that.
A bit like Scrooge, I guess it's never too late.
KRM
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 at 7:11 PM
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Many years later...
Don't fret about it. We have thick skin in this business. Welcome back!
On
Vortexians,
Having worked in the automotive industry for a long time, I've encountered
various things that can be of use to the amateur scientist. A lot of them are
not applicable here, but one that came back to mind the other day I thought I
should put out there, and maybe you guys can offer y
Hello again, Vortexians.
It's been a long time, perhaps 10 years or so since I've been here. I can't
recall exactly, but that was another life. You'd be surprised how much can
change in that time, and how much you look back on with regret and sorrow.
I'll start off by saying, if there are people
--- On Sat, 1/28/12, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
> As the one who 'rode her ass' a number of times, I have said
> that her (his)
> technical criticisms were WELCOME... but to lay off the
> focus on the
> personalities.
Good idea. Discussing the science and analysis of the tests is what we sho
--- On Sat, 1/28/12, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> By the way, I'm disappointed by all the Mary Yugo bashing. I
> did not find MY's skepticism to be severe or particularly
> extreme, compared to plenty I've seen.
Well, as a semi-interested outsider who'd love a cheap (essentially fuel-less)
heat
"There is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
V,
Whatever side of the aisle you fall on with regards to Rossi, you got to admit,
given his slap-it-together plumbing style, a Lenard ray tube built from a booze
bottle, kitchen foil, and hardware store crap is right up their alley.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FYVBsGCUVg
Gotta admit, Clag
--- On Wed, 11/23/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
> Most interesting! "Garnet is desirable because it
> inherently transmits light differently in one direction than
> in another: It has a different index of refraction — the
> bending of light as it enters the material — depending on
> the direction of
On 11/13/2011 1:15 PM, Vorl Bek wrote:
>> I have had it with Mary Yugo.
>
> I think Mary Yugo is a good addition to this list.
>
> Mary Yugo's skepticism is better than excusing Rossi's odd
> behaviour on the grounds that he must be an eccentric genius.
I have no idea if Rossi is a scammer or i
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Yeah. Bien sur. The whole issue isn't that some
> religious law might be broken; it's that you can get
> contradictions if we allow stuff like this to go on without
> careful controls on it, and short cuts, improbability
> physics, and bistrom
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Jouni,
I am not certain I follow quite what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting
that, possibly, the absolute frame of reference may have differing velocities
based on the velocity of the local object? I.E, some planet, Earth or Venus,
whatever?
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> I believe I alluded to something like this earlier.
In reading back over previous emails, yes, you're right.
>
> In a universe which adheres in general to the SR model, you
> can, none the less, allow instantaneous
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
> In the CERN OPERA results, neutrinos arrived about
> 2.48x10^-5 the travel time sooner than expected. For a
> 168,000 ly trip the expected photon arrival delay time Dt
> should be
>
> Dt = (2.48x10^-5)*(168,000 yr) = 1521
> days = 4.17 years
Righ
--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
> This measurement conflicts with early arrival time data for
> neutrinos from supernova. The New Scientist article quotes
> Marc Sher of the College of William and Mary in
> Williamsburg, Virginia, "It's not reasonable." ... "If
> neutrinos were that m
--- On Thu, 5/12/11, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
>
> Yeah, well... that's what I would have done. But who
> listens to me! ;-)
>
Hey, at least you get replies!
I do the math showing that Rossi's (erroneous, due to mysterious typo?) claim
of 58g Nickel > 30,000 TOE of crude represen
V,
Double checked my math after thinking about it. Unless I am missing something,
that is the way it is.
No one has anything to say on this?
You can't even get this kind of energy by fusing up the chain all the way from
hydrogen to nickel-56 as happens in massive stars, as far as I know, thoug
--- On Mon, 5/9/11, Terry Blanton wrote:
> He then claims that 58 g of Ni provides the equivalent
> energy of
> 30,000 tons of oil with the strangest calculation that
> begins with 10
> MeV of energy per reaction. This is converted to mass
> equivalent,
> multiplied by Avogadro's number and, usi
--- On Fri, 4/1/11, Terry Blanton wrote:
Hmm. A quick search reveals discussions about this back on Mar. 11, so it
doesn't look like April Fools shenanigans.
http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/03/11/a-nuclear-explosion-on-mars/
And paper here:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2011/pdf
--- On Sun, 3/13/11, Jed Rothwell wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell
Subject: [Vo]:Reactor #3 just blew up, and another tsunami coming
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, March 13, 2011, 9:26 PM
> Reactor #3 just exploded.
> Also there are aftershocks and another 3 meter tsunami is headed for the
>
--- On Sun, 3/13/11, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
> Kyle, I have posted this particular OFF
> TOPIC commentary in vortex-l because I have perceived the fact that
> there are individuals on this list that have shown interest in what's
> been happening in Madison, Wisconsin.
V,
This is one of the most sobering things I have seen in a long time.
God only knows what the effect of it all will be in the end. 10,000+ dead in a
virtual blink of the eye. Radiation. Mass destruction. Lives destroyed or
forever altered.
My wife has a friend who is Japanese. We aren't sure
--- On Sat, 3/12/11, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
But seriously... what are you thinking? Things were relatively peaceful until
you began posting this stuff. Maybe you missed Bill Beaty's ban on this sort of
discussion? I, of all people, listened to this warning. But perhaps
--- On Sat, 1/29/11, Jed Rothwell wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Big Picture
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, January 29, 2011, 4:57 PM
> This is an unknown nuclear reaction for crying out loud! A NUCLEAR
> REACTION. It is not a Gumby toy or potato battery. I have seen
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Jones Beene wrote:
> ... a true character ... but I'm not so sure the Dime Box
> was fictitious ?
The romantic in me likes to think it was real. Maybe not in this plane of
reality, whatever it is, but *somewhere*.
I liked R.C.
We talked quite a bit off-list about many thi
--- On Tue, 7/20/10, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> If it was an interstellar communication and it happened to
> impinge on earth, it would have stayed pointed in our
> direction for a long time. Ditto for a deliberate signal to
> attract our attention and announce the existence of another
> intelligent s
V,
>From http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/faq/part6/section-12.html
I did some calculations (assumes I did the arithmetic right) for a dish with an
aperture of 10,000 meters. Such a structure could be conceivably constructed in
space, using either one massive construct, or arrays of smaller o
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Hmmm . . . What about up-links to geosynchronous TV and telcom
> satellites. Or, if a civilization expands beyond one planet (but not
> interstellar), what about interplanetary communications?
I don't have any data on hand about those systems, but it
--- On Sun, 7/18/10, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
> I seem to recall that measurements on some supernova
> indicated that the neutrino
> burst and the x-rays arrived at the same time. IOW
> neutrinos don't travel faster
> than light. (Only tachyons do that ;^)
On the one hand...
In my defense, I wa
--- On Sat, 7/17/10, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
> To put this in perspective, in order to pick up 1
> micro-Watt in total from our
> 10 MW transmitter, the dish would have to have a radius of
> 6 million km.
> BTW the *closest* star to Sol is 4 ly away, not one.
1uW is a lot of power, at least to
--- On Sat, 7/17/10, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
> At a distance of 1 light year, a dish with a radius of 100
> m would pick up grand
> total of 3E-22 W from a 10 MW transmitter on Earth. I don't
> think there are any
> 10 MW transmitters, and even if there were, a signal that
> small would be
> c
--- On Fri, 7/16/10, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jed, and all:
Another I'd add to the list is, we assume they would use radio waves or optical
(laser) communication (ala COSETI). Some other medium may exist, which we
either cannot use effectively at the moment (neutrinos) or which we don't know
about
--- On Fri, 5/21/10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Sorry for the long delay in replying, it was a... rough week.
> I used that same substance, different mixture. More sugar,
> I think, and I used it for smoke bombs, it burned slowly
> with copious white smoke, basically harmless. Except a
> friend
--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Unspeakable . . .
>
>
> I can't bring myself to read this.
>
>
> See:
>
>
> "Witness: Mallove asked for help before he died"
I read it, unfortunately.
This is awful. I cannot imagine the mindset of a "person" who would not do as
he asked. "Help me
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Jones Beene wrote:
> From: Jones Beene
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Just for fun...
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 10:22 AM
> In the (non-ecclesiastical) category
> of 'nothing new under the sun'
>
> Here is an article that many vortician 'flamers' will
>
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMQEiRWoiJw
> >
> > Is it practical? No. Was it fun? Oh yes.
>
> Better page: http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/flame-amp/flameamp.htm
I know Nyle's pages are better than mine, that's why I linked to him from my
ow
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
> All good points, Kyle. The only individual I can think of
> that is trying to
> reverse this trend is Dean Kamen, inventor of Segway.
> Segway is also not
> "practical" but it's still an impressive product that has
> found a niche
Frank,
I'm late in replying, as I usually am, what with how my life generally is...
Don't give up. I may not say much these days, but I read your messages. Keep at
your work.
--Kyle
V,
With some spare time over the weekend, and little to do (a rarity), I decided
to make a crystal-less crystal radio. Inspired by Nyle Steiner's work (google
him, he is a god among amateur scientists), I conducted a couple hour's worth
of experimenting with using flames as a detection method f
--- On Sun, 2/21/10, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> From: Jed Rothwell
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:TEST
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Sunday, February 21, 2010, 10:34 AM
> Another test. I have not been able to post
> messages.
> - Jed
>
Came through OK here, Jed.
I've been having the same problem, it began
--- On Sat, 2/20/10, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Census Community Survay..what is the remedy if I fail to
> produce?
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> First, I'm pretty sure that it's a misdemeanor at worst,
> and there isn't
> any jail time, there prob
Test...
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Terry Blanton wrote:
> HARIMA, JAPAN—Saying that there was no more knowledge to
> acquire about
> the physical nature of the universe, the International
> Union of Pure
> and Applied Physics announced Monday that it had concluded
> the
> scientific study of matter, energy, fo
--- On Fri, 1/22/10, Rick Monteverde wrote:
> Of course there are a few right here in our own
> neighborhood that are decent
> candidates for deep bio activity. And aside from that one
> where we are to
> "attempt no landing...", we wouldn't have to fight off
> those annoying blue
> people just t
V,
It is more a sad one, I think, so far.
Up here where I live, a lesbian woman was assaulted two girls and a group of
four men, apparently simply because the woman was a lesbian. Among other
things, she was stabbed in the eye, and will most likely (if she has not
already) lose that eye. I can
--- On Sat, 12/5/09, Alexander Hollins wrote:
> From: Alexander Hollins
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory (Follow-up)
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Saturday, December 5, 2009, 8:24 AM
> Its a comedy bit by george carlin,
> about "racial terms" that are
> stupi
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory
> (Follow-up)
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 10:55 PM
>
> It wasn't; I was mostly thinking in terms of people being
> e
V,
If you can watch this with a straight face, well, I'm rather impressed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0bKq3x74UE
I don't know if Koji Kondo would be amused or horrified. But, if that made your
ears bleed, then THIS is freaking cool, and straight from the man himself:
http://www.youtube.co
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Alexander Hollins wrote:
> From: Alexander Hollins
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory (Follow-up)
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:53 PM
> * Happens to be." "He
> happens to be black." Like it's a fucking
> acci
See comments below...
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> From: Jed Rothwell
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory
> (Follow-up)
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 3:02 PM
> Rick Monteverde wrote:
>
> > >> M
V,
I'll try this again. In my previous post in the other thread, I made a few
points relating to some things being argued, but as is usual, there was no
response to what I said whatsoever, save one private message effectively
calling me a racist for posting a link to the (I thought) humorous vi
--- On Fri, 10/30/09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Hi Jed and all,
There's more than a few unanswered questions about this whatsit.
1. Previous models have produced "modest thrust." What is "modest thrust?" The
best we have seen to date is an apparatus of indeterminate weight very slowly
revolving aro
--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> "A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have
> suggested that
> the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to
> produce with the
> collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation
> would ripple
> backward through time and stop
--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Late reply... sorry. Had to repair a family member's car. Unbelievably simple
problem, a real bear to track down.
> The only reason we stopped is because the Chinese do it so
> cheaply. This is also why the U.S. stopped manufacturing so
> many goods. Tha
--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Terry Blanton wrote:
> One problem with their story is that the home system of the
> aliens was
> identified as Zeta Reticuli, a binary star system. It
> is believed
> that binary systems likely would not contain planets, much
> less those
> which could sustain life.
>
> Bu
--- On Thu, 9/3/09, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson > >
> > Yes!
>
> I second that.
>
You got it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-CQRSHkci8
GENTLEMEN! I give you... this THING!
Yeah, it's a terrible, and probably quite boring video. And the hands holding
the contraption belong to yours truly.
--- On Wed, 9/2/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> > Good? No? Indifferent?
>
> Good? Great, really.
Thanks, appreciate that.
> The experiment, I mean. The result I'm not so happy
> with -- trouble is
> it didn't produce the result I expected! Arrgh,
> experiment wins again!
>
> Now, where
V, and Stephen and Horace in particular...
Okay. The following experiment was performed.
Took my two trusty bearings from the working BB motor. Left the U bolts
attached to the outer races. Fine.
Took a length of 5/8" smooth steel shaft, cut two pieces 2" long from that. One
piece was clamped
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Unfortunately, this experiment would be a pain in the neck
> to perform,
> and if I can judge by the silence, both Horace and Kyle
> have given up on
> this particular time sink.
No.
Things are just... things are hard. Life.
As for your "stat
--- On Sat, 8/22/09, Horace Heffner wrote:
> I would recommend holding off on the graphite until you get
> a chance to take some measurements first. The graphite
> messed up my motor to some degree as far as measurements are
> concerned.
Alright, will hold off on that then. In any case, the th
V,
Behold:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMO8Pyi3UpY
--Kyle
Postscript: Maybe if the water was D2O?
V,
Hey kids, what time is it?
"Howdy Doody time!"
No, actually, it's ball-bearing motor time again. The old motor was
disassembled and remade into a more nimble form. The spacing between the
bearings was halved, thus reducing resistance. Also, the wobbly allthread shaft
was replaced with a mu
--- On Fri, 8/21/09, Terry Blanton wrote:
> From: Terry Blanton
> Subject: [Vo]:Roswell Confession
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Friday, August 21, 2009, 8:58 AM
> http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/08/scientist-admits-to-study-of-roswell.html
>
> Sunday, August 16, 2009
> SCIENTIST ADMITS TO
V, and Horace of course,
Got out the original ball bearing motor which works, and connected a high
current transformer of indeterminate turns ratio (made it myself years ago, do
not remember). Technical details of the transformer are below:
Core: several spools worth of iron rebar tie wire woun
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Horace Heffner wrote:
> Well, Kyle, the ball bearing motor may just have some
> anomalies left up its sleeves. Looks like the back emf
> possibly doesn't increase with rpms, at least in some range.
> How strange is that?
Do you want me to rig that transformer I made up to
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Horace Heffner wrote:
> This is a bit of a surprise. I would have thought
> with that much current it would have had at least some sign
> of working. I guess there is probably more inherent
> friction.
It could be. Didn't feel like there was any more difficulty in spinning
Or lack thereof.
Tests using various cage-to-race tightnesses showed no motoring effect
whatsoever, even with enough current applied to cause heavy automotive jumper
cables to become uncomfortably hot. Identical shaft and flywheel setup was used
as in the ball bearing motor which works flawless
Horace,
Just for the hell of it, I am making a new bearing motor out of automotive
bearings, the old conical roller type used in the front wheels of
rear-wheel-drive cars. It's almost done, but I unfortunately ran out of 5/16"
nuts tonight, so cannot continue until tomorrow evening.
Two bearin
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Horace Heffner wrote:
> Say, thanks for the response! There's nothing like
> robust equipment, eh!
Heh. I've got some nasty stuff here I've acquired from various times and
places. Having a good friend who we here affectionately refer to as "The
Scrounger" (apologies to Ja
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> > state of mind.
>
> If you're going to use English to communicate with others,
> please use
> the words to mean what we all agree that they mean.
> "time" is not a state of mind.
> A country mile is not an hour.
> And a letter in which
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Horace Heffner wrote:
> Some of the youtube experiment videos show motors that seem
> to run well with low current. I would not have expected the
> contact to be so poor. Maybe it *is* indeed poor and
> that is key to getting enough torque. The fact
> flywheels are required
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jed,
New York state is never to be outdone in the stupidity department. You should
read the inspection manual for here; it is a three-ring circus.
1. If a car has a 1mm hole in a rear taillight lens, it fails. Because, you
know, that tiny bit of white
V,
This is a catch-all message for a couple different things in different threads.
1. John Berry: did finish the HV supply to charge the tube/capacitor. But due
to the current consumption of the tube in 'keep alive' mode and the desire to
have everything isolated from ground, I am going to hav
V,
Today, went out and got a nice power supply for a Marinov bearing motor. 1200
ampere jump starter box.
Two high quality RBI ball bearings, 5/8" shaft size, were purchased. Mated them
to a shaft with an aluminum flywheel on the end, used a couple U bolts to hold
the bearings to a wooden bas
V,
Built a quick and dirty one tonight. Does work, not well, but it does at least
take far longer than it should to spin down. The bearings were basically cheap
crap from Valu Hardware. Need to get something better.
Power source was a moderately charged 12V Autocraft lawnmower battery,
someth
V and John,
1.2kVDC and 4kV, eh? No problem.
Did find: old microwave oven. Transformer still works, lower wattage oven so
"safer" output. 120VAC to 2kVAC transformer. Plan to send this to a 2 stage
multiplier, as I have about a hundred 6kV diodes on hand and nice capacitors
rated for this vol
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Michel Jullian wrote:
> Or it could be that in both cases the capacitance remains
> constant
> (defined by the dielectric material, area and thickness),
> and the
> decrease in frequency is due to the increase in resistance
> of the
> resistor + plasma series arrangement fee
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, William Beaty wrote:
> From: William Beaty
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hiddink capacitor links
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 3:28 PM
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, John Berry
> wrote:
> If something interests you, then test it.
Don't worry Bill, me and Joh
--- On Tue, 6/23/09, Michel Jullian wrote:
> Kyle, nice work as always. Couldn't the plate (the support
> of the net
> charge) be simply the inside surface of the glass tube, and
> the plasma
> be just the conducting "wire" leading to that plate? In
> this case,
> suppressing the "wire" would al
V,
Hmm. Very little to say, re: my plasma capacitor relaxation oscillator. I'll do
a few more quick tests and let you know what I find.
John, now that we've established, despite the static, that one can make a cap
with one plate a plasma, what specifically would you like me to do with it
firs
John, and all interested,
In an experiment to determine whether or not a lit fluorescent tube can act as
a capacitor when surrounded with a conductive material, I did the following
experiment.
A relaxation oscillator was constructed; +V of about 110VDC from a 'bandolier'
of 9V batteries put t
V, and John Berry in particular,
Figured I should make a more aptly titled thread for this, as "Enough Already"
doesn't make much sense in light of what we're talking about. :)
Made a mistake in my last post, UV blacklights DO have a phosphor, one that
prefers the blue end of the spectrum. Not
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry wrote:
> Yes, though Gray has air and hence no inner tube between
> the plasma and the metal terminal.
What is he using as plasma? Corona?
> > The outside of the envelope is metal
> > foil.
> That should work however everything indicates that the
> results wi
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry wrote:
> From: John Berry
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Enough Already
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 8:41 PM
> Too bad about the helium ;)The
> charecteristic we want is for the plasma to be very exact
> about when it is and is not a plasma.It m
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry wrote:
> From: John Berry
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Enough Already
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 6:43 PM
> Hopefully though it is the end of this
> whole affair as it is about finding a resolution.
> It is still interesting how many are put
Vortex,
I have apologized to Jed. I don't know if he will accept it, but nevertheless,
I post it here as well, to make a public statement of it.
Jed and I do not agree on many things. But unfortunately, I took advantage of
that, and lashed out in anger. I feel anger first, when I perceive a th
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Chris Zell wrote:
> From: Chris Zell
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:On Topic
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 7:15 PM
> OK, I'm interested in the
> anomalies you mentioned, particularly the conditioning of
> space.
> The whole no ether thing never made sense to
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Edmund Storms wrote:
> Kyle, in the absence of Jed, I feel it's my duty to educate
> about cold fusion. If you want to know what has been learned
> up to 2007, I suggest you read my book "The Science of Low
> Energy Nuclear Reaction". If you want to learn what is going
> on
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, John Berry wrote:
> Personally my interest is in the aether and I have much
> evidence for a model I have developed which explains most
> everything and roughly how to do almost anything, but I can
> not imagine trying to wade into that subject here.
I've had an interest in
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jed's temporary ban...
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 8:22 AM
>
>
> Interesting page. Here are some comments (yes,
> they're just theory, I
> don't have a 30K DC supply t
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, Mike Carrell wrote:
> Kyle sees snapshots of Jed as a cruel and arrogant person
> -- in fact he drives a cheap car.
Prius is not cheap. $1000 Buick is cheap.
> What Kyle does not see is
> Jed's acute and passionate awareness of the millions in
> developing nations whose l
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, OrionWorks wrote:
> From: OrionWorks
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Public apology to Kyle Mcallister, and a rephrasing of my
> original comment
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Sunday, June 14, 2009, 6:15 PM
> Kyle,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to exp
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, OrionWorks wrote:
> I wish to express a public apology to Kyle MCallister. My
> previous
> comment was impulsive, and it shows so. Let me rephrase my
> prior
> thoughts into something less impulsive, and hopefully more
> thoughtful.
I appreciate it.
--- On Sat, 6/13/09, OrionWorks wrote:
> Really? That's your impression of Jed?
Yes.
> I would suggest you might want to consider looking in the
> mirror when
> you say that.
I wish for people to be free to choose their own paths. Read what he has
written, and I have often fought against, a
--- On Sat, 6/13/09, Mark Iverson wrote:
> From: Mark Iverson
> Subject: [Vo]:Jed's temporary ban...
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Saturday, June 13, 2009, 1:23 AM
> Hey Jed, time to go take a vacation
> and get some R&R... Go climb a mountain with your
> kids. By the
> time you get back,
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Terry Blanton wrote:
> > Credit to TinselKoala.
>
> Which is an anagram for Nikola Tesla. Whatcha you
> wanna bet it is
> Alsetalokin of Whipmag fame? ;-)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIvZJ9xGutI
Same person. Voices are a clear match. This guy's been doing a lot o
V,
Been away from the computer for a while, but now that I'm back, I need to
clarify something.
The video I posted a link to pertaining to the fishing line being used to run
the Mylow motor is NOT my video. It was posted by someone calling
himself "TinselKoala"...which while an intere
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, OrionWorks wrote:
> I hope I was able to answer Kyle's concerns. Sounds like
> Buffalo, NY,
> has a few issues of it's own as well! ;-)
I am very glad to hear that all is well with you and yours. It is a terror
beyond imagining when one feels that those he loves are in dan
Steven,
I hope everything goes well, and safely, for you and
yours. I've dealt with similar things before, albeit
with a machine in my hands that would be far more
effective than any modern donut-monster. Thankfully, I
never had to use it.
One thing I am not entirely clear on, why did the cop
no
V,
Have had and done with this. I don't know if it is
possible or not. Maybe. But whatever the case, this
thing is getting very stupid, very fast.
Mylow, posting to Youtube.com as "magnetmotor1" took
everything down today, posted a reply to a comment by
"TinselKoala" on this video:
http://www.y
>--- Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>
>-
>
>Mylow (and his twin brother) demonstrate the motor
>with six bar magnets:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_KQ8tldXnY
Watching this with my wife now.
Something about the video seems odd. I cannot put my
finger on it, but it i
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
