ay 21, 2011 11:34 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in
> palladium...
>
> Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html
Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html
but it bears repeating, since Dr Brown did comment directly to Rossi.
The important things which Julian misses IMHO - and which makes this
energetic reaction both NON
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium...
I beleive that this reference is the same as in my post "the dipole constrant"
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
FYI:
"Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladiu
I beleive that this reference is the same as in my post "the dipole
constrant"
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
> FYI:
>
> "Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium (Pd) due to vibrational
> deuteron dipole-dipole interactions and associated resonant tunneling that
> over
FYI:
"Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium (Pd) due to vibrational deuteron
dipole-dipole
interactions and associated resonant tunneling that over-cancels the Jastrow
factor between deuteron
pair wavefunctions"
Abstract
We show that interstitial hydrogen nucleii on a metallic lattice
5 matches
Mail list logo
