Joseph:
The site came up quickly on FF (Xphome) but the image is taking for ever
to
load (56 dial-up).
Yeah I forgot to mention that I've not done any image optimisation at this
point so the images that teh Flash movie loads in are around 100k each -
sorry for all you dial-up testers at this
All the other pages come up very fast and there is a consistent clarity. I
particularly like the way you've done the login page.It's the log in
windows that really seem more inviting than most, even though the blue is
slightly cold.
Joseph
Joseph:
The site came up quickly on FF
Hi Joseph,
I don't think so. When I connect, the window that opens for SBC is IE.
That is the one that I am having problems with. When I open FF myself
and browse I have no problems.
Riva
Joseph Harris wrote:
Riva,
I have a situation where FF amd IE work from two different connect windows;
MOU, you have 70 validation errors. They are in two principal groups. One is
the no such attribute problem. The other is the entity issue in the php
links. There is one error that seems to indicate you've used an id twice --
to the tower with ye!
Many of the attribute issues have to do with xhtml
Hi all
The new site is nearing completion so I thought I'd better ask you
wonderful people for a once over. Not a lot of the site actually has
any content yet (for example the Flash widget has temporary graphics
and the portfolio has test documents) but you should be able to see
the structure.
I have just come across Nvu, a web page editor, supposedly like Dreamweaver.
Does anyone know about it?
Joseph Harris
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface
Thanks for the reply.
Last week when my DSL went out, I called tech support to get back
online. They had me go to a certain website (192.168.0.1) to try and
fix the problem, but anytime I tried to navigate from there I got a
blank page. The woman did tell me to go to the Advanced tab under
-Original Message-
From: Portman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:12 PM
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] IE display problem
Thanks for the reply.
Last week when my DSL went out, I called tech support to get back online.
They had me go to a
At 08:18 PM 3/3/2005, you wrote:
http://www.themmen.co.uk/newsite/
Comments on a postcard to the usual address.
Hi Ross,
I really like your FLASH =) I think overall it looks very sharp. There are
2 things I would change. 1) it's very narrow - I would widen it out a bit
- I'm thinking to
I don't have a router. The only change I did make was to reset my
password. It is also only some sites that come up blank.
Riva
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
192.168.0.1 would be your modem. The 192.168.xxx.xxx address range is a
private address and isn't on the internet. It is purely local. Your
I want to use a hyperlink to another drive. Using the a href how does
one do this.
Tom Webb
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
I looked at it for a sec from home last night and it
took right at 30
seconds to pull up the page on DSL (1.5mbps) then an
additional 17
seconds for the flash to load.
I still need to do a lot of image optimisation to do
on the site to speed things up a bit and this will be
most noticable
Drew
MOU, you have 70 validation errors.
Thanks for the check I've not done a proper XHTML
Strict validation yet so I'm aware I'm going to have
to tweak things.
There is one error that seems to indicate you've
used an id twice -- to the tower with ye!
Please spare me this once I have been
Screen grabs would be good Franni thanks along with
system spec and browsers tested!
MOU
P.S. I am reliant on you Mac guys at this stage -
we're Macless in the office (a big bug bear of mine
for cross-platform Director development too).
Send instant messages to your online friends
Deb
I really like your FLASH =) I think overall it looks
very sharp.
Glad somebody likes it lol!!! Trust me guys it will be
better when it's finished...
There are 2 things I would change. 1) it's very
narrow - I would widen it out a bit
- I'm thinking to 700'ish px or so
Just goes to show
Screen grabs would be good Franni thanks along with
system spec and browsers tested!
MOU
P.S. I am reliant on you Mac guys at this stage -
we're Macless in the office (a big bug bear of mine
for cross-platform Director development too).
Screenshot on its way offlist - MacOs X, IE5.5 is where the
The site looks great, Ross, very crisp and clean, easily navigated, and
professional. I might change the wording for the Open Full View button on
the Flash control (which I like, BTW, especially the texture) to View Menu
or something. When I first moused over it I had the idea at first that it
Send them out forthwith to procure an Mac and do not let them re-enter
the building without one.
Seriously.
Mac Mini's are cheap-a-cheap-a and pack a hell of a wallop... so long
as you're not doing sound or video *editing* on them... then again a
powerbook can easily handle that sort of thing,
18 matches
Mail list logo
