Re: [vmeet] Meetecho suggestion for IETF-96 and beyond

There were some times I would have liked to be able to mute the audio in a session. Tony ___ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Re: [vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee

Stewart Bryant wrote: > > I attended remotely, connecting into a (one) session on pretty > well every slot. I had one persistent technical problem: > > I was using W10 + Chrome Version 49.0.2623.110 m (64-bit) > and found that for every session I had to connect, then disconnect > then reconnect

[vmeet] getting better...

I have participated on Meetecho a year ago and it was poor. There is a definite improvement this time. I just ran into several snags where chunks of the meeting froze and important pieces of the conversation were lost. Also, it would be useful if you can add one camera focused on the room, just

Re: [vmeet] Meetecho suggestion for IETF-96 and beyond

I suggest that dicussion of enhancements to meetecho and other virtual meeting tools at least cc the vmeet@ietf.org mailing list. Tony On 4/8/16, 3:38 PM, "WGChairs on behalf of Derek Atkins" wrote: >After spending the week trying to attend several WGs remotely this week, I >have a

Re: [vmeet] remote presenters without headsets

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Thomas Watteyne wrote: > > +1 > > I've seen this over and over. I would also warn folks against iPhone-like > headphones with a mic on the wire. It's either too low (and the voice sounds > too low), or held in front of the presenters mouth, in which case the soun

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

On 4/8/16 4:16 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > video content less active (limit it to slide projection as opposed to a > human face, or change the codec, or have the human able to turn it off > without losing audio, etc). If we have packet sequence number

Re: [vmeet] [95attendees] Experience as a remote attendee

If anyone has comments regarding meetecho, other virtual meeting tooling, and how to make them better, I encourage you to post them on the vmeet@ietf.org mailing list. Tony Hansen From: 95attendees <95attendees-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Stewart Bryant

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > video content less active (limit it to slide projection as opposed to a > human face, or change the codec, or have the human able to turn it off > without losing audio, etc). If we have packet sequence numbers, maybe > we want to capture realtime statist

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

> On Apr 8, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Paul Kyzivat wrote: >> On 4/8/16 9:55 AM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: >>> And to repeat once again, because it bears repeating: >>> >>> First off, meetecho is a VAST improvement over how remote access used >>> to be, and it's getting better

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

Paul Kyzivat wrote: > On 4/8/16 9:55 AM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: >> And to repeat once again, because it bears repeating: >> >> First off, meetecho is a VAST improvement over how remote access used >> to be, and it's getting better every meeting. Thanks!!! > +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +

[vmeet] Experience as a remote attendee

I attended remotely, connecting into a (one) session on pretty well every slot. I had one persistent technical problem: I was using W10 + Chrome Version 49.0.2623.110 m (64-bit) and found that for every session I had to connect, then disconnect then reconnect to get the slides. This was repeat

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

On 4/8/2016 11:57 AM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: Running a tech cockpit might be a task that could/should be offloaded from the chairs. When I was a chair, I found having to fiddle with ack. didn't mean to mandate it as a chair task, if it needn't be. all of the "tech stuff" to be distracting fr

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

On 4/8/16, 1:57 PM, "vmeet on behalf of Dave Crocker" wrote: >On 4/8/2016 10:03 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote: >> I really like the idea of the chair cockpit. For example, we could get >> Meetecho to pre-load the slides that have been loaded in to the tools site >> (and all of the associated draft

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

On 4/8/2016 10:03 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote: I really like the idea of the chair cockpit. For example, we could get Meetecho to pre-load the slides that have been loaded in to the tools site (and all of the associated drafts), have their laptop connected to both projectors, and have their lapto

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

Team Meetecho added. > On Apr 8, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) > wrote: > > I really like the idea of the chair cockpit. For example, we could get > Meetecho to pre-load the slides that have been loaded in to the tools site > (and all of the associated drafts), have their lapt

Re: [vmeet] Suggestion

I really like the idea of the chair cockpit. For example, we could get Meetecho to pre-load the slides that have been loaded in to the tools site (and all of the associated drafts), have their laptop connected to both projectors, and have their laptop be the place where you navigate the decks.

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

On 4/8/16 9:55 AM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: And to repeat once again, because it bears repeating: First off, meetecho is a VAST improvement over how remote access used to be, and it's getting better every meeting. Thanks!!! +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 ___

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

And to repeat once again, because it bears repeating: First off, meetecho is a VAST improvement over how remote access used to be, and it's getting better every meeting. Thanks!!! - Tony On 4/8/16, 9:42 AM, "Meetecho IETF support" wrote: >Hi Tony, > >answering inline. _

[vmeet] Suggestion

Lee and I chatted this morning, and he wondered aloud what it would take to virtualize IETF 100. Not to remove the f2f component, but to make remote participation work well enough that we can say remote participants are at least second class citizens, as opposed to being an oddball tacked on. P

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

On 4/8/16 9:42 AM, Meetecho IETF support wrote: Relaunching the window from agenda starts all over from the very beginning login screen. If you previously clicked "remember my login info", it fills in the name and registration info. But you still need to re-click the buttons acknowledging the no

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

Hi Tony, answering inline. Il 08/04/2016 15:04, HANSEN, TONY L ha scritto: On 4/5/16, 10:57 AM, "Meetecho IETF support" wrote: Il 05/04/2016 01:31, HANSEN, TONY L ha scritto: Some comments from my remote experiences today. First off, meetecho is a VAST improvement over how remote access

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

+1 to all of the below. I've been meaning to post a similar comment. On 4/8/16 9:04 AM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: On 4/5/16, 10:57 AM, "Meetecho IETF support" wrote: Il 05/04/2016 01:31, HANSEN, TONY L ha scritto: Some comments from my remote experiences today. First off, meetecho is a VAST im

Re: [vmeet] meetecho for remote presenters

On 4/5/16, 10:57 AM, "Meetecho IETF support" wrote: >Il 05/04/2016 01:31, HANSEN, TONY L ha scritto: >> Some comments from my remote experiences today. >> >> First off, meetecho is a VAST improvement over how remote access used >> to be, and it's getting better every meeting. Thanks!!! A few mo