RE: Wicket Feedback panels and Hibernate Validation

No luck with this. I tried checking message.getReporter() and it's always the form instead of the field. Keith Wooldridge -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:24 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: W

Re: Wicket Feedback panels and Hibernate Validation

Hi, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Wooldridge, Keith A wrote: > I'm trying to create a custom hibernate validator , based on bradhouse's > solution in this StackOverflow > thread. >  I'm pass

Wicket Feedback panels and Hibernate Validation

I'm trying to create a custom hibernate validator , based on bradhouse's solution in this StackOverflow thread. I'm passing in the field name that I would like the error message to be associated

Re: Wicket feedback

Hi! One more benefit for MashupWebPage is that you can use it for creating tests: public void testSomeFieldComponent() { Page page = new MashupWebPage(); Form form; page.add(form = new MashUpForm(GID)); FormComponent customField; form.add(customField = new CustomFieldToBeTested(GID

Re: Wicket feedback

Hi! > Could you help me with some examples? In what way? Normally you have a panel like this: class Panel { add(new Button("button")); } You cannot change the panel content flexibly at runtime. Now if you have a MashupContainer you can do: mashupContainer.add(new Button()); mashupContai

Re: Wicket feedback

Hi Johan, Thanks for joining the discussion. I think it makes sense for swing have different components for TextField and TextArea, because the component look and feel is defined in java, even position and size. So if it looks different for the end user, it should be handled by swing in a diffe

Re: Wicket feedback

Sorry, when I wrote Scala and Grails I meant Scala and Groovy. Em 28/12/2009 18:43, Ricardo Mayerhofer escreveu: Hi Igor, Em 23/12/2009 20:28, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: Good discussion. Em 23/12/2009 15:32, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:

Re: Wicket feedback

Hi Igor, Em 23/12/2009 20:28, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: Good discussion. Em 23/12/2009 15:32, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: Hi Igor, Thanks for your respons

Re: Wicket feedback

I do all that (except haven't tried wicket bench!!) but I still want to develop FASTER!! I want to get rid of all friction. Currently I get friction from incoherent markup (I add replace a component via ajax update but mistakenly add it into the wrong parent element.. I would like a compile-time er

Re: Wicket feedback

Maybe all I need is an ide that would show me the hierarchy on-line while editing in java and maybe alert whenever there is a mismatch. I think wicket bench might help with that... but in any case you can write test cases for your code using WicketTester the simplest being that the page/pa

Re: Wicket feedback

Hi! > you have the sources, you can build whatever infrastructure you need > that is missing. lets see it. I had a quick look into it. IComponentResolver could probably implement such quirk. My first problem in trying to implement it is that I cannot actually come up with a real world use case/t

Re: Wicket feedback

So you just want to throw all the components of a page or panel (the one with markup) in 1 big place. then all those have to be uniquely named ofcourse. Throughout the complete page. Repeaters will then be a bit special i guess. Because they are generation ListItem components for you that then als

Re: Wicket feedback

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: > Good discussion. > > Em 23/12/2009 15:32, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: >> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer >>  wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Igor, >>> Thanks for your response. Here goes my observations: >>> >>> Em 22/12/2009 1

Re: Wicket feedback

Good discussion. Em 23/12/2009 15:32, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: Hi Igor, Thanks for your response. Here goes my observations: Em 22/12/2009 14:41, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer

Re: Wicket feedback

you have the sources, you can build whatever infrastructure you need that is missing. lets see it. -igor On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: >> what does that have to do with OO exactly? > > hmm.. > >>> It should be sufficient that the artist thinks the gfx are immacculate >>

Re: Wicket feedback

> what does that have to do with OO exactly? hmm.. >> It should be sufficient that the artist thinks the gfx are immacculate >> and that the java developer thinks the code is immacculate. Why do we >> need to couple java with html hierarchies and stuff? Some namespace >> attribute could suffice t

Re: Wicket feedback

i think it is a trade off. we synchronize with the markup and lose some OOP, but we gain in desing. Have you ever change the look and feel of your application? with wicket it is really easy, in other frameworks it is a nightmare. NM On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Martin Makundi < martin.maku...

Re: Wicket feedback

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: > More OO is less synchronization between markup and wicket. what does that have to do with OO exactly? > It should be sufficient that the artist thinks the gfx are immacculate > and that the java developer thinks the code is immacculate. W

Re: Wicket feedback

More OO is less synchronization between markup and wicket. It should be sufficient that the artist thinks the gfx are immacculate and that the java developer thinks the code is immacculate. Why do we need to couple java with html hierarchies and stuff? Some namespace attribute could suffice to all

Re: Wicket feedback

It is HTTP! and we can use OOP very well. Wicket makes it possible. +1 for wicket :) NM On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > and where is this more OO? > > -igor > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Martin Makundi > wrote: > > I vote +1 for more OO Wicket. Way to go Ricardo!

Re: Wicket feedback

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: > Hi Igor, > Thanks for your response. Here goes my observations: > > Em 22/12/2009 14:41, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: >> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer >>  wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> We've just finished with succes

Re: Wicket feedback

and where is this more OO? -igor On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: > I vote +1 for more OO Wicket. Way to go Ricardo! > > ** > Martin > > 2009/12/23 Ricardo Mayerhofer : >> Hi Igor, >> Thanks for your response. Here goes my observations: >> >> Em 22/12/2009 14:41, Igor Vaynb

Re: Wicket feedback

wicket does two things: provides a way to render javascript to bootstrap a gwt widget in a page and provides callbacks for the gwt widget to access serverside data. -igor On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Johan Compagner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:32, Sudhir N wrote: > >> One more thing

Re: Wicket feedback

an interesting question... i had some thoughts about this as related to my "sprockets" experiment a few years back... http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/200804.mbox/%3c16411092.p...@talk.nabble.com%3e unfortunately, i know as little about GWT now as i did then. jon On D

Re: Wicket feedback

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:32, Sudhir N wrote: > One more thing I am still looking for is, integrating GWT. I did that > before with other framework. > > > > i asked this question more How do you see this integration? What should be integrated. What should wicket do? What should GWT do?

Re: Wicket feedback

I vote +1 for more OO Wicket. Way to go Ricardo! ** Martin 2009/12/23 Ricardo Mayerhofer : > Hi Igor, > Thanks for your response. Here goes my observations: > > Em 22/12/2009 14:41, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: >> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer >>  wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi all, >>

Re: Wicket feedback

Gujarat, India > > Personally I'm always ready to learn, although I do not always like being > taught > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 12:03:05 AM > Subject

Re: Wicket feedback

Hi Igor, Thanks for your response. Here goes my observations: Em 22/12/2009 14:41, Igor Vaynberg escreveu: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: Hi all, We've just finished with success a wicket project for a large online retailer. I think wicket is the best framework

Re: Wicket feedback

> > > > > > From: "sudhir543-...@yahoo.com" > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 11:57:34 AM > Subject: Re: Wicket feedback > > >> so how does webwork know which properties of your actions sho

Re: Wicket feedback

lthough I do not always like being > taught > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 2:13:37 AM > Subject: Re: Wicket feedback > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:13 AM,   wrote: &

Re: Wicket feedback

aught From: "sudhir543-...@yahoo.com" To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 11:57:34 AM Subject: Re: Wicket feedback > so how does webwork know which properties of your actions should be injected > from spring and whic

Re: Wicket feedback

to learn, although I do not always like being > taught > > > > > > ____ > From: Igor Vaynberg > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 12:03:05 AM > Subject: Re: Wicket feedback > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009

Re: Wicket feedback

ht > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 12:03:05 AM > Subject: Re: Wicket feedback > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:20 AM,   wrote: >> Yes, from my little experience,

Re: Wicket feedback

rg To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Wed, 23 December, 2009 12:03:05 AM Subject: Re: Wicket feedback On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:20 AM, wrote: > Yes, from my little experience, I just started learning it [Because I feel it > has some thing different to offer] > >>orly? so what about inte

Re: Wicket feedback

___ > From: Igor Vaynberg > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Tue, 22 December, 2009 9:46:45 PM > Subject: Re: Wicket feedback > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM,   wrote: > > lol > >> Ajax with wicket is easy.. if you do it the wicket way..  But integration >&g

Re: Wicket feedback

From: Igor Vaynberg To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tue, 22 December, 2009 9:46:45 PM Subject: Re: Wicket feedback On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:21 AM, wrote: lol > Ajax with wicket is easy.. if you do it the wicket way.. But integration > with other engines isnt going to be easy.

Re: Wicket feedback

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote: > Hi all, > We've just finished with success a wicket project for a large online > retailer. I think wicket is the best framework out there, but as any other > project there is room for improvement. I will talk about some topics bellow, >

Re: Wicket feedback

> From: Ricardo Mayerhofer > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: Tue, 22 December, 2009 6:49:02 PM > Subject: Wicket feedback > > Hi all, > We've just finished with success a wicket project for a large online > retailer. I think wicket is the best frame

Re: Wicket feedback

ick start global PVT LTD. > Baroda - 390007 > Gujarat, India > > Personally I'm always ready to learn, although I do not always like being > taught > > > > > > > From: Ricardo Mayerhofer > To: users@wicket.apache.org > S

Re: Wicket feedback

users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tue, 22 December, 2009 6:49:02 PM Subject: Wicket feedback Hi all, We've just finished with success a wicket project for a large online retailer. I think wicket is the best framework out there, but as any other project there is room for improvement. I will talk about some top

Re: Wicket feedback

ways like being taught From: Ricardo Mayerhofer To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tue, 22 December, 2009 6:49:02 PM Subject: Wicket feedback Hi all, We've just finished with success a wicket project for a large online retailer. I think wicket is th

Wicket feedback

Hi all, We've just finished with success a wicket project for a large online retailer. I think wicket is the best framework out there, but as any other project there is room for improvement. I will talk about some topics bellow, I hope it can help in some way. - Separation of corcerns I think