...@bigpond.com
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 9:10:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A backdoor to proton annihilation?
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 6 Apr 2019 03:39:40
+:
Hi,
A minor variation is the possibility that it's the excess positron
The key to the Holmlid effect is the creation of CP violation. What can
produce this condition?
There is a upcoming version of QM that uses complex numbers and
four-dimensional Riemann space. It's used to handle open systems.
It is called PT-symmetric quantum mechanics.
PT-symmetric quantum
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 6 Apr 2019 03:39:40
+:
Hi,
A minor variation is the possibility that it's the excess positron that is
responsible for the stability of the whole proton. If an intruding electron were
to annihilate that positron, then the whole proton
, 2019 4:50:55 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A backdoor to proton annihilation?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/03/29/no-physicists-still-dont-know-why-matter-and-not-antimatter-dominates-our-universe/#4a6e2cd25826
As per Andrei Sakharov
We've known how to create more matter
.
Bob Cook
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 4:34:09 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A backdoor to proton annihilation?
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:31:57 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/03/29/no-physicists-still-dont-know-why-matter-and-not-antimatter-dominates-our-universe/#4a6e2cd25826
As per Andrei Sakharov
We've known how to create more matter than antimatter in theory since the
late 1960s, when physicist Andrei Sakharov
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:34:09 +1100:
Hi,
If all baryons are indeed composed of positron electron pairs, with an excess of
a single positron in a proton, then all it would take to convert the proton into
an anti-proton would be for an electron to replace
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:31:57 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
If such a mechanism exists, then it implies the relatively easy conversion of
matter into anti-matter, and probably also the reverse. A slight asymmetry in
the ease of conversion from one to the other may also
Holmlid uses a crystal frequency doubler ( 1064 to 532 nm ) which
polarizes the laser light to a single handedness. The chirality of the EMF,
both fields and particles, are very important to the LENR reaction. The
strong force is a chiral force.
Hi Robin,
➢ It violates conservation of charge unless one can simultaneously flip the
charge of an electron, which would be the equivalent of getting a proton and an
electron to swap charges.
Hmmm… Perhaps that is exactly what happens on a transient basis. Some kind of
double charge reversal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation
There are mesons that change change. This is how there is a case put forth
about why the universe holds only matter and not any antimatter.
Holmlid got in trouble with particle physics for violating the conservation
of baryon number. Protons and
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 5 Apr 2019 06:50:07 -0700:
Hi Jones,
You may be right. I was thinking in terms of conservation of energy, but upon
further consideration, I am forced to admit, that it might be possible with the
addition of zero energy.
When a proton and an anti-proton
More support for the magnetic flux tube posit on matter distruction as
follows:
This matter distruction issue is common to most LENR reactor designs. It
becomes apparent when the reactor is pushed to high energy production
levels.
For example, in an interview that Dennis Cravens had with Host
I think that what is going on is a change of state condition in the cloud
of electrons that cover the positive core of the ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH)
when the laser light hits the UDH. The Laser pulse greatly increases the
density of the polariton population in the electron cloud so that a Bose
in understanding nucleon stability when
irradiated by a laser such as used by Holmlid in his experiments.
Bob Cook
-
From: JonesBeene
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:19:47 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:A backdoor to proton
… correction… meant to say the photons of the laser which provides the input
for the Holmlid effect have an individual mass-energy of less than one eV. To
put that into the context of charge conjugation – there are a few papers out
there such as
“Direct, Resonant Production of States with
A yellow-green laser pulse – according to Holmlid and replicated by Olafsson
in Iceland and Zeiner-Gunderson in Norway – produces a large number of muons
per pulse. They have performed sophisticated measurements to ascertain this.
The photons of the laser which provides the input for the
Hi Robin
> In order to flip the charge, you probably need to add the difference in
> energy,
i.e. 2 proton masses worth, or about 2 GeV.
[snip]
It is very doubtful that the entire mass-energy of a proton is to be found in
charge alone which is the implication of what you are saying.
For
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:25:32 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>Oops meant to say antiproton not antineutron. Presumably laser
>irradiation of dense
> hydrogen would make antiprotons from protons by flipping the charge. The
> antimatter
> then annihilates with
I hear that a spark does just as well as a laser pulse.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:19 PM JonesBeene wrote:
> One of the big knocks about the Holmlid effect – where the claim is that
> hydrogen
>
> is completely annihilated- showing up primarily as muons, which then decay
> (but
>
> can catalyze
Oops meant to say “antiproton” not “ antineutron.” Presumably laser
irradiation of dense
hydrogen would make antiprotons from protons by flipping the charge. The
antimatter
then annihilates with matter… but without the GeV level of input formerly
used…
Perhaps either antiparticle is
Thinking about it as an engineer might, it could be that an individual
proton is subjected to locally enormous stress which causes it to fail
(disintegrate).
Harry
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, 2:19 PM JonesBeene One of the big knocks about the Holmlid effect – where the claim is that
> hydrogen
>
> is
One of the big knocks about the Holmlid effect – where the claim is that
hydrogen
is completely annihilated- showing up primarily as muons, which then decay (but
can catalyze fusion before decay) is the low input energy used by Holmlid.
This annihilation process is well known in beamlines at
23 matches
Mail list logo
