On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:58:16PM -0600, Peter McNabb wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Clint Savage wrote:
>
> > Utah Open Source Conference 2007 nears, only 24 days remain until the
> > conference begins. Registration is available on-line:
> >
> > https://register.utosc.org/
> >
> > For
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 12:06:35 pm Ash wrote:
> I have some new servers with Windows server 2003 and IIS. Being a
> Linux guy, I know apache, but nothing about IIS. Is there a site
> somewhere that shows how to do something in IIS if you know how in
> apache?
The configuration models between II
On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Clint Savage wrote:
> Utah Open Source Conference 2007 nears, only 24 days remain until the
> conference begins. Registration is available on-line:
>
> https://register.utosc.org/
>
> For more information visit:
>
> http://www.utosc.org
As a reminder, I can get you
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 09:34:27PM -0700, Bryan Murdock wrote:
>
> I have a question for the group wisdom here. What is the best
> free/cheap desktop virtualization for occasionally running a windoze
> desktop under Linux? xen? vmplayer? vmware server? qemu?
> parallels? virtualbox?
>
> Let
Bryan Murdock wrote:
> You mean like, if I want to connect _to_ the Virtualbox VM, it's a
> pain? I can live with that. How about just browsing the web and
> maybe accessing a file share from within the VM?
>
> Bryan
Connecting *out* is simple enough, yes. Browsing, checking email, etc
all work
On 8/14/07, Christer Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bryan Murdock wrote:
> > So has anyone tried virtualbox lately? 'Cause I've heard the same
> > thing, but haven't had a chance to see for myself. I'm looking for
> > the next best thing here, i.e., one of you has seen for yourself.
> >
> >
Bryan Murdock wrote:
> So has anyone tried virtualbox lately? 'Cause I've heard the same
> thing, but haven't had a chance to see for myself. I'm looking for
> the next best thing here, i.e., one of you has seen for yourself.
>
> Bryan
I've been using virtualbox and it is really pretty slick.
On 8/14/07, Adam Findley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virtualbox I believe is built on qemu, and is supposed to be rather
> light and fast.
So has anyone tried virtualbox lately? 'Cause I've heard the same
thing, but haven't had a chance to see for myself. I'm looking for
the next best thing her
On 8/14/07, Adam Findley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Clint Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Xen is painful for installing windows, KVM is not. VMWare is nice,
> > but its not open.
>
> Well put. I guess the first question you should be asking is how new
> is your processor? if i
Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> I would say VMware server is easier to use the VMplayer it is a pain to have
> to rerun the scripts every time you update the kernel though. I haven't had
> so many problems installing the tools in the guest, but that is harder in
> VMplayer. Problem is there is no hardware
Utah Open Source Conference 2007 nears, only 24 days remain until the
conference begins. Registration is available on-line:
https://register.utosc.org/
For more information visit:
http://www.utosc.org
SCHEDULE
Come check out the schedule. Its being updated daily, many
presentations are are n
> I have heard people having success with Crossover Office. Have you
> given that a shot?
Unfortunately FFXI shows up as "Known not to work" on Crossover's site.
--
James Hearn
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the respon
I tried this on the WAA list, but got no love. I'm hoping someone here
can help me.
I have some new servers with Windows server 2003 and IIS. Being a Linux
guy, I know apache, but nothing about IIS. Is there a site somewhere
that shows how to do something in IIS if you know how in apache?
I've
On 8/14/07, Flaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Stephen Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what about cedega?
>
> Unfortunately it looks like Cedega doesn't support the game. At least
> none of the compatibility lists show it as working. In any case, I'm
> not a fan of the way Transgamin
BYU-UG,
Some of us are trying to put together a large order of "Powered by
Ubuntu" case badges (picture link below). I thought I would extend the
invitation to a few of the neighboring LUGs and anyone that uses or
advocates Ubuntu.
If you'd like to donate $10 to the fund it'll get us quite a few
On 8/14/07, Stephen Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about cedega?
Unfortunately it looks like Cedega doesn't support the game. At least
none of the compatibility lists show it as working. In any case, I'm
not a fan of the way Transgaming has treated the open-source
community. I'm not sure I
On 8/14/07, James Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you can virtualize windows too under xen. They are fully virtualized
> and
> > so they will be slower.
> > There are paravirtualized drivers, that work well, however cost. Any
> 'XEN
> > aware' paravirtualized guest will
> > run at near/cl
On 8/14/07, Clint Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Xen is painful for installing windows, KVM is not. VMWare is nice,
> but its not open.
>
> My 2 cents (again)
>
>
Installing windows is super easy. You just have to use a distro that has
put effort into XEN :P
In seriousness, installing w
> you can virtualize windows too under xen. They are fully virtualized and
> so they will be slower.
> There are paravirtualized drivers, that work well, however cost. Any 'XEN
> aware' paravirtualized guest will
> run at near/close native. No 3D support. Don't know if thats on the
> roadmap o
On 8/14/07, Clint Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xen is painful for installing windows, KVM is not. VMWare is nice,
> but its not open.
Well put. I guess the first question you should be asking is how new
is your processor? if it has virtualization support, then I highly
recommend KVM, as i
Xen is painful for installing windows, KVM is not. VMWare is nice,
but its not open.
My 2 cents (again)
Clint
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS
On 8/14/07, Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would say VMware server is easier to use the VMplayer it is a pain to
> have
> to rerun the scripts every time you update the kernel though. I haven't
> had
> so many problems installing the tools in the guest, but that is harder in
> VMpl
I would say VMware server is easier to use the VMplayer it is a pain to have
to rerun the scripts every time you update the kernel though. I haven't had
so many problems installing the tools in the guest, but that is harder in
VMplayer. Problem is there is no hardware graphics acceleration in Playe
23 matches
Mail list logo
