>From Richard,
> Unless, and this can be troubling ...we have already elected our last
> President. By executive order, the President can now "put off" the next
> election. Yes! the power is in place because executive orders now in place
> permit this "if" a national emergency is declared.
> The e
Unless, and this can be troubling ...we have already elected our last
President. By executive order, the President can now "put off" the next
election. Yes! the power is in place because executive orders now in place
permit this "if" a national emergency is declared.
The existing President can d
But Obama is a smoker whose parents died early in life. And Biden has
suffered two brain aneurysms. If they both die, guess who's the prez?
("But everyone knew her as Nancy.")
Prediction: Considering Biden's latest performances, after the VP
debate, he will pull out "due to health reasons" and
Steven
You may be underestimating the level of "closet racism" in the USA.
But lest we deplete the ranks of vorticians even further - why not at least
label this kind of political post as off-topic?
Good analysis Steven. I hope you are right.
Ed
On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
Since we are speculating on presidential outcomes I thought this might
be a good opportunity to share the opinions of a blatantly
unscientific and unverified source - particularly insofar as this
sou
Since we are speculating on presidential outcomes I thought this might
be a good opportunity to share the opinions of a blatantly
unscientific and unverified source - particularly insofar as this
source's take on the election. Please take the following "predictions"
with a grain of salt. ;-)
The e
On Sep 23, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:05:37
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I hope the people who elected
and supported him are pleased.
[snip]
He was voted for by lots of people, but he was never elected, as
both elections
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:05:37 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>I hope the people who elected
>and supported him are pleased.
[snip]
He was voted for by lots of people, but he was never elected, as both elections
were rigged.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 03:47 PM 9/23/2008, Ron Wormus wrote:
Jed,
There needs to be more transparency. How many mortgages are actually
in default? I heard less than 20%.
Amen to that.
As I said, the quickest way to separate the sheep from the goats
would be to demand that any company that participates in bailo
Jed,
There needs to be more transparency. How many mortgages are actually in default? I heard less than
20%. Why not just pay those off from the bottom up instead of rescuing all these guys who leveraged
themselves at 30:1? I don't trust Bush & his gang of theives. I see it as a last theft befo
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ron Wormus wrote:
. . . a single sentence of thirty-two words, but it represents a
significant consolidation of power and an abdication of oversight
authority that's so flat-out astounding that it ought to set one's
hair on fire. It reads
Ron Wormus wrote:
. . . a single sentence of thirty-two words, but it represents a
significant consolidation of power and an abdication of oversight
authority that's so flat-out astounding that it ought to set one's
hair on fire. It reads, in its entirety:
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuan
It should never be said that "W" & his boyz aren't ballsy!
A critical - and radical - component of the bailout package proposed by the Bush administration has
thus far failed to garner the serious attention of anyone in the press. Section 8 (which ironically
reminds one of the popular name of t
Howdy Vorts,
One can accept that liars can figure while figures don't lie.. well.. errr..
until we listen to Sec. Paulson explain how wonders can equal numbers while
eating cucumbers... or numbers can perform wonders.. or.. err.. maybe I am just
suspicious when anybody starts "explaining" how s
14 matches
Mail list logo
