Jed,
I find it strange that you didn't know there were 2 MW of reactors in
the plant. I thought that was common knowledge.. The first set of the
older design were what you saw in the photo montage that Rossi
provided. (Nothing to do with Lugano - low temperature units) The
second set of four 250 kW units were right at the end. In Rossi's photo
he is listening to one with a stethoscope.
It is pretty weak to say that they all didn't work without any evidence
of that. That Rossi didn't attempt to use them is fairly strong
evidence he was satisfied with the four 250 kW units, no matter what you
have been told by IH. Do you really think he would build about 80
units for fun and not use them if needed? One of the design of these
unused units was what passed the initial test. IH was bleating about
how he used a different design for the test and tried to make out that
disqualified it, if you recall.
On 12/5/2016 7:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jed,
Rossi had a double set of reactors in the 1 MW experiment. The
standby reactors were of the old design that you think may have
worked.
No, I meant the little cylindrical one used in the first Levi tests:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGindication.pdf
I have no idea why the other cylindrical ones at Lugano did not seem
to work.
I did not know there was a double set of reactors in the 1 MW
experiment. That's news to me. I have no idea whether the unused ones
might have worked.
My only technical knowledge of this test is what is in Exhibit 5 and
in the photos. As I said, I know that Exhibit is based on Rossi's own
data. Everything I could tell from the data was in Exhibit 5, plus
some stuff I could not tell. Exhibit 5 was also partly confirmed by
Rossi's comments to Lewan.
- Jed
