Thanks for the comments yall! The top charts part of Magma is just the
popular entry point. What Im most excited by is the potential for Magma to
become one of the most effective ways to find those obscure, off the beaten
track videos that no one is watching except you and your friends.
This
You are so right and we have IP detection on our priority list before public
roll out in order to select a nationally specific version that will exclude
any videos that are not available in your country. Thanks for the comment
Frank!
Andrew
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Frank Carver
Thanks Rupert. This is the best example of a reason why its good to keep
things private while letting people use the site. I didnt even know about
the limit on tags, you should be able to have a one or two character tag, I
just add that to the bug fix list.
Thanks again!
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at
Well, this list doesn't do it for me much anymore either. I dont
really get that much support from the list. This is not to say that
this is not a supportive community or that its gone bad, its just that
I personally dont get that much from it anymore.
People are not as moved as they seemed to
Without needing to use the export to iphone feature, the iphone now
plays most .mov files, including 3ivx, mpeg4 and h.264 [you can surf
rocketboom.com on the iphone without any problems].
However, a couple of weeks ago, we created special interface just
for the iphone:
Yep, thats one part, and mostly some javascript.
On Jul 16, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Hello Andrew,
On 7/16/07, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
However, a couple of weeks ago, we created special interface just
for the iphone:
http
Wikipedia is a business.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:08:17
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Wikipedia allow commercial CC media contribution
requirement
I understand the concept of Free
This news re: youtube certainly helps to change my opinion about H.
264's adoption potential.
I think my prior comments on 3ivx went up against H.264 but I still
believe the main benefit of 3ivx is that it is a better alternative
to mpeg4 compression as an encoder. Its comparison to H.264 is
We use 3ivx on Rocketboom for our main .mov Quicktime distribution
file. I've used this for about 2 years and I'm glad to see that the
update is finally here (when Apple came out with the Intel
processors, creating 3ivx was not possible (though playing was) and
so we have remained on an
I would suggest that h264 is not nearly as pervasive of an option to consider
yet do to the large number of machines out there that can not process the codec
fast or smooth enough.
Also, while H264 looks nice at the highest of settings, I have grown weary of
the artifacts that appear with
@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, while H264 looks nice at the highest of settings, I have grown
weary of the artifacts that appear with intricate motion.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hu
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: yeehawsunny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:11:11
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Freedom of Speech Watch How you Say it. Call For
Help
My good friend runs the American Civil Liberties Union
Sorry, please disregard, I didn't have the phone on lock and that email was
sent by my pocket.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:45:33
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re
Today we launched a new sponsorship model with YouTube as our first day's
sponsor:
http://www.rocketboom.com/sponsorship
So far, we have received pretty good feedback, any crits?
Sent via CrackBerry
Good points. When talking about an order of $ in the hundreds of
dollars, I guess cheap is relative, especially considering how much
time you may spend in your life encoding and how expensive it would
of been a few years ago.
I imagine a line a computers that cost more (but still consumer),
I'd pitch in for D.C. the folowwing year when things are way more manic.
But now or then, D.C. Is a good one I thinlk.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:04:23
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re:
The only reason NOT to go with separate files, in my opinion, is
based on ranking in the charts. For instance, if you have 2 or three
dif quicktime feeds, it starts to divide your itunes audiences and
then you dont get reported on any charts. There is some discovery
loss for people who
Elbows
--- In videoblogging@: mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason NOT to go with separate files, in my opinion, is
based on ranking in the charts. For instance, if you have 2 or three
dif quicktime feeds
2 years later, does the question still apply? No feed = no videoblog?
:)
On Apr 17, 2007, at 9:39 AM, joshpaul wrote:
Is there a feed? I couldn't find one.
On 4/17/07, Peter Van Dijck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is now a videoblogger :) Some of ours are funnier though.
This Friday on Rocketboom we are going to highlight a video from
Videoblogging week 2007.
We asked people to find their favorites and then leave the link(s) to
the video in the comments section today.
And/or you can vote on your favorite one there in the comments.
Rocketboom news-day videos have embedded links, you can click on the
QT video and launch a browser window with the reference.
We use Textation:
http://home.netvigator.com/~feelorium/feelorium/Textation/index.html
Its a bit of a clunky editor but work just fine.
On Apr 2, 2007, at 7:26 PM,
geek nerd dork
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Mar 2007 19:44:18
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New words for the vlogging world??
In Cincinnati Ohio, you are still just a geek, trust me (talking
Interesting email I got. Attacking the msm for a presidential politician is
very risky, but you can almost imagine the implications as it reads.
The potential is great which we all know, but it feels like we may soon reach a
tipping point.
Email:
You may have heard by now that John Edwards
It would be nice if someone would put up a videoblogging sxsw wiki.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:02:13
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] SXSW Roll Call
Tim Street
8th-13th
Sent from my
I'm happy to lend a hand too, I think NYC would be super.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:47:16
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Vloggercon? (was Re: Tuesday FlashMeeting)
NYC! NYC!
We just completed a demographics study of the Rocketboom audience.
We were motivated to do it because advertisers have been egging us on.
I decided to take the opportunity to find out for myself anyway.
A few interesting inferences to be made.
Here is a link to the post which show a fews of
. :)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just completed a demographics study of the Rocketboom audience.
We were motivated to do it because advertisers have been egging
us on.
I decided to take the opportunity to find out for myself anyway
This may be a repeat email from last year and the year before that,
but I encourage everyone to consider SXSW.
I have been on quite the conference circuit and hands-down, SXSW is
the most fun. Its very social, very informative, its a great town and
a great season to be there.
Check out the
This may be a repeat email. If this email comes first however, I may
have figured out how to streamline the yahoo group system. If not,
back to the drawing board.
I sent the below to take you up on the bitching Steve because I just
cant let you get away with it all alone ;) Im serious
Great! Notes from Steve, the self-proclaimed authority on
videoblogging (who has been talking about starting his own for over 2
years now). Lets strip out all the nonsense and get right to the
points Steve was trying to make with Jeff Pulver's offer to give away
$40 thousand dollars to a
I figured out how to email through, perhaps.
If your reply-to-email to the videoblogging group has all the html
stuff on the side bar that Yahoo sticks on the email, such at the
recent activiy side bar, colorful sponsored links etc, then I
guess the email will get clogged up while Yahoo
I know a lot of people here use blip and I love you guys for that but still,
its only a tiny fraction of this list.
It would be great to see all of the everyday technical problems with service
discussed on your website instead of this one.
Thanks for the consideration,
Drew
Sent via
One question I have, and it is hinted at, but not
clear, so I would prefer a yes no type answer is.
Does the phone allow for cell phone video recording?
how minutes in recording capacity?
Im going to infer that the answer is no video recording.
a) Video recording was not mentioned.
b) The
video iphone - question
And can you Video Chat with iChat AV?
on 1/10/07 12:01 AM, andrew michael baron at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mailto:andrew%40rocketboom.com com wrote:
One question I have, and it is hinted at, but not
clear, so I would prefer a yes no type answer
The internet will use will happen over wi-fi and then when wi-fi is unavail it
will switch to EDGE and then GSM if no EDGE.
So yes, just like this piece of crap blackberry (yesterdays gem) which I have
set up on cingular edge and gsm, the iphone will have interent whereever
cingular has
I'm in steve jobs keynote right now.
Oh boy. This phone is a widscreen. No buttons.
160pixels per inch.
Thinner than Q and black jack.
Runs osx!!!
2 mega pixel camera.
This is a major revolution.
I tried to upload a video pic on flickr.
Also itv now called apple tv is out in feb
/07, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mailto:andrew%40rocketboom.com com wrote:
I'm in steve jobs keynote right now.
Oh boy. This phone is a widscreen. No buttons.
160pixels per inch.
Thinner than Q and black jack.
Runs osx!!!
2 mega pixel camera.
This is a major
the battery consumption like?
--- andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mailto:andrew%40rocketboom.com
com
wrote:
The interface is the most impressive.
You can pintch and expand your fingers to zoom, and
you can scroll by moving your finger across screen.
Runs full safari
@yahoogroups.com, CarLBanks carlbanks@ wrote:
I think one of the coolest things from reading the liveblogs is
that IT RUNS OS X!On 1/9/07, andrew michael baron
andrew@ wrote: 5 hours of full video/phone use, 16hrs
of audio. Due out in June. :(
Sent via
, CarLBanks carlbanks@ wrote:
I think one of the coolest things from reading the liveblogs
is that
IT RUNS
OS X!
On 1/9/07, andrew michael baron andrew@ wrote:
5 hours of full video/phone use, 16hrs of audio.
Due out in June. :(
Sent via
Bark.
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Paul Knight wrote:
woof woof, go andrew
I still want one.
Paul Knight
On 9 Jan 2007, at 19:08, CarLBanks wrote:
I think one of the coolest things from reading the liveblogs is
that IT RUNS
OS X!
On 1/9/07, andrew michael baron [EMAIL
How many kids have a phone and an ipod? Now you only need one.
Add the camera, video player and there ya go, a much better deal.
Plus, there is the high-design which is worth it, having seen how the
interface works.
Also, the computer supports memory cards.
On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Heath
And java.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Freitas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:42:15
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED], videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: [video_vertigo] iPhone
sull wrote:
do you think osx is
If anyone is interested in helping out with a second life event
(first Congressional presence in a virtual world), we are interested
in a couple of extra cinematographers to help document this event:
http://tinyurl.com/y646zh
If you are savvy with screen capturing in Second Life and
A very interesting observation of the MSM ignoring videoblogging's
role in the anouncemenet:
http://newteevee.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/
...Some of the MSM accounts do reference the fact that Edwards
official campaign Web site went live briefly Wednesday by mistake3, a
),
but to 1) learn from all of you as I create my own vlog and 2) to
discuss the implications of public policy that might impact the
fortunes of online video. I look forward to it.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today Joanne, Chuck and I
Today Joanne, Chuck and I are out in New Orleans.
We just filmed John Edwards' first announcement that he is running
for president.
I just uploaded the video to John Edwards' YouTube account.
a href=http://youtube.com/watch?v=1etlZaf6zUw;http://youtube.com/
watch?v=1etlZaf6zUw/a
(BTW, it
You must be in a different field.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 15:33:40
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Congdon at Apple
How the heck do I get featured on there?!
On 12/23/06, Casey
On iHD and high bit rate files:
One of the things that helped popularize Rocketboom initially was
that I was one of the first to regularly distribute video content
with enclosures.
At the time, the audience (audio podcasters) was growing a great
rate, but there was almost no video content
- I want it to be opt-in
- I want prominent link to my site
- I want a link to the post's permalink
- I want a link to my feed (not the directory's feed of my stuff)
- I want my work's license displayed
I find this list of points to be spot on as the primary concerns.
I think FireAnt,
On Dec 18, 2006, at 5:23 PM, sull wrote:
so, let's talke about 'added value'.
No one has put it all together in one easy place to discover. Its an
obvious missing gap and the value to everyone is immense.
For this reason, I believe (so far) the directory part of the
conversation should be
Obviously you feel something is different here with Network2. Can you
explain why you see this as different?
-Verdi
Sure, it all comes down to the people.
The aggregator I complained about recently involved a guy who
threatened to sue Rocketboom.
This aggregator involves a guy who has
Oh boy, digging a deeper hole for yourself.
ABC News is exactly the people we were in deep talks with. ABC NEws
and ABC Family. Its all under Dinsey and we were in project talks
with all. You have just lied again, mark my words here. I will
release the document to my blog then.
The AAA
The deal I was trying to secure was for $250,000
You landed the deal for $0.
Nice one.
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Amanda Congdon wrote:
As far as AAA goes, just another example of you failing to secure
sponsorship. No contract, no deal. Unless there was a contract that
you hid from me?
PROTECTED]
Cc: Johnson, Channing [EMAIL PROTECTED], andrew michael
baron [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Congdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Matthew Lesher, semi-urgent
Bryan and Channing,
Thank you for getting back to me on this so quickly. As it turns
out, the HBO meeting is now happening
The best way to avoid factual statements is to ask questions.
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Amanda Congdon wrote:
This proves what? That I (not you) had an HBO meeting and that I fired
my manager?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you
Ladies and Gentlemen, Im finished.
Ive said everything I wanted to say to defend myself from Amanda.
EOF
I would like to explain my method and thank you for providing a forum
in which to help.
I did not find this back-n-forth harmful, inappropriate or out of the
ordinary.
For me this is a
BBC!? You da man!
On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Paul Knight wrote:
Drew,
You da man, as far as I concerned.
Paul
On 16 Dec 2006, at 21:15, andrew michael baron wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen, Im finished.
Ive said everything I wanted to say to defend myself from Amanda.
EOF
I
Gary, whats the point of telling me Im getting on your nerves? You
are doing exactly what Andrew Congdon did and I have no problem
speaking up about it and defending myself.
I think I provided a well rounded argument for disucssion about the
cost of doing business when merging established
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of andrew michael baron
Sent: 15 December 2006 14:33
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!
Gary, whats the point of telling me Im getting on your nerves? You
are doing exactly what Andrew
On the topic of ABC's videoblog, I'm going to set aside all of the
technical problems everyone has already mentioned with the video
distribution and the ABC platform - the fact that there are no RSS
feeds, the comments are pre-approved and filtered (even when not
offensive), the video
Apparently, not having your own ideas runs in the family. ;)
On Dec 14, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Andrew Congdon wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sour_grapes
On 12/14/06, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the topic of ABC's videoblog, I'm going to set aside all
Jeeze, I have never been so offended.
Its like Alice and Wonderland around here, somebody pinch me:
http://www.dembot.com/011895.html
On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:47 AM, CarLBanks wrote:
This gives me hope that I could be picked up one day.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
own show, I think. Or you can continue to
attempt to drag me down and write emotional emails to ABC but I'm
done talking about this publicly. Time to move on.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeeze, I have never been so offended.
Its
, jesse.cooper wrote:
A creative partnership I thought you all had that with
rocketboom... now it sounds as if you would like to creatively get
paid by ABC for what Amanda does regardless if you are a part of it or
not.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL
.
I've always said to Amanda that we should just have a public debate to
end this once and for all, that way we can show everyone the truth.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amanda, I have always been outspoken about sharing my experiences
http://wearcam.org/glogs.htm. (I don't mind telling you
that I almost peed my pants with glee when I found out I may
be able to get my hands on an Eyetap http://www.eyetap.org/
and join the cyborg logging weirdos.)
Nox
On 12/8/06, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
You are also a human, like it or not. And you can call it what you
want but its a website you are talking about when you say 'my site'.
You could take your site off the web but right now its there and
that's what it is.
You vlogger, you.
:P
On Dec 9, 2006, at 3:56 PM, David Howell wrote:
Back to the age old question of terminology, I think vlogging and
vloggers stuck.
Surprisingly, even the regular You-Tube people identify with vlogging.
Just in case anyone is interested, here is the bulk of an apple
script that we just started using to auto-upload all our files each day.
After the master file is complete, and the rendering is engaged, the
script waits for the files to complete rendering, and then ftp's all
the files to the
On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Ted Tagami wrote:
can you skype-out with this?
.
Yep.
BTW, a couple of weeks ago at the Network2 party in NYC, Nokia showed
up with an N95 which is now out and seems to be a major upgrade and
also supports calls over i.p :
The new auto-focus, 5 megapixel
:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering getting the Nokia N93 for two purposes:
- Can only have a basic plan with Sprint or another carrier -- I'm
considering the $29.95, 200 minutes plan -- or is another plan
required
Cool, I just made one with a story album I created once before.
A new part of the story will appear each day, no matter when you sign
up, as you say. Neat-o!
http://feeds.feedcycle.com/10033/10063/68d31be2/1164596201/
Drew
http://www.rocketboom.com
http://www.dembot.com
On Nov 26, 2006, at
In The Myth of Sisyphus, Sisyphus, unfortunately, was in the wrong place at the wrong time and overheard secrets of the Gods fighting. So Sisyphus was punished to spend the rest of his life pushing a bolder up a mountain. When the bolder fell, or rolled over the other side of the mountain,
In case anyone is interested we have been working with this really
cool company called Podzinger.
I have been pretty excited about this feature, probably more so than
any one feature we have added to our site:
http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/search.html
Its speech-to-text video search and
I predict this article will be more of the talk of today:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.05/guide.html
Not just online, this is a pretty comprehensive overview for a
magazine.
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Yikes, to clerify, check out the story links on the right, all kinds
of goodness.
On May 1, 2006, at 10:33 AM, andrew michael baron wrote:
I predict this article will be more of the talk of today:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.05/guide.html
Not just online, this is a pretty
I also thought this was a good one!On May 1, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Ted Tagami wrote: Overall, I'd say a very good article! Congratulations! On 5/1/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Video bloggers claim spotlight Online diaries looking a lot like television Ellen Lee, Chronicle Staff
There is an interesting discussion with good outbound source links on
the wikipedia entry of CSPAN. It appears as though the site claims in
one place that the material is public domain and in another section
of the website, one could infer that it's not public domain.
also be
similarly used for educational purposes.
http://www.c-spanclassroom.org/copyright.asp
On Apr 30, 2006, at 5:19 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
There is an interesting discussion with good outbound source links on
the wikipedia entry of CSPAN. It appears as though the site claims
Thanks JD, great information!!
On Apr 26, 2006, at 9:49 PM, JD Lasica wrote:
I promised I'd ask an attorney friend about our friend Gumby, and
Andrew's idea of dusting him off and remixing him for the 21st
century. Here's what she says:
This Gumby Problem is a lot like the Peter Pan
We are not having a problem at all right now, but I always think
about this with regards to our theme song that we have adopted, Zoom
a Little Zoom.
It came from an album called Space Songs with Tom Glazer, a popular
1940's folk musician:
http://www.acme.com/jef/singing_science/
Unlike the
David, I could add a pretty long rant about knee jerking responses
but I'll just suck it up and get right to the point:
Copyrights and trademarks can expire, lapse or be changed for a
number of reasons. I have found that in fact there are several Gumby
cartoons that are a part of the public
stubby little fingers typing
away then. Rather than write back to me though, address whatever it is
you have to say to the owners of the Gumby copyright.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, I could
discussion,.,On 4/24/06, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Way to stay off-topic and avoid your dishonest and false statements.None of it is your fault per say, and I assume you can't help it, butI only addressed you to let you know that you were wrong.On Apr 24, 2006, at 1:19 AM, David Howell
I noticed on Veoh, they have a complete Gumby video on the home page in the 'featured videos' section.http://veoh.com/I assume the particular Gumby video http://tinyurl.com/jruf7 is public domain because Michael Eisner is featuring it, along with a couple of complete Superman videos that I have
No, I was trying to say that what used to be God is now just a
stepping stone. . .
On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
Did you buy five copies for your mother?
On 4/20/06, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also an article that came out yesterday
INTERPRETATION: I DONT CARE ABOUT ROLLING STONE!
On Apr 20, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Susan wrote:
Dude, we're going to have to butter your ears just to push you through
the doorway!!
;)
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL
The former Disney CEO, it seems, has joined the board of a San Diego-based company called Veoh, which helps deliver video over the Internet. The NY Times quotes him on why he's so excited about the venture, founded in 2004:"Anybody, now, can have their own network," Mr. Eisner said. "There are
On Eisner's new TV show via BoingBoing:
In spite of his formidable star power, former Disney chairman
Michael Eisner's new CNBC talk show did not attract the audience
network execs hoped. Tuesday's debut of 'Conversations with Michael
Eisner' netted only 95,000 viewers, according to
Much agreed. In terms of user experience, depending on popups to display your work will often provide a discontinuous experience for many people. Because so many people have popup blockers they will have to allow popups, even from a site like Verdi's or that recommended by freevlog . Also,
Thanks for the clarification, I had falsely assumed that browsers blocked pop-ups even when requested. Gald to know thats not an issue for the most part.On Apr 17, 2006, at 10:44 AM, David Meade wrote: Generally requested "pop-ups" are allowed with anything not just Firefox. its only the
I think you misinterpreted my voice then. While you were being sharp
and discounting my question as worthwhile, I simply said:
David, I could be wrong on this, but I'm pretty sure you are not
clear. I had a look at your site and you use the embed code inside an
object. Thus when people begin
I just did the fix. Heres what I did (the following information is
simply reiterated from:
http://developer.apple.com/internet/ieembedprep.html )
#1
First I downloaded this .js java file from Apple:
http://developer.apple.com/internet/licensejs.html
Inside that zip package is a file called:
Basically, if you used an embed object, you will need to convert to _javascript_. :(On Apr 15, 2006, at 4:34 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:I just got a terribly unfortunate e-mail about a new patch that IE is using to avoid paying royalties to Active-X.This probably effects almost all
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, if you used an embed object, you will need to convert to
javascript. :(
On Apr 15, 2006, at 4:34 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
I just got a terribly unfortunate e-mail about a new patch that IE
is using
Hmmm, curious, the scripts you are pointing to seem to me to be HTML embeds which means that they would not work. Or rather, that people who begin to update their IE browsers to the latest updates, may require a message to confirm Active-X. Please correct me if I am wrong, I am just going by
Seems like it would be a great place to work for many videobloggers:
About Pixar Animation Studios:
Pixar Animation Studios combines creative and technical artistry to
create original stories in the medium of computer animation. Pixar
has created six of the most successful and beloved animated
People have mostly gotten to the point on this thread already with
regards to what is socially acceptable under different scenarios,
though I'm pretty sure that no matter the who, what, where, when, or
why, no matter what is fair use or no, no if's and's or but's, one of
the general laws
1 - 100 of 356 matches
Mail list logo
