http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/technology/amazon-moves-to-cut-checkout-line-promoting-a-grab-and-go-experience.html
Amazon Moves to Cut Checkout Line, Promoting a Grab-and-Go Experience
The millions of jobs working the checkout lines are going to go away.
http://www.bls.gov/ooh/sales/cashiers
An interesting new path opening up all about special quantum states found in
Nature both in natural crystals and synthetics varieties. Quantum ‘spin
liquids’ where there is a vast amount of entanglement going on… now of course
such massive entanglement has always been what cold fusion required a
a.ashfield wrote:
I find it strange that you didn't know there were 2 MW of reactors in the
> plant.
>
I do not know such details at all. The only thing I know about is the
sample data. I immediately saw the problems in that data such as the
pressure of 0.0 bar. The data is obviously fake, and p
Jed,
I find it strange that you didn't know there were 2 MW of reactors in
the plant. I thought that was common knowledge.. The first set of the
older design were what you saw in the photo montage that Rossi
provided. (Nothing to do with Lugano - low temperature units) The
second set of fo
a.ashfield wrote:
> Jed,
> Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The standby
> reactors were of the old design that you think may have worked.
>
No, I meant the little cylindrical one used in the first Levi tests:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGindication.pdf
I have n
Jed,
Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The standby
reactors were of the old design that you think may have worked.
If the four 250 kW units didn't work why did Rossi not use the backups?
As far as is known they were never activated.
On 12/5/2016 5:28 PM, Jed Rothwel
Frank Znidarsic wrote:
Jed how can Parkhomov claim successes by following Rossi when Rossi had
> none?
I suppose Parkhomov is mistaken, or misinformed about Rossi's work.
There are several other possibilities --
Takahashi and others have tested finely divided nickel and reported it
produces e
Jed how can Parkhomov claim successes by following Rossi when Rossi had none?
Frank Z
Russ George wrote:
> Within this social media miasma which this Vortex is the condemnation of
> Rossi and name calling by nere-do-wells and armchair dilatants, aka trolls,
> adds nothing positive to the development of science.
>
See the lawsuit Exhibit 5:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6qvu
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-05-2016-can-we-stop-stagnators.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Well I guess I stand more with Bob that with Brian on this. As a working
experimentalist in the field (like Brian, god bless him) I have plenty of
things I wish (might demand) that Rossi (and a long list of other
experimentalists) might do to make my life more interesting and exciting and
save me a
See below
I also consider that Rossi has been able to improve upon the COP's of the
system by finding compatible combinations of Li, H, Ni nano particle
characteristics, and, primarily control circuit resonance to allow minimal
energy input and long term self sustaining operations.
"Those
Higgins—
I second Jed’s thanks for the AP paper translation. Its seems to nail down the
results of 22 years (at least) of the Ni-H LENR system R&D. S. Forcardi and
other Italians should get the credit it seems to me.
I also consider that Rossi has been able to improve upon the COP’s of the
13 matches
Mail list logo