The presence of a previously
unknown form of energy was frequently inferred by HHO researchers from the
amazing scalability of oxyhydrogen welding torches.
I've watched this happen; watched firebrick MELTING in seconds right in front
of my own lyin' eyes... It was called Brown's gas whe
it
(despite all the ooohs and aas) as does taking out the garbage... perhaps
less...
P.
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2008 10:49:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Science and faith
- Original Mes
Many years ago, George Orwell wrote a very powerful essay, entitled, "Benefit
of Clergy."
It clarified - as only Orwell could - a similar type of situation.
I recommend that all Vorticians read it and think about what Orwell was trying
to say.
P.
- Original Message
From: Jones Been
g the other cheek. I don't advise this
approach now, but the brute force approach is not working either. Unless
rational decisions are made in the future, the result I fear will not
please either one of us.
As for further discussion of this topic, I apologize to anyone who finds
Hmmm... Ya don't think that higher oil prices are due to (1) greed, and (2) the
holy purpose of holding the world by the balls until the Caliphate is
established (ie - the West succumbs financially and goes down the tubes)? It
seems that the scientific idea of cause and effect is somewhat inapp
Quite right Ed. For an interesting story on this, read any of the biographies
of Edgar Cayce - "The Sleeping Prophet"
P..
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Oil Gang responds
St
Exactly.
P.
- Original Message
From: OrionWorks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2008 9:05:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Oil Gang responds
Philip sez:
...
> People are where they are because it's where they
> are, as "part of the dream." My approach is, "l
You have a point, and personally I don't go for the "God gave it to us" stuff,
because I can't prove it.
But I have to ask you if you live in America, and how you feel about the white
man coming in and taking over, and, if you feel bad about it - very bad about
it - if you've ever considered mo
w? If you
prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do
we not die?"
Harry
On 9/6/2008 5:21 PM, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
The same situation is taking place as we speak. Ideology and ego have replaced
common sense, and perhaps outmoded things like h
S
> is dragged deeper into the conflict. No matter which side you favor, this
> is the situation. The policies used in the past have clearly not worked no
> matter how "correct" you think them to be. The question is, what do you
> suggest we do now?
>
> Ed
>
I like all that Steven... I do tend to lecture a little (perhaps a lot); just
ask my wife...
But it doesn't really matter if nobody is paying attention to the content -
which is a human condition; we're too busy paying attention to what's going on
inside our minds by way of reaction. C'est la
e you favor, this is the
situation. The policies used in the past have clearly not worked no
matter how "correct" you think them to be. The question is, what do you
suggest we do now?
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> I personally don't like the idea of playing nice with people
Steven, I can understand. I was in Pakistan a few years ago doing engineering
work (fortunately I wasn't a journalist), and I saw many men holding hands.
S'OK... as kids we all held our fathers' hands... However - and I don't want
to read too much into this - this was done in America, in the
with the Saudi and
supporting everything the Israeli government wants. One is done for
money and the other is done for politics. Unfortunately, the two have
now formed an explosive mixture.
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> That's funny Ed,
>
> I thought I saw President Bush holdi
That's funny Ed,
I thought I saw President Bush holding hands with a Saudi person some time ago,
and I heard that his dad was fundamentally owned by a bunch of these Saudi
people all controlling the world's oil flows. I must have been either mistaken
or blind... These must have been Mossad age
ms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2008 1:30:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Yes - I know something of Sai Baba, the latest in a lineage of Sai
> Babas. I also know a disciple who spent 25 years
.
This is not always the case. Sai Baba says that additional men having
the same abilities are alive now in various countries and presently at
different ages who will carry the message into the future. Keep your
eyes open.
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> Ed,
>
> I wonder if you'
Ed,
I wonder if you've ever heard of a man they called the "Backwoods Buddha"...
Look him up on the 'Net if you're interested...
P.
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2008 7:30:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science
Of course there's a maximum number of watts per sq metre of panel available
from the sun, so that's an important factor to consider when justifying any
investment.
On the other hand, by covering a roof (and perhaps a south-facing wall) with
solar panels, the panels intercept the incoming sola
"One thing I don't get is why solar costs so much more
than nuclear or coal fired. There's almost no moving
parts, and much less to break down, it seems to me.
There's got to be some politics in this somewhere, but
I don't know exactly where."
A broad subject... One factor is that the amount of po
Yeah - even though I'm not North American by birth, I easily saw over the
years, how much the public had been sucked into Japanese (and European) car
mode. And the stupid NA auto manufacturers got just as sucked in and tried to
compete with the little 4-cyl jobs. Americans were (and as far as
It's the "other story" that's most likely the most interesting story...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:29:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Bigfoot on Mars??
Howdy Horace,
NASA loves this kinda stuff if i
olving faster?
Crummy night -- we just had a layoff at work (I made the cut but some
very good people didn't). So the tone of this may be a little
downbeat.
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> LOL I empathize... in all respects.
>
> "Does that make us a self-evolving species?&quo
etting married next sunday to a very jealous woman whos an
excellent shot with a handgun. but others im sure would sacrifice in my place)
On 12/14/07, PHILIP WINESTONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hah! Few people are paid to think... at least not in the way you and I define
thinking. Th
Hah! Few people are paid to think... at least not in the way you and I define
thinking. That's another story. Somebody took me to task (mildly for a
change) for saying that humans are not necessarily improving... But when the
word "evolution" is used, it implies that improvement is in the wor
There are exquisitely beautiful cave paintings in France, dating back about
15000 years. There are even more exquisite paintings - again in caves in France
- dating back 35000 years. Does this indicate that perhaps there were
wonderfully cultured people over 35000 years ago, and that that cultur
Very interesting...
"...our world is just one of a countless number of parallel universes..." Have
to add, "each one as unreal as the next."
Hui Neng - the Sixth Patriarch of Zen - summed it all up by saying, "From the
first there is nothing." The other thing is, that he talked about "no-min
I think that means your worm is dead., not drunk.
P.
- Original Message
From: Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:00:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
On Nov 19, 2007 9:08 AM, R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sti
Richard, I think you could easily vie with Yogi Berra for quotable quotes...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:08:12 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Nick Palmer poster excerpt..
<
LOL
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 11:27:41 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Nick Palmer wrote..
This topic was started off by Richard "Dime box" Macaulay looking for
a
conomic models
On Nov 17, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Nick Palmer wrote:
> Philip Winestone ranted
> < crowd" don't want us burning ANYTHING, so the proposal to dig up
> coal and use if for ANYTHING will be met with fierce resistance,
> mostly by bigmouths.>>
>
&
EXACTLY my point of view; buying time for LENR to happen without falling under
the curse of OPEC.
P.
.
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:33:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NEW IPCC report was: Economic models
--
Now THAT's interesting...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:14:58 PM
Subject: [VO]:Brown's Gas Hydrogen to steam
Blank
BODY {
MARGIN-TOP:25px;FONT-SIZE:10pt;MARGIN-LEFT:25px;COLOR:#00;FONT-FAMI
Yes the word "greed" is most appropriate. Oddly enough, when I think about the
"oil gang" and its greed, I don't so much think of the oil companies
themselves, who do put money, time and effort into getting the stuff out of the
ground and processing it (don't all shout at me at once!!!), I thin
Jed,
Yes... when I sent my email to the journalist in question, I was very careful
to avoid talking about, or knocking the work, that this chap is doing out in
the west of Canada. I don't think it pays to malign other people's work,
unless they go over the top and start unreasonably maligning
I read that in the Post this morning. I don't know how viable this is, but I
wish Dr. Laberge lots of luck. Seriously.
I wrote to the writer of the article, pointing him in the direction of Cold
Fusion, if only to make him aware that there's lots of other interesting work
going on in the ener
P.
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:42:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> You don't even have to convert coal to methanol... When you consider
how
>
You don't even have to convert coal to methanol... When you consider how much
energy is used by many manufacturing processes, to name but one major energy
using sector, converting them from, say natural gas or oil would make a huge
dent in overall energy usage.
I don't know about North Americ
Are you having as good a weekend as I think you are Richard?
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 8:35:29 AM
Subject: [VO]: Economic models
Blank
BODY {
MARGIN-TOP:25px;FONT-SIZE:10pt;MARGIN-LEFT:25px;C
I've been considering what I see as the "anomalous" behaviour of hydrogen, ever
since I watched (from a distance of about 24 inches) a firebrick melting after
a hydrogen flame was applied to it for about 10 seconds. This was a
demonstration of something called "Brown's Gas," which was apparentl
Um... The scientific/rational side of me says "What?"
The non-rational (intuitive) side of me says, "What.?"
Two different "whats". So there's your answer.
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 9:13:28 PM
pod base required for LENR
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> Nice stuff... But kind of circular...
Nah, it's more like martial arts technique. :)
See what needs doing, see from all angles simultaneously, then go knock
heads together as needed.
I've gone through the stag
LOL!!
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 11:46:24 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Tripod base required for LENR
A one leg tripod footed in quicksands... m... we are not there yet ;-)
Michel
- Original Messa
't think. The word
'intelligence' (as in 'Intelligence Service') also comes to mind.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "PHILIP WINESTONE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Tripod base required for LENR
Interesting... Picasso's portrayal of himself publicly was, from what I've
heard, quiet different from what he really felt... which coincidentally is
exactly what that quote is about. And of course if Picasso's real intention
was to play his "admirers" like a fly fisherman; to soak them for the
@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2007 9:50:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Tripod base required for LENR
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
> How about "refuse to tolerate all conscious dishonesty in ourselves"?
> We all lie to ourselves - mostly unconsciously - about a myriad
As a person who does some painting, drawing, etc., I only have to look around
to attest to what Picasso was talking about; looks like most of today's artists
never read this piece... a piece which takes my breath away. I have a two-book
set on Picasso; the first book I devoured with great relis
Well I tried to say it in a few different ways. The simple answer is that we
have to do battle with those who deliberately (consciously) lie, and
furthermore, who deliberately try to convince others that their lies are in
fact truths.
This has nothing to do with motes or logs or whatever, whic
How about "refuse to tolerate all conscious dishonesty in ourselves"?
We all lie to ourselves - mostly unconsciously - about a myriad of things...
something I won't get into in detail, but perhaps worthy of some thought.
My own view of life, including the LENR fiasco (back to LENR), is that th
Courteously? The response is often a mirror of the original attack; perhaps
slightly less (or more) so. Since most attacks on LENR that I've seen over the
years, have been both thoroughly dishonest and thoroughly discourteous, I stand
by my original "blunt and ruthless" (but nonetheless honest)
Richard, I'm assuming that this pier includes the will to confront intellectual
dishonesty and graft in very blunt terms, if necessary. Once the "attack" is
made, the "counter-attack" should be focused and ruthless.
Still thinking...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAI
Just saw this, Richard. The market system is great, but this is obviously not
the market system... Ominous.
Begs the question: How many media and government people are fattening
themselves on all that money, for "services rendered"? Perhaps that explains
this "failure". Perhaps this also expl
rgy schemes,dime a dozen
Monotone eventually becomes monotonous.
Harry
On 1/9/2007 8:54 AM, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Hmmm... the more I hear "green" the more I turn green when I hear the word
"green."
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay &l
Hmmm... the more I hear "green" the more I turn green when I hear the word
"green."
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2007 8:42:46 AM
Subject: [VO]: Energy schemes,dime a dozen
Blank
BODY {
MARGIN-TOP:25
Richard,
"...feed on itself..."
Does that answer your question?
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 8:42:52 AM
Subject: [VO]: Hydrogen outlook?
Blank
BODY {
MARGIN-TOP:25px;FONT-SIZE:10pt;MARGIN-LEFT:25
Richard - did you write this inside or outside the Dime Box Saloon?
(It would sound so French if you called it the Dime Box Salon, by the way.)
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:08:16 PM
Subject: Re: [V
k for you, because the majority always knows... Doesn't it?
P.
- Original Message
From: Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 3:14:50 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Beware of bogus history of "lone mavericks"
PHILIP WINESTONE wrot
de
all the necessary measurements.
Harry
On 23/6/2007 9:11 PM, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
When the rational minds at Vortex start to buy into the mythology/religion of
man-made global warming, we're in deep trouble... except for those of us who
make a lot of money from the field.
There was an
Hi Richard,
How inconvenient that people like you and I won't just lie down and allow
ourselves to be thoroughly programmed.
CO2 credits? Reminds me of a little piece of "philosophy" that one of my
fellow Glaswegian "lay philosophers" said: "Man has an infinite capacity for
stupidity."
(I
vil.
And oil companies are good and only speak the truth without any hint of
anything self serving.
I bet you'd have believed the tobacco lobby too.
On 6/24/07, PHILIP WINESTONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When the rational minds at Vortex start to buy into the mythology/religion of
When the rational minds at Vortex start to buy into the mythology/religion of
man-made global warming, we're in deep trouble... except for those of us who
make a lot of money from the field.
There was an interesting article today in The National Post (Canada), written
by a physicist, in which,
I keep on saying it: Bring CF to the people - both investors and users -
emphatically not the government. Once a decent application is created,
advertised and sold, the people will know what to do with it. Edison and Ford
understood that.
Keep good ideas away from the government teat.
P.
-
Yes - I've had a few run-ins with people who (a) have never been inside a
factory let alone gotten their hands dirty in one, and (b) have no idea what
it's like to be an "hourly paid" working dude, most times at the mercy of
"trends". Then there's the joy of shift-work...
My own take on energy
Actually, for the purposes of scientific argument, "bollocks" is much preferred.
P.
- Original Message
From: John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 8:27:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:to John Berry regarding GW
Balls!
On 4/24/07,
t to the core of people, people are used to being
shallow not deep.
Truth isn't our friend, nor is light.
Or perhaps because they voted for Bush and own stock in oil companies.
It isn't Gore making a killing, Bush has the monopoly on killing.
On 4/23/07, PHILIP WINESTONE <
[EMAI
Then there's the small matter of two Canadian scientists who utterly refuted
the thinking/mathematics behind the so-called "hockey stick" graph that showed
how much we puny humans have influenced climate since the Industrial
Revolution. These chaps have been all but totally ignored, but it's di
Richard, I bet you were going to tell us that the green stuff in their mouths
isn't tropical vegetation...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 10:14:16 AM
Subject: [VO]:Re: Global warming
Blank
BODY {
MARGI
Not only that, but Jeff didn't deny that global warming wasn't happening
(although that in itself is questionable - if we're "allowed" to question the
sacred GW Scriptures); he was simply saying that the evidence (evidence, mind
you) is that global warming has happened before and will happen aga
The warming 500 - 1000 years ago is a blip compared to what, exactly?
P.
- Original Message
From: John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 10:10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Global Warning
On 4/23/07, Kyle R. Mcallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicely said Jeff.
P.
- Original Message
From: Jeff Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 6:42:29 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Global Warning
The headline in my newspaper of Saturday Feb. 3, 2007 said,
“GLOBAL WARNING- If nothi
I think we should aim all the fire-hoses on earth at the sun, then say ready!
set! go! (The element of surprise is so important.).
P.
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global
Richard,
That "somebody" will be you, no doubt.
I'm a totally unknown artist, and I say that a primary is whatever
you say is a primary - seen or unseen.
I also happen to be a huge fan of black and of white - nothing and
everything - and sometimes colours just get in the way of a good pictur
The truth is that it isn't in any space - 3- or otherwise. There
really is nothing there except what we project/perceive Nth-hand and
draw conjectures from... whoever we are.
As Hui Neng said, "From the first there is Nothing."
P.
At 06:20 PM 4/9/2007, you wrote:
Jones wrote...
It is not
Ed - I've been following this saga only sketchily, and it only
reinforces my observation that there's an enormous number of people
who regard this world as a gigantic court of law; that everything
(every word) has to be legally justifiable. What a bore
The world is NOT like that, and I fo
All I know is that a few years ago I stood beside a "Brown's Gas
Generator" and watched in awe as a colourless flame MELTED a
firebrick in just a few seconds.
Not sure about its applicability in an internal combustion engine,
but it may be applicable in a new form of external combustion engine
Sorry for barging into someone else's letter...
A quick question: We all seem to be fixated on "excess
energy". What if one of the many innovative (or potentially
innovative) ideas were to result in an engine (a fairly simple
engine) of some sort that ***didn't*** produce excess energy, but
Or as Hui Neng said: "From the first, there is nothing."
P.
At 11:37 AM 2/25/2007, you wrote:
Paul wrote:
"A poll of 72 leading physicists conducted by the American
researcher David Raub in 1995 and published in the French
periodical Sciences et Avenir in January 1998 recorded that nearly
Pathological scepticism is not the same as deliberately lying to cover up
meaningful results.
P.
At 09:43 AM 2/7/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Now you mention it, anybody knows if anything positive came out of
their Toyota/Technova funded CF lab in Nice, France?
Many posit
Steve,
The word of the day seems to be "dogma" whether it be in science, art,
religion... My take on all this is to be silent - to shut my mouth - and
observe... only opening my mouth when I sense receptivity. This is where
intuition comes into play. From time to time my ego gets the better
Rush Limbaugh!! That's who
P.
At 08:00 PM 2/5/2007 -0600, you wrote:
Steve Krivit wrote..
It's not so much that the mind is shut. It's a process of belief systems
and the influence of mass media.
Howdy Steven,
You have the fundamentals .. but ..CF lacks the charismatic person th
After all that's happened, the Science Inquisition is still humming
along. I feel bad for the guy, especially as few in the media (correct me
if I'm wrong) will go out to bat for him. Hopefully I am wrong.
I myself got into, shall we say, an intense conversation today, while at
work. I ment
Perfect Richard. But I still have to see Dime Box to believe it really
exists... and that it has a tavern...
P.
At 06:38 PM 1/21/2007 -0600, you wrote:
Philip wrote..
Excellent!!! How true!!! The reason is that the intent in all cases is to
indoctrinate along certain predictable lines thus
and ultimately
applying solid investigation.
Call me a cynic...
P.
At 10:14 AM 1/21/2007 -0500, you wrote:
On 1/21/07, Philip Winestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(And we too have our major sources of inertia... We call it collectively,
"the government.")
"Just look at us.
Canadian "smarts" at work, eh Philip?
All these Canadian smarts have no idea that the "eh" started off (or "aff")
in Glasgow, my city of origin. It's actually more like "aih".
The problem with the company's approach, from some of my tentative dealings
with them, is that like a lot of such co
I have an intuitive feeling - totally unsubstantiated - that the law of
energy conservation is to energy, what Newton's laws were to mechanics (or
physics in general).
I mean you can take a pound of any explosive and explain that the energy
from that explosive is a direct (measurable) result o
Well enlighten us ! Can you name the company and the enzyme, please.
The company in Ottawa is Iogen (that's an "I" not an "L"), but I'm afraid I
didn't go so far as to find out the name of the enzyme; I've been remiss.
(And we too have our major sources of inertia... We call it collectivel
I believe everything I'm told.
P.
At 07:50 AM 1/20/2007 -0800, you wrote:
Philip Winestone wrote:
Nobody seems to have taken notice of this process, which was pioneered by
a company in Ottawa.
Well - not exactly ! Our (USA) DOE/NREL has poured lots of its precious
(underfunded) resources
There is another way of making ethanol: from cellulose. There's a process
that uses an enzyme that converts the cellulose to sugar from which it is
converted to ethanol. The process is proven; ethanol is being produced
this way.
Nobody seems to have taken notice of this process, which was pi
The whole roofing situation is an expensive problem to solve. You can't
just penetrate a roof of any sort without extensive sealing, etc. All that
costs money. And even if the collectors are anchored parallel to the roof
- perhaps even attached closely to it, the risk is still there that ther
Kyle, I can relate totally to what you're saying having dealt with
stupidity, feigned or otherwise, when I was trying to eke out a living in
the solar energy design business (many years ago). So much for being a
"highly paid consultant" - a phrase usually thrown at me by overpaid,
overpension
Sorry - that was Big Bobby Clobber's line - the resident hockey player on
the Royal Canadian Air Farce:
"Do unto others before they do unto you."
P.
At 05:43 PM 11/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 1
cended, there is no sower and no reaper.
no-P.
At 08:59 PM 11/12/2006 -0500, you wrote:
On 11/12/06, Philip Winestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terry - perhaps there's a corollary to that law:
"As you treat others, so you will be treated."
Yes, it's calle
Terry - perhaps there's a corollary to that law:
"As you treat others, so you will be treated."
[From the alter-dimensional treatise on Galactic Federation Law]
P.
At 07:23 PM 11/12/2006 -0500, you wrote:
On 11/12/06, Philip Winestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You
You're quite right Jones... for what it's worth, I genuinely appreciate
both your attitude and your approach.
This "conversation" doesn't belong here, so it should stop immediately.
Your points about unaccountable (unearned?) wealth are well taken. I've
been studying a little, the art of Japa
Oh - and if you want to read an interesting take on the dichotomy between
"talent" and "disgusting human beings," I suggest you read Orwell's
"Benefit of Clergy." It may enlighten you.
[Aside: Sometimes I wonder how God manages to survive without people like
Mel and his trusty followers flyin
"The Jews" got upset at Gibson's portrayal of them in the film, because it
perpetuates what is at best a myth and at worst a slander that's been going
on for 2000 years. Do yourself a favour and read James Carroll's
"Constantine's Sword" a book that shows just how much "the Jews" owe to
Consta
"I know that Jews have been smearing him ever since he
had the gall to make a movie about the founder of his
religion, but I'm sorry to see you joining in."
What you say here says more about you than about "Jews".
I'm sorry to see you joining in.
P.
At 11:46 AM 11/11/2006 -0800, you wrote:
Or you can perhaps entertain the theory that human evolution is not the
commonly-accepted straight line trend from the ape until now, at which time
we modern-day humans are at the supreme end-point (all of us) of millions
of years of positive evolution. And there's more to come... In fact
so-c
The message below was for Kyle... Not that the rest of the Vorts don't make
excellent points...
P.
At 07:08 AM 10/1/2006 -0400, you wrote:
You make some excellent points. The moon mission was the highlight of our
times (aside from what the conspiracy-loons think) and the US dropped the
ball
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
