en determine that it has indeed
> demonstrated a tunneling that should not be possible? I suspect that the
> uncertainty principle would preclude such an experiment.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Veeder
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Fri, Ma
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, May 24, 2012 4:22 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
I guess this is also Frank Znidarsic contention:
"If the range of the strong nuclear force increased beyond the
electrostatic potential barrier a nucleon would feel the nuclear force
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Harry Veeder
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Thu, May 24, 2012 4:22 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
>
> I guess this is also Frank Znidarsic contention:
>
> "If the range of the strong nuclear force increa
!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, May 24, 2012 4:22 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
I guess this is also Frank Znidarsic contention:
"If the range of the strong nuclear force increased beyond the
lectrostatic pote
I guess this is also Frank Znidarsic contention:
"If the range of the strong nuclear force increased beyond the
electrostatic potential barrier a nucleon would feel the nuclear force
before it was repelled by the electrostatic force. Under this
situation nucleons would pass under the electrostatic
As another way to over come the coloumb barrier, I vaguely recall a
paper proposing that the range of the strong force may reach further
under some circumstances.
Harry
When two like charged participles are cooper paired together, do they still
have charge? They may not. Their charge may be delocalized and exist at a
location that is far distant from the spin part of them.
If they both had the same charge, how could they stick together?
A quasi-neutron… jus
*It isn't clear to me why a cooper pair of protons would be of nuclear
dimensions, nor why they would be able to surmount the Coulomb barrier.*
Essentially, there exists no Coulomb barrier at the point of charge
concentration if that concentration is dense enough.
These days, I am interested in
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 22 May 2012 21:44:13 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The cooper pair of protons speculation
It isn't clear to me why a cooper pair of protons would be of nuclear
dimensions, nor why they would be able to surmount the Coulomb barrier.
(They only have a reasonable chance
---
> From: Axil Axil
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 9:44 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
>
> There are a number of assumptions at issue in this tread that I would
> like to counter. I believe that a cooper pair of Protons fuses with the
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> **
>
> Another reason that Focardi/Rossi’s claim of nickel going to copper is
> brain-dead.
>
Or a gambit intended to divert attention from what is really going on.
Eric
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 6:50 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
Awkshully, the most stable isotope in the periodic table is not one of iron’s
major isotopes.
62Ni has the highest binding energy per nu
I also suspect that the reaction is a bit more complex than a single hydrogen
fusion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
There are a number of assumptions at issue in
ided the original input proton energy of 5.6 MeV is assumed to be
unimportant as you suggest.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Finlay MacNab
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 5:23 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
The easiest way to visualize the effe
tra
> heat. Could this be the effect that I am calculating? It does seem to add
> up in the numbers.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jones Beene
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 5:22 pm
> Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 En
Awkshully, the most stable isotope in the periodic table is not one of iron’s
major isotopes.
62Ni has the highest binding energy per nucleon of all isotopes, including
iron, even though the average binding energy per nucleon for iron is slightly
higher than nickel.
Another reason that F
that it has a single proton nucleus. Iron cannot fuse with itself
inside a star because the resultant reaction would be endothermic, this is why
stars burn out, not because of H + Fe fusion.
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
From: dlrober
the
numbers.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 5:22 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
Are you discounting QM and quantum tunneling?
One could say that the in tunneling - threshold energy is briefly
Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 5:22 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
Are you discounting QM and quantum tunneling?
One could say that the in tunneling - threshold energy is briefly "borrowed"
and then a short time
ginal Message-
From: Finlay MacNab
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 1:50 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
Your calculation does not take into account the fact that the activation energy
barrier releases the energy added to overcome it during the rea
Are you discounting QM and quantum tunneling?
One could say that the in tunneling - threshold energy is briefly "borrowed"
and then a short time later, the "debt" is repaid – before the net gain is
obvious.
From: David Roberson
Could you help me understand how the 5.6 MeV is recov
53rd
floor before climbing back down the the second floor to end their journey.
This is the nature of all "activation energy barriers".
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
From: dlrober...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:35:41 -040
the the second floor to end their journey.
This is the nature of all "activation energy barriers".
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
From: dlrober...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:35:41 -0400
I have been researching the cold fusion reacti
I have been researching the cold fusion reaction that is suggested by Rossi and
Focardi in their recent paper
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf and
have a couple of questions. The authors suggest that 3.41 MeV of energy is
released by the fusion of a pro
24 matches
Mail list logo
