Re: [Vo]:Geneste's paper / pilot wave theory

Only 42% of quantum physicists belong to the Copenhagen school . Geneste is trying to redo General Relativity...good luck on that. There is no chance that science will listen to him. The "strange radiation" has been duplicate many times. It is real. There does not seem to be a connection

Re: [Vo]:Geneste's paper / pilot wave theory

Hi, The article on pilot waves is interesting. De Broglie's and Bohm's thesis suggests that there are possibly viable alternatives to the Copenhagen interpretation. The Copenhagen school seem to have turned an epistemological problem into an ontological one (that is to say, they turned a

Re: [Vo]:Geneste's paper / pilot wave theory

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:27:42 -0500: Hi, The entire purpose of measurement is to refine one's knowledge of a system. Why is it then surprising that the wave function of a measured system provides more explicit information than the wave function of an unmeasured

Re: [Vo]:Electron-mediated alpha decay in quasi-stable isotopes

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:36:58 -0400: Hi, [snip] >I looked it up for you. > >http://www.tau.ac.il/~jortner/Publications/Pub601-/630.pdf The energies I saw mentioned in this paper were meV not MeV. IOW milli-eV not Mega-eV. That's smaller by a factor of 1 billion. >

Re: [Vo]:Lifetime of atoms extended using a mirror

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:16:23 -0400: Hi, [snip] Even a change in the speed of light could be just that, a change in the speed of light, and may not mean that the rate of flow of time has changed. >Atomic clocks count time through the counting of atomic vibrations.

Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

Why would a SPP as a black hole look like a tachyon? http://phys.org/news/2015-09-law-implies-thermodynamic-black-holes.html Because the area of future and past holographic screens increases in different directions, the direction of time is different for the two types of screens. In past

[Vo]:An Spp as a tachyon

Why would a SPP as a black hole look like a tachyon? http://phys.org/news/2015-09-law-implies-thermodynamic-black-holes.html Because the area of future and past holographic screens increases in different directions, the direction of time is different for the two types of screens. In past

[Vo]:ALL THE PAPERS FROM THE AIRBUS-ISCMNS WORKSHOP

here they are: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/all-papers-presented-at-airbus-iscmns.html Enjoy! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

I wrote a short post about two papers that are of interest, but are negative regarding Ni+LAH. Jean-Paul Biberian has conducted a series of experiments with the Parkhomov formula (now known to be a partial formula of Rossi). The

[Vo]:Publishing the Lundin/Lidgren paper

Several weaknesses in the paper presented by Lundin and Lidgren have been discussed here, as it should be. When I gave attention to the paper on my blog I expected such weaknesses to be discovered and exposed. However, my reason for giving publicity to the paper were three: - the authors’

Re: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

Without reading through these parers, did Biberian do a fuel preparation preprocess as Rossi did in the Lugano fuel? On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Jack Cole wrote: > I wrote a short post > about > two papers

[Vo]:Geneste's paper / pilot wave theory

I’m trying to figure what connections there might be between the model presented by Airbus Chief Scientist Jean-François Geneste: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/10/17/lenr-from-experiment-to-theory-paper-by-jean-francois-geneste-airbus-group/

[Vo]:Biberian's Rossi replication attempt

Here is the link provided by Peter Gluck to the papers presented at Airbus: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/all-papers-presented-at-airbus-iscmns.html Here is a paper by Biberian: Replication attempts of the Parkhomov experiment

Re: [Vo]:Publishing the Lundin/Lidgren paper

There is a distinction to be made here between a cause and an effect, The production of neutrons is an effect of the cause of LENR. This cause has in its nature the power to suppress the production of neutrons as well as gamma rays. A cold reactor will produce these neutrons and gamma rays because

Re: [Vo]:Re: Ni+LAH systems not performing

Most folks do not know what Rossi did to the fuel. They should look at the analysis of the fuel in appendix 3. It's all in there.

Re: [Vo]:Re: Ni+LAH systems not performing

I would presume the formula outlined in the patent would be sufficient--if the patent is of a valid working device. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:16 PM Axil Axil wrote: > Most folks do not know what Rossi did to the fuel. > > They should look at the analysis of the fuel in

Re: [Vo]:Re: Ni+LAH systems not performing

Rossi was surprised and pleased the Parhomov replicated his process. The key is to use carbon as a method to produce rydberg matter, The Russian nickel powder was so impure, it replicated Rossi's fuel prep process where he added carbon to the nickel powder. The people in the west use well formed

Re: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

Hi Jack, On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Jack Cole wrote: My conclusion at this point is that nickel and LiAlH4 does not reliably > produce excess heat, and if it does at all, it is rare. Do you know if any of the replicators have been including potassium or vanadium in

[Vo]:short report from the Workshop plus LENR news

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-17-2015-short-w11-report-more-daily.html more coming this evening, I guess... Just borrowing 145 IQ points to be able to study Geneste's skepticscide breakthough "Reverting" paper. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

[Vo]:Re: Ni+LAH systems not performing

Most folks do not know what Rossi did to the fuel. From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 7:40 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing Without reading through these parers, did Biberian do a fuel preparation preprocess as Rossi did in the Lugano fuel? On

Re: [Vo]:Publishing the Lundin/Lidgren paper

I'm glad it was published. I think it is unlikely that a theorist is going to find the complete theory in one simple step. In the same way it is unlikely that the first simple experiment will create just the right complete conditions for perfect LENR. But each one of these theories and

Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 17 Oct 2015 01:02:01 -0400: Hi, [snip] >How does electron volts convert to magnetic field strength in tesla? It doesn't directly. They measure different things. However it may be indirectly related in specific circumstances. But it order to answer the

Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 17 Oct 2015 01:11:41 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Why does the image appear stretched within the surface of the film? This only >makes sense if the actual particle has a great deal of width at right angles >to its motion through the film. Am I missing

Re: [Vo]:Geneste's paper / pilot wave theory

I asked JF Geneste the same question and got this answer: “The physics I propose allows giving support to a wave which is not the case of vacuum (in my opinion). In that sense, what I propose strongly supports the pilot wave theory. Nevertheless, my theory is much more general.” He also