Re: [Vo]:Analysis by GoatGuy

But there was not temperature difference before until the temperature in the inner circuit topped, and after until the self sustaining mode, it seems was all the heating was caused by the heater and not by an excess heating. I don`t see where you claim there was an evidence of excess energy before

Re: [Vo]:Analysis by GoatGuy

you prefer numeric data. > >—Jouni > > > lauantai, 8. lokakuuta 2011 Daniel Rocha > kirjoitti: > > But there was not temperature difference before until the temperature in > the inner circuit topped, and after until the self sustaining mode, it seems > was all the heating

Re: [Vo]:Focus.it article on the Oct. 6th test adds small details about the device "producing frequencies"

Both messages made it to the group! :-) 2011/10/9 Akira Shirakawa > (This is a second copy. It looks like the original message didn't make it > to the group. I've removed a few URLs from the message body just to be sure > they weren't the cause) > > > Hello group, > > An preliminary article on t

[Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/view topic.php?f=4&t=285 The technological breakthrough of LENR (or CANR) is no longer speculation. It is a fact that will eventually

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

The question was not posted, but I guess he is calling of clowns the people of Defkalion: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=20#comment-94489 Dear Martin: These are just clowns. No other comment is opportune. I want not to dirt this blog with that shit. My attorneys are taking

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

Interesting! He deleted the message! 2011/10/10 Daniel Rocha > The question was not posted, but I guess he is calling of clowns the people > of Defkalion: > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=20#comment-94489 > > Dear Martin: > These are just clow

Re: [Vo]:No Control

When you have a black box, controls are valid when there is a double blind, that is, the experimenter and the subject don't know which one is true. In the case of humans, it is to filter the placebo effect. In the case of the e-cat, it is to avoid fraud, that is, slightly different designs to make

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Press Release 10/10

> > > > I think the people at Defkalion are sincerely respectful of Rossi, as am I. > He is a genius. He invented this device. He deserves barrels of money and a > dozen Nobel prizes for it. Unfortunately he is not very good at doing > demonstrations. > > - Jed > > I am not sure if that is an irony

[Vo]:New video on ecat.com

http://www.e-cat.com The video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhvD4KuAEmo Some videos and interviews on the 6th October demo.

[Vo]:Pre order your e-cat here! (not joke)

On this website http://www.planetpay.com/x_reg.php Rossi is OK with that website, as you can notice here: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=20#comment-94587 John M ichell October 10th, 2011 at 3:17 PM

[Vo]:Here is how to fake the big e-cat:

>From ecatnews.com ** John Dlouhy October 11, 2011 - 3:08 pm | Permalink Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before and after, but not why it mysteriously gained a kilogram of weight. I can offer a plausible explanation. On the botto

Re: [Vo]:Here is how to fake the big e-cat:

Find it here: http://ecatnews.com/?p=1010#comments Although the scenario was discussed, this is "the cake recipe", as people say here, on how to fake one. 2011/10/11 Rich Murray > Hello Daniel Rocha, > > Obviously, this scenario has to be discussed fairly and fully, befor

Re: [Vo]:Pre order your e-cat here! (not joke)

I am actually surprised that Rich did not comment on this because one of the clearest marks of scams is the pre order of products not properly demonstrated...

Re: [Vo]:Rossi heat exchanger fitting / SOME flow data

Welcome Raymond! Your testimony of Rossi's presentation and opinions will be very valuable to our discussions! 2011/10/11 Raymond Zreick > Hy Alan, I'm Raymond Zreick, journalist for Focus magazine (Italy). This is > my first message in this mailing list. > > > > @Alan > > > I don't think we ev

Re: [Vo]:CERN clocks subatomic particles traveling faster than light

The GPS device corrects for this error. In fact, this is the first source of error accounted by the device: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-112516142975720/unrestricted/ch7.pdf Either all GPS devices they used were broken or the result is just a coincidence. 2011/10/14 Terry Blan

Re: [Vo]:CERN clocks subatomic particles traveling faster than light

As far as I know, each GPS device sycs with several different satellites, or clocks, at least 3, and also corrections for gravitational effects from general relativity. 2011/10/14 Stephen A. Lawrence > OMG -- of course! You can't synchronize (all) clocks on the Earth's > surface -- it's a rotat

Re: [Vo]:CERN clocks subatomic particles traveling faster than light

eling faster than light To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Regarding gravitational time dilation. Since gravitational acceleration is countered exactly by centripetal acceleration I can not see why it should be included in the pdf you refer to. David On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:

Re: [Vo]:CERN clocks subatomic particles traveling faster than light

They do take account of that. -- Forwarded message -- From: Stephen A. Lawrence Date: 2011/10/14 Subject: Re: [Vo]:CERN clocks subatomic particles traveling faster than light To: vortex-l@eskimo.com ** On 11-10-14 02:53 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: As far as I know, each GPS

Re: [Vo]:Pictures/Videos on Focus.it

I predict that this information will make people post more than 2 posts on the interwebs. 2011/10/14 Michele Comitini > Some more pictures (by Massimo Brega - Focus/Focus.it) and videos put > Raymond Zreick to take a look at. Videos too. > > short: http://goo.gl/MyIhH > long: > http://www.focus

Re: [Vo]:DGT Understands LENR

The best part here it is that they indeed confirm that Rossi is lying about they not having the necessary know-how to make the core WOW! 2011/10/15 Terry Blanton > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3407#p3407 > > > > Defkalion GT > Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:04 am > > J

Re: [Vo]:DGT Understands LENR

It is extremely easy to prove within a few seconds that any of these devices work, without any kind of calorimetry, water heat or steam. Take it to the neutrino detector in Gran Sasso, Italy. The neutrino emission of Hyperion and Ecats must be extremely high, so there will be certainly a strong sig

Re: [Vo]:DGT Understands LENR

According to Rossi, Nickel transmutes to Copper and it decays to Nickel again by beta decay, so there is neutrino emission. 2011/10/15 > In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:37:53 -0300: > Hi, > [snip] > >It is extremely easy to prove within a few seconds that any of these

Re: [Vo]:DGT Understands LENR

That's what I understand by reading this... "Even though, we intend to support papers with results supported by the measurements from *new instruments **we had to develop in order to control* and further develop the technologies embedded in our products" 2011/10/15 > In reply to Daniel Rocha's

Re: [Vo]:DGT Understands LENR

Who said they need the catalyst? 2011/10/15 > In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:15:43 -0300: > Hi, > [snip] > >That's what I understand by reading this... "Even though, we intend to > >support papers with results supported by the measurements from *new > >instruments **w

Re: [Vo]:DGT Understands LENR

Being nice is the usual behavior of any company with decent public relations. 2011/10/15 > In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:30:34 -0300: > Hi, > [snip] > >Who said they need the catalyst? > > I think the fact that they are still being nice to Rossi implies that they > n

Re: [Vo]:Forbes weighs in on the controversial Rossi's eCat phenomenon

WOW, now that is really a mainstream magazine! 2011/10/17 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson > > Mostly speculative > > > > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/17/hello-cheap-energy-hello-brave-new-world/ > > > > Mostly harmless. > > http://www.singularity.com/charts/page50.html > > On a

Re: [Vo]:Why has Rossi to build a 1MW plant?

I agree with Rossi. He must scale this up because this energy is so insanely dense, that in a decade or so interplanetary spaceships can be build, with a weigh of thousands of tons. Gigawatts will be required. 2011/10/18 Jed Rothwell > Susan Gipp wrote: > > Because this is in his flamboyant nat

Re: [Vo]:How to simulate the four-hour heat after death event in your kitchen

Jed, how about this: Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before and after, but not why it mysteriously gained a kilogram of weight. I can offer a plausible explanation. On the bottom of the E-Cat housing sits a relatively large volume enclosure, the reactor module, which we are told

Re: [Vo]:Manifold mispositioning makes measurements meaningless

There is a problem with you simulation, in my opinion. The number of cells in your model increases linearly with the distance from the flow. But it increases linearly because your model is 2D. If it were a 3D model, the number of cells would increase by the square of the distance, and the diffusion

Re: [Vo]:Manifold mispositioning makes measurements meaningless

Well, are you sure? If you see the object in 3D, the object is not symmetrical, so, it is not a matter of just increasing the radial value. 2011/10/26 Alan J Fletcher > At 04:44 PM 10/26/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> There is a problem with you simulation, in my opinion. The num

Re: [Vo]:Your Oct 28 Predictions

Well, I will bet 25! 2011/10/27 ecat builder > Please feel free to write your prediction about the Oct 28 1MW Rossi test. > ** Please include a 0 to 100 prediction ** > 0 is a scam is exposed, 25 is an unexposed scam, below 50 is failure, > and 100 is commercially viable no doubt LENR power. > >

Re: [Vo]:Your Oct 28 Predictions

A huge nuclear explosion with a lot of tritium and cobalt 59 fall out would make me happy! At least it would show to all mankind that LENR is a true phenomenon. 2011/10/27 Peter Heckert > Am 27.10.2011 17:44, schrieb ecat builder: > > Please feel free to write your prediction about the Oct 28 1

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

The test has already began, if you count inspecting the machine as part of the test: http://ecatnews.com/?p=1095 2011/10/27 Peter Gluck > Damn the measuring instruments, full speed ahead! > > Those instruments tell sometimes nasty things. > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jed Rothwell wro

Re: [Vo]:ECAT Measurements Confirm Excess Heat Production

David, how can you exclude the possibility of hidden chemical resources? 2011/10/27 David Roberson > The ECAT is not dry during this time, in fact it is filled with water. A > small region of vapor probably exists above the water. > > I do not agree that T2 can change without energy being absor

Re: [Vo]:Live Twitter feed by Passerini

Good news is: nothing exploded! 2011/10/28 Bruno Santos > Midnight... hope it doesn't turn out to be a sooner-tha-expected > Halloween. > > > 2011/10/28 Terry Blanton > >> Thanks for the corrections. So, it's after 3 pm there. When >> does the show begin? After the barrel of wine is consum

Re: [Vo]:ideal client

That's ~3KW for every core... So, that's much less than the other test on 6th october, or at lest at the low end. And the client was promised 1 to 6 amplification! Wow, happened? 2011/10/28 Peter Gluck > Stirling Allan reports: > > *Q&A just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained contin

Re: [Vo]:ideal client

There certainly was input, as it always happen to achieve a threshold temperature to begin the reaction. But, anyway, this was not the promised test... 2011/10/28 Terry Blanton > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Rocha > wrote: > > That's ~3KW for every core... So, that

Re: [Vo]:ideal client

. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jed Rothwell Date: 2011/10/28 Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal client To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Daniel Rocha wrote: > And the client was promised 1 to 6 amplification! Wow, happened? The amplification was reportedly infinite, but anyway, how do you know what the custo

Re: [Vo]:ideal client

Santos > Wouldn't the client bother to open each unit and check what's inside? I > wouldn't buy without taking a look inside each and every cat. > > > > 2011/10/28 Daniel Rocha > >> He always promised, during all these months, that the costumer would get a

Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

Gamma rays may have a subjective definition.You can say that Gamma Rays are photons emitted by state transitions of the nucleus and X-Rays are photons that comes from electrons. X-Ray machines emits what would be otherwise consider gamma rays, around 140KeV. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Re: [Vo]:Re: Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

h such that it could almost fit > in the range of visible light > > I think you need to read some physics books. Gamma rays have smaller > wavelength then X-Rays and visible light. And a re more powerful and > hazards. > > *From:* Daniel Rocha > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29,

Re: [Vo]:Re: Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

m-to-high” > frequency limit (actually is medium frequency). > If you say that a common visible light source it’s a gamma ray source, you > are crazy. > > *From:* Daniel Rocha > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:17 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: H

Re: [Vo]:Re: Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does seem to be a permit.

Yes, a typo kind of error. 2011/10/29 Mattia Rizzi > Oh, only a small error you think? > Energy =~ 1/wavelength > You said Energy =~ wavelength > > *From:* Daniel Rocha > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:36 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]

Re: [Vo]:New Energy Times..hmmmmmmmm

What do you mean? Did something change there? I see nothing different... 2011/10/29 Ron Kita > Greetings Vortex: > > I went to http://www.newenergytimes.com no insight...did some one kick > the pluggg. > Grins, > Ron Kita >

Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit

Area 51? 2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher > Rossi no-comments : > > > Andrea Rossi > October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM > > > > Dear Max: > The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I > do not know if an

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:500kW generator was also running during the 5 hours!‏

Maybe the generator was just idle, this is why it wasn`t making too much noise. One of these days, I went near the electric generator of my office`s new building and it was extremely noisy when it was on full power. Most of the time it is inaudible... 2011/10/30 ecat builder > That the E-Cat ope

Re: [Vo]: Is the ECAT out of the bag?

How would that explain the absence of radioactive elements of random half life times? 2011/10/30 Higgins Bob-CBH003 > And let us not forget Occam’s razor. Dr. Ed Storms, in his book, makes > a good point that any theory of the mechanism should explain all of the > experimental evidence, not ju

[Vo]:Defkalion Congratulates Andrea Rossi

"The following message was posted (waiting for moderation) in Journal of Nuclear Physics: *Our congratulations to Andrea Rossi. Defkalion Green Technologies SA"* http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=418

Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report

4 m^3/s is not too much. That is a column of 1.6m^2 ascending at 1.6m/s. The area that concealed the radiators was much bigger. 2011/10/31 Peter Heckert > They test the temperature at the output pipe, but this does not say much > about the energy when the mass flow is not known. > > When Lewan l

Re: [Vo]:megawatt ecat produces 70 kW [very little steam, mixed with water]: Joshua Cude: Rich Murray 2011.10.31

2011/10/31 Jed Rothwell > > It is a shame that Rossi did not allow the observers to confirm the claim. > > - Jed > > Probably Peter Svensson did look closely. Look at his tweets today, right after he came back from his trip to watch the E-Cat: http://twitter.com/#!/petersvensson petersvensson p

Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report

: vortex-l@eskimo.com Am 31.10.2011 15:38, schrieb Daniel Rocha: 4 m^3/s is not too much. That is a column of 1.6m^2 ascending at 1.6m/s. The area that concealed the radiators was much bigger. I feel a hot stream of air if my car stands in front of the garage, it is still hot and the motor fan is

Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report

But the heat from the sun is in form of EM waves whereas in this case it is already being carried by a convective current and unless it mixes with surrounding air, the heat will hardly be carried by long IR waves. 2011/10/31 Peter Heckert > Am 31.10.2011 15:51, schrieb Daniel Rocha: >

Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report

re > left open. > It was incredibly hot inside and for sure this where less than 470 kW > heating power. > I was happy I survived this ;-) > > Am 31.10.2011 16:01, schrieb Peter Heckert: > > Am 31.10.2011 15:51, schrieb Daniel Rocha: > > That is open field and and there

Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report

under maximum full load for hours. > Under such circumstances most trucks would overheat and must do a pause or > slow down very,very much. > > > Am 31.10.2011 16:27, schrieb Daniel Rocha: > > In that case, there was a ceiling, so, even though the windows were > opened, th

Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report

I was not referring to Rossi's building... 2011/10/31 Jed Rothwell > Daniel Rocha wrote: > > In that case, there was a ceiling, so, even though the windows were >> opened, the hot air was trapped. >> > > The fans were placed outside the building. The barrier

Re: [Vo]:Rossi 1MW : Why is the energy hidden behind pressboard?

I think if there is a scam, you can put Levi with all of them. He was with Rossi and the "costumer" all the time. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jed Rothwell Date: 2011/11/1 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi 1MW : Why is the energy hidden behind pressboard? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com . It is bi

Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as fractional Rydberg

I typed "most energetic of all chemical reactions" on google http://www.google.com.br/search?num=100&hl=pt-BR&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US&rlz=1I7GGLL_pt-BR&q=%22most+energetic+of+all+chemical+reactions%22&oq=%22most+energetic+of+all+chemical+reactions%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=0l0l0

Re: [Vo]:Some thoughts about Rossi's personality

Is that really a fake PhD? I thought it was an honorary doctorate for his biofuel powerplant. For example, the former president of my country, Lula, got and has been getting these titles even though he just studied until the 4th grade (that is below junior high). He couldn't study since he had to w

Re: [Vo]:Re: A real customer would not have accepted the 1MW plant.

Jed is right on this one. Rossi cannot do much besides that and must be paranoid. What would you do in Rossi's place? 2011/11/7 Mattia Rizzi > The real purpose would be to find out how to >> > mass-produce similar machines. > > It's interesting how you an write something like this quoted sentenc

Re: [Vo]:What Happened with DGT

That's the rest mass of the electron... So, any idea? 2011/11/8 Terry Blanton > From Jeane Manning: > > > http://changingpower.net/articles/physicists-insights-on-greece-and-rossi%E2%80%99s-e-cat/#more-716 > > Her source says: > > "It is known that the type of asserted reaction, namely Ni -Cu >

Re: [Vo]:Minor progress

Ignoring the issue that the range of weak force is ~10-18m, around 1000x smaller than a proton's radius, so it is kind of hard to make a lattice of W bosons (one of the carriers of this force), that theory doesn't explain where so many random radioactive are not formed. So, it is very difficult for

Re: [Vo]:Oct 6 Heat Exchanger Manifold Thermocouple Placement.

20% is enough to show the excess energy with excelent confidence. It would be bad if the error was around 40% or more. 2011/11/10 Alan J Fletcher > I've updated > http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_**ecat_oct11_spice.phpto > reflect a 20% possible err

Re: [Vo]:National Instruments signs to do E-Cat controls

Do you know whether or Daniele knows who is the secret customer? In case you don't know, can you ask him? 2011/11/11 Akira Shirakawa > On 2011-11-11 00:53, Akira Shirakawa wrote: > > "Today, Leonardo Corporation, led by Andrea Rossi, inventor and >> developer of the one-megawatt cold fusion E-C

Re: [Vo]:Physorg comments : new Krivit Crusade

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_Scale

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

Kullander will talk about the ecat on 11/23. 2011/11/11 Aussie Guy E-Cat > Oct / Nov sure has been interesting: > > 06 Oct - Single E-Cat module demo > 28 Oct - 1 MW E-Cat plant demo with first sales announcement > 10 Nov - NI announcement > 12 Nov - E-Cat web site up with sales / payment condit

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

Rossi does not have investors and doesn't need them right now. 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat > You have suggested Rossi may have scammed investors? Bold statement there > Mary. Care to disclose your proof as otherwise you may have just committed > Defamation and I'm sure the Vortex administrators

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

Rossi does not have investors and never asked for them -- Forwarded message -- From: Aussie Guy E-Cat Date: 2011/11/12 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up To: vortex-l@eskimo.com You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop making up statement that you ma

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

Aussie Guy, if you keep insisting that Rossi asked around for investors, you are provoking troll attacks, because you are creating a strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the mess around here. 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat > Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around saying y

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact. 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat > Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From what I > have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this project. > > AG > > > > On 11/12/201

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

s. > > AG > > > > On 11/12/2011 2:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> You answer to someone as you were acknowledging such fact. >> >> 2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat > aussieguy.ecat@gmail.**com >> >> >> >>Ka? I never said Rossi was looking

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

to someone that the > statement they just made may be defamatory, in no way supports the > defamatory statement. > > AG > > > > On 11/12/2011 2:57 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> But you cannot say that is defamatory if there is no investors. >> >>

Re: [Vo]:Andrea rossi: This is not yet our official website

He meant this is not the final version. 2011/11/12 David ledin > Andrea Rossi > November 12th, 2011 at 6:22 AM > > Dear Italo: > This is not yet our official website, contains many errors to be > corrected, contains wrong names in wrong places. It needs a lot of > corrections, so pèlease disrega

Re: [Vo]:Order Form

This post, among others, violates the rules of this community. You are using too much irony and scorn. And I am not the first to note that. Where are the moderators of this forum? 2011/11/12 Mary Yugo > Whoopee. I have to rush to put up an order form for my pink, invisible > flying unicorns th

Re: [Vo]:New E-Cat customers to reveal their identity

Not everything there is a scam. At least one is not, which is plasma focus, which they frequently feature among the top 5 and is based in an old technology. But they never claimed overunity, just 1/10 of the input energy, in the form of neutrons. Actually, a few of their shots is enough to kill

Re: [Vo]:People who will not do their homework do not deserve a response

No time to study the literature but time to nagger and flood forums all day with messages. 2011/11/13 Mary Yugo > This test will not work. Cold fusion does not produce neutrons and it seldom produces radiation. I have told you that before. If you do not believe me, please review the l

Re: [Vo]:People who will not do their homework do not deserve a response

If you don't read the literature, you won't be able to tell apart what is logical to what is illogical. Besides, I am not a native speaker and gmail's dictionary offered a wrong correction. 2011/11/13 Mary Yugo > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > &g

[Vo]:Was it ever detected isotopes with "medium" half lives in transmutations

I don't remember in seeing in any paper isotopes with half lives of 1year to 1 years. That is, pretty much stable for the time length of any practical experiment but unstable to the point leaving a deadly waste, even if in small quantities.

Re: [Vo]:Was it ever detected isotopes with "medium" half lives in transmutations

h "medium" half lives in transmutations To: vortex-l@eskimo.com There was a movie about this in 1952 http://www.hulu.com/watch/70146/tales-of-tomorrow-ahead-of-his-time Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: Daniel Rocha To: vortex-l Sent: Sun, Nov 13, 2011 9:56 am

Re: [Vo]:Was it ever detected isotopes with "medium" half lives in transmutations

Oh! Nice! Would you mind showing a paper with such transmutation? Perhaps an example in each order of magnitude in the interval. 2011/11/14 Jones Beene > *From:* Daniel Rocha > > ** ** > > **Ø **Before seeing it, I am referring to transmutations of cold fusion. >

Re: [Vo]:Was it ever detected isotopes with "medium" half lives in transmutations

/14 Axil Axil > See > Reports of tritium production from Rossi-like experiments > > Jones Beene > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg49057.html > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> Oh! Nice! Would you mind showing a paper wi

[Vo]:A big company makes a public bid for an ecat.

Charlie Sutherland November 14th, 2011 at 10:36 AM Dear Mr. Rossi, We make GREEN detergents and are growing even in these dangerous economic times. My company relies on GREEN technology and a GREEN aware customer base. Our customer distribution reaches all 50 states and several countries in Euro

Re: [Vo]:Swedish Radio : advertising a scam ?

Isn't the CEO of Earthtech this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff It seems that the most mainstream research he ever did was cold fusion, heh. 2011/11/15 Mary Yugo > > My apologies : I was confusing you with Stella_Nokia (eg on Defkalion). >> > > No worries. > > For what it'

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Energy Catalyzer and National Instruments.

I think the explanation is straightforward. Rossi is always accused of sloppy measurements, like poor calorimetry, so an NI logo would be equivalent to a seal of quality. 2011/11/16 Peter Heckert > How to explain this? > > >

[Vo]:Detailed exposed of the e-cat scam.

According to Krivit: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/12/swedish-public-radio-turns-spotlight-on-lewan-and-ny-teknik/#comments Steven B. Krivit says: November 15, 2011 at 08:57

Re: [Vo]:When faced with reality

Ampenergo is owned by his wife. 2011/11/16 Marcello Vitale > There is the only problem with the investment story that it does not > appear to be true. The only source of money Krivit cites is Ampenergo, that > is Rossi himself. > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Joshua Cude wrote: > >> >> >>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Energy Catalyzer and National Instruments.

You will break your keyboard. 2011/11/16 Mary Yugo > the guy who links his web site to stories about cars than use water as the > only fuel and about Obama going to Mars. >

Re: [Vo]:When faced with reality

In any case, it doesn't make sense to call Ampenergo as one of the (supposedly) scammed parts. The deal with AP was to sell the e-cat in the name of AR's company, so they should actually be the front gate of a scam. 2011/11/16 Terry Blanton > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM,

[Vo]:Official ECAT site, finally?

This is the old ecat.com domain, that one with the videos about the October's experiments. Now, it was refurbished and it looks like really an official website. http://ecat.com/

Re: [Vo]:Official ECAT site, finally?

They even link directly to Jed Rothwell's website: http://ecat.com/ecat-technology I hope he doesn't mind giving out some free bandwidth! :) 2011/11/16 Daniel Rocha > This is the old ecat.com domain, that one with the videos about the > October's experiments. Now, it w

Re: [Vo]:Official ECAT site, finally?

WTF THEY MENTION WIDOM LARSEN THEORY AS THE THEORY FOR THE E-CAT!!! http://ecat.com/ecat-technology/ecat-science 2011/11/16 Daniel Rocha > They even link directly to Jed Rothwell's website: > > http://ecat.com/ecat-technology > > I hope he doesn't mind givin

Re: [Vo]:ECAT.com lunch new website in association with andrea rossi.

I already posted this, LOL! 2011/11/16 David ledin > look professional > > http://ecat.com/ > >

Re: [Vo]:ECAT.com lunch new website in association with andrea rossi.

That websites promotes WL as an explanation for the ecat and also links to Jed's library, directly to a pdf link. 2011/11/16 Jed Rothwell > Akira Shirakawa wrote: > > That's why somebody should ask Rossi if this website is really what it >> makes it appear to be: >> > > Good idea. I asked him.

Re: [Vo]:Stremmenos seems to be upset at U of Bologna

I understood something slightly different. UB was blackmailed to have the funding of many of its projects cut if it proceeded to test the e-cat. 2011/11/16 Mary Yugo > Google translate is difficult -- maybe we have an Italian speaker here? > > As I read it (badly in translation) it seems Stremme

Re: [Vo]:Stremmenos seems to be upset at U of Bologna

Oh, I just checked the website. That is a letter published in a journal, http://www.soc.chim.it/riviste/chimica_industria, in April 1999. It is not related to the ecat. 2011/11/16 Daniel Rocha > I understood something slightly different. UB was blackmailed to have the > funding of many

[Vo]:What motivated AR to take Widom Larsen theory seriously?

Does AR wants Krivit to be discredited if he fails with the ecat? Or is it a technical motivation? Here is the link: http://ecat.com/ecat-technology/ecat-science

Re: [Vo]:New european commercial E-Cat Offer

Andrea Rossi November 17th, 2011 at 6:18 AM Dear Francesco F: Yes they are our North Europe commercial Branch, and they have been authorized to make their website. Anyway, you made a very useful comment: there are around man

Re: [Vo]:New european commercial E-Cat Offer

BTW, I cannot post on Rossi's forum, from anywhere. It's probably something wrong with their website, would someone mind to submit that e-cat seller to AR, please? 2011/11/17 Daniel Rocha > Andrea Rossi > November 17th, 2011 at 6:18 > AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-ph

Re: [Vo]:New european commercial E-Cat Offer

is all in german language. Is this offer authorized by you? best regards, Peter Andrea Rossi November 17th, 2011 at 6:12 AM Dear Peter Heckert: Yes, they can sell in Switzerland our product. Warm Regards, A.R. 2011/11/17 Daniel Rocha > BTW, I cannot post on Rossi's forum, from anywhe

[Vo]:Rossi feeding skeptics with much more skepticism.

His representative in Switzerland is very, to put mildly, suspicious: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transaltec.ch%2Ffacma%2Fdesign.php%3Fdesign%3D2 Due to physical *conditions, such systems* are *only economically

Re: [Vo]:Rossi feeding skeptics with much more skepticism.

This is the English version: http://www.gammamanager.com/index.html 2011/11/17 Daniel Rocha > His representative in Switzerland is very, to put mildly, suspicious: > >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >