Why would a SPP as a black hole look like a tachyon? http://phys.org/news/2015-09-law-implies-thermodynamic-black-holes.html
Because the area of future and past holographic screens increases in different directions, the direction of time is different for the two types of screens. In past screens, time moves forward. Expanding universes, such as ours, involve past holographic screens, and so we naturally perceive thermodynamic time as running forward. In contrast, time runs backward in future holographic screens. In a sense, this interpretation has the odd result that thermodynamic time runs backward inside black holes and collapsing universes. In a SPP as a black hole would look like a tachyon which is a particle that is traveling backward in time. In the 1967 paper that coined the term, Feinberg proposed that tachyonic particles could be quanta of a quantum field with negative squared mass. However, it was soon realized that excitations of such imaginary mass fields do not in fact propagate faster than light, and instead represent an instability known as tachyon condensation.Nevertheless, negative squared mass fields are commonly referred to as "tachyons", and in fact have come to play an important role in modern physics. The SPP as a black hole would be a tachyon contain negative mass and moving backward in time. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > How does electron volts convert to magnetic field strength in tesla? The > top magnetic field strength to produce a quark gluon soup is 10^^13 tesla. > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:05 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:20:17 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >see >> > >> > >> http://www.ecoinventions.ca/iccf-18-keith-fredericks-possibility-of-tachyon/ >> > >> >These thing he sees are SPPs >> >> My first impression is that these tracks are the result of a grain of >> grit being >> scraped across the plate. >> My second impression is that they are helical track caused by a charged >> particle >> in a magnetic field. >> >> Assuming for the moment that they are real tracks, then the assumption >> that all >> the energy of the particle is kinetic may not be valid. If they have >> rotational >> energy as well, then the energy/momentum calculation could be off, and >> consequently the conclusion that they are superluminal could be wrong. >> >> The energy value they come up with is 4.5E14 eV, which is a lot more than >> 64 GeV >> (i.e. it's 450000 GeV). >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
