handled by a jQuery
My question is: is this also possible with Wicket? I don't want to use Ajax
forms, I'd rather do everything in the DOM of the browser and then submit it
yes, you can work on your form dom, adding form components with known names,
and dial with then on your onSubmit method like:
I have been going through the Wicket in Action book, but using the
1.4.2 release. I figured the changes where minimal enough I could get
through things. In the Cheese store example I have the following
code:
package org.miller.wicket.example;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
the key is in getCheeses...
It should be something like private IModelListCheese getCheeses()
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Andrig T. Miller andrig.t.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have been going through the Wicket in Action book, but using
I have in CheesrPage the following:
private ListCheese getCheeses() {
return CheeseApplication.get().getCheeses();
}
If I change that to:
private IModelListCheese getCheeses() {
return CheeseApplication.get().getCheeses();
}
I then just get the same warning here, and of course then I
Can you pastebin the entire java file?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Andrig T. Miller andrig.t.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have in CheesrPage the following:
private ListCheese getCheeses() {
return
Sure:
package org.miller.wicket.example;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.Link;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListItem;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListView;
import org.apache.wicket.model.IModel;
public class
Ah, yes - sorry I missed it. There are a couple of errors.
1 - change your Cheese cheese = (Cheese) line (see below)
2 - change getDefaultModel to getModel - the generic version of the method
public Index() {
add(new ListViewCheese(cheeses, getCheeses()) {
private
Ah, thanks, that did the trick.
The migration guide says to use getDefaultModel instead of getModel,
but I guess that's not true all the time.
Andy
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Ah, yes - sorry I missed it. There are a couple of errors.
1
getDefaultModel still requires a cast - that was the direct migration.
getModel was then added back in to genericized components. So, where you
want to use generics, you must use the getModel variation.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Andrig
Okay, thanks. That's helpful.
I should be able to translate to 1.4 from what's in the book much more
easily now.
I really appreciate the help.
Andy
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
getDefaultModel still requires a cast - that was the direct
Hi!
If a form validator depends on a nested form's components, it will
assume they are valid because the nested form's components are
validated after the parent form?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-wicket-validation-tp25657602p25669362.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-wicket-validation-tp25657602p25669362.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Right - the session, etc, is available via a ThreadLocal. So, it's
not available in a new thread.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Ashika Umanga
Umagiliyaauma...@biggjapan.com wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I tried to call Page.info() inside the new
Greetings all,
Please refer to image at :
http://i26.tinypic.com/11qi6o7.jpg
I am going to invoke a webservice using Axis2 Client,asynchronically.To
getback the results, I am using a Callback handler in axis2.
Within my page, I am going to create the Callback object
(axisCallbackHandler in
I'm not 100% sure, but I'm pretty sure that it would depend on your
servlet container more than Wicket. The threads for handling requests
are spun up by the servlet container before Wicket is ever handed the
request. And typically these threads are pooled - so it wouldn't be
*destroyed*. But
Hi Jeremy,
I tried to call Page.info() inside the new thread created by
axis2client , then it gives the message :
EXCEPTION:you can only locate or create sessions in the context
of a request cycle
I guess,this means I must change the page data inside the same thread right?
Thanks in
well,
markup inheritance lets you create pages (or panels for that mater) with the
same layout.
Suppose you want to have two pages that both have (the same) header and a
footer.
Markup inheritance is a way of doing that (there are other options as well).
So what you do is, create a Base page.
In
Have you extended the Header page in the index page?
class HeaderPage extends Webpage{
}
class IndexPage extends HeaderPage{
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Beginner-question-about-wicket%3Aextend-tp24968417p24968623.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list
Thanks for your quick reply!
I now got it! I thought it was the other way round! foolish me! :-)
Really appreciate!
Oliver
Eyal Golan wrote:
well,
markup inheritance lets you create pages (or panels for that mater) with the
same layout.
Suppose you want to have two pages that both have (the
Hi,
well, wicket and JSP have not much in common beside the fact that they
both rely on Java...
a simple example for your needs would be this here:
http://wicket.apache.org/examplemarkupinheritance.html
Best,
Korbinian
Oliver-Sven Fritsch schrieb:
Hi everybody!
I'm really new to wicket
Hello everybody,
I am trying to use the FilterForm with TextFilter ChoiceFilter but
*without *FilterToolbar because I use DataView and FilterToolbar waiting
a DataTable.
I can't use a DataTable because I am not use a IColumn because my
columns are bizarres (see attach).
The problem is that
why dont you just roll your own components that do what you want. as
you have already observed filterform and *Filter components are made
to work together.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Dutrieux
Olivierolivier.dutri...@pasteur.fr wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am trying to use the
no its not really safe if the changes to locale resort the list.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Ian MacLartyian.macla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if someone could clarify when it is safe to use the index as
the value for IChoiceRenderer#getIdValue. The documentation says that
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Igor Vaynbergigor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
no its not really safe if the changes to locale resort the list.
Okay, thanks.
Ian.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-adding-%22synchronized%22-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp21970542p21970542.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
once by request cycle
processor, which in turns is shared by all requests (i read this at Wicket
In Action)
so synchornized the mountsOnPath can produce a big lock contention
problem
if we have many requests at the same time?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question
produce a big lock contention
problem
if we have many requests at the same time?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-adding-%22synchronized%22-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp21970542p21970542.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
Root of all evil! Root of all evil! ;-)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
And for 1.4+ we could make that map concurrent if that isnt already the
case
--
Thomas Mäder
Wicket Eclipse Consulting
www.devotek-it.ch
:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-adding-%22synchronized%22-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp21970542p21988196.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
if that isnt already the
case
--
Thomas Mäder
Wicket Eclipse Consulting
www.devotek-it.ch
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-adding-%22synchronized%22-on-mountsOnPath-at-WebRequestCodingStrategy-tp21970542p21988196.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
requests (i read this at Wicket
In Action)
so synchornized the mountsOnPath can produce a big lock contention problem
if we have many requests at the same time?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-adding-%22synchronized%22-on-mountsOnPath
OK, thanks for the info.
Jan
2008/11/5 Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the mechanism for looking up expressions is not extensible, because it
isnt meant to be extended. so you have to write your own model from
scratch using something like mvel/ognl to access the property. both of
those
2008/11/5 Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Jan Stette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. To explain a bit more why I'm asking: I have a table component
that's
configured using property expressions as to what's shown in each column.
The types of objects to be
the mechanism for looking up expressions is not extensible, because it
isnt meant to be extended. so you have to write your own model from
scratch using something like mvel/ognl to access the property. both of
those support method calls afaik.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Jan Stette
101 - 200 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
