Think Different : Please Opensource WebObjects ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/o
Hi List,
I'm having difficulties with Auto Recover (in JavaMonitor).
(1) When I add a new instance it is added with Auto Recover turned on
but doesn't automatically start (I've been waiting over 22 mins now).
(2) When I kill an instance (ie `kill -KILL $pid`) JavaMonitor shows
the instance
I agree that the Java Client issue is sufficiently serious, and there
is much pain out there. However, I don't think WO is to blame – I
think it's Java and Swing to a large extent. As someone posted the
other day, (http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=193593)
there is a growing
Did I miss something? Is .net open source?
As for Stephane's comment "and IBM is everywhere with WebSphere,
there's a lot of lobbying inside to kill WO"
that has always been the case with IBM and now Microsoft lobbyists -
the problem is that those technologies need a lot more people to make
Thanks, that sounds like another good option.
--- Art Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:24 AM, jerry porter wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know how to get the "no kidding" sql string that will be
> > issued to the database by
> > EOF.
>
>
> Implement
> EOAdaptorChan
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:24 AM, jerry porter wrote:
Does anyone know how to get the "no kidding" sql string that will be
issued to the database by
EOF.
Implement
EOAdaptorChannel.Delegate.adaptorChannelShouldEvaluateExpression() in
an EOAdaptorChannel delegate. Send the EOSQLExpression o
Thanks for the tip, I will look into it.
--- Guido Neitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03.10.2007, at 14:24, jerry porter wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know how to get the "no kidding" sql string that will
> > be issued to the database by EOF.
>
> You can check whether ERXAdapterChannelDelegat
On 03.10.2007, at 14:24, jerry porter wrote:
Does anyone know how to get the "no kidding" sql string that will
be issued to the database by EOF.
You can check whether ERXAdapterChannelDelegate gives you an idea on
how to do what you want.
cug
_
Is there a different WebObjects version on build machine?
Certain older versions of WO did not have that method defined for
NSMutableArray
On Oct 3, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Calven Eggert wrote:
Hi All,
I've built my WO app on my machine, Java 1.5, Eclipse Europa. No
problems.
I've checked o
On 03.10.2007, at 14:03, Calven Eggert wrote:
I've checked out my source code on my Xserve Build machine and it
won't
compile. Same Eclipse version, same Java version.
Same WO version? "contains" came in 5.3 if I remember that correctly.
Try "containsObject" and it should work.
cug
Hello,
Does anyone know how to get the "no kidding" sql string that will be issued to
the database by
EOF.
What I would like to do is capture the statememt that is issued when turning on
EOAdaptorDebugEnabled for later use and comparison.
My intent is to toss the sql string in a debugging attri
Use:
containsObject()
Ken
On Oct 3, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Calven Eggert wrote:
Hi All,
I've built my WO app on my machine, Java 1.5, Eclipse Europa. No
problems.
I've checked out my source code on my Xserve Build machine and it
won't
compile. Same Eclipse version, same Java version.
Er
Hi All,
I've built my WO app on my machine, Java 1.5, Eclipse Europa. No problems.
I've checked out my source code on my Xserve Build machine and it won't
compile. Same Eclipse version, same Java version.
Error msg:
The method contains(String) is undefined for the type NSMutableArray
Here is
Read Apple's Lips: Not Going To Happen. Period. If that means we
have to lose you to .NET, then get going and stop posting.
This topic has been discussed to death. There are some good reasons
why it isn't going to happen and your posting the 10,000th post about
it isn't going to change
AMEN BROTHER!!
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:25:52 -0400
From: Ken Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WO(Re)petition STOP!!
To: Christian Trotobas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OK - this needs to stop - I'm very close to stopping my subscription
to this list, and I'm sure
Think Different : Please Opensource WebObjects
Because, today, in France, it is almost impossible to sell any
software based on proprietary tools to public institutions (education
for example), when there are so many open source alternatives...
Open source WO or we will have to stop using i
OK - this needs to stop - I'm very close to stopping my subscription
to this list, and I'm sure other people out there that help
occasionally (or a lot) will stop subscribing as well.
TAKE THIS TO TALK - OR BETTER YETJUST STOP!
Ken
On Oct 3, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Christian Trotobas wrote:
One more crucial point for some companies : as Andrus pointed, there
have been no roadmap for years. The only feedback some companies had,
was: tools are getting dropped one by one. Ok, everybody knows that
eclipse/wolips is far better than PB and Co. But some huge companies
had been explai
Hi Miguel,
answer below
Le 3 oct. 07 à 12:42, Miguel Arroz a écrit :
Hi!
I know people who develop on Windows today, no problems. I know
people who develop on Linux, they way the only problem is that
EOGenerator does not run, but a) EOGenerator is not even made by
Apple, and 2) There
Hi!
On 2007/10/03, at 12:13, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Was? It is still the best idea for the 90% of the ubiquitous stuff.
Even in the WO world, the open source components make up a
significant chunk of the stack: OS (sometimes), Tomcat (sometimes),
Wonder, WOLips, Ant, pdf frameworks, AJAX f
On 3-Oct-07, at 7:22 AM, mike deavila wrote:
I have used WO since 1996 (when it was NeXT). In the early days,
Apple had one major release after another. Apple has not had a
major release or upgrade with new features in years. If you look at
what others...
Folks,
Please,
We've all h
I have used WO since 1996 (when it was NeXT). In the early days,
Apple had one major release after another. Apple has not had a major
release or upgrade with new features in years. If you look at what
others are doing, .NET and flex and the others... WO looks less
attractive everyday. Sur
On Oct 3, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
When you say "I know many developpers that wil be back on the WO
side, if Apple opensource WO, but they are currently using uggly
technology, just for eating."
I think they just don't know any better. Not all open source projects
are born eq
Hello Joeles;
is your json-rpc code open source? could be interesting for me, too.
The Cocoa component is in the "liblecocoastuff" library. It compiles
as a ".a" which you then statically link into your Objective-C binary.
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
busin
Hello Joeles;
you mentioned the WO wiki.
would you mind to give me the url of the wiki?
this could be helpfull for me :-)
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Home
Look for "Web Services" in there.
is your json-rpc code open source? could be interesting for me, t
Hi!
I know people who develop on Windows today, no problems. I know
people who develop on Linux, they way the only problem is that
EOGenerator does not run, but a) EOGenerator is not even made by
Apple, and 2) There is a Java replacement on Wonder, I think,
although I'm not sure.
Al
Ian, David, Miguel ...
I can't agree with you.
My last client, is looking for WO replacement because of lack of
windows and linux support.
Ten years of WO development without roadmap, multi to mono platform
support,
Actually I'm just trying to convince my new client to use WO, we
d
27 matches
Mail list logo