Christian Ohm wrote:
>> When I registered at transifex I wondered why the registration isn't done
>> encrypted. I was glad to see that (at least) signing in is encrypted just to
>> see that after the login things are unencrypted again, changing password,
>> too. Seems their monetary interest in not
Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 19:51, Christian Ohm wrote:
> Hm, looks like underlings also push directly to the repo (and the diffs are
> horrible, one changed translation, and it reformats a lot of other stuff as
> well), and the review process is stupid, it offers the comp
On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 19:51, Christian Ohm wrote:
> Now we just need someone to be your underling, to see how it works (maybe I'll
> add another test account for that). I'm not sure how access works, I hope the
> coordinator can add people, then review their translations and commit them
>
On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 19:09, Kreuvf wrote:
> So, since you already started that experiment, let's go and see where that
> leads
> us. First thing: The FAQ misses yet another question (or it's just me not
> asking
> _frequently_ asked questions): With transifex in place can you still edit
Christian Ohm wrote:
> Well, it is an experiment currently, to see what it can do. From the looks of
> it, we can assign a maintainer to each language, who can then add others to
> work together, and commit stuff. So my management overhead decreases
> significantly, since I just have to add one per
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 21:49, Christian Ohm wrote:
> Well, it is an experiment currently, to see what it can do. From the looks of
> it, we can assign a maintainer to each language, who can then add others to
> work together, and commit stuff.
Oh, this also means that we can have a large
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 21:18, Kreuvf wrote:
> And please don't get me wrong: I am deeply convinced that translations can
> only
> be good (aka consistent) as long as there is one maintainer. I've already been
> through this "everybody can edit translations like stupid" shit at Launchpad
>
Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
>> Why do we need this?
>
> Because all talk about a private Pootle (or similar) installation fell on deaf
> ears.
I've never seen such talk, but I don't read any forums except the internal ones
regularly :X And still I wo
Fastdeath wrote:
> On 2010-08-11 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
>> Most important question: Why should we trust transifex?
>> Especially since that site is an interesting target (getting commit access to
>> whatever number of repositories transifex has access to) for attackers.
>
> sf.net can get hacked to,
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
> Who is transifex?
> Why does transifex have commit access?
>
> More questions:
> Why do we need this?
Because all talk about a private Pootle (or similar) installation fell on deaf
ears.
> Hasn't the benevolent dictator model worked out well
On 2010-08-11 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
> Most important question: Why should we trust transifex?
> Especially since that site is an interesting target (getting commit access to
> whatever number of repositories transifex has access to) for attackers.
sf.net can get hacked to, wz2100.net to but sf.net
transi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 11426
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=11426&view=rev
> Author: transifex
> Date: 2010-08-10 20:30:29 + (Tue, 10 Aug 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> l10n: Updated German (de) translation to 98
12 matches
Mail list logo
