Sure, wicket-tree is still in its conception phase.
I'll tidy up the project structure soon.
Sven
On Sa, 2009-07-25 at 18:57 -0400, James Carman wrote:
So is the project a war (since it runs with jetty:run)? Wouldn't that make
it hard to use in other projects?
On Jul 25, 2009 6:18 PM,
Nested tree and tree table seems promicing.
What I missed in your example is single-selection mode, and sortable headers
with filters.
One of my the upcoming tasks is to build a selector component that knows
whether the object is hierarchical and puts inside a datatable with
navigator or
Why you don't extend ITreeProvider from IDataProvider? They looks compatible
for now. I can add IDataProvider to my implementation class and delegate
roots() to iterator(). From the other hand it is just extra method.
One thing to mention. There should be full row select option. You just
need to
I find the source code pretty clean and easy to understand. Especially if you
are familiar with DataTable component. For instance I see that it is easy to
use Ajax versions of Toolbars instead of static (however
DefaultAjaxFallbackTreeTable would be usefull)
Looking forward for the
Hi,
I've added single selection to the example. I'm not sure how sorting and
filtering applies to hierarchical data though.
API will be finalized after sufficient feedback from the Wicket
community - so keep on firing questions ;).
Sven
On So, 2009-07-26 at 01:51 -0700, Vladimir K wrote:
Just make IDataProvider in charge for sorting and filtering like DataTable
does.
Filtering in tree could be seen in Eclipse preferences for instance.
svenmeier wrote:
Hi,
I've added single selection to the example. I'm not sure how sorting and
filtering applies to hierarchical data
Hi,
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
Selection is not part of the tree components. There are just to many
different notions of selection:
- single/multiple selection
- subtree selection
-
svenmeier wrote:
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
I don't insist. But you do have IDataProvider wrapper over ITreeProvider in
TableTree.java :)
Selection is not part of the tree
Does TableTree support partial (ajax) updates?
-Matej
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Vladimir Kkoval...@gmail.com wrote:
svenmeier wrote:
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
I don't insist.
It does not. It is stated at the bottom of the home page
http://code.google.com/p/wicket-tree/
For ajax updates it should behave not worse than DataTable component.
Matej, I find the idea of re-using data provider, columns and cells
developed for DataTable very important.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
ITreeProvider and IDataProvider are not exactly compatible, I don't
think we gain anything by extending the former from the latter.
I don't insist. But you do have IDataProvider wrapper over ITreeProvider in
TableTree.java :)
Yes, indeed ;).
I din't find API to control expanded state of
Sven,
i added TableTree (why not TreeTable?) to my panel and added a button to
switch between tree and table representation.
The problem is that DataTable relies on the user that binds it to the
table tag at the time when your TableTree contains table within.
It is not a big deal just an
Since you update AbstractTree in ajax request I can't omit etra 'div' tag
that encloses table tag neither by using wicket:component nor by calling
setRenderBodyOnly(true).
Vladimir K wrote:
Sven,
i added TableTree (why not TreeTable?) to my panel and added a button to
switch between tree
Hi,
*Nested*Tree... *Table*Tree... I hope this makes sense ;).
I will align the markup for TableTree with the markup of DataTable,
thanks for the hint.
Sven
On So, 2009-07-26 at 16:29 -0700, Vladimir K wrote:
Sven,
i added TableTree (why not TreeTable?) to my panel and added a button to
Any live examples, would be nice?
**
Martin
2009/7/25 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net:
Hi all,
i would like to announce wicket-tree, a new project hosting a clean
slate development of tree components for Wicket.
The API has not been fully stabilized yet but you are invited to take a
first
I didn't found live examples neither, but after checking out ( svn
checkout http://wicket-tree.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
wicket-tree-read-only ) and building the project, there is a war file,
which you could deploy and see the examples.
// at the chekcedfoldercontent (nested tree) example if
Hi,
the project contains an example application:
mvn jetty:run
... should get you going.
The usual Jetty start class is contained too. So do a
mvn eclipse:eclipse
... and you're able to play with it in Eclipse.
Regards
Sven
On Sa, 2009-07-25 at 22:29 +0300, Martin Makundi wrote:
Any
Hi Peter,
// at the chekcedfoldercontent (nested tree) example if I check the
parent, then the kids won't be checked in, is this for purpose?
no purpose here, it's just an example and has nothing to do with the
tree code.
Is there any chance, that a tree would come, which nodes are links
Cool, that was exactly, what I was looking for.
Thanks.
Peter
2009-07-26 00:06 keltezéssel, Sven Meier írta:
Hi Peter,
// at the chekcedfoldercontent (nested tree) example if I check the
parent, then the kids won't be checked in, is this for purpose?
no purpose here, it's just an example
So is the project a war (since it runs with jetty:run)? Wouldn't that make
it hard to use in other projects?
On Jul 25, 2009 6:18 PM, Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu wrote:
Cool, that was exactly, what I was looking for.
Thanks.
Peter
2009-07-26 00:06 keltezéssel, Sven Meier írta:
Hi
20 matches
Mail list logo
