I'm somewhat puzzled. Do you have one of these long requests going on when you
get the improper session timeout error?
Or is there a lengthy request that was aborted by the user/client? Because that
doesn't stop the database query. Eventually you'll get a broken pipe error i
1200
>>> Receive Timeout: 1200
>>
>> Do you have requests that take longer than 20 minutes?
>>
>>
>>> The page seems related to an http error 500.
>>
>> Is it a 500 or another 5xx?
>>
>>
>>> Is any way to avoid the adaptor to give t
Do you have requests that take longer than 20 minutes?
>
>
>> The page seems related to an http error 500.
>
> Is it a 500 or another 5xx?
>
>
>> Is any way to avoid the adaptor to give the request to another instance if
>> one instance is too slow to
to respond because this seems no helping because at
> the end it causes a "Session timeout" error.
This would just hide your problem. You need to fix it.
> I need also to say that when the user get a untimely "Session Timeout", there
> is not waiting time (We got the
Minium Adaptor threads: 16
Maximum Adaptor threads: 256
Adaptor threads: 8
Listen Queue Size: 128
Project Search Path: ()
Session TimeOut (sec): 2500
I tried to set something similar to your parameters but then on direct action
half of the time the user get a page with:
No error
I
On Oct 11, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>
>> In addition to what Chuck said, check the adaptor threads and listen
>> queue size in the Application settings. Typically I used min 10, max 20,
>> queue 20. This is very app specific. It's better to let connections queue
>> up than to let t
On 2013-10-10 10:54 PM, "Klaus Berkling" wrote:
>On Oct 10, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> Do any of your requests take a long time to process (lots of database
>> access or calculations)? Wotaskd will send the requests to another
>> instance if one is too slow in responding. For mo
On Oct 10, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Do any of your requests take a long time to process (lots of database
> access or calculations)? Wotaskd will send the requests to another
> instance if one is too slow in responding. For most applications this is
> a useless attempt at recovery.
Do any of your requests take a long time to process (lots of database
access or calculations)? Wotaskd will send the requests to another
instance if one is too slow in responding. For most applications this is
a useless attempt at recovery. You can try increasing the Connect and
Receive Timeout
Am 10.10.2013 um 09:42 schrieb Schoenenberger Dominique
:
> It's like the adaptor (?) gives the request to the wrong instance.
Yes. Instance 12 may be offline or not reachable (responds too slow)
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They wi
I put some log and have more information about this problem:
I have multiple instances (15 instances on 2 servers). Here what happened:
1) Click on a button using instance number 12
2) Instance number 1 receive the request and returns a session timeout because
I have no session on this instance
r's request is getting sent to a different instance which of course won't
> have the user's session.
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> On 2012-09-14, at 6:52 AM, Schoenenberger Dominique wrote:
>
>> I have a problem with untimely session timeout. The user is d
ominique wrote:
> I have a problem with untimely session timeout. The user is doing actions
> with the application but suddenly after doing something (a click on a button
> for example), he got a session timeout.
>
> The probability of this to occur is quite low but very annoying fo
Salut Dominique!ça và?I think you can safely assume the session timeout is not cos of xhtml validation :)Thx,RaviOn Sep 14, 2012, at 05:38 PM, Schoenenberger Dominique <dominique.schoenenber...@nagra.com> wrote: I have a problem with untimely session timeout. The user is doing actions wi
I have a problem with untimely session timeout. The user is doing actions with
the application but suddenly after doing something (a click on a button for
example), he got a session timeout.
The probability of this to occur is quite low but very annoying for the user.
I suspect that it occurs
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/InternetWeb/Reference/WO542Reference/com/webobjects/appserver/WOSession.html#setTimeOut(double)
On Oct 22, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> what does the double value of the session timeOut represent?
>
>
what does the double value of the session timeOut represent?
If I do a setTimeOut(5000); what amount of time does this represent? seconds?
When I change the value, it doesn't seem like seconds, but I know it's not
minutes (or it doesn't feel li
Is there a built-in method to know the session remaining time before timeout ?
otherwise i guess that I can calculate it from the last session sleep()
timestamp
Thanks
Amedeo ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-
unfortunately at the moment i don't know jdb
but can i try setting breakpoints
Amedeo
On 18/feb/2010, at 00.25, Mark Ritchie wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On 17/Feb/2010, at 1:53 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
>> Might be worth checking it is the session you think it is?
>
> This is certainly something to consid
Hey!
On 17/Feb/2010, at 1:53 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
> Might be worth checking it is the session you think it is?
This is certainly something to consider! Setting a break point on the session
constructor would be a quick way to show how many sessions are getting created
and when... Something
On 17/Feb/2010, at 2:46 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
> Look at my website, www.confindustria.chieti.it, in the top right corner
> there is a barely visible number indicating the session timeout value... (
> 1200 ), after user log in, the value go to 3600 and remain 3600, but session
ot an expert here but in case it helps!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 17 Feb 2010, at 10:46, Amedeo Mantica
wrote:
Look at my website, www.confindustria.chieti.it, in the top right
corner there is a barely visible number indicating the se
corner there is a barely visible number indicating the session
timeout value... ( 1200 ), after user log in, the value go to 3600
and remain 3600, but session expires after 1200
Amedeo
On 16/feb/2010, at 22.21, Mark Ritchie wrote:
On 16/Feb/2010, at 12:13 PM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
no, is
Look at my website, www.confindustria.chieti.it, in the top right corner there
is a barely visible number indicating the session timeout value... ( 1200 ),
after user log in, the value go to 3600 and remain 3600, but session expires
after 1200
Amedeo
On 16/feb/2010, at 22.21, Mark Ritchie
Am 16.02.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Mark Ritchie:
P.S. I'm open to learning how to do this in Eclipse however my
understand is that Eclipse can't set break points when it doesn't
have the source code.
Well, he could override setTimeout in his WOSession subclass and set
the breakpoint there...
On 16/Feb/2010, at 1:21 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
> path/to/woa -NSJavaDebugging YES
>> stop in com.webobjects.appserver.WOSession.setTimeOut
>> run
>> ...
Dratted fancy e-mail readers change the greater then sign prompt into a
vertical bar... *grumble*
The above should be more like:
path
On 16/Feb/2010, at 12:13 PM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
> no, is inside the R-R Loop
Hey Amedeo!
I would set a breakpoint on the setTimeOut() method and see when the timeout is
being set!
Using jdb, this would be something like:
path/to/woa -NSJavaDebugging YES
> stop in com.webobjects.appserver.WO
no, is inside the R-R Loop
Amedeo
On 16/feb/2010, at 21.11, Timo Hoepfner wrote:
> To get the new timeout "applied", the session needs to be checked into the
> session store again. This usually happens at the end of the
> Request-Response-Loop. Any chance you modify the timeout outside of the
To get the new timeout "applied", the session needs to be checked into the
session store again. This usually happens at the end of the
Request-Response-Loop. Any chance you modify the timeout outside of the RR-loop?
Timo
Am 16.02.2010 um 20:54 schrieb Amedeo Mantica:
> no, i'm monitoring the v
may be in some undocumented method ?
On 16/feb/2010, at 20.56, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
>
>> no, i'm monitoring the value it is 3600 after user logs in
>>
>> very strange
>>
>> there is a method that returns the remaining time ?
>
> No. Y
On Feb 16, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
no, i'm monitoring the value it is 3600 after user logs in
very strange
there is a method that returns the remaining time ?
No. You could dig around in the WOSessionStore for it.
Chuck
On 16/feb/2010, at 20.16, Chuck Hill wrote:
no, i'm monitoring the value it is 3600 after user logs in
very strange
there is a method that returns the remaining time ?
Amedeo
On 16/feb/2010, at 20.16, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a strange behaviour,
>>
>> In m
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
Hello,
I have a strange behaviour,
In my application constructor i have:
setSessionTimeOut(600);
and it works perfectly, the session expires after 10 minutes
now, when an user authenticates i call this in session...
this.setTimeOut(3600);
Hello,
I have a strange behaviour,
In my application constructor i have:
setSessionTimeOut(600);
and it works perfectly, the session expires after 10 minutes
now, when an user authenticates i call this in session...
this.setTimeOut(3600);
but... the session still expire after 600 seconds...
Hi,
We initially define the timeout within the Session object's constructor.
On the transactions which needs the user to be "off" a while (like document
editing within FCKEditor) we update the user's session timeout in the page
constructor.
Following your tip on the sessio
uot; while the correct
>> message would be "session not found" in this case. Maybe this is the case?
>> Then use something like WOLongResponsePage or ERXLongResponse to pevent the
>> instance from blocking.
>>
>> Timo
>>
>>
>> Am 03.02.2
Hi Fred,
I set setSessionTimeOut() in the Application which works reliably for me.
Regards,
Rob. ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update
Trotobas a écrit :
> Hi Fred
>
> Could it be exceptions that cause the session to end prematurely ? And the
> exception being catched but hidden by a "session timeout page" ?
>
> Regards
> Christian
>
>
> On 3 févr. 2010, at 14:41, Frédéric JECKER wrot
Hi Fred
Could it be exceptions that cause the session to end prematurely ? And the
exception being catched but hidden by a "session timeout page" ?
Regards
Christian
On 3 févr. 2010, at 14:41, Frédéric JECKER wrote:
>
> Hi Timo,
>
> The fact is that disconnections ar
ke WOLongResponsePage or ERXLongResponse to pevent the
> instance from blocking.
>
> Timo
>
>
> Am 03.02.2010 um 11:13 schrieb Frédéric JECKER:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In our application's Session object we set the default session timeout to
>> 3600 s
n this case.
Maybe this is the case? Then use something like WOLongResponsePage or
ERXLongResponse to pevent the instance from blocking.
Timo
Am 03.02.2010 um 11:13 schrieb Frédéric JECKER:
Hi,
In our application's Session object we set the default session
timeout to 3600 secon
Hi,
In our application's Session object we set the default session timeout to 3600
seconds by a call to the setTimeOut() function within the constructor.
One some specific transactions we lengthen this time by modifying the user's
session (again using the setTimeOut() function).
We
On Jan 27, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jake Bearkley wrote:
HI All,
We have a webobjects application which when the session timeout
displays a "CustomSessionTimeoutPage". On this page we have a link
to the main page for them to click on.
1) is there a way to log a user out and return t
HI All,
We have a webobjects application which when the session timeout displays a
"CustomSessionTimeoutPage". On this page we have a link to the main page
for them to click on.
1) is there a way to log a user out and return them to the current page
instead of this custom page?
2)
time ago, I did a brief article for this on STEPWISE;
http://homepage.mac.com/andrewlindesay/le/articles/wo_errorreporting_article.pdf
Regards;
I have looked through all the documentation I can find, but I
cannot find
information on replacing the generic Web Objects Session Timeout
message. I
che
;
>> I have looked through all the documentation I can find, but I cannot find
>> information on replacing the generic Web Objects Session Timeout message. I
>> checked in WOnder as well, hoping there was some information there.
>> What framework do these items live in?
time ago, I did a brief article for this on STEPWISE;
http://homepage.mac.com/andrewlindesay/le/articles/wo_errorreporting_article.pdf
Regards;
I have looked through all the documentation I can find, but I
cannot find information on replacing the generic Web Objects
Session Timeout
/andrewlindesay/le/articles/wo_errorreporting_article.pdf
Regards;
I have looked through all the documentation I can find, but I cannot
find information on replacing the generic Web Objects Session
Timeout message. I checked in WOnder as well, hoping there was some
information there.
What
Hello;
I have looked through all the documentation I can find, but I cannot
find information on replacing the generic Web Objects Session Timeout
message. I checked in WOnder as well, hoping there was some
information there.
What framework do these items live in? Is there a way to
On Mar 30, 2009, at 13:18, David Avendasora wrote:
This is the approach I was thinking of. Have the client keep track
of how long since the last server communication (I have no idea how
to do that...) and set a timer based on the session timeout value.
It's only job would be to giv
On 31/03/2009, at 6:39 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:31 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
OK, you can download WOJCKit here:
http://web.mac.com/flor385/eSwamp/software/files/WOJCKit.zip
Whaaat? No SVN accesss? Pfff. :-P
On 30-Mar-09, at 1:38 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 15:50, David Avendasora wrote:
Flor, anyway you want to set it up is fine with me. :-) :-) :-)
*any* way? How about 3.5 inch floppies shipped from Southern
America to the US via Russia, by boat? :) Let's stick to .m
Le 09-03-30 à 16:48, David Avendasora a écrit :
On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 15:50, David Avendasora wrote:
Flor, anyway you want to set it up is fine with me. :-) :-) :-)
*any* way? How about 3.5 inch floppies shipped from Southern
Ameri
On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 15:50, David Avendasora wrote:
Flor, anyway you want to set it up is fine with me. :-) :-) :-)
*any* way? How about 3.5 inch floppies shipped from Southern America
to the US via Russia, by boat? :) Let's stick to
On Mar 30, 2009, at 15:50, David Avendasora wrote:
Flor, anyway you want to set it up is fine with me. :-) :-) :-)
*any* way? How about 3.5 inch floppies shipped from Southern America
to the US via Russia, by boat? :) Let's stick to .me for the time
being, though I would like to Subversion
On Mar 30, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
OK, you can download WOJCKit here:
http://web.mac.com/flor385/eSwamp/software/files/WOJCKit.zip
Whaaat? No SVN accesss? Pfff. :-P
Be careful or he will setup a Maven repository for you!
Ahhhg
Good point.
Flor, anyway you wa
On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:31 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
OK, you can download WOJCKit here:
http://web.mac.com/flor385/eSwamp/software/files/WOJCKit.zip
Whaaat? No SVN accesss? Pfff. :-P
Be careful or he will setup a Maven repository
On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
OK, you can download WOJCKit here:
http://web.mac.com/flor385/eSwamp/software/files/WOJCKit.zip
Whaaat? No SVN accesss? Pfff. :-P
It's a WOLips project. Eclipse 3.4.1, appropriate stable WOLips
(update say a month ago or something
OK, you can download WOJCKit here:
http://web.mac.com/flor385/eSwamp/software/files/WOJCKit.zip
It's a WOLips project. Eclipse 3.4.1, appropriate stable WOLips
(update say a month ago or something).
Note: this project contains both server and client side classes. Both
are well documented i
On Mar 30, 2009, at 13:18, David Avendasora wrote:
This is the approach I was thinking of. Have the client keep track
of how long since the last server communication (I have no idea how
to do that...) and set a timer based on the session timeout value.
It's only job would be to giv
On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:24, David Avendasora wrote:
Yes, there is. By default I believe it is 30 minutes, or maybe 20.
I'm not entirely sure. It is the same session timeout that a web
client session has by default
It'
On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
I'd be happy to implement the "ping" system, and put it into
WOJCKit, if somebody else has the time to test it. I am wy too
busy at the moment to deal with that. Anyone interested?
Certainly, I'm going to need to go down this ro
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:24, David Avendasora wrote:
Yes, there is. By default I believe it is 30 minutes, or maybe 20.
I'm not entirely sure. It is the same session timeout that a web
client session has by default
It's the same session mechanism, controlled with the same s
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:06 AM, John Huss wrote:
Is there a session timeout in JavaClient? I would think there has
to be. What happens when the session times out? Is there built-in
notification or do you have to handle it manually?
Yes, there is. By default I believe it is 30 minutes, or
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:06, John Huss wrote:
Is there a session timeout in JavaClient? I would think there has
to be.
Yep, there is.
What happens when the session times out?
The next request from a client coming to the session gets refused, the
client app is informed of why, and the
Is there a session timeout in JavaClient? I would think there has to be.
What happens when the session times out? Is there built-in notification or
do you have to handle it manually?
John
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Robert Tupelo-Schneck wrote:
It doesn't seem to work correctly when I click an
AjaxTabbedPanelTab. In that case the tab fills with something
that looks like the normal WebObjects session timeout page with
a bit of javascript tacked on the end; in fact,
that case the tab fills with something
that looks like the normal WebObjects session timeout page with a
bit of javascript tacked on the end; in fact, if I peek at
redirect.contentString(), I get
Missing Session Error
...
document.location.href='/cgi-bin/WebObjects/WOPrefixReg.wo
looks like the normal WebObjects session timeout page with a
bit of javascript tacked on the end; in fact, if I peek at
redirect.contentString(), I get
Missing Session Error
...
document.location.href='/cgi-bin/WebObjects/WOPrefixReg.woa/wo/1.0';
Any idea why the
On Jan 30, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Robert Tupelo-Schneck wrote:
It doesn't seem to work correctly when I click an
AjaxTabbedPanelTab. In that case the tab fills with something that
looks like the normal WebObjects session timeout page with a b
case the tab fills with something that
looks like the normal WebObjects session timeout page with a bit of
javascript tacked on the end; in fact, if I peek at
redirect.contentString(), I get
Missing Session Error
...
document.location.href='/cgi-bin/WebObjects/WOPrefixReg.woa/
ke the normal
WebObjects session timeout page with a bit of javascript tacked on the
end; in fact, if I peek at redirect.contentString(), I get
Missing Session Error
...
document.location.href='/cgi-bin/WebObjects/WOPrefixReg.woa/wo/1.0';
In other instances, when it works corr
On Jan 28, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 12:13 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
The fix is in. Revision 8864. Please let me know how that works.
It works. SessionID in URL, errorPage displayed.
Excellent. Thank you!
Thanks a _lot_.
(As a really quick aside, since we
On 29/01/2009, at 12:13 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
The fix is in. Revision 8864. Please let me know how that works.
It works. SessionID in URL, errorPage displayed. Thanks a _lot_.
(As a really quick aside, since we're all here and having so much fun:
how can I build just a single Wonder fra
On Jan 28, 2009, at 5:33 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 11:54 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hold on now, that is just a work around, not a solution.
After this marathon, a work around is looking good to me...
The question now is why ERXRedirect is not putting the session ID
in the URL
On 29/01/2009, at 11:54 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hold on now, that is just a work around, not a solution.
After this marathon, a work around is looking good to me...
The question now is why ERXRedirect is not putting the session ID in
the URL for you And, it is a bug. I have a fix, do you
On Jan 28, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Both of these still produce the same result for me: a redirect to
something like AM.woa/wo/4.0, which it presumably can't find and
so returns Main. I've got logging in Session.terminate(), and
On 29/01/2009, at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Both of these still produce the same result for me: a redirect to
something like AM.woa/wo/4.0, which it presumably can't find and so
returns Main. I've got logging in Session.terminate(), and it's
not being called.
Using the second variant,
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 4:08 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Score WebObjects: 1, Chuck: 0
Score Paul: 0, because...
The defect is mine. The correct code is:
if (AjaxUtils.isAjaxRequest(aContext.request())) {
// Create redirect to return to break
On 29/01/2009, at 4:08 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Score WebObjects: 1, Chuck: 0
Score Paul: 0, because...
The defect is mine. The correct code is:
if (AjaxUtils.isAjaxRequest(aContext.request())) {
// Create redirect to return to break out of Ajax
AjaxUtils.redirectTo(errorPage)
But, but.. Where's the Purple Moose? I still don't see it...
What? Huh?
Oh.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 1:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
If not, follow Anjo's
On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 1:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
If not, follow Anjo's suggestion of overriding dispatchRequest()
and logging out the response before returning it.
Jan 28 13:23:08 AM[50121] WARN N
On 28/01/2009, at 4:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
It looks like WO is not saving errorPage in the page cache when
handleException is called. I thought it did, maybe this is a 5.4
change. I am going to stick this on my To Do stack for now.
No problem. Thanks for looking at it, Chuck.
--
Paul
On 28/01/2009, at 4:05 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
I'm not using ERXRedirect directly, but in
Application.handleException() I have this:
@Override
public WOResponse handleException(Exception anException, WOContext
aContext) {
AMErrorPa
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 1:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
If not, follow Anjo's suggestion of overriding dispatchRequest()
and logging out the response before returning it.
Jan 28 13:23:08 AM[50121] WARN NSLog -
: Exception occurred while handling
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:41 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 28.01.2009 um 06:23 schrieb Mike Schrag:
Thanks for taking a look. I'm glad it's not just me...
Honestly, I wish it was just you. ;-) This stuff makes my head
hurt sometimes.
I'll trade you my current set of issues :)
Me too! Gladly.
Am 28.01.2009 um 06:23 schrieb Mike Schrag:
Thanks for taking a look. I'm glad it's not just me...
Honestly, I wish it was just you. ;-) This stuff makes my head
hurt sometimes.
I'll trade you my current set of issues :)
Me too! Gladly.
Cheers, Anjo
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 1:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
If not, follow Anjo's suggestion of overriding dispatchRequest()
and logging out the response before returning it.
Jan 28 13:23:08 AM[50121] WARN NSLog -
: Exception occurred while handling
Thanks for taking a look. I'm glad it's not just me...
Honestly, I wish it was just you. ;-) This stuff makes my head
hurt sometimes.
I'll trade you my current set of issues :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 3:37 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
How are you using that ERXRedirect again?
I'm not using ERXRedirect directly, but in
Application.handleException() I have this:
@Override
public WOResponse handleException(Exception an
On 28/01/2009, at 3:37 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
How are you using that ERXRedirect again?
I'm not using ERXRedirect directly, but in
Application.handleException() I have this:
@Override
public WOResponse handleException(Exception anException, WOContext
aContext) {
AMErrorPage err
On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 1:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
If not, follow Anjo's suggestion of overriding dispatchRequest()
and logging out the response before returning it.
Jan 28 13:23:08 AM[50121] WARN NSLog -
: Exception occurred while handling
On 28/01/2009, at 1:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
If not, follow Anjo's suggestion of overriding dispatchRequest()
and logging out the response before returning it.
Jan 28 13:23:08 AM[50121] WARN NSLog -
: Exception occurred while handling
request:
java.lang.NullPointerException
Jan 28 13:2
On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 10:59 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 10:08 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/01/2009, at 5:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
F
On 28/01/2009, at 10:59 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 10:08 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/01/2009, at 5:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
FireBug and FireFox. Take a look at the Net log. Yo
On Jan 27, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 28/01/2009, at 10:08 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/01/2009, at 5:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
FireBug and FireFox. Take a look at the Net log. You can see
all the traffic back and forth. Of
On 28/01/2009, at 10:08 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/01/2009, at 5:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
FireBug and FireFox. Take a look at the Net log. You can see all
the traffic back and forth. Often these things came in an Ajax
update and so don
On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 27/01/2009, at 5:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
FireBug and FireFox. Take a look at the Net log. You can see all
the traffic back and forth. Often these things came in an Ajax
update and so don't show up in the page source (as originally
One can also override dispatchRequest() and log (or use the ERXApp
logger that already does this)
Cheers, Anjo
Am 27.01.2009 um 19:22 schrieb Mike Schrag:
There is a trick and I am wondering, does anyone remember it? It is
hard to search for in archives, google, etc. One can call tcpdump
There is a trick and I am wondering, does anyone remember it? It is
hard to search for in archives, google, etc. One can call tcpdump
with a set of options and see just the html of the web
communications going back and forth from or to an app.
Alternatively, just the HTML and HTTP traffic w
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
