There were one or two replication attempts on the NASA forums following the
most recent positive, albeit inconclusive, results. But unfortunately it
suffers from a similar problem as LENR in that few folks have the cahoneys
or resources to play with live magnetrons. This is lab science, not
deskt
From: Vibrator !
Ø So an EM drive in a lab cannot show an energy asymmetry because it can't
accelerate anywhere.
That does not add up logically or scientifically… Despite conflicting claims,
no one has yet “busted” all of the positive results, which are probably about
“chirality” more
Muonic decay in the reactor is an interesting prospect that I would like to
read more about. However, I don't think the muons, electrons, or protons
are going to escape the reactor in any large number due to the mass/cm^2
they would have to traverse to get out. Muons are no more likely to
penetra
It may be that the intrinsic spin (and angular momentum) of a particle is
converted preferentially to a particle with linear momentum in the direction of
a magnetic field. In this case there would be no apparent conservation of
linear momentum. This seems to happen in macroscopic systems—a kid
I agree with Higgins--
“The penetration is directly related to the energy of the muon.”
If the muons that are produced in the reactor are slow muons they may not get
out in any case before decaying. All they do is act to catalyze other nuclear
reactions before decay.
Bob Cook
From: Bob H
From: Bob Higgins
Ø Muonic decay in the reactor is an interesting prospect that I would like to
read more about. However, I don't think the muons, electrons, or protons are
going to escape the reactor in any large number due to the mass/cm^2 they would
have to traverse to get out. Muons ar
As mentioned to Bob the muons are not slow – they are fast in Holmlid’s theory.
However, this should be confirmed by him, as I am also basing some of my
understanding on Stubbs, along with all of Holmlid’s papers, which have evolved
over the years.
If we follow the Stubbs model of nine equiv
One advantage the EMDrive has over LENR, is that it's fairly replicable.
The amateurs can do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbf7735o3hQ
Craig
@Jones - i have no doubt the efficacy of the principle can be tested in the
lab - i'm not talking about an ability to detect thrust.
I use the qualifier "effective" N3 violation in reference to a system in
which mechanical (classical) momentum is not conserved - quantum or
relativistic effects no
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-13-2016-lenrervs-report-is.html
My offer for a Solomonian Solution is here, the ERV can work in peace, and
we weill not die prematurely due to curiosity.
Who can help? I am planning to read the Accountant's Balance tomorrow
evening. Thanks in advance!
Ev
“And it is this direct implication that Shayer et al have not yet answered to,
so far as I'm aware. The conversion of input energy to acceleration would
remain constant, at any velocity. If 1 m/s/kg costs a whopping kJ, it'll
ALWAYS cost 1kJ, whether from 0 - 1 m/s or from 999 m/s to 1 km/s, a
@Bob
Use a magnetic shield to divert muons and other charged particles.
I describe it here
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2862-A-Simple-LENR-Magnetic-Radiation-Shield/?postID=15183#post15183
[image: Inline image 1]
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> Mu
“And it is this direct implication that Shayer et al have not yet answered to,
so far as I'm aware. The conversion of input energy to acceleration would
remain constant, at any velocity. If 1 m/s/kg costs a whopping kJ, it'll
ALWAYS cost 1kJ, whether from 0 - 1 m/s or from 999 m/s to 1 km/s,
Bob, if you take the kid and merry-go-round as a system in free space it can be
shown that both linear and angular momentum are conserved. The interaction
with the Earth makes it less clear.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Mar 13, 2016 11:22 am
Flat Earth and the Gyroscope Myth https://youtu.be/deoLBQTtXJw Published on
Dec 19, 2015 Good synopsis of Foucaults pendulum. This guy actually measured
the speed of light back in 1864. (12 min into video for Forcault info.) This
guys you tube video appears to dispute the earlier measurements
Shawyer's theory explicitly repect CoE, and it explains that acceleration
consume energy, through dopler effect and decalibration of the cavity...
http://emdrive.com/faq.html
"*6.*
*Q.* *Is the EmDrive a form of perpetual motion machine?*
*A. *The EmDrive obeys the law of conservation of energy an
Muons with less than about 4MeV are not going to escape the reactor.
Cosmic muons are average 2GeV. No magnetic field that I could generate is
going to significantly deflect either of these.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> @Bob
>
> Use a magnetic shield to divert muons and
Something is getting out of the LENR reactor. The mouse is stimulating the
cat in Rossi's reactor clustering scheme. The some emission of the mouse is
producing the LENR reaction inside the Cat type reactor.
That emission only exits the Mouse when the power to the heater coils of
the Mouse is turn
Axil--
I am interested in the ideas you have put forth below.
It would be nice if you were to add some references to the documents you have
that substantiate the various ideas. For example I am not familiar with the
notion of a magnetic beam. Magnetic fields are the classical notion of what
See
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2862-A-Simple-LENR-Magnetic-Radiation-Shield/
and my posts in
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/1853-Ask-questions-to-Dr-Sveinn-%C3%93lafsson-Science-Institute-University-of-Iceland/
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bob C
Dave--
I agree with your comment—note I suggested it SEEMS to happen. The real issue
is what happens in a coherent system. Can a nano particle convert spin—angular
momentum--- to linear momentum?
Bob Cook
From: David Roberson
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:49 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Su
If SPP’s are present at the location where muons are produced, their large
magnetic field may be sufficient to sap a good deal of energy and effectively
capture the muon in a helical death spiral, producing more electrons and
photons on the way to the center of the SPP.
The time constant for s
This article describes the troubles that oil-producing nations are
experiencing. These problems be far worse if it becomes generally known
that cold fusion is real. That knowledge alone will reduce the price of
oil. If cold fusion succeeds these nations will all be bankrupt.
- Jed
That opinion is an overreaction. It will take 20 to 30 years before any
fraction of transportation is converted over to LENR.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> This article describes the troubles that oil-producing nations are
> experiencing. These problems be far worse if i
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> That opinion is an overreaction. It will take 20 to 30 years before any
> fraction of transportation is converted over to LENR.
>
It would take a lot less than that in wartime.
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Jed Rothwell
> wrote:
This doesn't make any sense:
"For a given acceleration period, the higher the mean velocity, the
longer the distance travelled, hence the higher the energy lost by the
engine."
Since we're not talking about relativistic speeds, then the idea that a
device will consume more energy, over a giv
Axil Axil wrote:
> That opinion is an overreaction. It will take 20 to 30 years before any
> fraction of transportation is converted over to LENR.
>
The time it takes to convert is not so important. An economist friend of
mine explained to me that markets respond to likely future events, either
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-employment-idUSKCN0W205X
China expects to lay off 1.8 million workers in coal, steel sectors
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Axil Axil wrote:
>
>
>> That opinion is an overreaction. It will take 20 to 30 years before any
>>
Axil,
Don't be such a pessimist. 1 - 2 decades is plenty to get LENT in
vehicles. I could even be less is the E-Cat X really can produce the
majority of its output as electricity.
In reply to Craig Haynie's message of Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:08:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Note the use of the word "acceleration".
Acceleration produces a force. Force times distance = energy.
>This doesn't make any sense:
>
>"For a given acceleration period, the higher the mean velocity, the
>longer
Although the largest uses for petroleum are energy/transportation, which would
be replaced by LENR, there are numerous other uses for petroleum which will not
be replaced by LENR, so there will always be some market for it. Here are some
of those other uses:
Agriculture
One of the most imp
31 matches
Mail list logo