RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

moving in as yet an ill-defined fashion. From: bobcook39...@gmail.com [mailto:bobcook39...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:24 PM To: mix...@bigpond.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation Robin— I think it’s a mistake to consider

RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

from Mail for Windows 10 From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:00 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:22:23 -0800: Hi, >Something smelts here. :) Yes, I guess Al mi

Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation > >In reply to a.ashfield's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:15:42 -0500: >Hi, >[snip] >>Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps >>https://drive.google.com/f

RE: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

Something smelts here. -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation In reply to a.ashfield's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:15:42 -050

Re: [Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

In reply to a.ashfield's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:15:42 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps >https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WUlh4c3dJWlh5Rjg/view > > From MFMP facebook. They talk a lot about the minor changes in P, Si, S, but

[Vo]:[Vo]Microwave innduced ransmutation

Microwave Induced Nuclear Transmutation in Compact Flourescent Lamps https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WUlh4c3dJWlh5Rjg/view From MFMP facebook.

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

Don't think serial numbers will be of much use in this area. They're valuable in tracing guns and cars because the sale of both those items is pretty heavily controlled, and so there's an actual record of what happened to, say, item number 2398623. But toys aren't tracked at all, and are unli

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

Whether one worries about the government or trusts it's every decision, it will surely be of general interest to have a sense of how governments will respond when there is a string of assassinations that appear to go back to cheap drones. My guess is that the fact that there is not much that can b

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

You need to worry about the government. On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:10 PM, a.ashfield wrote: > > What parts? small electric motors and batteries? RC is a do it yourself >> operation now, or just take parts from toys. >> > > Good question. Not

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:10 PM, a.ashfield wrote: What parts? small electric motors and batteries? RC is a do it yourself > operation now, or just take parts from toys. > Good question. Not sure. Perhaps serial numbers on the types of RC parts that go into toys. Clearly having traceable seria

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

What parts? small electric motors and batteries? RC is a do it yourself operation now, or just take parts from toys. On 7/8/2016 4:56 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: I worry about non-military and non-police organ

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

Jed, "I worry about non-military and non-police organizations working on robots to kill people. It is hard to know what could be done to stop them." I am more worried about governments having them. They would be more lethal and more numerous. On 7/8/2016 4:45 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfi

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

you mean, drones? we already have them. On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > >> I would be surprised if the military are not working on robots designed >> to kill people. >> > > They would be remiss if they were not working on this. > > In a sense, every

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

> *Sent:* Friday, July 8, 2016 1:56 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’ > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: > > > > I worry about non-military and non-police organizations wo

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

What a banal discussion, a cheap drone off of E-Bay with a small Claymore is more than sufficient technology. From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 1:56 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’ On

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: I worry about non-military and non-police organizations working on robots > to kill people. It is hard to know what could be done to stop them. > If assassinations using cheaply-made drones without traceable parts become a recurring issue, I'm

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

a.ashfield wrote: > I would be surprised if the military are not working on robots designed to > kill people. > They would be remiss if they were not working on this. In a sense, every weapon that kills people at distance is a sort of robot, starting with arrows, continuing up to artillery and

[Vo]:[Vo]: Dallas Police’s ‘Bomb Robot’

The Dallas police used a robot deigned to disarm bombs to to carry and detonate a bomb to kill one of the shooters. I would be surprised if the military are not working on robots designed to kill people. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dallas-police-bomb-robot_us_577fbed9e4b0c590f7e8fc62?

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] ehang 184 flying taxi

Here is a video about the Ehang 184: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrPejpbz8RI

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] ehang 184 flying taxi

a.ashfield wrote: > Electric motors are quite reliable and it could possibly descend safely if > one failed. It is light enough one could even fit a parachute I suppose. > Good point. The Cirrus airplane is equipped with a parachute. Their website says: " In fact, there are 117 people alive to

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] ehang 184 flying taxi

Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. Electric motors are quite reliable and it could possibly descend safely if one failed. It is light enough one could even fit a parachute I suppose. You're probably right it would be better to land on tarmac or concrete. I think vertical takeoff and landing is essential for

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] ehang 184 flying taxi

ere were a very clean paved pad. Hoyt Stearns Scottsdale, Arizona US -Original Message- From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 6:08 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:[Vo] ehang 184 flying taxi Looks like a neat design. I can see some po

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: Peter Hagelstein discusses the Karabut results in -- > "Directional X-ray and gamma emission in experiments in condensed matter > nuclear science" > > http://brillouinenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Directional-X-ray-and-gamma-emission-in

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

It would also be interesting to retest on an outgassed lattice to see if the effect still occurs. Fractional ambient gases instead of hydrogen. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 3:47 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

Alain, very nice citation! Fran From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com [mailto:alain.coetm...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alain Sepeda Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 2:39 AM To: Vortex List Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR Lou Pagnuco on LENR-Forum found an arxiv paper. do you think it have

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

The is something special about the layered structure of graphite. I would follow that lead. On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > Lou Pagnuco on LENR-Forum found an arxiv paper. > > do you think it have connection ? > > I see also connections with Hydroton's theory... > > http

[Vo]:[Vo] X-rays in LENR

Lou Pagnuco on LENR-Forum found an arxiv paper. do you think it have connection ? I see also connections with Hydroton's theory... http://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.08504v1.pdf "X-ray laser pulses from solids" ABSTRACT: In experiments on irradiation of metal surfaces by ions of keV energy, X-ray laser r

[Vo]:[Vo] STAIF II Conference

Ron Kita has alerted me to a conference with a session on LENR in 2016. It is the STAIF 2, the "Space Technology & Applications International Forum" in Albuquerque, NM USA on April 21-23, 2016. Here is the link to their site: http://staif2.org/ They have a session G on LENR that will be cha

Re: [Vo]:[Vo}:Weak But Recurring Anomalous Signal

Andrea Rossi September 9th, 2015 at 8:16 AM John: The E-Cat X is very, very promising and it is going so well, that I have also better understood from her some theoretical explications. About theories: yesterday the CERN o

[Vo]:[Vo}:Weak But Recurring Anomalous Signal

Apart from reporting the new E-Cat X is performing very well, Rossi highlights this discovery. Weak But Recurring Anomalous Signal Rivets Particle Physicists http://thewire.in/2015/09/07/weak-but-recurring-anomalous-signal-rivets-particle-physicists-10162/

[Vo]:[vo] Splitting water with a Catalyst.

Sounds crazy. But published in Science today. That lends credence. http://m.phys.org/news/2014-09-hydrogen-production-breakthrough-herald-cheap.html http://www.gla.ac.uk/news/headline_358595_en.html You guys know anything about this? Thanks.

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported

From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 8:48 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported Corrected link: http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/ContHOH.pdf

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported

The alternative explanation for the EUV radiation profile of the Mills plasma system is photon cavity compression and expansion of EMF from ambient source inside the system. The input ambient sources include both infrared radiation from heat and gamma radiation from nuclear reactions. All ver

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported

Hoh (disambiguation) >From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from HOH (disambiguation) )

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported

Corrected link: http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/ContHOH.pdf

[Vo]:[Vo] BLP New Mills paper, with replication reported

http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/ContHOH.pdf

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

As the Little River Band said, "Don't let the screen door hit you on your way out!" And perhaps in a few years we'll see if it was your theory dreamboat that ran onto the sand, or hundreds of respectible scientists simply looking into an anomaly, which is what science is supposed to be about.

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

- Original Message - From: "John Franks" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:05:25 PM Subject: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper That "great" paper where the mechanism is revealed to the world and CF is all done and settled (barred getting anythi

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > > Yeah Goodstein even commented how good the work of Scaramuzzi was, but >> just avoided the question of whether excess heat was real or not. >> > > I rather like Goodstein's piece. The qu

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Eric, You're right about critiques of theory generally speaking. Those within the field who are most able (i.e. academic theoreticians) to critique theory are often silent about others work. Storms is not a physicist-theoretician by profession, but his comprehensive reviews and critiques (and his

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: Yeah Goodstein even commented how good the work of Scaramuzzi was, but just > avoided the question of whether excess heat was real or not. > I rather like Goodstein's piece. The question facing him (whether he perceived it or not) was: do I wa

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

I really enjoyed Garwin's response during the 60-minutes piece when told that the Department of Defense study "left no doubt that excess heat was produced". About 10 minutes in Garwin (looking very uncomfortable): "...Well...that's a statement...I'm living proof that there is doubt...they can say

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: >I think Lewis, Garwin, etc. also came out of SRI convinced but had to save face no matter what. So, Garwin had his tea but choked on it. Lovely!

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Yeah Goodstein even commented how good the work of Scaramuzzi was, but just avoided the question of whether excess heat was real or not. All these psuedoskeptics do is avoid the excess heat claim. Lets bash P-F neutron detection. Lets bash theory. Lets just assume the calorimetry was wrong, even th

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Well, the aptly-named one :-) certainly knows how to get a rise out of his patients, so to speak . From: Foks0904 James, Lets just admit we've been beaten by the best, shall we?

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

The real weasel at CalTech is Goodstein -- basically realizing that CalTech had committed a crime against humanity and trying to write a historic placeholder they can point to to say "See! We didn't really deny it! It wasn't our fault!" On Tue, De

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Lewis is an embarrassment in a number of ways: A) Lewis' claim about improper stirring was a joke and created a huge smokescreen because he announced it flippantly and matter of factly at APS. B) I think it was a few months later, Fleischmann and Lewis were both at the same ACS (pretty sure) meet

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Wait just a second, Dr. Cranks doesn't hold a candle to Dr. NATHAN LEWIS (Cal Tech) in his devastating conclusion to the fiasco of the century: "This experiment hasn’t been reproduced by any national laboratory or any university yet without a good football team." I'm afraid Dr. Cranks is _not_ "th

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Well, I suppose being beaten by *the best* isn't too much of an embarrassment is it? Now's a good time to admit defeat and save face, for sure. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > James, > > Lets just admit we've been beaten by the best, shall we? > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

James, Lets just admit we've been beaten by the best, shall we? On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:54 PM, James Bowery wrote: > Did Dr. Cranks ever get around to describing why it is we are to ignore > IBM's *empirical* result of room-temperature BECs when, as anyone with a > preschool education knows

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:05 PM, John Franks wrote: > That "great" paper where the mechanism is revealed to the world and CF is > all done and settled (barred getting anything that works), take a look > where it was published and the readership. Hardly a critical audience, it's > all BIOLOGY!!! >

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Did Dr. Cranks ever get around to describing why it is we are to ignore IBM's *empirical* result of room-temperature BECs when, as anyone with a preschool education knows that, room-temperature BECs are impossible? On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:43 PM, John Franks wrote: > Quickly scanning it (I'm r

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

John Franks wrote: I'll get my coat. Nothing to see here. Nothing has happened in the past 20 > years. > > UNSUBSCRIBING. > No, you are not unsubscribing. You may think you are headed out the front door, but you keep putting on your coat and then walking into hallway closet and slamming the door

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

OK. See you Mr. Franks. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:23 PM, John Franks wrote: > I'll get my coat. Nothing to see here. Nothing has happened in the past 20 > years. > > UNSUBSCRIBING. > > In another 20, you'll all be dead or (more) gaga. > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

I'll get my coat. Nothing to see here. Nothing has happened in the past 20 years. UNSUBSCRIBING. In another 20, you'll all be dead or (more) gaga. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > I already conceded defeat Franks. > > *it's like the your love of your life, the the past 20

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

I already conceded defeat Franks. *it's like the your love of your life, the the past 20+ years, your ecstasy and joy...* Yes. Exactly. Eloquent stuff. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:10 PM, John Franks wrote: > NO! > > I know you embarrassment is palpable now - it's like the your love of your > li

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

NO! I know you embarrassment is palpable now - it's like the your love of your life, the the past 20+ years, your ecstasy and joy, has a STI and the nurse at the clinic just shouted it out to the whole waiting room. Use protection when doing science or you'll be ill-conceived, unplanned or oozing

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

*SO WHO WAS THE INTENDED AUDIENCE IN THIS BIOLOGY JOURNAL!!! * Can you stop yelling? On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:43 PM, John Franks wrote: > Quickly scanning it (I'm reading it on a small screen on a sea ferry), the > premise is that the deuterons don't obey MB statistics (wrong, density not > h

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

Quickly scanning it (I'm reading it on a small screen on a sea ferry), the premise is that the deuterons don't obey MB statistics (wrong, density not high enough), that there needs to be some modification to the tail-off of the statistics too and that the crossing of grain boundaries relieves the d

[Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

That "great" paper where the mechanism is revealed to the world and CF is all done and settled (barred getting anything that works), take a look where it was published and the readership. Hardly a critical audience, it's all BIOLOGY!!! Volume 96, Issue 7, July 2009 ISSN: 0028-1042 (Print) 1432-19

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] That BEC paper

You've cracked the case Franks. Well done. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:05 PM, John Franks wrote: > That "great" paper where the mechanism is revealed to the world and CF is > all done and settled (barred getting anything that works), take a look > where it was published and the readership. Hardly

[Vo]:[Vo) anyone here going to NI Week?

Anyone here on Vortex going to NI week (specifically the last day Aug 8)? Perhaps there is someone that would want to be there as a “fair judge” to “witness” if I cut the spheres open on the last day. Not much use in taking something to cut it if no one will be there to view it. I have test

[Vo]:[Vo] New Thermocell

The new thermocell could be used to generate electricity from low grade steam in coal fired power stations at temperatures around 130°C. This would be implemented by having the steam pass over the outer surface of the hot electrode to keep it hot while the other electrode is air or water cooled.

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

> From: "DJ Cravens" > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 6:58:51 AM > Subject: RE: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature > thanks, but most of these are temperature as function of time. > > What I am after is power out as a function of temperature. They are all constant-input-

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

thanks, but most of these are temperature as function of time. What I am after is power out as a function of temperature. Dennis > Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:29:09 -0700 > From: a...@well.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature > &

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

Lewan April 19 : http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166567.ece/BINARY/Report+test+of+E-cat+19+April+2011.pdf Not a clear knee ... maybe two linear slopes, then an exponential at the end Lewan April 28 : http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166569.ece/BINARY/Report+test+of+E-cat+28+April

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

Lewan Sep 7 : http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3264365.ece/BINARY/Report+E-cat+test+September+7+%28pdf%29 Near the end -- only starts plotting from 100C (output) -- linear to 130C

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29 Fig 6 has an example of a "knee" between two linear segments-- presumed to be heater and then ecat.

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

> From: "DJ Cravens" > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 7:14:32 PM > > somewhere I remember seeing power outputs of Rossi's device as a > function of temperature. > It was something like 0 until some threshold. > Can anyone here remember where that was? Short answer -- based on the 2011 experiments.

[Vo]:[Vo] Rossi and temperature

somewhere I remember seeing power outputs of Rossi's device as a function of temperature. It was something like 0 until some threshold. Can anyone here remember where that was? Thanks, Dennis

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] substitutes?

no Ni H data well not from gas but you might want to look up the CETI data. George Miley did an analysis on some of that data. Recall the outer layer was Ni or Ni with a slight Pd overcoat. Dennis From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:43:44 -0700 Subject: Re: [Vo

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] substitutes?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, David Roberson wrote: It appears that you would like to see an experiment where the mix of D to > P is adjusted. Have you seen any correlation in the data from earlier > tests that support the idea that a 50/50 mix would be the most active? > When it comes to N

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] substitutes?

: Tue, May 21, 2013 10:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] substitutes? On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, DJ Cravens wrote: Ni-62 If we assume that speculation about Rossi is correct, whatmaterials other than Ni-62 could be used? If it is p + X reaction, what other isotopes other than Ni62could be

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] substitutes?

Given the history of Cold Fusion, when Rossi was having some success with H2, wouldn't you expect him to try to amp-up the result by using D2 instead of H2? Wouldn't Focardi have suggested the experiment? Rossi, claims that D2 doesn't work in his reactor - a claim made as though he has tried it w

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] substitutes?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, DJ Cravens wrote: Ni-62 > > If we assume that speculation about Rossi is correct, what materials other > than Ni-62 could be used? > > If it is p + X reaction, what other isotopes other than Ni62 could be used? > > Or perhaps it is really a p+p reaction with Ni-6

[Vo]:[Vo] substitutes?

Ni-62 If we assume that speculation about Rossi is correct, what materials other than Ni-62 could be used? If it is p + X reaction, what other isotopes other than Ni62 could be used?Or perhaps it is really a p+p reaction with Ni-62 donating something??? Anyone have any suggestions? Dennis

Re: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders

t; D2 > > > ---------- > Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 02:09:28 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders > From: janap...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > > Dennis > > > Were you using 5 micron nickel particles as per Rossi and DGT?

RE: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders

/foam. I would advise extreme caution in using fine Ni powders. (they also can auto ignite). D2 Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 02:09:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders From: janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Dennis Were you using 5 micron nickel particles as per Rossi and DGT? On

Re: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders

DJ Cravens wrote: > First, I would like to reiterate what others have pointed out about the > health risks. I personally suffered symptoms of pulmonary hypertension > as a result to exposure. Initially the doctors diagnosed it as PH and > said I had 3 to 5 year life expectancy. But local doct

Re: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders

Something similar (mixing with oxide to prevent sintering) can be found in this patent: http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2012166808&recNum=264&docAn=US2012040017&queryString=evaporators&maxRec=193361 On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > Dennis > > > Were yo

Re: [Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders

Dennis Were you using 5 micron nickel particles as per Rossi and DGT? On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:37 PM, DJ Cravens wrote: > Nano nickel > > > > Health/safety > > First, I would like to reiterate what others have pointed out about the > health risks. I personally suffered symptoms of pulmonary

[Vo]:[Vo) nano nickel powders

Nano nickel Health/safety First, I would like to reiterate what others have pointed out about the health risks. I personally suffered symptoms of pulmonary hypertension as a result to exposure. Initially the doctors diagnosed it as PH and said I had 3 to 5 year life expectancy. But local d

[Vo]:[Vo]:1000°C E-CAT!

http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=td Micron sized nickel powder starts to congeal as temperatures rise up to 1000C. Tubule surface treatments on the grains will ooze away and the grains will start to melt together. See page 77 of the reference. Concl

[Vo]:[Vo] Casimir Effect: Egyptian Teenager Invents New Space Propulsion System

    Egyptian Teenager Invents New Space Propulsion System Based On Quantum Physics   Gizmodo ^ | May 29, 2012 |    Precocious young physicist Aisha Mustafa just patented a new system that could propel spacecrafts to the final frontier without using a drop of fuel. In short her system

[Vo]:Vo]:Gibbs Will Interview Dick Smith

"I had a very interesting discussion with Dick Smith earlier today regarding his thoughts on Rossi and the E-Cat and I’ll be posting an interview with him in the next few days." Mark Gibbs (Forbes)http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/02/15/rossi-responds-to-smiths-challenge-to-prove-e-cat-w

[Vo]:[Vo] elephant in the living room

Hi, I've just seen that clip about -cat & al... http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmw45i_e-catalyzer-e-cat-andrea-rossi-energy-catalyzer-revolution-all-parts-1-2-3-4-5-6-10-12-11_news very positive vision, but it shows a way todays situation could be interpreted... and it raise a pointy to me, whate

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : Rossi to show e-cat live... like Defkalion...

On Dec 3, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote: after defkalion who say they will install a webcam to show an hyperion working http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=587 it seems that rossi agree too for a 24x7 show http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/12/rossi-open-to-

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : Rossi to show e-cat live... like Defkalion...

Am 04.12.2011 08:04, schrieb Alain dit le Cycliste: after defkalion who say they will install a webcam to show an hyperion working http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=587 it seems that rossi agree too for a 24x7 show http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/12/rossi-open-to-live-str

[Vo]:[Vo] : Rossi to show e-cat live... like Defkalion...

after defkalion who say they will install a webcam to show an hyperion working http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=587 it seems that rossi agree too for a 24x7 show http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/12/rossi-open-to-live-streaming-video-of-his-e-cat-technology/ Note to MY : I

[Vo]:[VO] : spin isomers of hydrogen

readin things about H bottle safety, and H I've found something curious... does someone have hear about the importance of spin isomers of hydrogen... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_isomers_of_hydrogen just curiosity ... maybe it is important for LENR, like it is for MASER... maybe it is the ta

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

Am 19.11.2011 07:48, schrieb David Roberson: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:25 AM, David Roberson > wrote: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jed Rothwell mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>> wrote: Rossi has given out _far_ more proof than any previous cold

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:25 AM, David Roberson wrote: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Rossi has given out far more proof than any previous cold fusion researcher. >That is a damning statement for the field of cold fusion. Now, if Rossi >fizzles in a few year

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:25 AM, David Roberson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > >> >> Rossi has given out *far* more proof than any previous cold fusion >> researcher. >> > > >That is a damning statement for the field of cold fusion. Now, if Rossi > fizzles in

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

-Original Message- From: Joshua Cude To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Nov 19, 2011 1:22 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: I wrote: There are videos and data from the Oct. 6 test. That test is

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

Lets approach this from a logical point of view. We should be able to agree about something. -Original Message- From: Joshua Cude To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Nov 19, 2011 1:15 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jed

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

-Original Message- From: Joshua Cude To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Nov 19, 2011 1:03 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Roberson wrote: All the HVAC guy did was to assume that all of the input water was vaporized

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I wrote: > > >> There are videos and data from the Oct. 6 test. That test is irrefutable >> by first principles. The tests from earlier this year were also excellent >> despite the poor instrumentation. >> > > Let me add that if you are not c

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > Rossi has given out *far* more proof than any previous cold fusion > researcher. > That is a damning statement for the field of cold fusion. Now, if Rossi fizzles in a few years, that should mean there was never anything to cold fusion.

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:26 PM, David Roberson wrote: > All the HVAC guy did was to assume that all of the input water was > vaporized. > Right. But the assumption was not based on any evidence. The temperature is consistent with 1% steam. > He did not actually measure whether or not the lev

Re: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle

: [Vo]:[Vo] : ECAT 1 MW System-Dazzle or Fizzle On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Mary Yugo wrote: (1) why is the temperature so stable, requiring power stability of 1% The temperature is not stable. It fluctuates considerably, as you see in the

  1   2   3   >