We're aware of this and have reached out to them.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Garfield
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:17 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MyHeavy.com
I've placed a phone call to them and expect a call back first thing
tomorrow morning (it's already 7PM in New York and it seems like the
responsible party has gone home for the day). I'll be calling back
first thing tomorrow if I don't hear.
We'll take care of this to the best of our ability, jus
It's not from our use of the flash player. He has some new Flash player
versions that can subscribe to RSS feeds, and he likes to demo them.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sull
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 7:51
I've been thinking about redirecting all requests for blip videos from myheavy
to a video about blip. If the problem isn't fixed tomorrow we will do just
that.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed Jan 03 21:14:46 2007
Su
[snip]
> On 1/3/07, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A custom flash player
> > written by online video company MyHeavy.com that overlays
> their logo,
> > display ads on top prior to rolling and such is clearly
> different to
> > any observer and the consumer from a browser.
>
> Not to th
I just got off the phone with Heavy's CFO and followed up with an e-mail
listing specific areas of infringement. I expect to hear from them in
the next hour or so, and if I do not I will follow up with another phone
call.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mail
[snip]
> okay...so they are just pulling in videos from feeds...and
> overlaying the watermark/videos on top...
>
> as Lucas says...yes, video hosting sites like Blip.tv can
> just redirect...
> and insert all Blip ads into the old URL...
I can do this on a case-by-case basis.
It's a really big Internet, and Heavy is much more concerned with the 17
year old boy sitting in front of his computer at 11 PM than they are
with you. How much influence do you have over that kid?
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
The Referer header is unreliable.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:25 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
>
Litigation is expensive and difficult. I've been on the phone with
them, and I'm hopeful that we can resolve this issue with simple
communication and without the need for lawyers. That said, if we have
to, we'll have our attorneys send them a nastygram. We're not at that
point yet, though. Soon
Yup, it looks like they've cleaned their act up. I'm expecting a call
from their CEO in a few minutes, so I'm guessing that will be the
message he delivers.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Howell
> Sent: Thursday,
Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:51 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
> Vlogger CC Licenses
>
>
> > This is a case for Brainstorming. For example, what's
> wrong with a
> > tool which allows each user to define a whitelist and
> blacklist? If
> > that were doable it would be a wonderful competitive advantage for
> > Blip. If I worked there I would propose that Blip be the
> first
They have disabled their aggregation functionality entirely for the time
being. I just got off the phone with their CEO, who was very contrite.
We'll be meeting with them next week to figure out how to do this right,
and allow people to opt in and out from blip using MediaRSS.
> -Original Me
ervices.
>
> Steve Elbows
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That is interesting. I'm going to noodle on this.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
I doubt the direct links will be fixed because of the way the page
works. The URL includes all the information necessary to render the
page, without ever hitting the database.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ryanne hods
See my earlier e-mail about this.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay dedman
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:48 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
>
Yes. We're meeting with them next week to figure out how they can do
this properly.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enric
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:47 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [video
e here who dont
> mind there videos being reused on sites with adverts, that
> could talk about this?
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve Elbows
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Steve. We d
TED]
> Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
> Vlogger CC Licenses
>
> Mike Hudack wrote:
> >They have disabled their aggregation functionality entirely for the
> >time being. I just got off the phone with their CEO, who
> was very contrite.
> >We'l
Hi guys,
There have been a lot of very interesting messages going back and forth
on this list about the MyHeavy incident, and I've been reading all of
them with considerable interest. At blip.tv we've been working really
hard on the issue of aggregation, striking deals with some of the major
por
We're OK with it if the content creator does it. We're actually in
discussions with AdBrite, and we're both working very hard to
incorporate AdBrite advertising directly into blip's advertising
options. I fear I can't say much more than that, but we've been talking
to the AdBrite guys for a very,
e-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hudack
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:54 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [videoblogging] AdBrite (here we go again)
>
> We're OK with it if the content
That's right. And I've learned that the best way to do that is with a
combination of community outrage and backroom conversation and
negotiation. We've been batting 1000 with this combination.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
suse of it's toolset.
>
> Thanks again for your involvement in the community.
>
> Best,
>
> TaulPaul
>
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > By way of follow-up... I see you'r
One thing that we've done almost from Day One is include a requirement
that everyone accessing blip.tv respect the licenses attached to media
hosted on blip. The relevant portion of our TOS:
All user-generated content will be uploaded onto the site under a
Creative Commons License (see http://www
so, if they are playing the blip video then it
> will show up there.
>
> ... Richard
>
> On 1/5/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > There have been a lot of very interesting messages going back and
> > forth on
We've already defined our own namespace for several things, and we'll
continue to "embrace and extend" RSS in a way that doesn't break
anything, at least for the benefit of our partners and people who write
software designed to work with blip RSS feeds when no alternative
standards exist.
That isn
s entity could do after being granted similar rights
> by creators.
>
> See Im thinking, not quite sure, that because creators are
> giving you and your partners these righrts, seperately from
> the license they attach to their work thats valid for
> 'everyone else', that
seem to have spend most of my time from 8PM till 3AM
> tonight on this stuff, ugh I think I am some sort of sick
> obsessive little moneky nerd! :D Quite why Ive probably spent
> more time on this stuff in the last few years than some
> content creators or service proviers have, es
Jeroen makes a very good flash video player that actually serves as the basis
for blip's player. His new player can subscribe to rss feeds and he is demoing
this capability by subscribing to the main blip feed on his site.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: v
The issue with 15/30fps is not just file size. CPU utilization is also
a concern. H.264 and On2 VP6 (Flash 8 video) are extremely
CPU-intensive, and other codecs are as well but to a lesser extent.
Going from 15 to 30 fps doubles your CPU utilization on decompression.
> -Original Message---
Hey Nicolas,
The short answer is "you bet." We actually released ipod transcoding a
week or so ago, but we pulled it back because many of our users already
upload ipod-compatible videos and there was concern about duplication of
effort and end-user confusion. We're planning to bring the feature
I say we should lock all the spammers in the brig without charge or access to
counsel! That'll teach the ingrates!
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue Jan 09 16:42:17 2007
Subjec
Hah! Dude. You're hitting that prematurely. Sorry, but it's not a
public feature yet, and it's a mistake that you saw it. But soon!
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Cammack
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:0
ogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Blip adds Intros & Outros
>
> I have been WAITING for that forever, please make it live as
> soon as you can
> :)
>
> Peter
>
> On 1/10/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hah! Dude. You'
And, of course, blip has a full API (actually three of them) that should
work well for doing just this. You can check out http://wiki.blip.tv/
(username and password in the prompt) for more info on all three.
The basic breakdown is: We've got a really simple REST-based API which
lets you do thing
f Of sull
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:19 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Blip adds Intros & Outros
>
> why not just do it for flv/player?
>
>
> On 1/10/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
me, if its under the users control, its more like a
> simple form of 'online video editing' that you are offering,
> will be fascinating to see what others think.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve Elbows
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EM
t; whatever) then uploading? I'm not sure I understand it...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben
>
> --
> Unleashed is an animated comedy show that follows the trials
> and tribulations of animal actors in Hollywood. A new episode
> every Monday!
>
> http://www.Unleashed.tv
>
My meeting was to be with them today, but I came down with the flu and
am home sick. We're rescheduling for early next week.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay dedman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 5:15 PM
> To: V
ople with actual cement heads.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
> --
> Unleashed is an animated comedy show that follows the trials
> and tribulations of animal actors in Hollywood. A new episode
> every Monday!
>
> http://www.Unleashed.tv
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.c
t; opportunities. If blip and others can broker partnerships
> with these we could really get a lot of vloggers whom are
> focused on entertainment, news or other areas of wider appeal paid.
>
>
> I hope I'm making sense.
>
> -Mike
> mefeedia.com
> mmeiser.com/blog
; Get well whenevah Mike. Take as much time as you like. The
> internet isn't going anywhere. From Beach Walks, we wish you
> an aloha-filled recovery with a dash of ainokea! I find it
> can be quite medicinal actually. :-)
>
> Me ke aloha pumehana,
>
> Rox
>
>
Devices that follow the space elevator specification will get me through
to the ionosophere within a week. Unfortunately none of them exist yet.
:-)
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas
> Haugstrup Pedersen
> Sent:
Hey Ron,
Are you uploading these yourself or asking blip to generate them for
you?
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Watson
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:52 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [vi
t takes the file and makes it the small
size again.
I bypassed this by coding height="360" and width="480" into the jpg, but that
makes the
images fuzzy, as was discussed in the "record small and increase the viewing
size" thread.
--
Bill C.
http://ems.blip.tv
m: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hudack
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:09 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com; Jared Klett
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blip JPEGs
>
> Got it. We do some resizing but it shouldn't be in
have a narrow main column.
>
> Can this be an option for people?
>
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Mike Hudack wrote:
>
> > The code itself is working okay, but it looks like our
> configuration
> > settings could use some tweaks. How does 640 x 480 sound
>
s just me.
> >>
> >> I'd like 320x240 since I have a narrow main column.
> >>
> >> Can this be an option for people?
> >>
> >> On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Mike Hudack wrote:
> >>
> >>> The code itself is working okay
will you still be adding opt-out to 3rd party sites?
>
> On 1/11/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The purpose of our meeting is to negotiate a deal for proper,
> > creator-friendly syndication to MyHeavy of the type that we do to
> > Ya
y, January 11, 2007 3:25 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Update on Myheavy
>
> mike,
>
> where would that be in the dashboard?
>
> so, i can opt-out of specific 3rd party sites so my content
> does not appear on their sites?
>
Hey guys,
We're building a new flash player at blip.tv. We've already had a bunch
of meetings about it internally, we've picked some basic things we want
it to do, and we're putting together the formal specification. We'll
definitely be including some basic stuff in it that you'd expect,
includ
e, seems like the way things are moving.
>
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Mike Hudack wrote:
>
> > So are we cool with 640 x 480 then?
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
We're hoping to make most of the features optional, I definitely want to
maintain a very simple version of the player.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of johnleeke
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:35 PM
> To: videoblogg
technology companies) to ensure that the
> rules and standards that come out on the other side of the
> old/new media combination works well for everyone. Anyway,
> I'll probably post the piece later today. I'll let y'all know
> when it's up.
>
> On 1
Ah, Susan, I think I'm staying in the Hilton too! Sweet!
This is going to be a very good SXSW.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:35 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subjec
I would definitely have to kill you if I told you. And with 2,500
people on this list it would be a long, very messy job :)
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lan Bui
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:06 AM
> To: video
Hey guys,
For the postroll ads people have to watch the entire video to see the
ad, then click on the ad to make you any money. Until recently, this
had to happen on blip.tv itself. We're now serving some ads off-site,
and more every day. By next week we should be showing ads on the vast
majori
I'm hanging out with Brian from AIB right now and he asked me for the same
thing not an hour ago. You and Brian will both get your wish very soon. :)
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun Jan 14 20:57:27 2007
Subject: [vide
For the record, you can upload a 1gb video to blip. Its just very very strongly
discouraged.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun Jan 14 21:37:38 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: What do you want in a player? - Markus
H
As it happens we know Steve, and I'll give him a ring today.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Watson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 7:42 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] magnify.
Here we go...
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Cammack
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:47 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [videoblogging] Re: magnify.net ?
>
> Yep. I'm watching your video no
Congratulations Peter, and welcome to the club, Frank!
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 18 12:12:26 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] mefeedia news
Hi all,
We've decided to turn over the reins of mefeedia.com to Frank
Man, that really sucks.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 18 12:35:29 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] Myspace blocking embeds in profile?
Hey folks -
Has anyone noticed that Myspace no longer allows < embed /> code
Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several points,
including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have the right to
resell our users' work without express user permission and would never do such
a thing.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogr
Lasica
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu Jan 18 14:06:48 2007
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post
On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several points,
> including extremely major ones. We d
nal Message -
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ;
JD Lasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thu Jan 18 14:06:48 2007
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post
>
> On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fyi, th
We do, but not quite as described on videovertigo. We're not sending it
through in cross-posts anymore since there doesn't seem to be aggregator
support for it.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pepa
> Sent: Friday, Janua
Terms of Service post
>
> Den 19.01.2007 kl. 00:00 skrev Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Its a very hard thing to boil a really large legal document into a
> > couple bullet points. I think jd's done a great job, its
> just a matter
> > of accounting for
I don't think that's the problem so much. 3g2 is a newer format, and I'd
imagine the difference is influenced more by the generation of phone than by
the network. If I recall correctly I've played with a few gsm phones that
handle 3g2 just fine.
- Original Message -
From: videobloggin
I would think you can't go wrong with 3gp.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun Jan 21 19:25:11 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Can I have some mobile video help?
Here is a video in .3gp format:
http://m.billshackelfor
And you work for or worked for them and are good friends with their CEO.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue Jan 23 00:46:03 2007
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Veoh Playing Nice?
I continue to have good experiences and ge
Hey Ron,
Right now we don't support private video or password-protected video on
blip.tv because of our focus on broadcasting to the public. We try to
avoid muddying the waters by adding features that may be more
appropriate for other types of video sharing. That said, private video
sharing is a
Hey Bill,
This is indeed pretty easy to do. We do it for a number of reasons,
from collecting statistical information to finding the most appropriate
server to deliver the video from, which means that our code for doing
this is pretty complicated. Your code can probably be much simpler.
I'm no
t; headers. It's deciding what kind of stats you want to save
> and then building the database scripts to deal with it.
>
> - Andreas
>
> Den 23.01.2007 kl. 14:47 skrev Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hey Bill,
> >
> > This is indeed pr
e you guys for
> that but still, its only a tiny fraction of this list.
>
> It would be great to see all of the everyday technical
> problems with service discussed on your website instead of this one.
>
> Thanks for the consideration,
> Drew
>
> Sent via CrackB
Hey guys,
Just so that you know the information about blip.tv in this table is
about six months old, and much has changed since then. We're getting in
touch with the author to make the change, in the meantime you can see
our actual advertising program by clicking on the link about blip.tv in
the
d we'll
proceed with implementation with both companies.
---
Mike Hudack
CEO, blip.tv
Office: 917-546-6989
AIM: mikehudack
Read the blip.tv blog: http://blog.blip.tv/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
hard?
>
> On 26 Jan 2007, at 10:18, Jan McLaughlin wrote:
>
> Thanks, Mike: Vlogosphere Secretary of State.
>
> Jan
>
> On 1/25/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just wanted to give everyone an update on where we
the
> rest of my work.
>
> Cheers,
> Ron
>
> On Jan 25, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Mike Hudack wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just wanted to give everyone an update on where we stand with
> > MyHeavy and Magnify, since I've met with the CEOs both companies
John,
I'm going to reply to David directly in just a moment. I'd just like to
point out that my ability to discuss the particular case of Magnify
right now is fairly limited since negotiations with Magnify are ongoing
and I don't want to jeopardize those conversations. It's kind of like
lawyers
en after I'm halfway down his throat? If that's the new
> > > regime, then let this be public notice: please don't come take
> stuff
> > > out of my house either. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Mike, this is not aimed at you. I appreciate the laudable work
would I have to make to get the offending website to stop? How
> > long
> > > > would it take them to compensate me? It's untenable.
> Opt-out is
> > > > bogus, unethical and probably illegal. Are we really okay with
> > > > this? Google is get
r-
> adjacent
> > > AdSense advertisements because they want the extra traffic that
> > > Magnify may generate will easily be able to opt in."
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve Elbows
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROT
; Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:15:17
> > To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MyHeavy and Magnify and aggregators in
> > general
> >
> > Wow, thanks for all the hard work and time you have spent
> on this. I
> > think it is great.
&
heir business models in our direction so
> we can more effectively help each other succeed.
>
> ALoha and mahalo nui Mike for your good will and tireless attention.
>
> Rox
>
>
>
> On 1/26/07, Lan Bui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> &
7;s not in yours either.
>
> Please think about the implications.
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > All I was really looking for from Magnify was attribution and a
> link.
> >
> > Any word on th
shboard and choose my options from there. I do want folks
> to realize that sites pursuing an opt-out strategy outside
> this kind of sandbox arrangement with blip or other services
> we use is inappropriate.
>
> And, again, thanks for your advocacy.
>
> -David
>
> --
this list to publicly discuss these
> relationships between a video hosting site and
> aggregatorsit'd be good if we all defined what we expect
> when someone uses ouir videos.
>
> Jay
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Mike Hudack" &
If you're looking to build a real form for this, you can do it using the
blip.tv API. We have documentation at http://wiki.blip.tv/ (the
username and password is in the prompt).
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Gar
Ah, micropayments, that favorite topic of mine! Way back when, long
before blip, I tried to build a micropayments service with a few of the
folks now at blip. The challenges we saw then are the same challenges
we see now: in order to do micropayments effectively you need a system
to pool transact
I don't think that's the issue. There's a ton of money spent on advertising
that isn't really thought about. Its brand adjacency that scares buyers.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri Jan 26 10:41:23 2007
Subject: Re: [
idering the
> > possibility of making the default position for Magnify "opt-out"
> rather
> > than opt-in (unlike providers who adhere closely to all points of
> the
> > best practices). Content creators who are okay with
> player-adjacent
> > AdSense advertisements because they want the extra traffic that
> Magnify
> > may generate will easily be able to opt in.
> >
> > Please let me know if these are acceptable outcomes for you, and
> we'll
> > proceed with implementation with both companies.
> >
> > ---
> > Mike Hudack
> > CEO, blip.tv
> >
> > Office: 917-546-6989
> > AIM: mikehudack
> >
> > Read the blip.tv blog: http://blog.blip.tv/
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Rupert,
Seems like we're crossing the line between videoblogging group
conversation and e-mail that should be sent directly to blip (we'd like
to try to keep blip support topics off the videoblogging group whenever
possible). We actively discourage the sharing of login information
(including e-ma
; walled-garden approach, such as the youtube approach.
>
> One minor question, about your post below.
>
> I don't see anything on my blip dash board about opt in/out
> to myheavy or magnify.
>
> Did you mean these will be available in the future, or am I
> missing an
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:59 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy and Magnify and
> aggregators in general
>
> Copyrigh
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 11:51 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy and Magnify and
> aggregators in general
>
> On 1/28/07
> On 1/26/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that defaulting to opt-out would make our
> negotiations harder,
> > and I also think that a good number of people who wouldn't
> object to
> > syndication to, say, AOL, would never opt in
I think we can all agree that the economy, whether on a global scale or
on a smaller scale such as the one we're currently discussing, is not a
zero-sum game.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Sent: Sunday, Janua
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
