Dear Alain,
I am just writing an editorial about progress blindness e.g. Jed Rothwell
is unable or unwilling to see any progress in what Rossi did achieved
starting from 2011 and accusing Rossi of possible amnesia- in the best
times he was able to get excess heat but later not, aat the 1year 1MW T
The reaction must be nuclear in some form, even if it is not fusion.
Rossi says he has a theory, so you are wrong.
AA
On 8/30/2016 6:04 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Until I see a patent with a claim talking about heat from a
nuclear reaction
a.ashfield wrote:
The reaction must be nuclear in some form, even if it is not fusion.
>
If you claim it is nuclear reaction of type A and it turns out to be B
instead, that puts your patent in jeopardy. Since you cannot patent a
theory, there is no point to mentioning one at all. That is accord
Peter Gluck wrote:
> . . . there was no trace of excess heat, this being obvious because there
> are rust stains on the static vanes of a flowmeter that was not opened but
> Murray had seen them . . .
>
That is preposterous. Of course it was opened! When you remove a flow meter
from a pipe you
Can you give details, facts, iit was sealed and Penon has rfemoved the
seals, has he asked Murray, "come Joe, take a look to it"?
Has Murray a photo of those stains? If the pipes are working half-empty
then the how does water flow in the vertical segements?
Have you idea about the absurdity of this
This thread on Weyl fermions, so-called “massless electrons” seems to be
gathering a bit of traction on the internet. The WF particle or quasi-particle,
which is essentially a quantum of negative charge (somewhat reminiscent of Ken
Shoulder’s EVO) ostensibly could be captured by protons to neutr
Peter Gluck wrote:
Can you give details, facts, iit was sealed and Penon has rfemoved the
> seals, has he asked Murray, "come Joe, take a look to it"?
>
What the heck does "sealed" mean? Where were these "seals"? In front of the
orifice? The water has to freely flow through a flow meter, or the
AA Rossi says he has a theory, so you are wrong.
Jed I know he has a theory, but I believe it keeps changing, and the
theorists tell me it has no merit."
In your last comment you stated he did not have a theory.
I was not aware there was a consensus yet on the theory of how cold
fusion works
please take the image of the flowmeter and show how can you see inside it
when in function. And how do myou open it when ot working?OK?
Have you ever seen the scheme of the plant? Let Rossi in peace, and tell
NOW where was that damned flowmeter placed; if you don't know ask IH
take please this s
Excellent. Theories worthy of the name are testable. Let's do that!
Until then, they are written on the wind.
BillR
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 9:59 AM, a.ashfield wrote:
>
> AA Rossi says he has a theory, so you are wrong.
> Jed I know he has a theory, but I believe it keeps changing, and the
>
BTW – for all of Don Hotson’s fans on vortex, and there are many…
The epo or BEC is based on Dirac’s equation and theories – as is all of
Hotson’s “interpretation of Dirac” and this field consists entirely of massless
electrons and massless positrons. Wow, think of how well this fits into the
Peter Gluck wrote:
please take the image of the flowmeter and show how can you see inside it
> when in function.
>
Of course you cannot see inside it when it is functioning. Why would you
need to do that? The rust is still there when it stops.
> And how do myou open it when ot working?OK?
>
But starting from the diagram, you can imagine how to make the pipes haf
full. Can you, independently from this affair? Is Rossi the inventor of
this scheme any plumber can use?
You are not aware of what terrible ies you say?
peter
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Pete
Peter Gluck wrote:
But starting from the diagram, you can imagine how to make the pipes haf
> full. Can you, independently from this affair?
>
I do not need a diagram for that. I can do it easily, with an open hose.
Put the hose on the ground. Turn the water a little until a small stream of
wate
excuse me, is this a serious answer? What has the hose to do with the Plant?
Anyway thank you, it was enough I fear your "logic" is contagious so I
apologize to anybody who will read your messages. Rational discussion with
you is impossible.
peter
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Jed Rothwell w
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-31-2016-progress-illusion-and.html
the text speaks for itself
peter
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Peter Gluck wrote:
excuse me, is this a serious answer? What has the hose to do with the Plant?
>
The pipe in Rossi's plant was half empty. That's the whole point.
(Note that the second photo I pointed shows a half-empty pipe, not a hose.)
I cannot understand what you are disputing here. Anyon
Some 46 years ago a good video was made on rotating flows.
It is number 19 in this series
Movies: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0EC6527BE871ABA3
Written lectures: http://web.mit.edu/hml/notes.html
Inertia oscillations and free shear layers
developed and filmed by
David Fultz
Hydrodynami
BTW, positronium has mass but Hotson's epo's do not.
Jones Beene wrote:BTW – for all of Don Hotson’s fans on
vortex, and there are many…
The epo or BEC is based on Dirac’s equation and theories – as is all of
Hotson’s “interpretation of Dirac” and this field consists entirely of massless
ele
19 matches
Mail list logo
