[USMA:44984] Re: Increased scientific research funding.

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
That is a very interesting essay.  Not understanding and being able to communicate in the language of science can hold one back or even produce regression while others who are fluent in the language of science will progress..   But funding scientific research won't have any affect on increasing

[USMA:44983] Re: Breech of FPLA law

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
I doubt many would complain (or even notice if metric only was on some packages).  So it seems that it is possible for businesses to just ignore the present law and start dropping the USC. Jerry  From: James R. Frysinger To: U.S. Metric Association Sent: Fr

[USMA:44982] Re: Breech of FPLA law

2009-05-01 Thread James R. Frysinger
Unless there are complaints, people who mark their product in metric only are not prosecuted. I've seen several products that were marked in metric only and not in dual indications. Jim Jeremiah MacGregor wrote: Look at the attached picture. It is from a product made in and sold in the US.

[USMA:44981] Re: Stephen's use of pseudonyms on other sites

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
Thanks for the links Ken.  I found this particular one amusing: Henry Joined: 23 Feb 2009 Posts: 1 Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 5:29 am    Post subject: Stimpy wrote: ..and yes you probably get the picture now - we have me posting - then Lee clinging on t

[USMA:44979] Re: Stephen's use of pseudonyms on other sites

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
I wonder why Stephen doesn't post his frustrations here for all of the USMA posters to see.  Yes, I would agree strongly that Stephen's sinister actions have brought this site down.  But that is true of every forum Stephen has been a member of.  Eventually they all close down and all because o

[USMA:44978] RE: Supplementary indications

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
Aside from milk, are there any other products sold in supermarkets in the UK?  One gets the impression that all one can buy is milk.  In the US  our shelves are stocked with thousands of different items.  What about the UK?  Don't they have thousands of different items for sale too?  And aren'

[USMA:44976] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
Do you feel that the 1.136 L size is destine to disappear completely in the near future? Jerry From: Ken Cooper To: U.S. Metric Association ; jeremiahmacgre...@rocketmail.com Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 3:46:55 PM Subject: Re: [USMA:44946] RE: FPLA 2010 Beca

[USMA:44966] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Stephen said   "Delivered milk is very regional in the UK." Or, in more truthful & precise terms, delivered milk has decreased from around 27% to around 8% of total UK retail milk sales over the last 20 years.   (Source - Dairy UK's "The White Paper - previously cited)   --- On Fri, 1/5/09, Ste

[USMA:44974] RE: Stephen's use of pseudonyms - Lee's use of pedantry and flying off topic

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
Important note: as with other acts of pedantry, twisting the truth, and general vendetta led spam - do not believe claims of joke posts by 'Jock' being myself. Apart from precisely no-one here being in the slightest bit interested (note the number of people who de-subscribe at the weekend) I

[USMA:44973] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
I was referring to the situation in the US where the amount to be tested depends on the larger of the declarations. In the office kitchen where I work one of the girls brought in her own bottle of soap to use by the sink for hand washing.  The soap was made by a company called Morningside (http

[USMA:44972] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
Increments of 500 mL are true (rounded) metric amounts and increments of 568 mL are pseudo metric amounts.  So, yes it is important if we are looking for products to be sold in true metric amounts. I was interested in knowing what the percentage of milk sold in true metric amounts is compared t

[USMA:44971] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
What if the amounts in the test are consistent between 450 and 452 g?  Would it matter if the supplemental unit overstates the highest amount by 2 g?  It seems that what you are telling us is that the supplemental amounts are ignored for testing purposes and can be wrong and no one would care. 

[USMA:44970] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
It just seems like a lot of extra work for nothing just to find which of the two or more numbers is the largest and which system takes precedence.  It would be much easier to establish the SI declaration as the base and just check to make sure the product is in compliance with it. Jerry ___

[USMA:44969] Re: Increased scientific research funding.

2009-05-01 Thread Jeremiah MacGregor
Just because he couldn't relate 30 kW to the power of his engine, doesn't mean he knew the horsepowers nor does it imply he would know what the power means in either units. Anyway I don't see the connection between providing money for science research and your story.  Training someone to unders

[USMA:44968] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Why not point out the so-called inconsistencies, Stephen?   Are you suggesting that 4 different products marked   450 g 1 lb 453 g 1 lb 454 g 1 lb 455 g 1 lb   are inconsistent?   IMO, the primary measurements are grams. The different products vary slightly in size. The supplementary imperial ind

[USMA:44967] Stephen's use of pseudonyms on other sites

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Stephen said   "I still find it rather telling that known extremists have to make up names to post behind (and in the case of Lee, rather sinisterly)." I would rather debate Weights & Measures, but cannot let this pass.   On www.metric-versus-imperial.com, Stephen posts as "Jock McScotland" (amo

[USMA:44965] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
So, when is Stephen going to tell Uppercrust Pies of Manchester, England that 450 g (1 lb) is an absurd way to describe their pies?   http://www.uppercrustpies.com/x3gioCart/products.php?deps=10   "1lb" is nothing more than a supplementary imperial indication. The primary indication is metric. -

[USMA:44964] RE: Supplementary indications

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Stephen said   "Realistically though - it still must be the case that people pick up a can, tin, bottle etc of red bull/coke/etc on visual size rather than be specific about the numbering on the side of the product" How would you describe this can then Stephen? 473 ml/1 US pt isn't exactly a c

[USMA:44962] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Because (until last month) the UK used a system of prescribed quantities.   Milk in non-returnable containers had to be sold in prescribed metric measures (which could also bear a supplementary indication). The prescribed measures included 1 litre & 1.136 litres. They didn't include 1.1 litres -

[USMA:44961] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
JMS - Please note the inconsistencies related to what would or would not be legal in the UK - I'm sure you will have picked it up. Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:19:48 -0700 From: jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net Subject: [USMA:44957] Re: FPLA 2010 To: usma@colostate.edu In the US, it would have to contain

[USMA:44959] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Jerry said   "It must be living hell for the inspector to know what amount to test to"   Not really, Jerry.   Until 1994, the UK regarded dual-marked packages in the same way as the US does now i.e. it must contain the larger of the two marked quantities.   Measurement was done in metric (it's a b

[USMA:44958] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
Jerry   As I have already explained, all "supermarket" milk is packed & sold in metric amounts. Is it really important whether that amount is a multiple of 500 ml or of 568 ml?   I think that you mean to ask "what percentage of milk is packed & sold in metric as compared to the percentage packed

[USMA:44957] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread John M. Steele
In the US, it would have to contain 1 lb, on average.  There is no question on that.   I'm not sure if the 450 g declaration would be OK or not.  It is OK, in fact required, to round down, but 453 g is the first 3-digit number smaller than 1 lb.  To round down further to 450 g might prompt some

[USMA:44956] Re: metric Britain

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
I've remembered something else at the NCT meeting. There was a chart behind the 'teacher' which was leaning against the back wall and it had 3 diagrams on it with different numbers with 'cm' shown after it. I believe it has something to do with cervix dilation in centimeters- or something -but

[USMA:44955] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Ken Cooper
I don't know how this package would be regarded in the US.   In the UK, it would be considered to be a 450 g package with a "1 lb" supplementary indication. A batch of the product would have to average 450 g or more. --- On Fri, 1/5/09, Jeremiah MacGregor wrote: From: Jeremiah MacGregor Subj

[USMA:44954] Re: metric Britain

2009-05-01 Thread ezra . steinberg
Yep, that's pretty revealing stuff. Thanks, Stephen! Ezra - Original Message - From: "Stephen Humphreys" To: "U.S. Metric Association" Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 3:08:04 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [USMA:44952] Re: metric Britain A quick update for you - as promised e

[USMA:44953] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread John M. Steele
If they are comfortable calculating the sample mean and standard deviation and the t-score of a student-t test, I'm sure the conversion of the Customary declaration to metric and comparing them is pretty trivial.   --- On Thu, 4/30/09, Jeremiah MacGregor wrote: From: Jeremiah MacGregor Subje

[USMA:44952] Re: metric Britain

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
A quick update for you - as promised ezra - regarding imp-usage in the UK. Last night we attended our first NCT. The NCT is basically a support network for those couples about to start a family. Basically you meet in a specific place and are 'coached'. Everyone in the group (all couples)

[USMA:44951] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
Mr Schweisthal You are fully aware that all my posts are true (I have really no reason to waste my time making up elaborate stories which I will have to remember forever just to keep you on the boil). There should be some recognition now that Lee's main reason for being here is to take

[USMA:44950] RE: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
Delivered milk is very regional in the UK. I've been to many towns where the familiar site of an electric milk van is still apparent. We don't drink enough milk - so we get ours from Tesco as and when (and you know how that is labelled) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:22:05 -0700 From: jer

[USMA:44949] Re: FPLA 2010

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
Although finally you admit to dual labelling in the UK ("coz Lee tells me so") the example you cite is almost as absurd as the 500 g "pound" and 500 L "pint" (and the metric record - lol). What I mean is - in reality it does not happen. 454 g is essentially regarded as a pound. Date: Th

[USMA:44948] RE: Supplementary indications

2009-05-01 Thread Stephen Humphreys
Realistically though - it still must be the case that people pick up a can, tin, bottle etc of red bull/coke/etc on visual size rather than be specific about the numbering on the side of the product (even if "he" [ahem] wouldn't allow it lol!). Obviously the figures are there to meet regula