Axil--
I am interested in the ideas you have put forth below.
It would be nice if you were to add some references to the documents you have
that substantiate the various ideas. For example I am not familiar with the
notion of a magnetic beam. Magnetic fields are the classical notion of what
you may be calling a magnetic beam. Does the beam shine out at a certain
velocity? Is the beam made of particles as suggested by the term beam? Are
the particles virtual particles in a virtual monopole beam since they seem to
originate from virtual quarks. A reference to Twister theory would be nice.
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 8:38 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Bremsstrahlung experimental note
There is a BIG difference between optical cavities and SPPs in that SPPs are
spinners and optical cavities are not. The SPP produces a monopole magnetic
beam. That is a quantum energy pathway into the SPP where nuclear energy is
transferred into the SPP directly through entanglement. This is called energy
teleportation. The nuclear energy that is generated in the LENR reaction is
transferred magnetically between the nucleus and the SPP.
Because the SPP is an analog monopole, it is governed by non-associative
quantum mechanics. This is difficult stuff to understand and might allow the
teleportation of neutrons and protons in addition to energy.
IMHO, Twistor theory is involved in LENR. It was first proposed by Roger
Penrose in 1967. He has been working on this stuff for 50 years and did make
much progress until he began to use non-associative quantum mechanics.
The protons and neutrons in the nucleus contain quarks and they are monopole
spinners, When the SPP monopole beam enters the nucleus, it causes the protons
and neutrons to decay. They decay into mesons. These mesons produce on decay
all kinds of pions and muons that disrupt nuclear material in and around the
monopole beam. This is where all those mesons and electrons are coming from in
Holmlids experiments and Rossi’s XCat.
Also hexagonal crystals get involved such as metalize hydrogen as an SPP
accumulation and concentration mechanism. The SPP monopole covering makes these
crystals indestructible. How that magnetic shield works, I do not understand
yet.
I have documents on all this stuff if you are interested in more detail.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Many thanks Axil it's a very good paper and both you and Mark in your two
responses answered my questions very well.
It's very very interesting that Hawking radiation could be generated from
plasmons in this way.
I still need to study it in detail but I notice that they say that these
cavities can work with light of any frequency not just infra red and optical is
in normal lasers. Does this literally mean it can absorb high energy gamma as
well? Or are they emphasising it can work at other higher frequencies than IR
and Optical but not necessarily up to gamma.
I'm curious because as far as I can see with normal plasmons the plasma
frequency is a few eV 15 eV for Nickel for example. This may be increased
slightly if the nickel atoms are heavily ionised some how but still would be In
the 10 or low 100s eV maximum. This is due to the sqrt relationship electron
density in metals. Even if we take Dirac plasmons into account and the material
is generating 2D or 1D electron flow the plasma frequency drops slightly due to
a more reduced effect of the electron density. So wouldn't plasmons not absorb
photons above the plasma frequency energy?
If what I say above is correct then only degenerate materials such as occur
in White dwarf stars would have sufficient electron density to have a plasmon
frequency in the 1 keV or 10s keV range maybe up to a hundred or so keV range
maximum.
Interestingly it could be that UDH and UDD with atomic separations of a few
pm could maybe have sufficient electron density for this. This might be
important to Holmlids. Results if UHD is implicated directly or if it surrounds
nano clusters thereby containing emissions below a few 10s keV within. This
could be important for K shell electron stimulation, auger X Ray emission or
nucleus stimulation effects.
(I wonder if UDH and UDD is in some way a little piece of a white dwarf star!
;) )
But if I understand right even degenerate matter would not absorb gamma in
the MeV range.
Is this correct or is the absorption due to another process or is the
electron density enhanced massively somehow due to cavitation I wonder. Or is
it only a analogue black hole to light below these plasma frequency
frequencies? To be fair probably I need to study the paper more to fully
understand what I am missing.
Even lower energy plasma frequency and light absorption could be important
even if it extends only to low energy X-rays or UV. And similar Hawking
radiation effects could still be relevant. This could also still have an impact
on electron transmission emission from atoms and absorption perhaps leading to
atomic scale stimulation effects especially in the bulk. Or Bremsstrahlung at
the most intense low energy frequencies perhaps leading to electron plasma
thermal excitation.
On 12 mrt. 2016, at 07:48, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep02607
Cavity Optical Pulse Extraction: ultra-short pulse generation as seeded
Hawking radiation
This article shows how a Dark Mode optical cavity (which is what an SPP
really is) can absorb light and store it, then later release it as Hawking
radiation (heat) at a latter time. The optical cavity acts as a black hole.
I say that all these "Dark Mode" objects share a dualism with the
astronomical black hole which allows them to do unexpected things like catalyze
LENR.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Axil a couple of quick questions?
Was it confirmed the pulse was only a few seconds? I thought they only
spotted it in the spectrum at the end of longer session but are not sure
exactly when and how long it lasted once initiated?
I have been trying to find papers and references on high energy gamma
absorption by SPP... I suppose your dark mode plasmons could you point me to a
reference? Also Does it require degenerate matter to form or some other method?
I know you have circulated a lot of documents and background on the broader
ideas about SPP but is there is one you recommend that specifically on these
points?
Thanks Stephen
On 11 mrt. 2016, at 23:16, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
Something must produce those electrons and that something (Alpha. beta}
produces EMF energy at a well defined gamma level.
Bright mode release of "photons" from SPPs when they decay...before an
SPP BEC becomes active.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Axil--
Bremsstrahlung radiation is due to inelastic scattering of electrons
as they pass through matter. There are no resonances. The radiations occurs
as a result of an electron changing direction as a result of the electric field
it is passing through. This change in direction (acceleration) saps energy
from the kinetic energy of the free electron and distributes that energy as
electromagnetic radiation equivalent to the loss of kinetic energy of the
electron. The spectrum is random photons because the distance and charge of
particles being encountered by an energetic electron is random. Thus the
forces on the electron, whether due to other lattice electrons or positive
charges in the lattice are random in magnitude.
Landau distributions of the energy of photons do not apply to free
electrons unless they are at relativistic velocities and have an effective mass
like a proton, pion, alpha or other heavy particle.
What do you consider is the likely mechanism producing the "Landau
distribution" you suggest? Specifically, what particles are involved in the
generation of the spectrum?
Bob Cook
-----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:19 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note
The seconds long MFMP X-ray burst is smooth and demonstrates no
resonance energy peaks caused by the interaction of electrons with
matter. The MFMP burst is strictly a release of photons in a random
energy distribution.
A Landau distribution is what we are seeing in the MFMP radiation
plot. It is the release of energy by particles based on a random
release process. This is seen when a particle gives up its kinetic
energy to a thin film as the particles interact randomly with the
matter in the thin film.
If SPPs are releasing their energy based on a random timeframe and/or
based on a random accumulation amount, a Landau distribution of energy
release will be seen.
You might see a Landau distribution if there is a random mixing of
both low energy photons (infrared) and high energy photons (gamma's
from the nucleus);
Such mixing is produced by Fano resonance, where an SPPs are being fed
by both infrared photon pumping and nuclear based gamma photon
absorption.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
Electrons may have nothing to do with the x-ray radiation.
The radiation could be produced by photon based quasiparticles.
The LENR reaction might start with Surface Plasmon Polaritons
initiated nuclear reactions and then after thermalization, the decay
of those SPPs. When the SPPs decay, they release their energy
content
as photons of varng energies,
After a second or two, a Bose condensate of these SPPs form and the
energy of the photons are released as hawking radiation which is
thermal.
The radiation seen only lasts for a second.
In LENR we get either high energy radiation (x-rays) or heat; not
both. This is based on the temperature of the reactor. A cold
reactor
produces X-Rays because of weak SPP pumping..
The SPP absorbs nuclear binding energy and stores it in a whispering
gallery wave (WGW) in a dark mode. The energy is stored inside the
WGW
until the WGW goes to a bright mode when the SPP decays. This
conversion from dark mode to bright mode happens in a random
distribution.
When the temperature is raised over a thermal conversion limit, a
BEC
is formed where the stored nuclear binding energy is released from
the
SPP BEC as hawking radiation which is thermal.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Bob Cook
<frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
The effectiveness of the SS can at stopping any high energy
electrons that
cause Bremsstrahlung would depend upon the thickness of the can
(or alumina)
and the energy of the incident electrons. I think the loss of
energy per
scattering event is proportional to Z ^2 for the nucleus that is
doing the
scattering. Al at Z=13 and with Fe at Z=26 the intensity of the
Bremsstrahlung signal would be about a factor of 4 different.
The mean
length of the path of an electron is a good parameter to know for
any given
substance (basically its density) vs the incident energy of the
electron.
Shielding engineering curves provide this information I believe.
Iron
being significantly more dense than Al2O3 would be much better at
slowing
electrons and thus producing Bremsstrahlung IMHO.
At high electron energies the change of direction of the electron
going
through SS can would be less than for a low energy electron. For
slow
electrons scattering can significantly change the direction of an
incident
electron such that all Bremsstrahlung would be emitted from the
material
that stopped the electron.
I think with a SS can present in the system vs no can and only
Alumina
stopping the electrons, one would expect to see a more intense
signal at
high energy compared to the spectrum from the Alumina reactor
chamber. The
absorption of the EM Bremsstrahlung by the respective media would
also have
to be considered. Neither Alumina nor SS may transmit some of the
Bremsstrahlung spectrum very well. Thus the effective shielding
of the EM
radiation considering a distributed source would have to be
evaluated for
the resulting high energy EM and the signal intensity corrected
accordingly.
The cut off at the high energy spectrum will be a useful value to
know to
understand the maximum energy of the electron source. This may
provide
information about the reaction producing the electrons. The
change of the
intensity of the Bremsstrahlung signal as a function of the
magnetic field
would also provide information as to whether or not the lattice
orientation
of the nano fuel was important. One might expect that the
electrons being
produced by the respective LENR reaction would produced in some
preferred
direction.
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 6:09 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note
I don't know if other Vorts thought of this already... but I had
a minor
epiphany regarding the radiation that MFMP measured in GS5.2. We
identified
this radiation tentatively as bremsstrahlung. This has certain
implications. Bremsstrahlung requires that the high speed
electrons impact
on a high atomic mass element so as to be accelerated/decelerated
quickly to
produce the radiation. It could be that the stainless steel can
that
contained the fuel was an important component in seeing the
bremsstrahlung.
Without the can, there would still be the Ni for the electrons to
hit, but
the Ni is covered with light atomic mass Li. If the electrons
were to
strike alumina (no fuel can present), I don't think there would
be nearly as
much bremsstrahlung because alumina is comprised of light
elements.
Thus, the stainless steel can for the fuel may be an important
component for
seeing the bremsstrahlung.
Bob Higgins
