Re: Eudora 1.5.5

Thomas Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, if Gmail won't work, is there another free POP3 email that works with > Eudora 1.5.5? fastmail.fm works but POP3 isn't a free feature: <http://www.fastmail.fm/> You could use DropMail (which does IMAP) with fas

Re: Eudora 1.5.5

Hotpop.com seems to work right well for the price (free). I *think* the ports are standard, iirc (seems to be set up with 110 in Mail.app right now). Ruffin Bailey On 11/1/05 3:30 PM, "Vintage Macs" wrote: > Ah, if Gmail won't work, is there another free POP3 email that w

Re: Eudora 1.5.5

Hummm... don't think so. I have an Yahoo account which I can fake a POP3 access, and download to my email client, but probably won't work on Mac... I've got a nice little e-mail account, with everything, but its pop3 access only works in Portugal :-( Do some search, but it seems like you are out o

Re: Eudora 1.5.5

Ah, if Gmail won't work, is there another free POP3 email that works with Eudora 1.5.5? Thanks, Thomas - Original Message - From: "Manuel Marques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vintage Macs" Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 5:20 PM Subject: Re: Eudora 1.5.

Re: Eudora 1.5.5

Gmail requires SSL (I think) so the incoming mail port (POP3) should be 995 instead of 110 (?). And the same happens to SMTP. I had (a bit of) trouble configuring the account in - imagine - Outlook 2003! Probably Eudora 1.5.5 won't work. :( Manuel Jorge M. Marques _ [EMAIL PROT

Re: Eudora 1.5.5

At 13:04 -0500 10/30/05, Thomas Burns wrote: >pop account [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Should I use another POP3 mail service or is Eudora too old? The lady wanted me to try gmail and set up an account for me almost a year ago. I have not been able to make Eudora 5.1 connect to it. They have s

Re: Eudora 1.5.5

I think gmail uses a special port instead of the regular port for mail. You may want to check with the gmail instruction? Sherman On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Thomas Burns wrote: Does anyone know how to configure Eudora 1.5.5 for gmail or some other email service? I'm trying to use

Eudora 1.5.5

Does anyone know how to configure Eudora 1.5.5 for gmail or some other email service? I'm trying to use it on a Mac Plus, but I get connection failed half way error. pop account [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp: smtp.gmail.com return address [EMAIL PROTECTED] via MacTCP Should I use another POP3

Re: Eudora Error

Hi All, > > Here's what I have: LCIII w/ a Q605 Mobo, 36 MB of RAM. A recent clean > install > of 7.5.3 w/ Open Transport 1.1.2 and Free PPP. The modem is a 33k Global > Village External. > > The software in question is Eudora Light 3.1.3 > > More often than

Eudora Error

Hi All, Here's what I have: LCIII w/ a Q605 Mobo, 36 MB of RAM. A recent clean install of 7.5.3 w/ Open Transport 1.1.2 and Free PPP. The modem is a 33k Global Village External. The software in question is Eudora Light 3.1.3 More often than not, Eudora will download a few messages then

Re: Eudora 3.1.3, ERR Bad login

At 20:40 -0500 on 06/03/03, Hardy Menagh wrote: >All correct. As to what system the server is, I don't know but may be >able to find out in a day or so with an email. The administrator is >going to work on it over the weekend. I just wanted to provide any Yeah, we can help him out a lot better if

Re: Eudora 3.1.3, ERR Bad login

On Thu, Mar 6, 2003, 7:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the pickle) wrote: So it sounds like your ISP's server doesn't like the [EMAIL PROTECTED] format, if I'm understanding that right. Correct? And that it also works fine if you use user: username POP3 server: server.tld but that Eudora

Re: Eudora 3.1.3, ERR Bad login

At 10:41 -0500 on 06/03/03, Hardy Menagh wrote: >I apologize if this is OT. I use Eudora Light 1.3.1 - 3.1.3 on a variety of >Compact, Vintage (and a G3) Macs. > >I signed on with a new ISP and am getting "ERR Bad login" messages when I >try to access my POP3 accou

Eudora 3.1.3, ERR Bad login

I apologize if this is OT. I use Eudora Light 1.3.1 - 3.1.3 on a variety of Compact, Vintage (and a G3) Macs. I signed on with a new ISP and am getting "ERR Bad login" messages when I try to access my POP3 account with them. Outside POP servers (like WebTV.net and Subdimension.com) wor

Re: Eudora 1.3.1 and Big Messages

Alan, I experienced the very same problem on my Mac Plus running Eudora 1.3.1, and since I couldn't get the email sent again, I had to follow a very circuituous route to get the file into one piece. I took the several parts and pasted each of them, in order, into a Word 5.1 document, and

Re: Eudora 1.3.1 and Big Messages

At 16:58 -0800 on 30/01/03, Alan O'Neil wrote: >I'm using Eudora 1.3.1 on my FeetsMac and it seems to have an aversion to >large messages. Every email that is over 24K is downloaded in 24K pieces >and saved with the subject "yadda yadda 1/3" and "yadda yadda 2/3&

Eudora 1.3.1 and Big Messages

I'm using Eudora 1.3.1 on my FeetsMac and it seems to have an aversion to large messages. Every email that is over 24K is downloaded in 24K pieces and saved with the subject "yadda yadda 1/3" and "yadda yadda 2/3" until there are enough pieces to total the original me

Eudora

ddrive it allowed me to increase the memory but then balked for not having the appearance manager installed.Thinking that this was an OS extension I did'nt hold out much hope for the DiskImage.I was surprised then seeing it being installed with Eudora. Alls well. Gil -- Vintage

Eudora

the pickle wrote: > > At 21:39 -0500 on 07/01/03, Ian Johnson wrote: > > >What if all of the files from the CD are copied to the hard disk and placed > >in the same arrangement, or the CD is imaged to a read/write DiskCopy image? > > The first *might* work but the second is almost certain to suc

Re: Eudora

on't succeed, we run the risk of failure." > -George W. Bush > ------ Hurrah! I can now use Eudora 4.2 on my IIci.Jeff pinned the problem.The settings panel on 1.5.5 and 3.1 only have a place to show the SMTP server and none for the

Re: Attbi and Eudora

--- Scott Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:03 PM 10/23/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Woops. I meant IMAP :) > > Ah, well, that'll do it ;) I personally think IMAP > would have died if not > for Microsoft taking it and twisting it around to > the evil that is Outlook ;) Heh, any of these

Re: Attbi and Eudora

At 21:09 -0400 on 23/10/02, Scott Holder wrote: >Ah, well, that'll do it ;) I personally think IMAP would have died if not >for Microsoft taking it and twisting it around to the evil that is Outlook ;) Don't forget pine. It's probably one of the big reasons IMAP still exists in the higher educat

Re: Attbi and Eudora

At 09:03 PM 10/23/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Erm, then how am I using SMTP on Eudora Light 1.5.4 then? It certainly is > >in that version, and has been in every version since AFAIR. > >Woops. I meant IMAP :) Ah, well, that'll do it ;) I personally think IMAP would have die

Re: Attbi and Eudora

At 20:58 -0400 on 23/10/02, Scott Holder wrote: >At 07:51 PM 10/23/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >>POP3, yes; SMTP not unless you can find the 68K version of Eudora Pro 4, which >>is getting rather difficult to locate these days. > >Erm, then how am I using SMTP on Eud

Re: Attbi and Eudora

At 07:51 PM 10/23/2002 -0400, you wrote: >POP3, yes; SMTP not unless you can find the 68K version of Eudora Pro 4, which >is getting rather difficult to locate these days. Erm, then how am I using SMTP on Eudora Light 1.5.4 then? It certainly is in that version, and has been in every v

Re: Attbi and Eudora

access my email from upstairs, where it is more convenient to me. Can >Eudora (a free 68k version perhaps) do pop3 and smtp? POP3, yes; SMTP not unless you can find the 68K version of Eudora Pro 4, which is getting rather difficult to locate these days. -- the pickle FAQ <http://macfaq.org/ind

Re: Attbi and Eudora

Eudora should do just fine. I still use the latest version on my PC and various other versions on my Macs. Scott Holder -Original Message- From: Vintage Macs [mailto:vintage.macs@;mail.maclaunch.com] On Behalf Of Alan O'Neil Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:32 PM To: Vintage

Attbi and Eudora

His list and thanks for the help. I am now browsing the web with WannaBe and it is very snappy. My only gripe is that I cannot enter text into an input field (i.e. to log into my AT&T email account) and I really want to access my email from upstairs, where it is more convenient to me. Can Eu

Re: Eudora conflicts?

> > >"Error involving Domain Name System. -23009 There are already 64 TCP >>or UDP streams open. (tcp:544)". >>dan_A > >Is the v3.01 an Eudora Lite version? >In any case, Eudora Lite 3.1.3L might be an upgrade that works better for you. > >Gamba >

Re: Eudora conflicts?

>I recently upgraded my IIci with a Sonnet Presto 040 card. I also >have the IIci on my cable network. Prior to installing the 040, I had >Eudora problems (V3.01). I was able to get on line with ICab but no >matter what I did to the Eudora settings I kept getting this error >mes

Re: Eudora conflicts?

IIci on my cable network. Prior to installing the 040, I had Eudora problems (V3.01). I was able to get on line with ICab but no matter what I did to the Eudora settings I kept getting this error message: "Error involving Domain Name System. -23009 There are already 64 TCP or UDP streams open

Eudora conflicts?

-- Hi All- I recently upgraded my IIci with a Sonnet Presto 040 card. I also have the IIci on my cable network. Prior to installing the 040, I had Eudora problems (V3.01). I was able to get on line with ICab but no matter what I did to the Eudora settings I kept getting this error message

Re: Eudora attachments RoundUp!

>'uucd' can be found at in the shareware section If you don't have any luck there, try: which is located on this page: -- Vintage Macs is sponsored

decoding attachments Re: Eudora eats outgoing attachments too! (was: incoming...)

--- mart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BBEdit? Thanks! > > -mart Make sure you get the beginning and ending tags of the encoded text. A good decoder will skip anything before it finds the start tag and ignore anything after the end tag. You can snag binary attachments off usenet that way, but i

Re: OLD e-mail; Was: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Mikael Jolkkonen wrote: [snip] > I guess that these things are becoming less well known nowadays, when > most e-mail clients auto-decode pretty much everything, but this is the > way things were done in the past. I recall getting bin-hex attachments as multi-part e-mail. That is, multiple messag

Eudora attachments RoundUp!

Hi! The Eudora 1.3.1 problems with incoming attachments are solved! Here's a summary: 1. The config menu: I see no difference/improvement with the choics 'application TEXT files belong to'. Eudora still encapsulates all the data into long multipart garbage mails. 2. the use

Eudora eats outgoing attachments too! (was: incoming...)

>Here's a trick I did on an attachment you sent me (yes it chews up >outgoing ones too). Aha! Mark, that's good to know. Although I have succesfully sent pictures with this Eudora recently. I'll dig in to it. I have some difficulties with Photoshop 3 and creator stuff

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Here's a trick I did on an attachment you sent me (yes it chews up outgoing ones too). I highlighted the data portion, copied and pasted it into a BBEdit file and saved it with the extension .bin. I then threw it onto Stuffit Expander, worked fine. I think it was BinHex or Macbinary but it mig

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Jeff wrote: >> I took another look at the Eudora config menu. The choice 'application TEXT >> files belong to' is pointed to my word processor Writenow 4. Is that OK - >> in the context of this question? >> >> -mart > > >No, because it's onl

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mart) wrote: >I have a slightly annoying problem. I use Eudora 1.3.1 under sytem 7.1 >with great pleasure, but if somebody sends me a picture as attachment, >Eudora eats it and spits it out as below: > >--7372ECABF546797AEF2CFB9

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

-- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mart) >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vintage Macs) >Subject: Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments! >Date: Tue, Apr 2, 2002, 8:47 AM > I took another look at the Eudora config menu. The choice 'application TEXT > files bel

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

-- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mart) >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vintage Macs) >Subject: Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments! >Date: Tue, Apr 2, 2002, 8:47 AM > > I wrote: >>> I have a slightly annoying problem. I use Eudora 1.3.1 under sytem 7.

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

I wrote: >> I have a slightly annoying problem. I use Eudora 1.3.1 under sytem 7.1 with >> great pleasure, but if somebody sends me a picture as attachment, Eudora >> eats it and spits it out as below: Jeff replied: >That version of Eudora's rather old, and may not

Re: Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

-- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mart) >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vintage Macs) >Subject: Eudora eats all incoming attachments! >Date: Tue, Apr 2, 2002, 5:27 AM > > Dear list, > > I have a slightly annoying problem. I use Eudora 1.3.1 under sytem 7.1 with >

Eudora eats all incoming attachments!

Dear list, I have a slightly annoying problem. I use Eudora 1.3.1 under sytem 7.1 with great pleasure, but if somebody sends me a picture as attachment, Eudora eats it and spits it out as below: --7372ECABF546797AEF2CFB90 Content-Type: image/jpeg; x-mac-type="4A504547&qu

Re: Eudora

>Called my ISP and asked again about the mail server ("Lost connection to >the mail server" message) >They said they called Qualcomm and they said they are getting lots ofthose >complaints and the ONLY way for folks to solve them is to use Eudora 5 and >up. >Looks li

Re: Eudora

At 16:05 -0600 on 01/10/01, Steve Conrad wrote: >Called my ISP and asked again about the mail server ("Lost connection to >the mail server" message) >They said they called Qualcomm and they said they are getting lots ofthose >complaints and the ONLY way for folks to solve t

Eudora

Called my ISP and asked again about the mail server ("Lost connection to the mail server" message) They said they called Qualcomm and they said they are getting lots ofthose complaints and the ONLY way for folks to solve them is to use Eudora 5 and up. Looks like Eudora wants all usag

Eudora Re: Mail Drop

--- Amber Rhea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While we're on the subject of email... Does anyone > know how to 'subscribe' > to IMAP mailboxes with Eudora?? That was what > deterred me from using Eudora. In my dealings with it (since I do tech support for a small

Re: Eudora

ration. >But if need be, the registration numbers are available. :-) OK, I just got the 4.2.2 updater... Same requirements as Eudora Pro 4.0.1: 68020 or higher, OS 7.1.2 or higher. Eudora 4.0.1 and updater 4.2.2 are up on "The Site." Anyone who wants these & doesn't k

Eudora 4.3.3 ... or Emailer?

>Steff wrote: >>The installer for Eudora 4.3.3 is available for free at >> >>http://www.eudora.com/products/old.html >> >>... however, it requires a PowerPC. > >Sho' 'nuff. I just checked the link. They are indeed giving 4.3.3 >away for free.

eudora

At 7:10 PM -0400 9/26/01, Vintage Macs wrote: >This would be a good one to put in the Archive, but, as Andrew said, >waiting until it's at least two version numbers old might be a good idea. Actually getting permission form QualComm is an even BETTER idea : ) jag -- __ Old m

Re: Eudora 4.3.3

Steff wrote: >The installer for Eudora 4.3.3 is available for free at > >http://www.eudora.com/products/old.html > >... however, it requires a PowerPC. Sho' 'nuff. I just checked the link. They are indeed giving 4.3.3 away for free. I also noticed that they have nothing

Re: Eudora

Amber wrote >>What is the latest version of Eudora that will run on a 68k Mac? >>Couldn't find *any* info o Qualcomm's site - they *really* want >>people to download 5.1! (Couldn't find any info elsewhere, either.) Then STEFAN wrote: >The installer fo

Re: Eudora 4.3.3

The installer for Eudora 4.3.3 is available for free at http://www.eudora.com/products/old.html ... however, it requires a PowerPC. Steff -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | --

Re: Eudora

At 13:19 -0400 on 26/09/01, Patricia Clark wrote: >Amber Rhea wrote: >>What is the latest version of Eudora that will run on a 68k Mac? > >I am too lazy to take my LC III out of the closet and put it together >and look, HOWEVER ... I have two versions of eudora downloaded on m

Re: Eudora

Amber Rhea wrote: >What is the latest version of Eudora that will run on a 68k Mac? I am too lazy to take my LC III out of the closet and put it together and look, HOWEVER ... I have two versions of eudora downloaded on my hard drive on a power mac that I could forward if you t

Eudora

What is the latest version of Eudora that will run on a 68k Mac? Couldn't find *any* info o Qualcomm's site - they *really* want people to download 5.1! (Couldn't find any info elsewhere, either.) -- *** Amber Rhea *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tangerinecs.com/~amber Fo

Re: Eudora

At 00:38 -0700 on 31/08/01, Alex Allee wrote: >From working at UPS for a while, you'd think I'd be an expert at throwing >stuff... Not so. Ah, so YOU'RE the guy who broke all those list members' goods and stole 60 of my CD-Rs a year ago :-p (We had a very entertaining discussion on one of the l

Sacramento County Fair (was Eudora)

es.com> and <http://www.heartwarmers.com> At 12:20 am -0700 8/31/01, regarding Re: Eudora, Alex Allee penned sagely: -> on 8/31/01 12:16 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -> -> >> on 8/30/01 11:59 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -> >&

OT: County Fairs. Re: Eudora

This year's theme for the Western Idaho Fair was "2001: A Fair Odyssey". The billboards and posters all had a pig sitting in a flying saucer on them. :P = "The earth swarms with inhabitants. Why then should nature, which is fruitful to an excess here, be so very barren in the rest of the plan

Re: Eudora

on 8/31/01 1:03 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/31/01 12:34 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/31/01 12:24 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Ugh, yep. I would rather they have drab boring ads than trying >> (and failin

Re: Eudora

>on 8/31/01 12:34 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> on 8/31/01 12:24 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> > Ugh, yep. I would rather they have drab boring ads than trying > (and failing) > to be clever and cute. > > But oh well. I haven't b

Re: Eudora

on 8/31/01 12:34 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/31/01 12:24 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Ugh, yep. I would rather they have drab boring ads than trying (and failing) to be clever and cute. But oh well. I haven't been to the f

Re: Eudora

>on 8/31/01 12:24 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Ugh, yep. I would rather they have drab boring ads than trying >>>(and failing) >>> to be clever and cute. >>> >>> But oh well. I haven't been to the fair in a few years anyway... >> >> Never been... nearly did, but I didn

Re: Eudora

on 8/31/01 12:24 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Ugh, yep. I would rather they have drab boring ads than trying (and failing) >> to be clever and cute. >> >> But oh well. I haven't been to the fair in a few years anyway... > > Never been... nearly did, but I didnt. > So, you g

Re: Eudora

>on 8/31/01 12:16 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> on 8/30/01 11:59 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> > on 8/30/01 11:45 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Advertising sucks >> After listening to the radio driving, sometimes

Re: Eudora

on 8/31/01 12:16 AM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/30/01 11:59 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/30/01 11:45 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Advertising sucks > After listening to the radio driving, sometimes I really

Re: Eudora

>on 8/30/01 11:59 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> on 8/30/01 11:45 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Advertising sucks After listening to the radio driving, sometimes I really want a Rolling Rock (Latrobe Brewing Company, PA)... Peace

Re: Eudora

on 8/30/01 11:59 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/30/01 11:45 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Advertising sucks >>> After listening to the radio driving, sometimes I really want a >>> Rolling Rock (Latrobe Brewing Company, PA)... >>> Peace >>> Aqua >>

Re: Eudora

>on 8/30/01 11:45 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Advertising sucks >> After listening to the radio driving, sometimes I really want a >> Rolling Rock (Latrobe Brewing Company, PA)... >> Peace >> Aqua > >After listening to the radio driving, I *really* don't want anything

Re: Eudora

on 8/30/01 11:45 PM, Andrew W. Hill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Advertising sucks > After listening to the radio driving, sometimes I really want a > Rolling Rock (Latrobe Brewing Company, PA)... > Peace > Aqua After listening to the radio driving, I *really* don't want anything to do with the

Re: Eudora

>Paul Stansen wrote: >>Tuck 'em into a corner and practice ignoring 'em. > > That's how subliminal advertising works best... Your conscious >mind doesn't notice, but, days or weeks later, you find yourself with >an impulse to buy something that you don't even remember seeing an ad >for. >

Ads Re: Eudora

--- Andrew Michael MacTao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stansen wrote: > > Tuck 'em into a corner and practice ignoring > 'em. > > That's how subliminal advertising works best... > Your conscious > mind doesn't notice, but, days or weeks later, you > find yourself with > an impulse to

Re: Eudora

Paul Stansen wrote: > Tuck 'em into a corner and practice ignoring 'em. That's how subliminal advertising works best... Your conscious mind doesn't notice, but, days or weeks later, you find yourself with an impulse to buy something that you don't even remember seeing an ad for. The

Re: Eudora

> >Marten, do you hate my G4? ;) > No, of course not. Why should I? I just felt very sorry for you that you have to get rid of your compact macs... And I hoped that I could get you start thinking again about it by pointing at the small amount of space these machines actually occupy. It's becoming

Re: Eudora

on 8/29/01 9:42 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> on 8/29/01 9:03 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Just download eudora 5 from the Web. It's free. >> >> Yeah, but it's got those annoying ads unless you pay for

Re: Eudora

At 9:23 pm -0400 8/29/01, regarding Eudora, Amber Rhea penned sagely: -> on 8/29/01 9:03 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -> -> > Just download eudora 5 from the Web. It's free. -> -> Yeah, but it's got those annoying ads unless you pay for i

Re: Eudora

At 9:23 PM -0400 8/29/01, Amber Rhea wrote: >on 8/29/01 9:03 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Just download eudora 5 from the Web. It's free. > >Yeah, but it's got those annoying ads unless you pay for it.. :P Just move them to a corner yo

Re: Eudora

At 21:23 -0400 on 29/08/01, Amber Rhea wrote: >on 8/29/01 9:03 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Just download eudora 5 from the Web. It's free. > >Yeah, but it's got those annoying ads unless you pay for it.. :P Then get Lite 3 or

Re: Eudora

>on 8/29/01 9:03 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Just download eudora 5 from the Web. It's free. > >Yeah, but it's got those annoying ads unless you pay for it.. :P > Well, I guess your g4 has at least a 17 inch monitor, so you must have so

Eudora

on 8/29/01 9:03 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just download eudora 5 from the Web. It's free. Yeah, but it's got those annoying ads unless you pay for it.. :P -- *** Amber Rhea *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tangerinecs.com/~amber For great justice -- Vi