Duplication of my US Patent that you asked for is right here http://biz.yahoo.com/ccn/050516/21a58906579d6465ecba4d32a91a3c30.html?.v=2
Just because people would rather first ridicule the idea and then steal it does not make me paranoid Jones - but it has made me more critical of the so called
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/06/27/noil27.xml
A warning of a possible near doubling in the cost of oil was issued yesterday
as UK prices rose to more than £4 a gallon and the AA Motoring Trust said the
price of diesel was approaching £5 a gallon.
Jones,
You accuse me of detracting and bringing scientific disrespect to the topic of ZPE and LENR.
I missed what you said on 6/25/02 "Hal stated clearly that he saw it" which is exactly opposite of the paraphrased "Hal told me he missed meeting Chernetski but got the papers." as he told both
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/06/27/noil27.xml
A warning of a possible near doubling in the cost of oil was issued
yesterday as UK prices rose to more than £4 a gallon and the AA Motoring
Trust said the price of diesel was approaching £5 a
From: Jed Rothwell
I suppose this is an Imperial (British) gallon, which equals 1.2 U.S.
gallons. So it comes to $7.61/gallon.
Yes, thanks Jed. Still a shocking price.
See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/27/politics/27nuke.html
http://www.consolidationeis.doe.gov/
Quote from Times:
Federal officials say the program would produce a total of 330 pounds over
30 years at the Idaho National Laboratory, a sprawling site outside Idaho
Falls some 100 miles to the
thomas malloy wrote:
I wrote;
And Ed Storms responded;
Well Thomas, I give hot fusion a 0 chance for success for the
following reasons:
I was giving the designers the benefit of the doubt when I gave them a
5% chance of success. Perhaps they have come up with some new wrinkle
that you
At 11:08 am 27/06/2005 -0600, Ed wrote:
Let's be realistic, Thomas. At one time the Japanese, the Germans, and
even the British wanted to conquer us.
And I thought it was the British colonists who rebelled and declared
UDI a la Smith in Southern Rhodesia. Just as well whites were in the
I was thinking of the war of 1812, Frank. Of course, burning Washington
would not equal conquering, at least then.
Ed
Grimer wrote:
At 11:08 am 27/06/2005 -0600, Ed wrote:
Let's be realistic, Thomas. At one time the Japanese, the Germans, and
even the British wanted to conquer us.
thanks jed. i wasnt going to step in as ive just had this
conversation with several friends, and liken it to bashing my head in
with a lead brick repeatedly.
On 6/27/05, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
That area of agreement a leftist notion called cultural
At 01:55 pm 27/06/2005 -0400, you wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
That area of agreement a leftist notion called cultural relativism (the
idea that all cultures are all equally good) which is leading to cultural
suicide.
That definition of cultural relativity is completely wrong, misleading and
Grimer wrote:
That definition of cultural relativity is completely wrong, misleading and
childish.
Etc.
The real problem seems to be in the meaning of the
word relativism as opposed to relativity. For example,
It means the same thing. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_relativism
I agree with you, Frank, some cultures are better than others, just as
some scientific theories and some people are better than others. Some
cultures are peaceful while others go to war. Some cultures pretend to
value the individual, while placing increasing emphasis on the state.
Some
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/24jun_electrostatics.htm?list151990
Using electric fields to repel radiation was one of the first ideas back in
the 1950s, when scientists started to look at the problem of protecting
astronauts from radiation, Buhler says. They quickly dropped the idea,
what eds saying is, you and the pope can interpret it how you want.
that doesnt change the fact that you are interpreting it WRONG, and
any attempt to argue a point based on a flawed interpretation is
itself flawed.
On 6/27/05, Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you, Frank,
Grimer wrote:
Hi Harry,
I wasn't sure what COP meant so I had to look it up
on an acronym site. I found Coefficient of Performance
and when I googled that I found it was used primarily
for fridges (and implicitly for heat pumps).
snip
You talkin' to me?
;-)
Harry Veeder
--Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global
Warming--
And the price tag would knock the socks off even a
big-budget agency like NASA: $6 trillion to $200
trillion for the particle approach. Deploying tiny
spacecraft would come at a relative bargain: a mere
$500 billion tops.
At 03:44 pm 27/06/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Jed wrote:
snip
As for the Pope, I doubt he has progressed beyond Pius IX, who in 1896
pontificated (literally) as follows: [L]et him be anathema . . . [w]ho
shall say that human sciences ought to be pursued in such a spirit of
freedom as one may be
leaking pen wrote:
what eds saying is, you and the pope can interpret it how you want.
that doesnt change the fact that you are interpreting it WRONG, and
any attempt to argue a point based on a flawed interpretation is
itself flawed.
Actually, I would soften that a wee bit and say I agree
Grimer wrote:
I very much hope and pray that he hasn't progressed beyond Pius IX
and I look forward to the day when the battle lines are once again
wonderfully clear
I rest my case! We are in perfect agreement. I accuse Grimer of letting
religion trump academic freedom, and interfere with
jed, i swear, head over to fark.com. we could use you. ill even
sponsor you for totalfark. we have discussions like this daily. its
great fun.
On 6/27/05, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grimer wrote:
I very much hope and pray that he hasn't progressed beyond Pius IX
and I look
Reading these posts can become addictive. Some of the insight is profound.
Lets continue the post and include more comments.
The world is blessed with writers with insight and they have provided us
partial answers to trends in world cultural shifts. Unfortunately, their insight
is predicated
closer to 1700 years. st john the divine is not to be confused with
st john the baptist. he lived in roughly 300 ad, and was of a judaic
endtimes cult. not a christian. he talks not of a second coming, but
of the first coming of the messiah, as he didnt believe jesus was the
messiah. just
http://pesn.com/2005/06/24/9600115_Lutec1000_Lu_Brits_Interview/
John.
24 matches
Mail list logo
