Could you use this method to test special relativity?
i.e. to see if the speed of the em wave in the wire independent of the
wire's motion.
Harry
Michel Jullian wrote:
Well done Stephen! To make the measurement truly accessible to all, the next
step would be to eliminate the digital scope,
Sorry, sent this to the wrong list. Jones had posted this here some time ago.
On 2/7/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/page1/
Harry Veeder wrote:
Could you use this method to test special relativity?
i.e. to see if the speed of the em wave in the wire independent of the
wire's motion.
I wish! Trouble is, to get a readable result you need to move the wire
really, really fast, and I don't see any way to do that.
Hi Stephen,
Well, by Dobbs, you've done an experiment. Congrats.
Now for the fun part!
I'm looking at the last scope shot,
http://www.physicsinsights.org/images/img_0748-a1.png
Amplify the receive channel (2) by 10, so you're at
100 mV rather than 1 V/div. Now let's talk about
that negative
See:
http://www.awea.org/newsroom/pdf/070202__GWEC_Global_Market_Annual_Statistics.pdf
QUOTE:
Brussels, 2 February 2007. The booming wind energy markets around
the world exceeded expectations in 2006, with the sector experiencing
yet another record year. On the day of the publication of the
Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Well, by Dobbs, you've done an experiment. Congrats.
Yeah, I do one now and then -- generally pretty trivial stuff, tho.
Now for the fun part!
I'm looking at the last scope shot,
http://www.physicsinsights.org/images/img_0748-a1.png
Amplify the receive
Terry Blanton wrote:
Sorry, sent this to the wrong list. Jones had posted this here some
time ago.
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/page1/
Not to worry - as this PR release is a most important development for
all of alternative energy (esp. wind and solar) and provides a good
That's how many electrostatic machines work such as the Wimshurst.
There are 3 different things, voltage, field strength and charge imbalance,
in this case the Voltage goes up, however the field strength goes down
(though is still considerable and covers more area) and the charge imbalance
Hi Stephen,
it looks like it has something to
do with the signal itself, almost like the pre-ringing of a perfect
low-pass filter
Given that your cutoff frequency is 60MHz, the leading edge
of the signals you are seeing probably bear little relationship
to the actual state of the signal. I say
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Could you use this method to test special relativity?
i.e. to see if the speed of the em wave in the wire independent of the
wire's motion.
I wish! Trouble is, to get a readable result you need to move the wire
really, really fast, and I
Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Stephen,
it looks like it has something to
do with the signal itself, almost like the pre-ringing of a perfect
low-pass filter
Given that your cutoff frequency is 60MHz, the leading edge
of the signals you are seeing probably bear little relationship
to the actual
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Could you use this method to test special relativity?
i.e. to see if the speed of the em wave in the wire independent of the
wire's motion.
I wish! Trouble is, to get a readable result you need to move the wire
really, really fast, and I
In this bloom of optimism about ultracaps as energy storage for cars and a
theoretically high recharging rate, do a reality check on the power
involved. You fill a gas tank in avout five minutes with enough energy to
drive a car at 70 mph for several hours -- and you are going to charge the
Let the price of a recharge vary inversely with the time one is prepared to
wait for a recharge.
Harry
Mike Carrell wrote:
In this bloom of optimism about ultracaps as energy storage for cars and a
theoretically high recharging rate, do a reality check on the power
involved. You fill a gas
Mike Carrell wrote:
In this bloom of optimism about ultracaps as energy storage for cars
and a theoretically high recharging rate, do a reality check on the
power involved. You fill a gas tank in avout five minutes with
enough energy to drive a car at 70 mph for several hours -- and you
are
Harry Veeder wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Could you use this method to test special relativity?
i.e. to see if the speed of the em wave in the wire independent of the
wire's motion.
I wish! Trouble is, to get a readable result you need to move the wire
really,
Mike Carrell I wrote:
You fill a gas tank in avout five minutes with enough energy to
drive a car at 70 mph for several hours -- and you are going to
charge the capacitor with that energy in minutes?
Mike has brought up this important point before, HOWEVER, there are
two mitigating
Try two.
On 2/8/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Sorry, sent this to the wrong list. Jones had posted this here some
time ago.
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/page1/
Not to worry - as this PR release is a most important development for
all of
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/400937/candle_power_who_needs_batteries/
On 2/8/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try two.
Zed, we gotta bug.
That's almost as hard to explain as the disappearing Subject line
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/400937/candle_power_who_needs_batteries/
I noted that Arthur D. Little says a large
hospital consumes about 1 MW. Here is a mega-mall example of power consumption:
. . . São Paulo is truly an all-in-one complex.
The 1.75-million-square-foot complex includes the
state-of-the-art WTC Business Tower, the elegant
Hotel Gran Meliá São
Nice fraud, orchestrated by the big candle wax lobbies no doubt :) It would be
more convincing if the bulb's light didn't turn on before the second candle,
and if it's luminosity wasn't constant!!
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I wrote:
But in the case of the NHE and Toyota, I sense that the decision
makers do not believe the results, so they lie about them. . . .
Our guess, based on talking with these people, is that when they saw
positive results emerge, they thought something like this:
Damn, that looks like
Michel sez:
Nice fraud, orchestrated by the big candle wax lobbies no doubt
:) It would be more convincing if the bulb's light didn't turn on
before the second candle, and if it's luminosity wasn't constant!!
Michel
Oh dear, hoodwinked again!
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
Fascinating.
I realize wax is being converted into CO2 H2O and other by-products as the
two candle flames burn.
But what are the energy conversion equations going on here? Part of me wants
to believe there might actually be some kind of OU going on, but I assume
that's really not the case
Jed sez:
...
In short, wind energy is not negligible, but it will have to grow
much faster to have a significant impact in time to affect global
warming. There is no reason why it should not go more quickly. The
presently installed wind capacity cost $23 billion. In an
unrealistically
Jed's right in that a successful supercapacitor technology could also build
large buffers for peak demands, just like the subsurface gas storage tanks
in ordinary gas stations. It is true that electric cars can be more
efficient than gasoline cars because you bypass the whole mechanical drive
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Could you use this method to test special relativity?
i.e. to see if the speed of the em wave in the wire independent of the
wire's motion.
I wish! Trouble is, to get a readable result
I replied to Jed's earlier post before seeing this one. The number he uses
0.2-0.3 kWH/km is creeping in 'rush hour' traffic, not at expressway
speeds -- I assume Atlanta is as bad as the Philadelphia area, where it is
70+ MPH. Pick your own number. The catch is not only at the service station,
Ok, well I would give this a freaking low chance of being real, even if I
was ok with the open circuit I'd not be so fine with the fact it's
symmetrical yet develops a DC voltage.
However if you look when the flame goes out on the lighter that is exactly
when the bulb turns on, so while the
thomas malloy wrote:
and Jed Rothwell replied;
I doubt very much that the Sun is putting out more energy, but if it
is we could easily fix the problem by spreading large Mylar parasols
in space. This calls for a space elevator, but the prospects for an
elevator are better than ever. It is
In reply to OrionWorks's message of Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:14:38 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
We can continue spend hundreds of billions of dollars meddling in the
affairs of oil rich countries, most that hate our guts (sometimes with
justification) to secure energy resources - all in the name of national self
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fPXewq8S5w
Another candle fake.
On 2/9/07, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, well I would give this a freaking low chance of being real, even if I
was ok with the open circuit I'd not be so fine with the fact it's
symmetrical yet develops a DC voltage.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mike Carrell wrote:
In this bloom of optimism about ultracaps as energy storage for cars
and a theoretically high recharging rate, do a reality
And Jed said;
Suppose you want to recharge a dozen cars at one time, ten times per
hour (six minutes each) during the peak
35 matches
Mail list logo
