Axel, Robin, ... and others.
So far, everyone has danced around offering any conjecture pertaining to my
original question.
The crux of my original question was:
When a chain reaction is initiated what are the speculated temperature
ranges, both the high AND LOW VALUES?
Plenty of discussion
Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:46 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:A question about how e-Cats manage to self-sustain
Axel, Robin, ... and others.
So far, everyone has danced around offering any conjecture pertaining to my
original
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:46 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
But so far no one has discussed and/or offered any speculation as to the
lower temperature limit. IOW, how cool can the chain reaction be kept
more-or-less sustainable?
I think the control of
From Axel
If you need an exact number, the start temperature is not
that high. In the Sweden test, the water temperature was
pushed up to 60C by the external heater before the reaction
became gainful.
The internal heater was also in action. So my guess is that
the temperature of the
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Thu, 26 May 2011
14:48:52 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Axel
If you need an exact number, the start temperature is not
that high. In the Sweden test, the water temperature was
pushed up to 60C by the external heater before the reaction
From Robin:
...
What makes you think it has to be 400 C to start?
Nothing would tickle me more to learn that the initialization temperature
is less than that 400 C. But then, maybe it needs to be greater than 400 C.
I dunno! My initial starting point was loosely based on previous literature
FYI
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.
*Initial running to reach vaporization. *The temperatures of the inlet water
and the outlet water were monitored and recorded every 2 seconds. The heater
was connected
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 26 May 2011 18:55:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
*Initial running to reach vaporization. *The temperatures of the inlet water
and the outlet water were monitored and recorded every 2 seconds. The heater
was connected at 10:25 and the boiling point was reached at
Axel, Robin,
Thank you, both of you, for humoring me.
I was aware of the March 29 report. I had already downloaded it. I was also
aware of Figure 6 showing the evolution of temperature changes over time.
However, having Axel specifically point out the kink that is recorded at
around 60 C was
Some more questions
Where the plot of the electrical power vs time is ?
Where the monitoring of Rossi hands over the pump and heaters controls is ?
Where the steam dryness measures are ?
2011/5/27 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net
Axel, Robin,
Thank you, both of you,
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 25 May 2011
16:37:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps I've misunderstood a fundamental aspect concerning how excess
energy is supposed to be extracted from Rossi's e-cats. Is it rather
the situation where once 500 C is reached (by external
Thanks for your input, Robin
I wouldn't mind additional commentary from the collective. ;-)
Are there differing views opinions on this matter?
Once again, I post my original questions [slightly reedited for
clarification]:
Perhaps I've misunderstood a fundamental aspect concerning how
Reactivity is directly related to the tendency of the Rossi reactor core to
change power level: if reactivity is positive, the power level tends to
increase; if it is negative, the power tends to decrease; if it is zero, the
power tends to remain stable. The reactivity of the reactor may be
13 matches
Mail list logo
