Re: Krivit Presentation/Paper for ICENES 2005, 26 August

Steven Krivit wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/Library/2005KrivitS-HowCanItBeReal-Paper.pdf http://newenergytimes.com/Library/2005KrivitS-HowCanItBeReal-Presentation.pdf Steven the caltech data table, slide 9 of the power point, has two Pin columns. Should the first be a Pout? Is this error

[OT] Chemtrails Legalized?

Senate Bill S 517 certain seems to do so: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_billsdocid=f:s517is.txt or http://tinyurl.com/7puwc and an editorial: http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Chemtrails.htm

BEC Manuscript Found

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166320,00.html They found the original. The imaged page on Fox shows the old style cut and paste. :-)

Re: Microwave MAHG? - and Pd surface topology

Jones sez: OrionWorks sez: If there is a correlation between 80 torr and the collision rate, wouldn't it imply that if the pressure were increased the collision rate would rise as well? Yes. Hypothetically speaking, the MHz frequency should therefore increase as well,

And Then There Were Four

I just updated the Ongoing Commercial Developments section of the peswiki cold fusion summary. I now list four companies as actively pursuing cold fusion commercialization. JET of Wesley, MAis now included (JET should have been included originally as they are one of the longest established

Re: [OT] Chemtrails Legalized?

Terry Blanton wrote: Senate Bill S 517 certain seems to do so: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_billsdocid=f:s517is.txt or http://tinyurl.com/7puwc and an editorial: http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Chemtrails.htm Moin Terry, There was a guy

Is iESiUSA For Real?

I just tried to look up iESiUSA's patent applications and suppossedly approved patent numbers on the USPTO website. Guess what? Nothing by the name of iESiUSA or any of their provided number can be found in the USPTO database?!? What to think? Not a good sign from a company making

Re: Krivit Presentation/Paper for ICENES 2005, 26 August

Sharp eye, you have there Mr. Bruce. Yes, it's in the original. I'll talk to Mel about it and see if I can get clarification/correction. Thank you VERY much! Steve At 05:12 AM 8/21/2005, you wrote: Steven Krivit wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/Library/2005KrivitS-HowCanItBeReal-Paper.pdf

RE: Is iESiUSA For Real?

Hello John, I posted about this back in March, but to recap: The US applications are just that, applications. They are not patents. You're looking in the right spot, but they haven't published yet so no publication number and no love for you. When they publish, you will be able to read them.

Re: Beta- atmosphere and the Cavity Magnetron

Grimer wrote.. Since the Beta-atmosphere is a doppelganger of the Alpha-atmosphere there is no reason why one should not construct a cavity magnetron equivalent for the Alpha-atmosphere using air - or even a cavity magnetron equivalent for the Alpha-Beta overlap using water. Immediately one

(Fwd) [jlnlabs] Vacuum = mass

--- Forwarded message follows --- http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-08/ns-ijv081005.php --- End of forwarded message ---

Re: Beta-atmosphere and the Cavity Magnetron

At 05:22 pm 21/08/2005 -0500, Richard wrote: Grimer wrote.. Do you remember the water based vacuum pumps one used in chemistry class - the ones where a constrained jet of water passes though and sucks air out of the connected vacuum apparatus. Obviously Frank has been examining his