detachment of these model objects was nor occuring.
Thanks for your help Sven.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Meier [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2018 6:25 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ListView
>
> Adding the outer one should be suff
model
persistence and not an issue with the best Java UI framework in the
world!
Regards,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Meier [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2018 5:42 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ListView
>
> Hi Chris,
>
: Sven Meier [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2018 5:42 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: ListView
Hi Chris,
I don't see a reason why your challenge shouldn't work.
What happens if you reload the page (F5) after adding via
Ajax? Do the missing cells show up?
Have fun
Sven
esday, 19 June 2018 5:42 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ListView
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I don't see a reason why your challenge shouldn't work.
>
> What happens if you reload the page (F5) after adding via
> Ajax? Do the missing cells show up?
>
> Have
Yes, the missing cells show up fine after an F5 page reload.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Meier [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2018 5:42 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ListView
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I don't see a reason w
...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, 25 May 2018 8:12 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: ListView
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:01 PM, JavaTraveler
wrote:
Quickstart ?
a mini application showing the problem
https://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4
this?
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, 25 May 2018 8:12 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ListView
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:01 PM, JavaTraveler
> wrote:
>
> > Quickstart ?
> >
>
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:01 PM, JavaTraveler
wrote:
> Quickstart ?
>
a mini application showing the problem
https://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-
> f1842947.html
>
>
Quickstart ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Could you share quickstart?
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Thu, May 24, 2018, 17:28 JavaTraveler wrote:
> Hello !
>
> So no sorry, it does not work.
> The solution of Maxim does nothing different.
> And the one from Sven makes a mistake since my
Hello !
So no sorry, it does not work.
The solution of Maxim does nothing different.
And the one from Sven makes a mistake since my ListView needs a list of
pieces, and pieceModel is just a Piece.
Any other solutions ?
--
Sent from:
Ok, so I managed to pass the piecesModel !
Thank you, it seems to be working :)
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
Hi,
pass a model with the pieces to the listView, this way it will always
renderContexrRelative an up-to-date list.
new ListView("pieceView", piecesModel)
Have fun
Sven
Am 23. Mai 2018 16:19:11 MESZ schrieb JavaTraveler :
>Hello,
>
>Does anyone know how to update a
You need to change your code a little:
1) pieceView.setOutputMarkupId(true); is not necessary
2) target.add(wmc); instead of target.add(wmc.add(pieceView));
should work as expected :)
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:19 PM, JavaTraveler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how
Hi James,
Some time ago I wrote this:
https://github.com/duesenklipper/wicket-appendablerepeater
It should work with forms. If not, let me know.
Best regards
Carl-Eric
On 27.03.2018 14:42, James Carman wrote:
It has been a while since I've used Wicket and man, I really forgot how
much I
Hi James,
Welcome back... Still remember you from old times in list :-)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:42 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> It has been a while since I've used Wicket and man, I really forgot how
> much I love this framework! It may be that I'm rusty, but I've
Hi James,
The best explanation for adding items via Ajax you could read at
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/repainting-only-newly-created-repeater-items-via-ajax/
Removing an item should be easier if the ListItems have id.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:42 PM, James Carman
Thank you, it's great!
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you'll have to add two MarkupContainers and style both :
>
>
>
> ...
> ...
>
>
> protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> WebMarkupContainer firstRow = new
Hi,
you'll have to add two MarkupContainers and style both :
...
...
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
WebMarkupContainer firstRow = new WebMarkupContainer("firstRow") {
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag) {
Thank you so much for you explanation.
I had to put the two inside the because I need to
repeat every two rows.
Do you have any hint on how to do it and still be able to change the color?
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:36 PM, ganea iulia
wrote:
> Thank you so much for
Thank you so much for you explanation.
I had to put the two inside the because I need to
repeat every two rows.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems your ListView is bound to the wicket:id="forEachItem"> tag, which cannot be styled.
>
>
Hi,
it seems your ListView is bound to the wicket:id="forEachItem"> tag, which cannot be styled.
Change your markup to:
Have fun
Sven
On 16.03.2017 09:58, ganea iulia wrote:
Hello,
I have a listview and I want to dinamically color some of the rows (items).
But it is not working,
Hi,
The problem is at:
You need the to be Wicket component.
is not rendered at Production mode.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:58 AM, ganea iulia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a listview and I
Hi,
yes, ListView and RefreshingView are quite similar.
ListView is a repeater implementation from Wicket's very early days: it
works on a list of objects - wrapped in a model of course, as you'd
expect it from a proper Wicket component.
RefreshingView doesn't care where the objects to
Hi,
sorry but I don't understand your problem.
You'll have to simplify your code, or it will be difficult to give you any
advice.
Creating a quickstart would be a good way to show what you want to achieve.
Regards
Sven
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
ListView uses its markup tag to render each of its items and is not
visible in the output by itself - thus it doesn't contribute anything to
the component tag.
Sven
On 03/10/2014 07:19 PM, Nick Pratt wrote:
Is there any reason why onComponentTag() wouldn't be invoked on a ListView:
Sven, I forgot.
code:
-
ListView listView = new ListView( users, users ) {
@Override
protected void populateItem( final ListItem item ) {
item.setDefaultModel(
First of all don't pull something out of a model and put it into another
model:
item.setDefaultModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(
item.getModelObject() ) );
Do this instead:
item.setDefaultModel(new CompoundPropertyModel( item.getModel() ) );
Perhaps this is the reason: the textfields
Thank you for quick response.
I tried what you suggested, no luck.
What I think is clicking remove link (SubmitLink), form memorizes input
data, then remove row.
--
View this message in context:
Sorry, I'm out of ideas. If you can create a quickstart, I'll debug the
problem.
Sven
On 06/28/2013 12:43 PM, always_rick wrote:
Thank you for quick response.
I tried what you suggested, no luck.
What I think is clicking remove link (SubmitLink), form memorizes input
data, then remove row.
ListPage.html
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4659905/ListPage.html
ListPage.java
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4659905/ListPage.java
User.java
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4659905/User.java
Hi Sven, it is odd. When I was building the
Hi Sven, I review my code and api. I misunderstood the
setDefaultFormProcessing( false ). Simply removing that method, then it
works. Now I am thinking of a way to skip validation, and process form
updating.
--
View this message in context:
You'll have to show us some code.
Sven
On 06/26/2013 08:33 AM, always_rick wrote:
Hi all,
I have a form of inputs (ListView).
I firstly tried the removeLink, it was working. Because it is a normal link,
it simply don't keep the other rows inputs. Obviously, it does not meet the
requirement.
ajax repainting will not work with wicket:container or
setrenderbodyonly(true) as in that case component tag is not rendered in
html.another way is repainting grand(er) parent which doesn't have
setrenderbodyonly(true) or wicket:container
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:22 PM, meduolis
Thank you so much, I would never have found that! Everything works perfectly
now
cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Listview-Checkbox-checked-by-default-and-disapearing-after-submit-tp4654605p4654610.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list
this.checkGroup = new CheckGroup(checkgroup, new
CompoundPropertyModel(this.someList));
...
this.listView = new ListViewString[](someList, new
CompoundPropertyModel(this.someList))
Do you really want the list to iterate over the checked items only?
I'd expect these components to use different
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Anders Sørensen aisz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an application which worked in Wicket 1.5.x, but something seems to
be broken, after updating to 6.1.1.
I have a table listing machines on the left side. When an item is clicked, I
update a table on the
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
So essentially I want to use Wicket 1.5 to display an item and its
associated quantity. The data structure I am using to back this is a
Map (new HashMap()) where Item is a POJ whose details are of no
consequence.
if the map is called something like
MapItem, Integer itemMap = new HashMapItem, Integer();
Hmm, so I would instantiate the ListView like so?
ListViewListlt;Map.Entrylt;Item, Integer lv = new
ListViewListlt;Map.Entrylt;Item, Integer(id, new
PropertyModelListlt;Map.Entrylt;Item, Integer(this,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
if the map is called something like
MapItem, Integer itemMap = new HashMapItem, Integer();
Hmm, so I would instantiate the ListView like so?
[...]
Is this what you are implying somewhat? Thanks for the
And I can force the model to update, via AJAX, or in other words, how I force
the list view to update after a user action?
onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
target.add(theListView) ??
}
or is it something I do with the model itself? Sorry, I have no experience
with LoadableDetachable,
You can call LDM#detach() after the modification, but since this particular
implementation is so light, I'd just use AbstractReadyOnlyModel instead. It
doesn't cache, so detach is not required.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
And I can force the model to
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:38:36 -0700
Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:
You can call LDM#detach() after the modification, but since this
particular implementation is so light, I'd just use
AbstractReadyOnlyModel instead. It doesn't cache, so detach is not
required.
Actually, getObject()
I assumed the action phase would dereference the ListItemModel (e.g. to
remove it from the map), hence dereference the LDM, and then require the
explicit detach() before rendering. Agreed that LDM is the way to go if
you're concerned about the ArrayList constructions.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at
Thank for you all for the response. I am trying to test that code but am
having a different separate issue at the moment. Your solutions however
worked exactly as intended. Thank you for all the help!
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:15:20 -0700
Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote:
I assumed the action phase would dereference the ListItemModel (e.g.
to remove it from the map), hence dereference the LDM, and then
require the explicit detach() before rendering. Agreed that LDM is
the way to go if
Use a LoadableDetachableModelListUser in the ListView Constructor.
Put all the load loading into the load method and see what happens.
Cheers
Per
Am 19.01.2012 07:49, schrieb x.yang:
Hello, Everyone,
I am trying to build a web app with Wicket, EJB3, and MySQL. My IDE is
Netbeans 6.9.1 and the
add(new ListViewAllocation(allocation,
allocationListModel) {
shouldn't this be item.add ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
For clarity, I would rename the ListItems:
protected void populateItem(final ListItemAsset assetItem) {
assetItem.add(new Label(...));
assetItem.add(new ListViewAllocation(...) {
protected void populateItem(ListItemAllocation allocationItem) {
allocationItem.add(new
Thank you so much!!! It worked Silly mistakes cost a lot!!! Thanks
again!!
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Peter Karich [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3550472-1465528180-240...@n4.nabble.com wrote:
add(new ListViewAllocation(allocation, allocationListModel) {
shouldn't this be item.add ?
Will do that now!! Got it worked!!!
Thanks a lot!!!
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:47 PM, scott.swank [via Apache Wicket]
ml-node+3550491-1122803921-240...@n4.nabble.com wrote:
For clarity, I would rename the ListItems:
protected void populateItem(final ListItemAsset assetItem) {
Sounds like you are calling setOutputMarkupId on a container.
So I googled your error message and founr WICKET-3237
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3237)
Bas
Op 30-3-2011 8:54, nino martinez wael schreef:
Listview gives mysterious log info what does it mean? This feels a bit
Ahh yes, I was diving a bit too deep in my ajax, to notice the html
side:) Nice that wicket is that way, I mean that you actually can
forget about js/html when doing ajax :)
2011/3/30 Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl:
Sounds like you are calling setOutputMarkupId on a container.
So I googled your error
You can set row hidden if you want, no problem:
ajaxRequestTarget.addComponent(listItem.setVisible(false));
**
Martin
2010/11/14 meduolis meduol...@gmail.com:
Hello, I want to do with listview some things, like after removing one item,
don't repaint other items. Or maby this component is
Re-render it before going to excel..
2010/8/31 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş alt...@gmail.com:
Hi all;
How can i disable Listview's column/s while post it to excel on the fly. I
mean i don't want to post all columns into excel.
Link linkExcel = new Link(linkExcel) {
private static final
Any code example ?
Thanks.
2010/8/31 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
Re-render it before going to excel..
2010/8/31 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş alt...@gmail.com:
Hi all;
How can i disable Listview's column/s while post it to excel on the fly.
I
mean i don't want to post
Any button will re-render the page. Just make your column in visible:
listview() {
onpopulate (item) {
item.add(column.setVisible(if-you-want-to-show-it-now));
}
}
form.add(listview);
button=new button() {
onsubmit() {
if-you-want-to-show-it-now = false;
}
}
form.add(button);
If you want to modify your data on a column-base, you should consider
using a DataTable instead of DataView/ListView.
So long,
Benedikt
Save Paper: Think Before You Print Beta Systems Email Disclaimer and Email
Impressum
Beta Systems email messages are confidential. They may also be
Hi!
Just change the mime type of the page to application/vnd.ms-excel.
**
Martin
2010/8/30 Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş alt...@gmail.com:
Hi all;
Is it possible to export a ListView to excel. Should i use always Datatable
?
Thanks.
Thanks;
I added table in to WebMarkupContainer and WebMarkupContainer in to
getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(
new ComponentRequestTarget(table));
It works.
2010/8/30 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
Hi!
Just change the mime type of the page to
hi, just add the form wicket id in property file.
e.g.
wicket:id=xxxForm
-wicket:id=valueListView
-wicket:id=value
xxxForm.valueListView.value.Required=please enter the value
Trevor Baker-2 wrote:
Hi,
I have a form that has an ListView (wicket:id=”valueListView”) of a bunch
of
Try with just value.Required
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Trevor Baker amoebawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a form that has an ListView (wicket:id=”valueListView”) of a bunch
of
required text fields (wicket:id=”value”).
In my WebApplication.properties, I have:
How are you managing transactions?
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:27 AM, pieter claassen
pieter.claas...@gmail.com wrote:
I find that when I delete objects from my ListView, my model object for the
ListView still contains a reference to the object. When the view tries to
render, the object is
No, my DAO's inherit from HibernateDaoSupport and I just go with the
defaults.
Regards,
Pieter
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:22 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
How are you managing transactions?
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:27 AM, pieter claassen
pieter.claas...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using a loadable detachable model or?
2010/6/25 pieter claassen pieter.claas...@gmail.com
I find that when I delete objects from my ListView, my model object for the
ListView still contains a reference to the object. When the view tries to
render, the object is already removed from
Yes, I reload the objects using my DAOs but, I have 2 MySQL databases on the
backend and so far have not been using @Transactional. This might be the
problem.
Now I just have to figure out to configure tx:annotation-driven
transaction-manager=txManager / for more than one transaction manager
These discussions might be of interest to you:
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-3955
http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?t=27754
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, pieter claassen
pieter.claas...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I reload the objects using my DAOs but, I have 2 MySQL
Looks like if you use Spring 3.x, you can do it. You have to use the
value of the @Transactional annotation to figure out which tx
manager to use.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:58 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
These discussions might be of interest to you:
Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
- item.add(removeLink(removeKeyword, item));
and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-dynamic-rows-always-remove-last-row-tp2260480p2261045.html
Try to use the RemoveLink that is available as inner class of ListView.
Regards,
Erik.
Op 18-06-10 18:29, jOki wrote:
Hi!!
Im trying to implement a dynamic Form, where you can add textfields and
remove as you want. The add button works fine, but the remove button always
remove the last
Just as a test, turn off the reuseItems property. See what happens.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:04 AM, jOki joa...@gmail.com wrote:
Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
- item.add(removeLink(removeKeyword, item));
and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
--
View
Also, is the item you're trying to remove a null in the list? Or, is it a
problem with equals/hashcode not being implemented correctly? I just fixed
a bug in ListView this week with the remove link and move up/down links. It
was relying on the equals of the model object of the item to find
Hi,
I tried with/without setReuseItems and the behaviour is the same.
I think you can be right with equals/hashcode not being implemented
correctly...
I tried another time with a ListString with different values and its
working...
I tried as well to implement these methods (equals/hashcode)
What kind of objects are they? For entities, I use a uuid for the primary
key and it's assigned when the object is created. That way you make
equals/hashcode based on the uuid so that everything stays consistent
On Jun 19, 2010 1:42 PM, jOki joa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried with/without
Igor, you are right. It is still not rendered when i do the
super.onComponentTag after the tag.put.
This is the markup for the listview. zoekresultaat is the id for the
listview.
When the page is rendered the first time it works fine, but not in Ajax
updates. In the debugger is see that on the
so its not rendered in markup? or its rendered in markup but you dont
see the effect? if latter its most likely a css issue, if former
create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue.
-igor
On 5/20/10, JeroenWolff jeroen.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor, you are right. It is still not rendered
thanks, it is not rendered in the html (view source in browser)
when i disable Javascript it works fine! I will put it in the quickstart and
report it in Jira
thanks
--
View this message in context:
maybe your javascript is overriding it
-igor
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:04 PM, JeroenWolff jeroen.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, it is not rendered in the html (view source in browser)
when i disable Javascript it works fine! I will put it in the quickstart and
report it in Jira
thanks
--
Now i've got it working with the quickstart and a simple ListView. Now i have
to find out the difference and why it is now working..,now working on
jetty...tomorrow i test it on Websphere...
Thanks!
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
private Contact selected = new Contact();
Ah - the beauty of creating a quickstart. It almost always makes us go back
and see what other weird combination of things is actually creating the
issue :)
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:18 PM, JeroenWolff jeroen.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
Now i've
Igor, thanks you've helped me a lot...but now i repaint the whole table and
on every onComponentTag i update the class if the item is selected or not. I
see in the debugger that onComponentTag and the tag.put(class, selected)
but it is not rendered.
What do i do wrong??
Thanks!!
This is my
try doing the tag.put(class, foo) BEFORE the super.onComponentTag -
which is where the tag is rendered
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:48 AM, JeroenWolff jeroen.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor, thanks you've helped me a lot...but now i repaint the
no, i dont think its rendered in the super called, only prepared for
rendering so his code should work just fine.
set a breakpoint and see if its being called. also what markup is the
listview attached to?
-igor
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Thanks Igor...
But i forgot to tell...my app is a single page app with only Ajax
replacements. Is it possible to click on a (Ajax) link in de
(Pageable)ListView and replace the ListView with a changed style on the
selected Item?
now in my Ajax onClick i have target.addChildren(listView,
repaint the item, eg add it to the target
-igor
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:30 PM, JeroenWolff jeroen.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Igor...
But i forgot to tell...my app is a single page app with only Ajax
replacements. Is it possible to click on a (Ajax) link in de
(Pageable)ListView and
add(new listview() {
item newitem(...) {
return new item(..) {
oncomponenttag(tag) {
super.oncomponenttag(tag);
if (getmodelobject().equals(selectedobject) {
tag.put(class, selected);
-igor
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:47 AM,
Hi Michael,
there's no requirement for components inside ListView to be stateless -
I wonder were you got that from.
You can have Links, Buttons or anything else in there so removing all on
detach is a recipe for disaster for the next incoming request.
Sven
Michael Gottschalk wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi Sven,
you wrote:
there's no requirement for components inside ListView to be stateless -
I wonder were you got that from.
I got that from the ListView class comment and from studying the code.
The comment says:
By default, setReuseItems is false, which has the effect that ListView
Hi Michael,
the only difference in my proposal is to call removeAll earlier:
not in onBeforeRender of the next request cycle, but in onDetach of
the current request cycle.
it makes a huge difference:
If you call removeAll in onDetach, the next request to a component
inside the ListView will
Hi Sven,
Am Freitag, 26. März 2010 schrieb Sven Meier:
the only difference in my proposal is to call removeAll earlier:
not in onBeforeRender of the next request cycle, but in onDetach of
the current request cycle.
it makes a huge difference:
If you call removeAll in onDetach, the next
On 03/02/10 11:55, marioosh.net wrote:
Sorry for my poor english ;)
I have ListView and model like below. I need tabs to reload sometimes,
so my model is dynamic and get tabs from database.
But i see that something is wrong. When i want to get Tab object by
getModelObject() in populateItem
Thomas Kappler-3 wrote:
On 03/02/10 11:55, marioosh.net wrote:
Sorry for my poor english ;)
I have ListView and model like below. I need tabs to reload sometimes,
so my model is dynamic and get tabs from database.
But i see that something is wrong. When i want to get Tab object by
Hi and many thanks Martin !
just setting the setReuseItems is enough ...
later,
Arnaud
2010/2/22 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
Yeah...try setReuseItems for your listView.
If you use ajax, you can use also AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerBehavior
Hi!
Yeah...try setReuseItems for your listView.
If you use ajax, you can use also AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerBehavior
http://old.nabble.com/New-behavior:-AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerBehavior-td26201382.html
**
Martin
2010/2/22 Arnaud Garcia arn...@imagemed-87.com:
Hi List,
If you
Hi!
Why do you need to count items? You can refer to different components
using their markupid.
**
Martin
2010/1/4 wic...@geofflancaster.com wic...@geofflancaster.com:
Due to Wicket handling things in a weird order, would anyone mind giving me
a hand in solving this issue?
When I create a
Very good point. Didn't think about that. Thanks, I've solved my problem!
Original Message:
-
From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:19:46 +0200
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: ListView Behavior
Hi!
Why do you need to count
ListView always popupates rows with new elements. That's why their
state is cleared. You have two options:
1. call listview.setReuseItems - this will keep the old rows
2. if you need something more fancy and want to repopulate the rows,
you will need to use a reusemanager that can copy the
Hi,
if you're using a Link, the browser won't send the edited values back to
your application.
Use a SubmitLink instead.
Sven
ayman elwany wrote:
Hi All ,
I'm new to Apache Wicket , I started working with it from 2 weeks and I'm
really enjoying it .but I have a little problem that I don't
Thanks Sven , it is working now , In the beginning it wasn't working at all
but after that I put the ListView and submitLink in a form and then worked.
Thanks again..
form wicket:id=ListForm
tr
tdstrongfont size=4Employer :/font/strong/td
/tr
tr wicket:id=employersList
tdinput type=text
Hi Martin , thanks for your answer ,I add it the setReuseItems(true); but no
effect , but the problem solved by changing the Link to submitLink and
putting the Listview and the link in a form so by clicking the link all the
fields in the form will be sent to the application.thanks to Sven for
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo