On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Angus Lees schreef:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> I get an assert when running this on devastation.rpl via Wine:
> >>
> >> 022] [1023] [1024] ces/devastation.r
Am Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2008 00:29:50 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> Angus Lees schreef:
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> I get an assert when running this on devastation.rpl via Wine:
> >>
> >> 022] [1023] [1024] ces/devastation.rpl: avifile.c:14
Angus Lees schreef:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I get an assert when running this on devastation.rpl via Wine:
>>
>> 022] [1023] [1024] ces/devastation.rpl: avifile.c:1460: AVIFILE_AddRecord:
>> Assertion `This->nIdxRecords < This->cbIdxRecords/s
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 00:40:24 schrieb Angus Lees:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > At Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:05:46 +0100 Angus Lees wrote:
> > > > So I figured
Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 00:40:24 schrieb Angus Lees:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:05:46 +0100 Angus Lees wrote:
> > > So I figured the best way forward with FMV sequences was to keep the
> > > released content, but av
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:05:46 +0100 Angus Lees wrote:
> > So I figured the best way forward with FMV sequences was to keep the
> > released content, but avoid the unreleased "codec130" video codec. Once
> > we aren't
At Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:05:46 +0100 Angus Lees wrote:
> So I figured the best way forward with FMV sequences was to keep the
> released content, but avoid the unreleased "codec130" video codec. Once
> we aren't keeping the original files, we may as well dump RPL and use a
> better known format. As
On 4/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We could simply make warzone capable of playing theora files, and then
just leave it at that.Then anyone willing to distribute the videos, or some other videos forthis purpose, can doso on their own behalf and responsibility.
Yes, I gues
Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> we have not, strictly speaking, been given
> permission to distribute the videos. One could argue that they would
> have released the videos as well, if only they had thought we could
> have made use of them, but it just so happens they did not, and it
> seems hard to imp
On 4/19/06, Angus Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I figured the best way forward with FMV sequences was to keep the
> released content, but avoid the unreleased "codec130" video codec. Once we
> aren't keeping the original files, we may as well dump RPL and use a better
> known format. As a
So I figured the best way forward with FMV sequences was to keep the
released content, but avoid the unreleased "codec130" video
codec. Once we aren't keeping the original files, we may as well
dump RPL and use a better known format. As a step in that
direction, here's a tool that will use the bi
11 matches
Mail list logo