RE: [Vo]:Cooper pairing of protons

My understanding concurs with Robin's, that they need to be in-phase. However, as Axil pointed out in his reference to a PhysOrg article which states: "These polaritons overwhelmingly prefer to march in step with each other, entangling themselves quantum mechanically." Not sure if that experiment

Re: [Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: > At 01:12 PM 1/17/2012, ***  Craig Brown *** wrote: >> >> I think the question here is WHY?  Why release a video saying LENR is >> looking good as a powerful replacement for conventional fossil fuels, then >> when questioned about it, Zawodn

RE: [Vo]:Rossi selling Licenses?

Jones, You missed your calling... :-) -m _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 7:13 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi selling Licenses? -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton > Like,

RE: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

Welcome Bruno! Hey, Vorts, has the Collective ever had the contributions from an economist before? Anyway, Bruno, thanks for your comments, and I would encourage you to analyze this from the perspective that it is *real*, that it is an entirely new type of nuclear/chemical reaction, and will r

RE: [Vo]:From NET: Bockris is still in the game!!

Abd, I only want to ask your opinion on the unexpectedly low gamma radiation. Let's assume we have a nanowire (or nano-"protrusion" on a nano-particle) with diameter of a few nanometers and (experimentally observed) carrying a huge 10^11 [Amp/cm^2] current density. Then would this nanowire be en

Re: [Vo]:Rossi selling Licences?

@Aussie Guy: You better hurry before you lose the exclusivity to sell e-cats down under, to Dick Smith :) just kidding! On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Like, wow! This is hotter than a Rossi Reactor. > > T > >

Re: [Vo]:Cooper pairing of protons

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:35:02 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Where N can be 1 to very many, N identical waves are said to be coherent. >These many waves have the same waveform; they are all in fact the same >wave. Since particles are matter waves, N particles that are identical a

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > Sure, the US went off the gold standard decades ago (a mistake in my > opinion), but where does money get invested when currencies weaken… > precious metals. You do realize that we’re not just talking trans

RE: [Vo]:multielectron catalysis theory A possible theory for rossi reactor

Jones, You should have posted the free version of that paper at URL: http://www.ladir.cnrs.fr/pages/fillaux/152_JPCM_2006_3229.pdf Also related may be the paper: Proton transfer across hydrogen bonds: From reaction path to Schrödinger’s cat* http://media.iupac.org/publications/pac/2007/pdf/7906x1

RE: [Vo]:Rossi selling Licenses?

-Original Message- From: Terry Blanton > Like, wow! This is hotter than a Rossi Reactor. Appropriate song on the jazz station just now, from 'A Little Night Music' if you are old enough to remember "Send in the Clowns" Don't you love farce? His fault, it's clear. I thought that he'd

Re: [Vo]:Rossi selling Licences?

Like, wow! This is hotter than a Rossi Reactor. T

[Vo]:Rossi selling Licences?

http://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=Lure+of+cold+fusion+backfires#q=Lure+of+cold+fusion+backfires&hl=en&prmd=imvnsu&source=univ&tbm=nws&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=Zy8WT8TDC7CviQfm_9RD&ved=0CDMQqAI&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e0379f193c830c55&biw=1440&bih=839 "He said Byro

Re: [Vo]:From NET: Bockris is still in the game!!

At 08:54 PM 1/16/2012, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: For those not following LENR for more than about the last year, the name Bockris might be new. He did a considerable amount of excellent LENR research in the 90s, and eventually faced several ‘official’ inquiries at the insistence of colle

RE: [Vo]:From NET: Bockris is still in the game!!

At 11:53 PM 1/16/2012, you wrote: I asked a close friend (PhD physicist) and he said the same thing as Krivit; that fusion has a *very* specific meaning *to a physicist*, and neutron capture is not 'fusion' as far as they're concerned. Now, if I was a physicist, I would hope that I'd be more con

Re: [Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

I wish "60 Minutes" would update their story on CF. It's been enough time to see where all the "promising research" of the old program has gotten. And I'd love to see them approach Rossi and Defkalion. In my estimation, that would be absolutely hilarious. Ever see the number D

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

At last a theme where I can contribute, being an economist. :-) Money today is Fiat money. There is no correlation between the dollar and the oil. Oil has its price on dollar, not the other way around. Currencies have their value based on several things, amongst which: government credibility, inf

[Vo]:More home E-Cat data announced

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=14#comment-171562 * Andrea Rossi January 17th, 2012 at 4:41 PM Dear Mark Szlazak: It will be cm 30 x 30 x 12 circa. Not able to make electricity yet.

[Vo]:Rossi and Italy

john46blog January 17th, 2012 at 11:02 AM Dear Andrea, I saw your recent interview with Sterling Allan. I discover a bunch of good news about your progress on e.cat development and I’m very happy for you. One thing I don’t like about your plans, it’s the decision to start the series production

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills: NASA, MIT, and the DOE have blood on their hands.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: > At 01:37 PM 1/17/2012, Robert Leguillon wrote: > > From Hank Mills - *Pure Energy Systems News*: > Original Source: > http://pesn.com/2012/01/15/9602013_138_Million_Cold_Fusion_Holocaust/ > > > Good grief : > > Just imagine that if cold f

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills: NASA, MIT, and the DOE have blood on their hands.

At 02:18 PM 1/17/2012, Vorl Bek wrote: Is Hitler's name still so painful to contemplate that it can't be spelt out 68 years after the war ended? I was trying to avoid the corollary to Godwin's Law : As well as the descriptive form, it can be used prescriptively: so if any poster does mention

RE: [Vo]:multielectron catalysis theory A possible theory for rossi reactor

Thanks for posting this - and it is intriguing in one way but flawed in another - certainly in the suggested binding energy. If it were true, the nickel active material would be completely unmeltable, for one thing. There is no basis for going to that extreme. The most obvious flaw in this theory

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills: NASA, MIT, and the DOE have blood on their hands.

Alan J Fletcher wrote: > > -- One of these individuals would have been the next > nuclear-armed H* > Is Hitler's name still so painful to contemplate that it can't be spelt out 68 years after the war ended? Maybe we should start writing S* and M** T** T*** as well.

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills: NASA, MIT, and the DOE have blood on their hands.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: > At 01:37 PM 1/17/2012, Robert Leguillon wrote: > > From Hank Mills - *Pure Energy Systems News*: > Original Source: > http://pesn.com/2012/01/15/9602013_138_Million_Cold_Fusion_Holocaust/ > > > Good grief : > > Just imagine that if cold f

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills: NASA, MIT, and the DOE have blood on their hands.

At 01:37 PM 1/17/2012, Robert Leguillon wrote: From Hank Mills - Pure Energy Systems News: Original Source: http://pesn.com/2012/01/15/9602013_138_Million_Cold_Fusion_Holocaust/ Good grief : Just imagine that if cold fusion had not been suppressed, there could be 138 million individuals alive

RE: [Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

At 01:12 PM 1/17/2012, *** Craig Brown *** wrote: I think the question here is WHY? Why release a video saying LENR is looking good as a powerful replacement for conventional fossil fuels, then when questioned about it, Zawodny tells everyone, that it's not useful and that he's sceptical about

RE: [Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

I think the question here is WHY? Why release a video saying LENR is looking good as a powerful replacement for conventional fossil fuels, then when questioned about it, Zawodny tells everyone, that it's not useful and that he's sceptical about it. Seriously, WTF is going on at NASA? -Origin

Re: [Vo]:Rossi on the Smart Scarecrow Show

At 03:34 PM 1/15/2012, Alan Fletcher wrote: Heck --- At $500 + $20/year I'm going to increase my order to FOUR units. Last I heard, Rossi was still saying you need a WATER line to the eCat. I hope that's changed. A few more AR blog clarifications (MY ..ok,ok : no need to respond) 1. Interface sp

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:29:56 -0800: Hi, [snip] >In addition, if currencies are based on the petro$, then that's going to >collapse like a tons of bricks when the financial industry realizes that >LENR just made petroleum obsolete. Then, currencies will

RE: [Vo]:Heat Output

Yes, as Mr. Lawrence noted, aliases are sometimes used, with little or no comments from the Collective. However, those contributors usually provide a high signal-to-noise in their postings, for example, Axil Axil. He has 129 postings since 8/18/2011 (5 months), and nearly all of them are signal,

Re: [Vo]:multielectron catalysis theory A possible theory for rossi reactor

Thanks, Brad That link works. However, the theory rests on QCD (quantum chromodynamics) which I do not understand. For those trained in QCD, it might be worth google-translating the more detailed Russian web page: http://viktor19451.narod.ru/ Aside from the diagrams, the translation looks pretty

Re: [Vo]:oilprice.com: Are we on the Brink of an Energy Revolution? Andrea Rossi to Build 1MW Power Plant

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:35 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson < svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The article might be of some interest. > > Titled: Are we on the Brink of an Energy Revolution? Andrea Rossi to > Build 1MW Power Plant > > Dated: Tue, 17 January 2012 > > > http://oilprice.com/Ene

Re: [Vo]:multielectron catalysis theory A possible theory for rossi reactor

Here is an alternate site for download: http://ecatplanet.net/downloads/pdf/Reaktor_Rossi.pdf - Brad On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:23 AM, wrote: > The website has been down for some time now. > It keeps returning the message: Bandwidth Exceeded ... try again later. > > It sounds like a pretty sop

[Vo]:Kullander's "detailed isotopic analysis" of "ash" from Rossi's E-Cat?

Hi everyone! Last November, Sven Kullander promised a "detailed isotopic analysis" of the ash from Rossi's E-Cat "by Christmas".  (http://ecatnews.com/?p=1416) It's now well past Christmas, and I haven't seen any signs of this report.   Does anyone know what happened to it? John

Re: [Vo]:Heat Output

ChemE: Not to worry, while real names are preferred, the frown on pseudonyms is not especially intense. If you want to call yourself ChemE I dare say nobody's going to care much (unless you start trolling). We've had people using pseudonyms off and on for as long as I can recall; some were c

RE: [Vo]:Heat Output

No, and she has been asked to provide her name, but she cowardly hides behind anonymity claiming she fears reprisal from 'true believers'. She occasionally adds some useful dialog to The Collective, but 90% of her barrage of postings are the same thing; suspicions about Rossi and SGT, and that non

Re: [Vo]:multielectron catalysis theory A possible theory for rossi reactor

The website has been down for some time now. It keeps returning the message: Bandwidth Exceeded ... try again later. It sounds like a pretty sophisticated theory that only a few can properly assess. Does it make any testable predictions? Or does it provide any insights into the CF/LENR results r

Re: [Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

This depends on how you classify the statement. If you expected it to help in the Rossi case, sure, it's not useful. But this was not NASA intentions. In the other case, where they are promoting LENR, this is tremendously helpful / useful. Therefore, I think, Gibbs headline is misleading and th

Re: [Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

Well, I have to agree with Gibbs, at least in the title. He said that NASA didn't say anything useful and not that cold fusion is useless 2012/1/17 Ron Kita > Greetings Vortex: > > More Gibbs Garbage: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/01/16/cold-fusion-nasa-says-nothing-useful/

Re: [Vo]:Heat Output

Mark, Thanks, I did not know that. Do you really think Mary's last name is Yugo? I really do appreciate all of the great ideas exchanged in this forum. The topic needs the focus. On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > ChemE: > > This fo

[Vo]:Forbes and Gibbs Garbage: NASA says Cold Fusion is Nothing Useful

Greetings Vortex: More Gibbs Garbage: http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/01/16/cold-fusion-nasa-says-nothing-useful/ Gibb is not useful. Respectfully, Ron Kita, Chiralex

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: > Then, currencies will be Nickel-based? Well, we certainly can't make them hydrogen-based since anyone could "print money" using electrolysis. ;-) T

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote: > LENR just made petroleum obsolete.  Then, currencies will be Nickel-based? >  Or what? bitcoin :) It makes sense actually since bitcoin relies on wasting lots of now unlimited energy. Rob