On Mar 7, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Hi,
If one has two separate toroidally wound inductors, and one passes
a DC current
through each coil, do they experience any force from one another,
particularly
when sharing a common major axis?
I'm interested in both theoretical
Howdy Vorts,
People and their love affairs with their autos. Any fleet operator can show
records that prove the Chevrolet autos and small trucks are the best all
around. We have a chev fleet, we try other brands for experience but it's
Chevrolet. Ever see a fleet of Lexus or Mercedes? Or
Yeah - even though I'm not North American by birth, I easily saw over the
years, how much the public had been sucked into Japanese (and European) car
mode. And the stupid NA auto manufacturers got just as sucked in and tried to
compete with the little 4-cyl jobs. Americans were (and as far as
it is very
easy to make a serious mistake in regard to the above, and which is
not related to leakage flux at all. That mistake is to not ensure
that an even number of winding layers is used for each torus, with
winding direction reversed at layer termination boundaries, so as to
Howdy Richard,
Just a couple of thoughts:
The Kiplinger Letter's recent comments regarding 100 bb'o'crude.
black gold reserves stashed away under ND certainly caught my eye.
I'm puzzled over the fact that I do not personally recall anyone in
the Vortex list ever mentioning the existence of this
Yep, Philip,
We have unit 3 4 nuke plant starting construction soon at Bay City Texas..
part of the South Texas project. They are having their share of the problems
using a Jap design .. plus the environmental problems to overcome.
The problem with Nukes are...
They can operate some 40-50
--- OrionWorks wrote:
The Kiplinger Letter's recent comments regarding 100
bb'o'crude reserves stashed away under ND certainly
caught my eye. I'm puzzled over the fact that I do not
personally recall anyone in the Vortex list ever
mentioning the existence of this potential
natural resource ...
Mostly correct but the Bakken is not a deep formation but a tight shale (no
permability) that is saturated with oil
but is very reluctant to give it up. It has been know forever it is basically
everywhere under the Williston basin;
you see it in every well drilled so that is great if it will
Howdy Steven,
The 2005 estimate USA crude consumption was some 20 million barrels per day
and change, in other words, nobody actually knows for sure.. you can
estimate the consumption is now some 21-22 mbd and counting. again nobody
knows the actual tally ,nor do they know refining amounts
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Indeed Horace you must be right that each winding layer not
compensated by a reverse wound layer must act as a single turn
current loop around the major axis, with the same current as in the
winding. This effect, resulting from a turn of
Interesting comments from Jones, Richard, and Ron.
I would certainly agree with the claim that The Kiplinger Letter is
pro-business. I'm sure their main clientele is the Business owner
(of both large and small operations) trying to figure out what the
hell Washington is going to do next, and how
thomas malloy wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
I can't allow the denigration of engineers in the automotive industry
continue. I had a friend who was an engineering manager in Detroit
I agree, IMHO, it's the MBA's and the lawyers.
Please, let us not oversimplify. Yes, there are cases such as
I wrote:
When the Confederates surrendered there were hundreds of thousands
of Union soldiers who had never heard a shot fired in anger.
Not hundreds of thousands. I think there were roughly a hundred
thousand Union troops in training or waiting, who had never been
deployed. More than all
In reply to R C Macaulay's message of Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:58:06 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Yep, Philip,
We have unit 3 4 nuke plant starting construction soon at Bay City Texas..
part of the South Texas project. They are having their share of the problems
using a Jap design .. plus the environmental
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:48:10 -0900:
Thanks Horace,
[snip]
If both tori have an
odd number of winding layers, or even if multiple winding layers are
used but all or most proceed in the same major axis direction, or
some combination of the above resulting
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:52:54 +1100:
Hi,
BTW, both tori would only have a single layer.
[snip]
This is along the lines of what I am trying to get at, though I was thinking
more of interactions between the individual minor axis loops of one torus with
Looking over at my shelf of disaster-related books . . . I should
list one of the best I have read: C. Christensen, The Innovator's
Dilemma -- When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. I quote
from this extensively in chapter 7 of my book.
I did not read the book about Enron but I
--- Jed Rothwell wrote:
The book Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in
Iraq has been widely recommended. I read a few
chapters and it seems excellent but I still cannot
bring myself to read it.
I am still thinking about the article of Jim Holt,
which was posted by Jack Smith a few days
On Mar 8, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 09 Mar 2008
08:52:54 +1100:
Hi,
BTW, both tori would only have a single layer.
[snip]
This is along the lines of what I am trying to get at, though I
was thinking
more of
http://pacificfreepress.com/content/view/2347/81/
What missing nuke? The investigation is little more
than a whitewash, so far. Was a false-flag operation
averted by the brave soul who snitched?
Why has Congress not been holding public hearings into
the incident?
The only reason for the high
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:15:02 -0900:
Hi Horace,
[snip]
Since you are talking about single layer tori, they
both have major axis hoop currents, and thus the confined fields of
both tori are shared with, overlap, the hoop fields of the opposed
tori, and thus
Not read any of this thread yet, but it reminds me of a thought I had
yesterday, I wondered if I could find a way to make a time varying magnetic
field not cause induction, and my conclusion is that I could.
I could (at one point anyway) cancel the inductive field around a solenoid
if I wound it
22 matches
Mail list logo
