Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-28 Thread anf
and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure out what is really happening? RM You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything RM that happens within an smtp conversation. RM http

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-27 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi, On 27.07.2011 at 00:56 a...@ltmd.org wrote: Just want to add that I tested right now and found that the same fresh programs configurations and settings on the clean 32-bit system working pretty good. Should I try once again to use recordio program on a 64-bit system? 'recordio' only

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-27 Thread Julien Escario
, spamassassin, spamdyke and others. SMTP-AUTH still not working. Trying to figure out what is really happening. -- --- __ ___ Julien Escario

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-26 Thread anf
and the new amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure out what is really happening? RM You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-26 Thread anf
the difference between working x86 server configuration and the new amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure out what is really happening

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-03 Thread anf
and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure out what is really happening? RM You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything RM that happens within an smtp conversation. RM http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/recordio.html Thank you

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-03 Thread Rick Macdougall
to multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure out what is really happening? RM You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything RM that happens within an smtp conversation. RM http

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-02 Thread Rick Macdougall
no success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure out what is really happening? Hi, You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything that happens within an smtp conversation. http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/recordio.html ie /service/qmail-smtpd/run #!/bin

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-01 Thread Rick Macdougall
On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote: I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the 64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem blocked me. Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2, dovecot

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-07-01 Thread anf
Hello Rick, Friday, July 1, 2011, 16:13:45, Rick Macdougall wrote: RM On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote: I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the 64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem blocked me. Right now I have no multilib 64

[vchkpw] SMTP-AUTH problem with vchkpw

2011-06-30 Thread anf
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the 64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem blocked me. Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2, dovecot-2.0.13 and some other stuff. Everything seems

[vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread OVH
Hi, On my Qmail 1.03 I can not simultaneously apply smtp-auth patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-0510) and chkuser (chkuser-2.0.8b-release or chkuser-2.0.9-release). It seems that there is a conflict between these two patches. you know a patch which includes 2 or a solution to the conflict ? Thanks

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread Roberto Puzzanghera
Hi, I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and chkuser. I can put together a package with just smtp-auth and chkuser if you like.. Anyway you can do it by yourself applying chkuser over smtp-tls

RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread OVH
Hi, Thank you for your patch, but it shows errors, so if you have only the patch with smtp-auth and chkuser i like it. Thanks! patching file FILES Hunk #1 succeeded at 135 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 337 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 406 (offset -1 lines). patching file

RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread Roberto Puzzanghera
Hi, my package was tested for netqmail-1.06. I think you are using qmail-1.03 regards Roberto On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:32:17 +0200, OVH wrote: Hi, Thank you for your patch, but it shows errors, so if you have only the patch with smtp-auth and chkuser i like it. Thanks! patching file

RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread OVH
Hi, Yes , I using qmail-1.03 ... I testing manual applying chkuser patch ... Thanks ! -Message d'origine- De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu] Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 14:44 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth Hi, my package

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread Remo Mattei
Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato? (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?). Remo On 5/4/11 5:14 AM, Roberto Puzzanghera ad...@sagredo.eu wrote: Hi, I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread Roberto Puzzanghera
On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote: Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato? (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?). Ciao Remo, the link to the surbl patch is still broken for months http://www.surbl.org/qmail/011_surbl I would be glad if someone

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth

2011-05-04 Thread Roberto Puzzanghera
Grazie Remo, anyway I managed to find here http://surbl.freeapp.net/qmail/011_surbl the patch that I was looking for. It's already embedded into my package. On next days I'll do more tests. regards Roberto On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:56:52 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote: Sorry one more

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-12 Thread Joe @ 3ZZZ
this issue? I have looked at SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work with vpopmail. It works. Just be sure that you have clear passwords enabled in vpopmail if you want to support CRAM-MD5 authentication. Quoting Davis Sylvester davis.sylvester...@gmail.com: Matt what smtp-patch do u suggest! Can u

Re: [vchkpw] Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-11 Thread Joe @ 3ZZZ
. This was just discussed on the list yesterday. Dovecot caches user information in memory and does not support roaming users. You will need to switch to SMTP authentication. POP-before-SMTP is *bad*. Is there a simple resolution to resolve this issue? I have looked at SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work

[vchkpw] Re: Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-11 Thread Eric Shubert
they can't. This was just discussed on the list yesterday. Dovecot caches user information in memory and does not support roaming users. You will need to switch to SMTP authentication. POP-before-SMTP is *bad*. Is there a simple resolution to resolve this issue? I have looked at SMTP-AUTH

[vchkpw] Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-10 Thread Davis Sylvester
I am using Qmail and Dovecot for IMAP. Prior to installing Dovecot we only offered POP3 and SMTP services. The issue I have run into is that after I installed Dovecot, IMAP runs fine, but when my users go to send email they can't. We are using POP-before-SMTP for SMTP auth. Since

Re: [vchkpw] Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-10 Thread Matt Brookings
looked at SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work with vpopmail. It works. Just be sure that you have clear passwords enabled in vpopmail if you want to support CRAM-MD5 authentication. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer

Re: [vchkpw] Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-10 Thread Remo Mattei
yes you should use smtp-auth that's what I use and I have had this for over 5 years now.. Works all over the world as long as the internet connection does not block port 25 hehe, which then I create an iptables rule where using an upper port goes to the qmail server port 25 and I can sent

Re: [vchkpw] Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-10 Thread Davis Sylvester
Thanks Matt. Sorry about not seeing previous post. I worked on this over the weekend and just got around to sending out request for help. !DSPAM:4c8a701d32711706316047!

Re: [vchkpw] Fwd: VPOPMAIL DOVECOT SMTP-AUTH

2010-09-10 Thread Davis Sylvester
users. You will need to switch to SMTP authentication. POP-before-SMTP is *bad*. Is there a simple resolution to resolve this issue? I have looked at SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work with vpopmail. It works. Just be sure that you have clear passwords enabled in vpopmail if you want to support

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-29 Thread Juraj Hantak
somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users authentication? If yes just check if additional software needed is available. Hi, See http://www.shupp.org/toaster/ Regards, Rick !DSPAM:4c2996f332711670912643!

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 06:43 AM, Den Arion wrote: I was looking for a version or patch to work with authentication with vpopmail. Almost all patches I found need additional software that it’s not available.. Does somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users authentication

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-29 Thread steamer
-- From: Juraj Hantak han...@webglobe.sk Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:44 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth Hi, You can try to use: http://www.spamdyke.org/ -- S pozdravom / best regards Juraj Hantak technicky riaditel -- WEBGLOBE, s.r.o

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-29 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/29/2010 03:00 AM, stea...@neotech-hk.com wrote: Dear Juraj Hantak technicky riaditel This user has been banned from the list. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com GnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-29 Thread Remo Mattei
Thanks.. On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/29/2010 03:00 AM, stea...@neotech-hk.com wrote: Dear Juraj Hantak technicky riaditel This user has been banned from the list. - -- /* Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On 06/29/2010 03:00 AM, stea...@neotech-hk.com wrote: Dear Juraj Hantak technicky riaditel This user has been banned from the list. /me face palms The level of cluelessness in HK is just incredible. No doubt thanks to the dumb efforts of this lot:

[vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-28 Thread Den Arion
I was looking for a version or patch to work with authentication with vpopmail. Almost all patches I found need additional software that it’s not available.. Does somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users authentication? If yes just check if additional software needed

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth

2010-06-28 Thread Rick Macdougall
On 28/06/2010 6:43 PM, Den Arion wrote: I was looking for a version or patch to work with authentication with vpopmail. Almost all patches I found need additional software that it’s not available.. Does somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users authentication? If yes

[vchkpw] Two patch about qmail-remote logging and smtp auth user verification

2009-12-16 Thread Ismail YENIGUL
Hello, As Endersys, we released two patches for qmail. 1) qmail canonicalised recipient logging and more patch: http://blog.endersys.com/2009/12/qmail-canonicalised-recipient-logging-and-more-patch/ 2) qmail from address and SMTP-AUTH username check patch http://blog.endersys.com/2009/12/qmail

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Postfix and SQL query for SMTP-Auth

2009-10-07 Thread Christopher Chan
Alessio Cecchi wrote: Hello, this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP. Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL that query the vpopmail DB for user authentication

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Postfix and SQL query for SMTP-Auth

2009-10-07 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Christopher Chan ha scritto: Alessio Cecchi wrote: Hello, this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP. Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL that query the vpopmail

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Postfix and SQL query for SMTP-Auth

2009-10-07 Thread Christopher Chan
Alessio Cecchi wrote: Christopher Chan ha scritto: Alessio Cecchi wrote: Hello, this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP. Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL

[vchkpw] Vpopmail Postfix and SQL query for SMTP-Auth

2009-10-06 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Hello, this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP. Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL that query the vpopmail DB for user authentication. My intention is to set

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-12 Thread James Cox
Sigh- this is a shame - it doesn't work. still getting smtp auth issues with fehcom's auth. So i've given up on it for now it works now, but now simscan messages are bled in: simscan:[17008]:PASSTHRU (7.70/5.00):2.6977s:[SPAM] :93.89.85.51:ja...@imaj.es :ima...@gmail.com I'm

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread Roberto
Thank you James, grazie Tonino. !DSPAM:4a30ba6832669637967409!

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread James Cox
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote: Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html ). qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if it is worth using 1.0.6. Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread Tren Blackburn
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009 Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote: Patch in Shupp

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread James Cox
I just did a fresh install of toaster. i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have the user f...@example.com, it tries to auth foo.com@:myip huh?? -james On 11 Jun 2009, at 13:51, Tren Blackburn wrote: I

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread Remo Mattei
Cox ja...@imaj.es wrote: I just did a fresh install of toaster. i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have the user f...@example.com, it tries to auth foo.com@:myip huh?? -james On 11 Jun 2009, at 13

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread Brian Lanier
- Original Message - From: James Cox To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems I just did a fresh install of toaster. i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's conflating

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread James Cox
export NOP0FCHECK=1 export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0 Just my 2 cents.. Remo On 6/11/09 8:44 AM, James Cox ja...@imaj.es wrote: I just did a fresh install of toaster. i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have the user f

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Brian Lanier ha scritto: - Original Message - *From:* James Cox mailto:ja...@imaj.es *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems I just did a fresh install

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-11 Thread Remo Mattei
of toaster. i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have the user f...@example.com, it tries to auth foo.com@:myip huh?? -james On 11 Jun 2009, at 13:51, Tren Blackburn wrote: I apologize

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
of those two are enabled. version 2.0.9 for me. What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ? I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been seen in years. Regards, Rick !DSPAM:4a2fb48732661746112274!

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread James Cox
accepted sender and... in my defines... neither of those two are enabled. version 2.0.9 for me. What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ? I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been seen in years. Rick: yeah, i saw

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender and... in my defines... neither of those two are enabled. version 2.0.9 for me. What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ? I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been seen in years. Rick

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Remo Mattei
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp auth. Remo On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, Rick Macdougall ri...@ummm-beer.com wrote: James Cox wrote: On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote: James Cox wrote: I've had it running for a few hours, and have

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Cox wrote: yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31 I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a solution to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Remo Mattei
Here is mine you can try to use my settings.. #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail` NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan export NOP0FCHECK=1 export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0 exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
CHKUSER rejected rcpt 1758 CHKUSER accepted sender and... in my defines... neither of those two are enabled. version 2.0.9 for me. What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ? I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Roberto
Hi James, what version of netqmail are you using? does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06? Roberto James Cox ha scritto: I've had it running for a few hours, and have this: 1 CHKUSER rejected relaying 5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt 28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt 362

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Roberto ha scritto: Hi James, what version of netqmail are you using? does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06? Roberto James Cox ha scritto: I've had it running for a few hours, and have this: 1 CHKUSER rejected relaying 5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt 28 CHKUSER

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread James Cox
complained. They passed to the one contained in Shupp's Toaster (the unique one I've checked) and all problems went away. As alternative, should try to disable logs. So, versions- I've got - netqmail 1.06 - smtp auth 1.03 from http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
with other auth patches complained. They passed to the one contained in Shupp's Toaster (the unique one I've checked) and all problems went away. As alternative, should try to disable logs. So, versions- I've got - netqmail 1.06 - smtp auth 1.03 from http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
with other auth patches complained. They passed to the one contained in Shupp's Toaster (the unique one I've checked) and all problems went away. As alternative, should try to disable logs. So, versions- I've got - netqmail 1.06 - smtp auth 1.03 from http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-10 Thread James Cox
Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html ). qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if it is worth using 1.0.6. Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's smtp-auth, and have ended up with failed auths: Jun 10 16:39:21 reason vpopmail[7505

[vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread James Cox
Hey, Here's an (edited) example of a smtp conversation, with a netqmail install with smtp auth and chkuser patches: 220 mail.23i.net ESMTP EHLO imaj.es 250-mail.23i.net 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN 250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN 250-PIPELINING 250 8BITMIME AUTH LOGIN 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Cox wrote: Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced that these lines should ever exist in the smtp

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread James Cox
On 9 Jun 2009, at 18:16, Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Cox wrote: Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread Harm van Tilborg
Hi James, You are copying stderr (file descriptor 2) to your stdout (that's what the terminating 21 is for). However, this log is only saved if multilog is indeed catching it. Find in the directory where this `run' file was located the directory `log', and publish the content of the `run'

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread James Cox
hey Harm, Here's the run file for the log - exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 n 10 /var/log/qmail/smtpd and yeah- i figured that i'm pushing to stdout... which i expect the log/run should catch via the multilog. therefore i'm a bit confused as to

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread Harm van Tilborg
Hi James, What version of chkuser are you using? When I look at the 2.0.9 source, I see the following lines inside chkuser_settings.h: /* * the following line enables debugging of chkuser */ /* #define CHKUSER_DEBUG */ /* * The following line moves DEBUG output from STDOUT (default) to

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

2009-06-09 Thread James Cox
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this: 1 CHKUSER rejected relaying 5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt 28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt 362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt 1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt 1758 CHKUSER accepted sender and... in my defines... neither of those two are

Re: [vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH

2008-04-03 Thread Tarak Ranjan
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 14:08 +0200, Optima (Justin Broton) wrote: :allow,SMTPAUTH= Hi List, what about :allow,SMTPAUTH= , if i set this parameter in tcp.smtp file , will it make mandatory/Must for others to User SMTP AUTH. /\ Tarak !DSPAM:47f49a73120505832912682!

[vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH

2008-04-01 Thread Optima (Justin Broton)
Hi All, I installed Qmail and add-ons like qmail1.03, vpopmail qmailadmin via lazy dog installer scripts from www.lazyinstaller.net which worked a treat. The problem is now our requirements are to ONLY allow SMTP AUTH and localhost ONLY and no other relaying or unauthorised sending of email

Re: [vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH

2008-04-01 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
Relaying is usually controlled by the tcp.smtp file using the RELAYCLIENT variable. To only allow localhost to relay and require all other IPs to use smtp auth you could put this one line in your tcp.smtp file 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT= Then rebuild your tcp.smtp.cdb file using tcprules

Re: [vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH

2008-04-01 Thread Remo Mattei
then use the relayclient it works fine like this format ipaddress:allow,RELAYCLIENT= you are set remo Marcin Soltysiak wrote: Relaying is usually controlled by the tcp.smtp file using the RELAYCLIENT variable. To only allow localhost to relay and require all other IPs to use smtp auth you

Re: [vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH

2008-04-01 Thread Rakesh Sharma
: Relaying is usually controlled by the tcp.smtp file using the RELAYCLIENT variable. To only allow localhost to relay and require all other IPs to use smtp auth you could put this one line in your tcp.smtp file 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT= Then rebuild your tcp.smtp.cdb file using

[vchkpw] qmail + smtp-auth + chkuser + vpopmail = messed up pipes?

2008-01-30 Thread Florian Leeber
Hi folks, after rather long but then successul compile marathon I finally habe everything in place...but... - inbound mail without SMTP auth works fine - outbound mail with auth leads basically to some messed up pipes or file descriptors whatever, look at this: ehlo () 250

Re: [vchkpw] qmail + smtp-auth + chkuser + vpopmail = messed up pipes?

2008-01-30 Thread Christopher Chan
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined.shtml Try the patch there. And take this up with Mr. Simpson if you have problems with his patch (you should not) !DSPAM:47a1341c310546330020416!

Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

2007-08-18 Thread John Simpson
for authenticated users. Port 587, is the default port for this kind of operation. Thanks. We will start that, too. But, we do have a number of clients that are ALREADY using port 25 for smtp-auth. Is there any way to keep them from being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance

Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

2007-08-18 Thread Trey Nolen
Thanks for the info. Trey Nolen - Original Message - From: John Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:28 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

[vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

2007-08-17 Thread Trey Nolen
We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line like the following gets added to open-smtp: ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,WHITELIST= 1187395788 This keeps the users from being affected

Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

2007-08-17 Thread Rick Widmer
Trey Nolen wrote: We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line like the following gets added to open-smtp: ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,WHITELIST= 1187395788 This keeps the users

Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

2007-08-17 Thread Trey Nolen
, is the default port for this kind of operation. Thanks. We will start that, too. But, we do have a number of clients that are ALREADY using port 25 for smtp-auth. Is there any way to keep them from being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance, is there a way to pass a variable to tcpserver

Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd

2007-08-17 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 8/17/2007 9:13 PM, Trey Nolen wrote: being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance, is there a way to pass a variable to tcpserver if the connection is authenticated via smtp-auth? Not without patching. the process goes like this: user - tcpserver - rblsmtpd - qmail-smtpd (with smtp-auth

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-11 Thread Rick Widmer
DAve wrote: A quick check of using Perl to auth against a vpopmaild instance works just dandy. I hacked up a copy of the generic checkpassword.pl script from qmail.org and had it working pretty quickly. It took longer to upgrade my test server and get vpopmaild working. Cool! But what

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-10 Thread Rick Widmer
DAve wrote: DAve wrote: Tom Collins wrote: DAve, I think you've found a bug in vchkpw. Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never intended to do. snip I think... that vchkpw will not work

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-10 Thread Rick Widmer
Rick Widmer wrote: Let me know if that works, and I'll make changes to the release version. That code could probably be permanently removed -- the user's directory is created by vdelivermail when necessary. vchkpw doesn't need to be doing it. Bill: I have to disagree. The

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-10 Thread DAve
Rick Widmer wrote: DAve wrote: DAve wrote: Tom Collins wrote: DAve, I think you've found a bug in vchkpw. Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never intended to do. snip I think... that

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-10 Thread DAve
DAve wrote: Rick Widmer wrote: DAve wrote: DAve wrote: Tom Collins wrote: DAve, I think you've found a bug in vchkpw. Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never intended to do. snip I

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-09 Thread DAve
DAve wrote: Tom Collins wrote: DAve, I think you've found a bug in vchkpw. Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never intended to do. In a nutshell I am trying to use vchkpw as an auth tool

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-08 Thread Rainer Duffner
DAve wrote: Good morning, Seems I am posting all over the internet these last two weeks, but I can't seem to grab my butt lately. I got FreeBSD running on the Sunfires, netqmail installed, Simscan install, ClamAV installed, everything is working fine. Last step, smtp-auth, why did I try? I

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-08 Thread Rick Romero
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:55 -0500, DAve wrote: Rainer Duffner wrote: DAve wrote: Good morning, No errors when building, seems to work, bash-2.05b# /home/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error. Domain pixelhammer.com was not found in the assign file That should not

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-08 Thread DAve
Rick Romero wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:55 -0500, DAve wrote: Rainer Duffner wrote: DAve wrote: Good morning, No errors when building, seems to work, bash-2.05b# /home/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error. Domain pixelhammer.com was not found in the assign file That should

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-08 Thread Tom Collins
DAve, I think you've found a bug in vchkpw. For some reason, it wants to create the user's directory if it doesn't already exist. This could be related to updating the lastauth file in the user's directory. Disabling AUTH_LOGGING on that system will help, but you'll still have code

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-08 Thread DAve
Tom Collins wrote: DAve, I think you've found a bug in vchkpw. Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never intended to do. In a nutshell I am trying to use vchkpw as an auth tool only, and

[vchkpw] Vpopmail smtp-auth

2007-03-06 Thread DAve
Good morning, Seems I am posting all over the internet these last two weeks, but I can't seem to grab my butt lately. I got FreeBSD running on the Sunfires, netqmail installed, Simscan install, ClamAV installed, everything is working fine. Last step, smtp-auth, why did I try? I should have

[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]

2007-02-08 Thread Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP)
Hi, I used Bill Schupp's Qmail Toaster to install the following: autorespond-2.0.4 - courier-authlib-0.58 - courier-imap-4.1.2 - netqmail-1.05 - toaster-scripts-0.8.1 - ucspi-tcp-0.88 Everything works as expected except for the fact that open-smtp is NOT being updated by courier-imap upon

Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]

2007-02-08 Thread Michael Bowe
is no longer available thus preventing IMAP-before-SMTP from working. Hope that helps! Michael. - Original Message - From: Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:04 PM Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming

Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]

2007-02-08 Thread Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP)
] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:04 PM Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users] Hi, I used Bill Schupp's Qmail Toaster to install the following: autorespond-2.0.4 - courier-authlib-0.58 - courier-imap-4.1.2 - netqmail-1.05 - toaster-scripts-0.8.1 - ucspi

Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]

2007-02-08 Thread Joshua Megerman
for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to them?? Am I missing something?? The solution is simple - use SMTP-AUTH instead of imap-before-smtp. If they can

Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]

2007-02-08 Thread Rick Widmer
and this is acceptable to them?? SMTP Auth. Have the roaming users login to smtp by adding a user name and password to the outgoing mail server configuration of their browser, and enable that function. (The same one they use to receive mail) Since you are using Bill Shupp's toaster, it should

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >