I'm a 'we have the perfect amount of water and just an abundance of glass'
person myself.
Actually I think the answer to the riddle is simple, were you filling the
glass or emptying it?
On 3/2/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote
From what I'm seeing Vo dominated b
Paul Lowrance wrote
From what I'm seeing Vo dominated by "Glass half empty" people? I've always found
"Glass half full" people to have much farther foresight. It's amazing how skeptics and
debunkers cannot see the obvious. It's highly unlikely a person will accomplish something they
disbe
Jones Beene wrote:
Terry
In fact according to another scientist's controversial theory, we may
be headed in the direction of a "Maunder Minimum",
... which... to Meander into cold cynicism, is another solution to the
global warming problem.
I have previously mentioned Avery and Singer's
Paul, you seem to think that just because you have used a computer modelling
program (LT Spice) that it's predictions are necessarily reality. If the
initial assumptions and parameters that were modelled and programmed in are
in error it won't be of much use to help us in the area we are looking
Terry Blanton wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Subtle is the Lord, but obvious she is not."
>
> Hail Eris!
>
> http://www.principiadiscordia.com/downloads/crazy1024.jpg
>
> Terry
>
I should have written, "Subtle is the Lord, but she is not crazy."
as a coun
On 3/1/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Methinks that, politics aside, it will only be a pole reversal - but
that could mean pretty major changes ... yet a bonanza for Map-Makers
everywhere.
Not to mention migratory birds.
Hail Eris?
Terry
PS or "Hell, Eris!"
On 3/1/07, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Subtle is the Lord, but obvious she is not."
Hail Eris!
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/downloads/crazy1024.jpg
Terry
On 3/1/07, Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeeze this is awful! They're going to pick out, very specifically, the
technology used in UFOs which _crashed_! This guarantees we'll be doing
something wrong.
Well, duh! How is this worse than E85 or H2? ;-)
Terry
Nice chart of "freezes" on Wiki, and it shows a ~200 year cycle. I get
the shivers just thinking about the cosmic repercussions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Carbon14_with_activity_labels.svg
Then there is the 2,000-2,300 year Hallsatt cycle.
These are subsets of the Schwabe cycle, th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> From what I'm seeing Vo dominated by "Glass half empty" people? I've always
> found "Glass half full" people to have much farther foresight. It's amazing
> how
> skeptics and debunkers cannot see the obvious. It's highly unlikely a person
> will accomplish so
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://physorg.com/news91888237.html
UFO science key to halting climate change: former Canadian defense minister
A former Canadian defense minister is demanding governments worldwide
disclose and use secret alien technologies obtained in alleged UFO
crashes to stem climat
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 3/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From what I'm seeing Vo dominated by "Glass half empty" people?
I've always
found "Glass half full" people to have much farther foresight.
Personally, I've always wondered why we needed such a big glass. ;-)
http://physorg.com/news91888237.html
UFO science key to halting climate change: former Canadian defense minister
A former Canadian defense minister is demanding governments worldwide
disclose and use secret alien technologies obtained in alleged UFO
crashes to stem climate change, a local paper
On 3/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From what I'm seeing Vo dominated by "Glass half empty" people? I've always
found "Glass half full" people to have much farther foresight.
Personally, I've always wondered why we needed such a big glass. ;-)
Terry
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
> I don't consider CF as "free energy",
---
Why not?
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
thomas malloy wrote:
> Vortexians;
>
> The posting on the Ev Gray motor motivated me to check the link. When I
> noticed that it was Sterling Allen's website, I sent him the email
> below, and recieved the following reply. I have previously posted my
> criticisms of the vaporware merchant Peter Li
Vortexians;
The posting on the Ev Gray motor motivated me to check the link. When I
noticed that it was Sterling Allen's website, I sent him the email
below, and recieved the following reply. I have previously posted my
criticisms of the vaporware merchant Peter Linderman
- no
- no
Dear Ste
Paul on the pretense of saving your time and energy with your "bluntness" you
are wasting everybody else's, when they obviously could be put to much better
use.
I don't consider CF as "free energy", and I am not an expert either. My
contributions to the field are only tools and proposals which
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/02/a_history_of_dark_matter.html
An alternative explanation is that environmental Hydrinos leak into the
container between the atoms of the solid where they are converted into Hydrogen
by the action of energetic electrons in the arc
Jones Beene wrote:
> If the curious would dump the silly rhetoric, take a moment to visit and
> study the excellent site of Professor Kowalski, they would discover that
> Michel Julian is, shall we opine metaphorically: knee deep into cold
> fusion... ... and we on Vo should be grateful for his ex
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> I would interpret your answers as, "You are not working on Free Energy
>> technology." Then may I ask "What's your purpose or goal at Vo?"
>
> What's yours? Just to be annoying?
>
> Do you think the group should only be open to people
Nick Palmer wrote:
Steven - I wasn't trying to insult you or Michel, however I was
definitely trying to insult Paul after his appallingly arrogant
"intelligent thinking beings" crack. Where is the late, great Chris
Tinsley when you need him? He could, and did, squash adolescent
grandstanding
If the curious would dump the silly rhetoric, take a moment to visit and
study the excellent site of Professor Kowalski, they would discover that
Michel Julian is, shall we opine metaphorically: knee deep into cold
fusion... ... and we on Vo should be grateful for his expert opinions
on any rel
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:49:54 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
In any case there's also thermal noise in the diode, as I believe I also
pointed out (though I didn't phrase it that way), and that is surely
where you should be hunting for th
Terry
>... "according to one scientist's controversial theory"
... you forgot to add "bogus theory"
Actually just the opposite is happening - with proof - the sun has been
cooling noticeably over this exact period, and the dearth of sunspots
and solar flux proves that:
http://www.dxlc.com/s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would interpret your answers as, "You are not working on Free Energy
technology." Then may I ask "What's your purpose or goal at Vo?"
What's yours? Just to be annoying?
Do you think the group should only be open to people trying to build
perpetual motion mach
I hope I got this right. If not, it's on Keelynet
http://cjunk.blogspot.com/2007/02/quacks-cranks-and-junk-science.html
Are global warming skeptics really cranks and kooks?
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 9:51 AM
To: vorte
NASA solar irradiance data:
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/IRRADIANCE/irrad.html
On 3/1/07, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
http://snipurl.com/1bozg
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Sc
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
http://snipurl.com/1bozg
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says
Kate Ravilious
for National Geographic News
February 28, 2007
Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet
Hello Nick,
Nick Palmer wrote:
> Firstly, I did not say that there is no THERMAL noise (obviously there
> is from the Brownian motion) I said that there is no thermally induced
> effective *voltage* noise when there is no current flowing.
If you want to learn about thermal noise then create
Steven - I wasn't trying to insult you or Michel, however I was definitely
trying to insult Paul after his appallingly arrogant "intelligent thinking
beings" crack. Where is the late, great Chris Tinsley when you need him? He
could, and did, squash adolescent grandstanding like this in a couple
Michel Jullian wrote:
> Indeed in an inertial frame the fictitious force vanishes (from the analysis)
> as a force, but it also magically reappears as mass times acceleration, simply
> going from the left hand side to the right hand side of F=ma while changing
> sign, so the equations remain the s
32 matches
Mail list logo
