I reckon it is a touchy issue. The legal folks might make allowances
for things like archive.org. I would not want this on any server that
I was responsible for unless I had written permission. I'd be happy
to use it from your sever if you want to host it. ;-)
Yours in paranoia,
Chuck
On 03/02/2010, at 8:53 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> Isn't copying Apple's, er, copyrighted material a bad idea? It seems like
>> the sort of thing to piss them off. Pissed off lawyers... never a good
>> thing. Trust me on that.
> yes.
> definitely.
> do not copy it.
> whatever you do.
> that is
don't count on it
On Feb 2, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Do you think Apple would be willing to give you a link on the WebObjects home
> page: http://developer.apple.com/tools/webobjects/?
>
> Nice work Pascal thank you for all your efforts.
>
> Johnny
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2010,
Do you think Apple would be willing to give you a link on the WebObjects home
page: http://developer.apple.com/tools/webobjects/?
Nice work Pascal thank you for all your efforts.
Johnny
On Feb 2, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> I looked at the robots.txt file on developer.apple.co
I looked at the robots.txt file on developer.apple.com and I don't see
any rules that stop bots to fetch anything in /legacy. And I do see
some stuff from the 5.4.2 docs in a Google search, but most of the
time, 3.x and 4.5.x links shows up before the 5.3/5.4 docs. It's all
crap.
Hi!
> Isn't copying Apple's, er, copyrighted material a bad idea? It seems like
> the sort of thing to piss them off. Pissed off lawyers... never a good
> thing. Trust me on that.
yes.
definitely.
do not copy it.
whatever you do.
that is all.
cough.
ms
___
Isn't copying Apple's, er, copyrighted material a bad idea? It seems
like the sort of thing to piss them off. Pissed off lawyers... never
a good thing. Trust me on that.
On Feb 2, 2010, at 1:49 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
don't copy wonder's -- it changes fairly often and seems to have
dec
don't copy wonder's -- it changes fairly often and seems to have decent
coverage on google.
ms
On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 10-02-02 à 15:52, Mike Schrag a écrit :
>
> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it
> was good old ht:
Ok, so I will use good old WebDevil to download the docs :-)
Hi!
YES! 5.3 and 5.4. Since it moved to legacy, Google does not index
it any more... maybe they (apple) have some robots.txt file that
causes that.
Hope they release the new version soon... o :)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2010
Hi!
YES! 5.3 and 5.4. Since it moved to legacy, Google does not index it any
more... maybe they (apple) have some robots.txt file that causes that.
Hope they release the new version soon... o :)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2010/02/02, at 20:52, Mike Schrag wrote:
Does anyone knows a go
Le 10-02-02 à 15:52, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a
bot, it was good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch
but if somebody have a better alternative, I'm all ears.
just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you
>>> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it was
>>> good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if somebody have a
>>> better alternative, I'm all ears.
>> just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you allow ads?
>
> Tried it, but far f
Le 10-02-02 à 13:21, Amedeo Mantica a écrit :
why not spotlight? ( if your webserver is on osx )
Spotlight Server = pure crap. And I don't think it will index non
local documents...
On 02/feb/2010, at 19.04, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 10-02-01 à 23:06, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Does anyone
why not spotlight? ( if your webserver is on osx )
On 02/feb/2010, at 19.04, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 10-02-01 à 23:06, Mike Schrag a écrit :
>
>>> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it was
>>> good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if somebo
Le 10-02-01 à 23:06, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot,
it was good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if
somebody have a better alternative, I'm all ears.
just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you
nice job :)
On 01/feb/2010, at 13.35, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts of one
> of our community member, Sophiacom (www.sophiacom.fr). Everything is much
> cleaner now, especially the Screencasts page.
>
> More stu
> Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it was
> good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if somebody have a
> better alternative, I'm all ears.
just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you allow ads?
ms
On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Haris Pobric wrote:
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by
stating why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as
technology) regardless of which particular de
BTW, Gordon Belray (a fellow Canuck) submitted a cool idea for the
front page :
http://www.fineart.utoronto.ca/wo/
The gears would be links to "internal" and external pages, so it would
be a startup page for everyone.
I'm also looking at adding a search box on the Web site, that s
On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:53 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 1-Feb-10, at 4:58 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 10-02-01 à 19:43, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the
"Why WO?" page. It should say "Because it rocks!
Le 10-02-01 à 20:27, Haris Pobric a écrit :
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by
stating why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as
technology) regardless of which particular develo
On 1-Feb-10, at 4:58 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 10-02-01 à 19:43, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the
"Why WO?" page. It should say "Because it rocks!". Not mention any
other stuff ... This whole p
On 02/02/2010, at 12:27 PM, Haris Pobric wrote:
> As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of WO in
> actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by stating why WO is a
> great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as technology) regardless of which
> particular
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by stating
why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as technology)
regardless of which particular development environment one happens to
be coming fr
On 02/02/2010, at 12:03 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
> Oh, my ...
>
> That's why my first idea was to say "Chunk, please take a look" ;-)
+1 (and for using quoted prose such as, "So says Chunk" :) lol
> Seriously, I can invest some time tonight, take a closer look from a
> different angle and we c
Oh, my ...
That's why my first idea was to say "Chunk, please take a look" ;-) Seriously,
I can invest some time tonight, take a closer look from a different angle and
we can discuss that.
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> It think the facts are good, but you are right: fr
It think the facts are good, but you are right: from a sales point of
view it looks at it from the wrong direction.
As a quick example,
But it’s in Java!
Yes, it’s Java, but it’s not J2EE. You don’t have to deal with EJB,
J2EE containers, Struts and the like. WebObjects uses Java for its
b
Le 10-02-01 à 19:43, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the "Why
WO?" page. It should say "Because it rocks!". Not mention any other
stuff ... This whole page is so negative. I'd say that needs
some
I would, but ... I'm not a native english speaker and it shows. It shows quite
often especially when I write something. I'll come up with something and will
send it to a group for discussion, though.
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> On 02/02/2010, at 11:43 AM, Guido Neitz
On 02/02/2010, at 11:43 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
> The design is pretty nice! I like it.
>
> But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the "Why WO?"
> page. It should say "Because it rocks!". Not mention any other stuff ... This
> whole page is so negative. I'd say that nee
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the "Why WO?" page.
It should say "Because it rocks!". Not mention any other stuff ... This whole
page is so negative. I'd say that needs some serious rewrite ...
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:35 A
It is really great to see the community support. Well done, everyone!
David
On 1-Feb-10, at 2:40 PM, Philippe Rabier wrote:
Merci Pascal.
But I want to add: a big round of applause for Pascal who makes a
tremendous job for the WOCommunity. Everybody knows that the
community would be harml
Those videos were there for a long time, but only in the podcasts
feed. The plan is to allow people to upload podcasts (or at least the
URL to a podcast) themselves so that people don't have to wait after
me :-)
Wow -
Great site! I never knew there existed all those videos. Very timely
Wow -
Great site! I never knew there existed all those videos. Very timely as I learn
wonder and ajax.
Thanks
On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts of one
> of our community member, Sophiaco
Bravo to both of them. This has been a big improvement to the site.
Thank you!
On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Philippe Rabier wrote:
Merci Pascal.
But I want to add: a big round of applause for Pascal who makes a
tremendous job for the WOCommunity. Everybody knows that the
community would
Merci Pascal.
But I want to add: a big round of applause for Pascal who makes a tremendous
job for the WOCommunity. Everybody knows that the community would be harmless
without the contributors to Wonder, the mailing list, ...
But today is the Pascal day ;-)
Philippe
PS: Aline, our graphic des
Nice Job!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
On 2010-02-01, at 4:35 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts of one
> of our community member, Sophiacom (www.sophiac
37 matches
Mail list logo
